This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Bingo.
I admit to taking him a little high at WR6, but he's one of the safest bets among the that tier to put up WR1 numbers. Maybe Wayne is safer.
Who uses cbs?Actually, that explains some of your other posts
i just picked a random website...which well known website would you like to use?
The gamelog is extraordinarily confusing...eventually it will make sense for you fellas. Keep trying.
Good post CEF.I agree about the oline making it challenging for Rodgers to connect with Jennings on deep routes. That needs to be taken into consideration before passing on Jennings due to a 4 game study of when Finley was in the lineup.
Exactly why Jennings is a mid-level WR1 regardless of your belief about Finley's effect on his numbers
No...you are clearly clueless as ever.Just stop already. You are getting destroyed in here once again.
He stopped himself once he thought he did enough damage.'Ilov80s said:Unstoppable? LOLFinley played 4 games last year:'LHUCKS said:Perhaps the first five games last season when Finley was unstoppable? Do you watch football?'Go deep said:'LHUCKS said:Did i miss something?
4 rec 47 yards
4 rec 103 yards
9 rec 115 yards
4 rec 36 yards 1 TD
Very good for a TE, but far from unstoppable.
Not his first time out there either.Jennings is at Fitz's WR camp, maybe this bodes well for him this season
What you are saying here is true, but you cant expect your first 2 or 3 picks to far exceed their draft positions. Your right, in order to win your league you will need to hit some Fosters, Steve Johnsons, etc, but you also need your top few picks to not bust. Thats what makes Jennings a good 2nd/3rd round pick, he is consistent with some upside.
My take as well. They rolled through the playoffs and won a Super Bowl throwing it to Jennings. They aren't going to just discard that because Finley gets medical clearance.'yoman said:
Say what you will about his methods, but LHUCKS does inspire some thoughtful analysis, even if it doesn't always come from him... straw that stirs the drinkSad to see this trolling is accepted in the Shark Pool as well.
Yeah...it usually ends up sparking good analysis that proves him wrong. But good to get some of the other information out of it I guess.Say what you will about his methods, but LHUCKS does inspire some thoughtful analysis, even if it doesn't always come from him... straw that stirs the drinkSad to see this trolling is accepted in the Shark Pool as well.
Just for fun, here are Brent Celek's first 4 games of 2009:6 rec 37 yards 1 TD8 rec 104 yards8 rec 104 yards 1 TD4 rec 58 yards'Ilov80s said:
Nice alternative angle!
McCarthy destroyed defenses by lining Jennings up in the slot last year, and playing Finley outside should make that even easier.
LRN to play PPR...Points in the above in PPR: Finley - 243.7 (Even more if TE get bonus as in many leagues)Jennings - 229.5Going back to 2009 when Finley returned from injury, and including the playoffs, here are their past 12 games togetherLAYER YEAR WK OPP TARG REC YD TD FPTFINLEY AVG 7.1 5.4 73.0 0.4 9.8 PRO16 113.3 86.7 1168.0 6.7 156.8PLAYER YEAR WK OPP TARG REC YD TD FPTJENNING AVG 7.5 4.2 71.8 0.5 10.2 PRO16 120.0 66.7 1148.0 8.0 162.8Formatting is off and I don't care to play with it.
another valuable contribution from "sho"...amazing this guy is still around.
not really
Coming from you?
But there was little value to contribute that had not already been done.Calling him the most overrated WR in NFL was not a valuable contribution to this board. Neither is 99% of your schtick.The guy has proven to be a very very very good NFL and fantasy WR...yet a 5 game sample blows that up in your mind.Where is the value in that?
this
somebody gets itNow onto the Frank Gore gamelog...usually when you callout players as underrated(as opposed to overrated) the Pool doesn't get it's panties in as much of a bunch.(like all the Packers homers in this thread)Say what you will about his methods, but LHUCKS does inspire some thoughtful analysis, even if it doesn't always come from him... straw that stirs the drinkSad to see this trolling is accepted in the Shark Pool as well.
Nelson. Okay, that's admittedly a stretch. But it wouldn't surprise me at all.
If Nelson were capable of leadding the Packers in TD receptions i dont think they would have drafted Cobb. I also think if Nelson were capable of being a good #2 WR he would have taken old man Drivers spot already, or at least eliminated James "butter fingers" Jones.from the picture.'LawFitz said:
I respectfully disagree. Cobb was drafted to replace Driver. He's much more in that mold, though I think he could be even better than the Donald over time b/c I think he's more explosive.The reason Jones has lasted this long is b/c he's a tease. He's an absolute beast physically, but ultimately he's been way too inconsistent. The Pack have been waiting for him to take over and at this point, I think even they might have given up.I see this WR corps becoming Jennings/Nelson on the outside with Cobb in the slot. May not evolve into that until both James and Driver are gone, but that could happen sooner rather than later.Nelson has Rodgers trust. If he becomes the starter opposite Jennings, look out. I will be following this closely as we head into this season. I think Nelson could be a major value play if things break right.
Exactly, and after Jennings, Finley, and the "new Driver" get theirs, how much is going to be left for Nelson. I dont think he will ever be a guy i would want to count on in my starting lineup. Also, if Jones was a tease, and Nelson was that good, i think they wuld have given up on Jones much sooner.
oorrect
Yes, this really added value to the board. And you might want to check in the amount of people disagreeing with you...its not just Packers fans and you appear to be the only one with some bunching going on.The problem with it...is you don't do it to get thoughtful analysis. Otherwise you would not consistently take the exact wrong opinion every single time.Saying Greg Jennings is the most overrated NFL WR is not a thought provoking statement. Its pretty much completely false...yet you defend it as if you wrote something profound.'LHUCKS said:somebody gets itNow onto the Frank Gore gamelog...usually when you callout players as underrated(as opposed to overrated) the Pool doesn't get it's panties in as much of a bunch.(like all the Packers homers in this thread)Say what you will about his methods, but LHUCKS does inspire some thoughtful analysis, even if it doesn't always come from him... straw that stirs the drinkSad to see this trolling is accepted in the Shark Pool as well.
Holmes? Please.Jennings uses his combo of decent speed, and great moves to get open. He has something not all WRs also have, chemistry with his QB.Loving that now he is just a system WR. Makes me think you have not watched him play much.Britt would not make it with the Packers...not with his off the field issues.Harvin needs to stay on the field first. But I don't think he is a #1 type WR to play on the outside. He is great in his role. Great slot guy and creative out of the backfield. But not sure he could play Jennings role in GB's offense.
A. I don't think Cobb's drafting had anything to do with Jordy Nelson.B. That old man Driver still has/had some good football left in him.C. Jones gets a bad rap for the drops because of the timing...but his drop percentage was not all that bad compared to his teammates.Nelson is easily capable of being a good #2 (maybe not great...but a good #2).
I'm sure this analysis could still take place without a fishing trip from the board's biggest tool.Say what you will about his methods, but LHUCKS does inspire some thoughtful analysis, even if it doesn't always come from him... straw that stirs the drinkSad to see this trolling is accepted in the Shark Pool as well.
B. Thats what you thought last year, remember this:post 194
I would say its more like he throws softballs that are too tempting to not hammer out of the park. He sets the bar so low that others feel compelled to compensate.*Greg Jennings is a elite WR because he is a technician. His game is much like Marvin Harrison was. Crisp route running, great hands, instincts, not afraid to go over the middle, he really does it all. He may not be as gifted physically as say Calvin or Andre Johnson .. but few are.I don't think he is over-rated for fantasy purposes being ranked 7 of the WRs. I would take the 2 Johnsons and Fitz ahead of him but after that your looking at White/Wayne/Colston.. I think Jennings is worth considering in that pocket of players. As far as Nicks/Bowe/Marshall/Welker ect. I can see issues rating any of them ahead of Jennings. So 7th rated WR makes sense to me. That is where he should be.*see bloom I even bothered to put some punctuation in my post. Something I usually won't do.Say what you will about his methods, but LHUCKS does inspire some thoughtful analysis, even if it doesn't always come from him... straw that stirs the drinkSad to see this trolling is accepted in the Shark Pool as well.
Greg Jennings is a elite WR because he is a technician. His game is much like Marvin Harrison was. Crisp route running, great hands, instincts, not afraid to go over the middle, he really does it all. He may not be as gifted physically as say Calvin or Andre Johnson .. but few are.Say what you will about his methods, but LHUCKS does inspire some thoughtful analysis, even if it doesn't always come from him... straw that stirs the drinkSad to see this trolling is accepted in the Shark Pool as well.
