RIFFrom Primates (same link, pg 17):
Somebody may have let the Cincy zoo slide on the recommendations.
"For Island exhibits"
RIFFrom Primates (same link, pg 17):
Somebody may have let the Cincy zoo slide on the recommendations.
I am pretty sure crack was involved at some point....You guys crack this yet?
Is island defined literally as entirely surrounded by wat3er in that code, or does it mean visually separated off by a moat from public access space? I would be surprised to learn it is an "Island" in the common parlance, but then I have no idea one way or the other.RIF
"For Island exhibits"
Most think there was some kind of "monkey business" involved in regards to the zoo safety standards and accreditation.People are really going ape #### crazy over this.
This is bananas.
Initial accreditation is half of the story. The other half is upkeep, inspections, maintenance, repair, etc.So, any more questions on accreditation?
Cincinnati has an island exhibit - for monkeys - surrounded by a moat that is full of water, so I will assume it is the required depth - for monkeys.Is island defined literally as entirely surrounded by wat3er in that code, or does it mean visually separated off by a moat from public access space. I would be surprised to learn it is an "Island" in the common parlance, but then I have no idea one way or the other.
I'm hoping Simeon Rice will enter the thread and lend his opinion.Most think there was some kind of "monkey business" involved in regards to the zoo safety standards and accreditation.
Doesn't really matter, but I'll note anyway:Cincinnati Zoo and Botanical Garden, Ohio Accredited through September 2019[also accredited by the American Alliance of Museums]
It may not actually be popularity, but how close a relative the animal is to us. A gorilla is in the ape family just like us and can be considered a distant cousin. A snake is quite a ways away.timschochet said:Some, but much less. If your point is that the popularity of the animal plays an important part in the reaction, I think you're right.
Its not a chain link fence.Initial accreditation is half of the story. The other half is upkeep, inspections, maintenance, repair, etc.
Secondhand from another board: the kid initially got through what's described as a "wire fence". IMHO, an intact wire fence (thinking "chain link" for a visual) does not have gaps big enough to allow a small child to pass through. Neither should it be loose enough at the bottom to allow a small child to raise it up and shimmy underneath.
YMMV.
For me, the point stands -- the first-line fence can't be "kid-permeable".Its more like a split rail fence - but with wire.
[Conservationist and TV host Jeff] Corwin told Fox 25 that the lesson is for parents to treat zoos with the respect they deserve.
“Zoos aren’t your babysitter,” he said. “Take a break from the cell phone, the selfie stick and the texting. Connect with your children. Be responsible for your children. I don’t think this happened in seconds or minutes. I think this took time for this kid, this little boy to find himself in that situation. Ultimately it’s the gorilla that’s paid this price.”
You understand the regs allow for a dry or wet moat in lieu of the 8' fence, right?For me, the point stands -- the first-line fence can't be "kid-permeable".
[sigh]You understand the regs allow for a dry or wet moat in lieu of the 8' fence, right?
I'd settle for this guy https://forums.footballguys.com/forum/profile/409-apes-with-guns/, weighing in here...I'm hoping Simeon Rice will enter the thread and lend his opinion.
There is no reason here to have to start in with the dirty talk. Nobody is impregnating any fortresses around here.You understand the regs allow for a dry or wet moat in lieu of the 8' fence, right?
There are no requirements that this be an impregnable fortress...
"God protected my child..."
This begs the obvious question..."God protected my child..."
Solid work, God.
She made it on FB.Not on FB, will someone post the Mom of the Year's statement?
TIA
Would have gotten away with a warning.new to this thread, but ...
imagine if the gorrilla was white.
Next week 2 Gorillaburgers + 1 child harness for a very special price!I wonder what they did with the Gorilla meat?
says the gorilla dragged the kid up a ladder into the habitat and was getting violent with the kidHere's a link providing some context to how the gorilla facility and how the child got in.
http://cin.ci/1WWSDby
Kid jumps into gorilla pen where he is welcomed as one of their own. But what happens next will break your heart [VIDEO]
ummm...because it was very preventable ?1. The parents are not to blame.
2. The zoo is not to blame.
3. The gorilla had to be killed.
Just an unfortunate accident all around. Why is everyone so quick to look for people to blame?
I doubt it. Just a bunch of very unlucky circumstances.ummm...because it was very preventable ?
so you dont think a 20 foot high fence would have prevented that 3 yo to get into the gorilla pit? christ there is a 15 foot drop into a moat that could have killed that kid never mind the apes ...saying it was an accident is crazy talkI doubt it. Just a bunch of very unlucky circumstances.
An amazing species is one step closer to extinction because of this woman and her offspring?
Heres a good face book post from an expertAn amazing species is one step closer to extinction because of this woman and her offspring?![]()
looks like a bush only?Basically their was no obstacle preventing the kid from getting down there. Correct?
Finally, after days I am actually able to visualize this tragic event. Thanks CNN & Buzzbait. What is the point of the moat if the gorillas can just jump down in it?Here's a link providing some context to how the gorilla facility and how the child got in.
http://cin.ci/1WWSDby
There is a fence, 4 feet of bushes, and a moat.Basically their was no obstacle preventing the kid from getting down there. Correct?