Tbh, it seems a silly discussion to have in the first place, as the numbers aren't close. which is why the world scientific community and world leaders expressed such great concern about this thing.
And of course the percentage reflects only those tested, and will ultimately adjust down. Just as the flu numbers reflect only those checking in to medical providers to report it (anecdotally...I've never gone to a doctor for the flu and know very few people who have). And the numbers still aren't close.
If there's legitimate discussion about this elsewhere, link me to it so we don't sidetrack this thread. So far, I haven't seen anything in the FFA that makes a good case for the "it's just a flu" , other than people living in relative isolation in places where it hasn't hit yet. Not really reflective of society at large.
I don't think saying "it's just flu" is giving the flu its just deserve. I was caught off guard when I started looking into flu numbers and the number of deaths from that each year. By comparing it to the flu isn't downgrading the seriousness in my opinion. I think the flu needs to be taken more seriously. I have never had a flu shot and I am probably going to change that up moving forward.
For me and based on what I have read, I think COVID is bad because of the unknown. Take the precautions and do what we are doing but when it is all said and done I don't think it will be much different than what the flu results are. It is probably very similar to what the flu was like before we had vaccines for it and will end up like the flu once we do have vaccines for it.