GM's thread about nothing (37 Viewers)

[bentley]

Another FF question. We had a three way tie in one division. Our tiebreaker rule is:

"The first tiebreaker for two teams tied for a playoff spot is head-to-head record. If the head-to-head record is tied, or if there are more than two teams in a tie, total points scored will be the next tiebreaker. If it's still tied, the team with the highest winning percentage in the division will advance. After that, it's a virtual coin toss."

Team A scored more than Team B who scored more than Team C during the regular season. Team C beat Team B in both matchups and split with Team A.

Team A obviously wins the division. I now see it as a two way tie between B and C, where C takes the second spot due to the sweep of B. But you could also read the rule to give B the second seed since they scored more.

No controversy yet, but I expect some.

 

[guru_007]

yeah, still curious about that Rover/wife thing myself

Haven't really been following the ysr drama.....

Shuke isn't really still angry/bitter now is he?

SLB care packages, wtf?!?!?!!?!?

drinking again tonight three holiday cards going out tomorrow.

playing poker, illegally online.

anyone else ready for the holidays? Hi guys and girls? Ilike this thread, kinda like a safe haven

one question....pm if necessary, but where the holy hell has HJS been lately???? It's been weeks. Some guys I enjoy reading I can see their alter egos (truckasaurus, stryker, redman hi).....but I'm pretty dense most of the time.

 

[bentley]

I made an off-color (and unremarkable) comment to my wife last night while watching Jeopardy! I will let you know what I said to the first three people who PM me wanting to know. I would post it here, but it would get me lengthy timeout.

Wait, what?

Did I miss an update somewhere?

was there a reconciliation? I thought this was an ugly ugly divorce.

I wouldn't go updating any notebooks. I have it on good authority it is still an ugly divorce.

I thought y'all were talking about Shuke and Tanner the first time I read this thread. Time to update the things I didn't get until I got them thread.

 

[AhrnCityPahnder]

Imp getting oot of the hospital tomorrow am.

 

[Tiny Dancer]

Another FF question. We had a three way tie in one division. Our tiebreaker rule is:"The first tiebreaker for two teams tied for a playoff spot is head-to-head record. If the head-to-head record is tied, or if there are more than two teams in a tie, total points scored will be the next tiebreaker. If it's still tied, the team with the highest winning percentage in the division will advance. After that, it's a virtual coin toss."Team A scored more than Team B who scored more than Team C during the regular season. Team C beat Team B in both matchups and split with Team A.Team A obviously wins the division. I now see it as a two way tie between B and C, where C takes the second spot due to the sweep of B. But you could also read the rule to give B the second seed since they scored more.No controversy yet, but I expect some.

I read the rule as giving Team B the spot.

 

[Mr. Pickles]

Ilike this thread, kinda like a safe haven

Except that it's not a safe haven.Watch your step. They are watching.

 

[Tremendous Upside]

Ilike this thread, kinda like a safe haven

Except that it's not a safe haven.Watch your step. They are watching.

No idea why a post of mine from the other night was scrubbed

 

[guru_007]

oh, I've had posts in here deleted for no good reason. That's fine.

but it seems there is some sense of leniency for the most part.

 

[Mr. Pickles]

oh, I've had posts in here deleted for no good reason. That's fine.but it seems there is some sense of leniency for the most part.

Guy got clipped just the other day. Your impression.. is misguided.

 

[videoguy505]

Another FF question. We had a three way tie in one division. Our tiebreaker rule is:

"The first tiebreaker for two teams tied for a playoff spot is head-to-head record. If the head-to-head record is tied, or if there are more than two teams in a tie, total points scored will be the next tiebreaker. If it's still tied, the team with the highest winning percentage in the division will advance. After that, it's a virtual coin toss."

Team A scored more than Team B who scored more than Team C during the regular season. Team C beat Team B in both matchups and split with Team A.

Team A obviously wins the division. I now see it as a two way tie between B and C, where C takes the second spot due to the sweep of B. But you could also read the rule to give B the second seed since they scored more.

No controversy yet, but I expect some.

I read the rule as giving Team B the spot.

I read it the other way, giving it to team C. Three teams are tied for spot #1, the division crown. The rules for that playoff spot are "if there are more than two teams in a tie, total points scored will be the next tiebreaker". Spot #1 goes to A.

B & C are now tied for a different spot. The rules for spot #2 are "The first tiebreaker for two teams tied for a playoff spot is head-to-head record."

If there was only one playoff spot open, obviously it would go to A. So he's taken care of. Declare him the division winner and move on. Now, there's a second spot open, and B & C have a claim on it... A is out of the equation. So head-to-head record decides it.

 

[CGRdrJoe]

oh, I've had posts in here deleted for no good reason. That's fine.but it seems there is some sense of leniency for the most part.

Guy got clipped just the other day. Your impression.. is misguided.

Leave Whitehead out of this

 

[guru_007]

oh, I've had posts in here deleted for no good reason. That's fine.but it seems there is some sense of leniency for the most part.

Guy got clipped just the other day. Your impression.. is misguided.

probably soI'll light a candle for them. perchance your appointment to ombudsmen may help out in these type situations? Godspeed, Mr. Pickles you seem to be a good fellow.

 

[Tiny Dancer]

Now, there's a second spot open, and B & C have a claim on it... A is out of the equation. So head-to-head record decides it.

A isn't really out of the equation. He has the same record as those two teams. Whenever more than two teams have the same record, total points is the tiebreaker.

 

[Samuel L Bronkowitz]

yeah, still curious about that Rover/wife thing myselfHaven't really been following the ysr drama.....Shuke isn't really still angry/bitter now is he?SLB care packages, wtf?!?!?!!?!?drinking again tonight three holiday cards going out tomorrow.playing poker, illegally online.anyone else ready for the holidays? Hi guys and girls? Ilike this thread, kinda like a safe havenone question....pm if necessary, but where the holy hell has HJS been lately???? It's been weeks. Some guys I enjoy reading I can see their alter egos (truckasaurus, stryker, redman hi).....but I'm pretty dense most of the time.

Pretty sure HJS got a number of timeouts in a short period of time and became disenchanted with the site. Not sure he's coming back.

 

[Mr. Pickles]

Pretty sure HJS got a number of timeouts in a short period of time and became disenchanted with the site. Not sure he's coming back.

Sure.

 

[shuke]

Pretty sure HJS got a number of timeouts in a short period of time and became disenchanted with the site. Not sure he's coming back.

Sure.

See ya tomorrow, Homer.

 

[Percy Allen]

I've been away for a while...who is this YSR dude?

Oh, when does the new "eat off" begin?

I'll hang up and listen off-air.

 

[Samuel L Bronkowitz]

Pretty sure HJS got a number of timeouts in a short period of time and became disenchanted with the site. Not sure he's coming back.

Sure.

See ya tomorrow, Homer.

 

[NorvilleBarnes]

Another FF question. We had a three way tie in one division. Our tiebreaker rule is:"The first tiebreaker for two teams tied for a playoff spot is head-to-head record. If the head-to-head record is tied, or if there are more than two teams in a tie, total points scored will be the next tiebreaker. If it's still tied, the team with the highest winning percentage in the division will advance. After that, it's a virtual coin toss."Team A scored more than Team B who scored more than Team C during the regular season. Team C beat Team B in both matchups and split with Team A.Team A obviously wins the division. I now see it as a two way tie between B and C, where C takes the second spot due to the sweep of B. But you could also read the rule to give B the second seed since they scored more.No controversy yet, but I expect some.

I read the rule as giving Team B the spot.

Me too.

 

[Flash]

Is it time to sell the Uranium stocks?

All of them took a big hit today.

Anyone, anyone........... Bueller?

 

[Mr. Pickles]

Looks like GM skipped town.

Convenient.

 

[Flash]

Another FF question. We had a three way tie in one division. Our tiebreaker rule is:"The first tiebreaker for two teams tied for a playoff spot is head-to-head record. If the head-to-head record is tied, or if there are more than two teams in a tie, total points scored will be the next tiebreaker. If it's still tied, the team with the highest winning percentage in the division will advance. After that, it's a virtual coin toss."Team A scored more than Team B who scored more than Team C during the regular season. Team C beat Team B in both matchups and split with Team A.Team A obviously wins the division. I now see it as a two way tie between B and C, where C takes the second spot due to the sweep of B. But you could also read the rule to give B the second seed since they scored more.No controversy yet, but I expect some.

I read the rule as giving Team B the spot.

Me too.

Team C gets the 2nd spot because there are only 2 teams tied after breaking the 3 way tie.

 

[Tiny Dancer]

Team C gets the 2nd spot because there are only 2 teams tied after breaking the 3 way tie.

The rules say if there's a three-way tie, total points is the tie breaker. It doesn't say to use a two-step method.

 

[Tiger Fan]

Our league moved to decimal scoring this year to help with tiebreakers...so what happened....two teams scored exactly the same amount.

I'm so ####### sick of head to head leagues...I scored the 2nd most amount of points in our league yet came in 9th due to h2h

 

[NorvilleBarnes]

I read it the other way, giving it to team C.

Three teams are tied for spot #1, the division crown. The rules for that playoff spot are "if there are more than two teams in a tie, total points scored will be the next tiebreaker". Spot #1 goes to A.

B & C are now tied for a different spot. The rules for spot #2 are "The first tiebreaker for two teams tied for a playoff spot is head-to-head record."

If there was only one playoff spot open, obviously it would go to A. So he's taken care of. Declare him the division winner and move on. Now, there's a second spot open, and B & C have a claim on it... A is out of the equation. So head-to-head record decides it.

This makes more sense. Team C should get it.

 

[krista4]

I read it the other way, giving it to team C.

Three teams are tied for spot #1, the division crown. The rules for that playoff spot are "if there are more than two teams in a tie, total points scored will be the next tiebreaker". Spot #1 goes to A.

B & C are now tied for a different spot. The rules for spot #2 are "The first tiebreaker for two teams tied for a playoff spot is head-to-head record."

If there was only one playoff spot open, obviously it would go to A. So he's taken care of. Declare him the division winner and move on. Now, there's a second spot open, and B & C have a claim on it... A is out of the equation. So head-to-head record decides it.

This makes more sense. Team C should get it.

I read it this way, too.

 

[Please See Mine]

anyone else ready for the holidays? Hi guys and girls? Ilike this thread, kinda like a safe haven

Define this.What is with these Kia commercials with the gerbils or whatever they are? Like I don't feel enough like a rat in a cage, despite all my rage, and now Kia wants me to associate that with their cars? Pass.

 

[videoguy505]

Another FF question. We had a three way tie in one division. Our tiebreaker rule is:

"The first tiebreaker for two teams tied for a playoff spot is head-to-head record. If the head-to-head record is tied, or if there are more than two teams in a tie, total points scored will be the next tiebreaker. If it's still tied, the team with the highest winning percentage in the division will advance. After that, it's a virtual coin toss."

"A" singular playoff spot, got to decide them one-by-one.

 

[Tiny Dancer]

I read it the other way, giving it to team C.

Three teams are tied for spot #1, the division crown. The rules for that playoff spot are "if there are more than two teams in a tie, total points scored will be the next tiebreaker". Spot #1 goes to A.

B & C are now tied for a different spot. The rules for spot #2 are "The first tiebreaker for two teams tied for a playoff spot is head-to-head record."

If there was only one playoff spot open, obviously it would go to A. So he's taken care of. Declare him the division winner and move on. Now, there's a second spot open, and B & C have a claim on it... A is out of the equation. So head-to-head record decides it.

This makes more sense. Team C should get it.

I read it this way, too.

Team A is still tied with the other teams. You can't just take that team out of the equation. Well, you could, but doing so isn't mentioned anywhere in the rules. The rules don't say anything about this two-step method.

 

[Tiny Dancer]

Another FF question. We had a three way tie in one division. Our tiebreaker rule is:

"The first tiebreaker for two teams tied for a playoff spot is head-to-head record. If the head-to-head record is tied, or if there are more than two teams in a tie, total points scored will be the next tiebreaker. If it's still tied, the team with the highest winning percentage in the division will advance. After that, it's a virtual coin toss."

"A" singular playoff spot, got to decide them one-by-one.

The first sentence that you're quoting is inapplicable to the situation at hand. There aren't two teams tied. There are three. Therefore the second sentence controls.

 

[krista4]

I read it the other way, giving it to team C.

Three teams are tied for spot #1, the division crown. The rules for that playoff spot are "if there are more than two teams in a tie, total points scored will be the next tiebreaker". Spot #1 goes to A.

B & C are now tied for a different spot. The rules for spot #2 are "The first tiebreaker for two teams tied for a playoff spot is head-to-head record."

If there was only one playoff spot open, obviously it would go to A. So he's taken care of. Declare him the division winner and move on. Now, there's a second spot open, and B & C have a claim on it... A is out of the equation. So head-to-head record decides it.

This makes more sense. Team C should get it.

I read it this way, too.

Team A is still tied with the other teams. You can't just take that team out of the equation. Well, you could, but doing so isn't mentioned anywhere in the rules. The rules don't say anything about this two-step method.

All I know is that I'm happy a lawyer wrote our rules.

 

[Please See Mine]

I read it the other way, giving it to team C.

Three teams are tied for spot #1, the division crown. The rules for that playoff spot are "if there are more than two teams in a tie, total points scored will be the next tiebreaker". Spot #1 goes to A.

B & C are now tied for a different spot. The rules for spot #2 are "The first tiebreaker for two teams tied for a playoff spot is head-to-head record."

If there was only one playoff spot open, obviously it would go to A. So he's taken care of. Declare him the division winner and move on. Now, there's a second spot open, and B & C have a claim on it... A is out of the equation. So head-to-head record decides it.

This makes more sense. Team C should get it.

I read it this way, too.

Team A is still tied with the other teams. You can't just take that team out of the equation. Well, you could, but doing so isn't mentioned anywhere in the rules. The rules don't say anything about this two-step method.

I agree that Team C should get it, but I also agree that the rules are not clear about breaking the division tie first, then breaking the wild card tie, as they are in the NFL.

 

[bentley]

Well, no ####. If the rules were clear I wouldn't have to ask.

 

[KGB]

ug, re-write the rule for next year. Ive been drinking and cant comment on it for this year.

Stuff like this makes me remember why I stopped being a commish after so many years.

 

[videoguy505]

Another FF question. We had a three way tie in one division. Our tiebreaker rule is:

"The first tiebreaker for two teams tied for a playoff spot is head-to-head record. If the head-to-head record is tied, or if there are more than two teams in a tie, total points scored will be the next tiebreaker. If it's still tied, the team with the highest winning percentage in the division will advance. After that, it's a virtual coin toss."

"A" singular playoff spot, got to decide them one-by-one.

The first sentence that you're quoting is inapplicable to the situation at hand. There aren't two teams tied. There are three. Therefore the second sentence controls.

I interpret the second sentence to refer back to the first. "If the head-to-head record is tied, or if there are more than two teams in a tie, total points scored will be the next tiebreaker." Tiebreaker for what? "A" playoff spot.

 

[Please See Mine]

Well, no ####. If the rules were clear I wouldn't have to ask.

you should get a lawyer to do them next time . . . I mean, hmm.

 

[Tiny Dancer]

Another FF question. We had a three way tie in one division. Our tiebreaker rule is:

"The first tiebreaker for two teams tied for a playoff spot is head-to-head record. If the head-to-head record is tied, or if there are more than two teams in a tie, total points scored will be the next tiebreaker. If it's still tied, the team with the highest winning percentage in the division will advance. After that, it's a virtual coin toss."

"A" singular playoff spot, got to decide them one-by-one.

The first sentence that you're quoting is inapplicable to the situation at hand. There aren't two teams tied. There are three. Therefore the second sentence controls.

I interpret the second sentence to refer back to the first. "If the head-to-head record is tied, or if there are more than two teams in a tie, total points scored will be the next tiebreaker." Tiebreaker for what? "A" playoff spot.

The first sentence has to say "a" playoff spot because it only refers to situations when there are two tied teams. You can't really have two teams tied for two playoff spots. That's not true of the situation in the second sentence. You can have three teams tied for two spots. I don't think it's fair to make the inference you're making.

 

[videoguy505]

You can have three teams tied for two spots. I don't think it's fair to make the inference you're making.

I don't think that's how to look at the situation they're in. The spots are different from each other. One could have a bye week, a better payout, a weaker opponent, and is preferable. Resolve that tie first. It's three teams tied for the top spot.ETA: sorry pickles

 

[Mr. Pickles]

Don't get this thread moved to the Shark Tank, dorks.

 

[NorvilleBarnes]

Team C gets the 2nd spot because there are only 2 teams tied after breaking the 3 way tie.

The rules say if there's a three-way tie, total points is the tie breaker. It doesn't say to use a two-step method.

Excellent point. Team B, definitely.

 

[Tiny Dancer]

You can have three teams tied for two spots. I don't think it's fair to make the inference you're making.

I don't think that's the situation they're in. The spots are different from each other. One could have a bye week, a better payout, a weaker opponent, and is preferable. Resolve that tie first.

It doesn't say "resolve that tie first" anywhere in the rules. You're making that up because you think it makes sense to do it that way or because that's the way the NFL does it or something. The rules just say that whenever three teams are tied, total scoring is the tiebreaker. Three teams are tied.

 

[shuke]

I read it the other way, giving it to team C.

Three teams are tied for spot #1, the division crown. The rules for that playoff spot are "if there are more than two teams in a tie, total points scored will be the next tiebreaker". Spot #1 goes to A.

B & C are now tied for a different spot. The rules for spot #2 are "The first tiebreaker for two teams tied for a playoff spot is head-to-head record."

If there was only one playoff spot open, obviously it would go to A. So he's taken care of. Declare him the division winner and move on. Now, there's a second spot open, and B & C have a claim on it... A is out of the equation. So head-to-head record decides it.

This makes more sense. Team C should get it.

I read it this way, too.

Team A is still tied with the other teams.

No, it's not.

 

[Tiny Dancer]

Team A is still tied with the other teams.

No, it's not.

The teams have identical records. They are tied.

 

[-fish-]

Don't get this thread moved to the Shark Tank, dorks.

it's nerded up beyond saving. send it to the ACF. it will be like it has its own forum.

 

[the rover]

Which team has Gates?

 

[the rover]

People ignoring the need for an update:1. YSR2. Rover

 

[guru_007]

Is it time to sell the Uranium stocks?All of them took a big hit today.Anyone, anyone........... Bueller?

link to all uranium stocks tanking please?

 

[gollum]

Another FF question. We had a three way tie in one division. Our tiebreaker rule is:"The first tiebreaker for two teams tied for a playoff spot is head-to-head record. If the head-to-head record is tied, or if there are more than two teams in a tie, total points scored will be the next tiebreaker. If it's still tied, the team with the highest winning percentage in the division will advance. After that, it's a virtual coin toss."Team A scored more than Team B who scored more than Team C during the regular season. Team C beat Team B in both matchups and split with Team A.Team A obviously wins the division. I now see it as a two way tie between B and C, where C takes the second spot due to the sweep of B. But you could also read the rule to give B the second seed since they scored more.No controversy yet, but I expect some.

we had the same kind of thingwe changed our rules, in any tie head to head only matters if one team swept all other teams involvedif not then head to head is thrown out and teams are ordered by record, divison record, points for, and the top teams from that sort go

 

[shuke]

Team A is still tied with the other teams.

No, it's not.

The teams have identical records. They are tied.

Until a tiebreaker resolves the tie. Once Team A is deemed the winner of the tiebreaker, it is not longer tied with the other two teams. That's why it's called a tiebreaker. The "breaker" is really the important part of "tiebreaker".

 

[Grahamburn]

Watched Roadhouse last night. It's imperative my first born be named, Dalton..