This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Both. With Bulaga in at LT, our OL is as solid as it's been in years. As far as the 2nd part, Rodgers has way more weapons to work with than Cutler does. With the Bears OL, Cutler will be the one running for his life imo..Which part do you find funny?
2 weeks in a row Monday Night home team underdog has covered (KC & S.D. then S.F. & N.O) with K.C. winning the game outright. Some may argue the Niners should've beaten the SaintsIf Packers play their game, Bears will need to play perfect again to win. Just don't see the Bears continuing to play perfect football.Close game. Packers 27 Bears 24.sho nuff said:
Well that's certainly a more helpful response thanBoth. With Bulaga in at LT, our OL is as solid as it's been in years. As far as the 2nd part, Rodgers has way more weapons to work with than Cutler does. With the Bears OL, Cutler will be the one running for his life imo..Which part do you find funny?
Revenge for what?
ok, just a couple points..1) best - 14 for 202) jones - 7 for 73) barber - 11 for 31rodgers - 4 td, 2 int, 94 ratingcutler - 5 td, 1 int, 121 ratingBoth. With Bulaga in at LT, our OL is as solid as it's been in years. As far as the 2nd part, Rodgers has way more weapons to work with than Cutler does. With the Bears OL, Cutler will be the one running for his life imo..Which part do you find funny?
minnesota and packers definitely better/more intense rivalry than packers bears.with the bears playing stud run D and packers getting NOTHING on the ground even against buffalo, i can see the bears rushing 4 a lot and playing max coverage. doesnt bode well for rodgers and the pass game considering he has played below his standards to start the season. will be a very close one and i think this game hinges on turnovers. whoever takes care of the ball and wins the field position battle will most likely take this one. toss up but i think CHI might take this one at home. hope im wrong here
bears homers: how has the front 4 in CHI been at generating pass rush so far?
Maybe, but I much prefer just sayingWell that's certainly a more helpful response thanBoth. With Bulaga in at LT, our OL is as solid as it's been in years. As far as the 2nd part, Rodgers has way more weapons to work with than Cutler does. With the Bears OL, Cutler will be the one running for his life imo..Which part do you find funny?
to things like that..
I hear ya on the stats, but it's such a small sample size. If we were 6 games in then yea, but 2?ok, just a couple points..1) best - 14 for 202) jones - 7 for 73) barber - 11 for 31rodgers - 4 td, 2 int, 94 ratingcutler - 5 td, 1 int, 121 ratingBoth. With Bulaga in at LT, our OL is as solid as it's been in years. As far as the 2nd part, Rodgers has way more weapons to work with than Cutler does. With the Bears OL, Cutler will be the one running for his life imo..Which part do you find funny?
Most of what you said is true. I wouldn't be shocked to see the Bears win by 3 sure, but I in no way think the Bears can score 34 on the Packers.I see this game being 16-14 or something like that, wouldn't surprise me if the Bears won.In this series, throw out the records, history has shown that.Insein said:
I do agree Green bay wins if this is a shootout.
You're right, but the game is not decided on stats, just scores.Barely got by, and lucky to have won, is spot on.
Contradict much?
Whatever happened to the "Packer/Bear Week used to be fun around here" thread?Was that you or him?
Outside of Peppers....nothing. Tommie Harris is a disappointment yet again. Mark Anderson has shown nothing as well. Izzy has shown some pressure, but nothing to worry about. The Bears may need to blitz if nobody steps up their game.minnesota and packers definitely better/more intense rivalry than packers bears.with the bears playing stud run D and packers getting NOTHING on the ground even against buffalo, i can see the bears rushing 4 a lot and playing max coverage. doesnt bode well for rodgers and the pass game considering he has played below his standards to start the season. will be a very close one and i think this game hinges on turnovers. whoever takes care of the ball and wins the field position battle will most likely take this one.
toss up but i think CHI might take this one at home. hope im wrong here
bears homers: how has the front 4 in CHI been at generating pass rush so far?
Then the score indicated they won by 5. Not 3 or 1....5.All of this barely, lucky talk is due to many not liking an NFL rule. Truth is the Bears dominated the entire game outside of turnovers(Forte fumbling on the 30 and Olsen in the redzone hurt the most) and one GL series.
Truth is, is that they made the wrong call, and the Bears were lucky.But whatever, A win is a win. If you don't know they were lucky to win that game, that's your problem. When you dominate a team stat wise and barely eke out a win, that's lucky.
Bit both. It's been 2 dl and 4 lb style nickel too
They just rotate the 2 DL(Raji, Pickett, Jenkins)? What does the front look like? standup backers as DE's???
Mostly against Philly it was that rotation when Harrel was out and Jenkins was in and out with thehand issue.And Matthews as one end...mostly stand up ends yesNot sure about during the buff game
Agree 100%. The Pack are a very good team, could have been great with Grant and I think they are much weaker without him, but still one of the top in the NFC. Cutler can prove a lot to me in this game.
Aww that would be awesome. I have Cutler and I'm going against Rodgers this week.
This is a valid question. Seem to remember that Cutler sucks in prime time. Anyone?
He was not good in all of their prime games last year (at GB, at ATL and at SF), except the week 16 game against the Vikings. But he is playing much better this year than he was for most of last year, so I am not sure if that means anything.
ready. This should be an interesting game.
I didn't see anything on profootballreference.com that would account for Sunday night games, but here's his splits for Thursday/Monday games. Seems pretty pedestrian
ETA, sorry for the formatting
Value G W L T Cmp Att Cmp% Yds TD Int Rate Y/A AY/A A/G Y/G Att Yds Y/A TD A/G Y/G TD 2PM PtsMonday 6 3 3 0 104 172 60.5% 1360 10 5 92.7 7.91 7.76 28.7 226.7 21 93 4.43 0 3.5 15.5 0 0Thursday 3 1 2 0 80 133 60.2% 1008 4 6 75.0 7.58 6.15 44.3 336.0 10 42 4.20 0 3.3 14.0 0 0
Nice info but is blowing up the thread plz condense or remove.I didn't see anything on profootballreference.com that would account for Sunday night games, but here's his splits for Thursday/Monday games. Seems pretty pedestrianETA, sorry for the formatting
Code:Value G W L T Cmp Att Cmp% Yds TD Int Rate Y/A AY/A A/G Y/G Att Yds Y/A TD A/G Y/G TD 2PM PtsMonday 6 3 3 0 104 172 60.5% 1360 10 5 92.7 7.91 7.76 28.7 226.7 21 93 4.43 0 3.5 15.5 0 0Thursday 3 1 2 0 80 133 60.2% 1008 4 6 75.0 7.58 6.15 44.3 336.0 10 42 4.20 0 3.3 14.0 0 0
Thats the scary good thing right now as a Packer fan.Offense has looked out of sync and put up 27 and 34. Maybe it was the teams they played...but if/when they do get going, it will be fun to watch.
