What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

How hot is your spouse / significant other? (1 Viewer)

How hot is your spouse / significant other?

  • 1

    Votes: 2 0.9%
  • 2

    Votes: 1 0.4%
  • 3

    Votes: 2 0.9%
  • 4

    Votes: 7 3.1%
  • 5

    Votes: 8 3.5%
  • 6

    Votes: 26 11.4%
  • 7

    Votes: 68 29.7%
  • 8

    Votes: 54 23.6%
  • 9

    Votes: 22 9.6%
  • 10

    Votes: 26 11.4%
  • I ain't got nobody

    Votes: 13 5.7%

  • Total voters
    229
Teasing you mostly, but I thought maybe you were trolling us with fake pics.  
Ah! Naw.. pics are real. Tipsy, sbonomo, cav, Village Idiot, Tusken Raider, Joe Bryant, Tiger Fan, Fuller, and a host of other FBG have met and will verify that's her. 

 
offdee said:
The reality is that's an upper tier 50 yr old so be proud GB!  But compared to 20 and 30 yr olds (which is what the offdee scale does) father time simply has a cap.   As said earlier, even the hottest 50 year old in the world probably isn't a 9 or 10 when comparing women as a whole.

6: Fairly attractive, no major flaws but maybe minor ones
Thanks for putting the final nail in the coffin of your ridiculous scale and proving once and for all it is a tool's tool.

 
FBGs certainly don't mind throwing up picks of their chicks but pics of us are a different story.  Clearly our women are keeping themselves together much better than we are.  Which actually kind of flies in the face of conventional wisdom regarding men's and women's aging. 

 
And I've got to say that I'm more than a bit surprised at the quality of gal you all have managed to bamboozle.  Good on you.  I'd post pics of my wife but she'd have my balls if I did.  She's super psycho about things posted online, doesn't even have a facebook.  One of her many "cute" qualities.  I guess.  

 
I don't agree completely with Offdee's scale, but he's a hell of a lot closer to reality than the guys who think there are as many 10s as there are 1s.  

I'd argue the distribution is more like this:  geometric distribution

To be a 10 you have to be smoking hot AND in your prime.  There's no such thing as a 50 year old 10, so that already suggests that the curve has positive skew based solely on age.  

Here's a good metric by which to judge the numbers you're throwing out on your wives.  Rate this chick results

You guys that are throwing out 9s and 10s willy-nilly, you're saying to the crowd, "My wife is as hot as Scarlett Johansen."  OK, dude.  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I got no issues....I know I out punted my coverage. I've known/wanted her since high school, but didn't date until well after. 2 kids and +25 years later and still killing it. Plus (from the income thread) she makes more then me and has better benefits all around...makes me wonder what she's even doing with me sometimes lol.

Link1

Link2

one more

 

 
RokNRole said:
Look on the bright side.

Had she made the squad she would have probably upgraded.
Oh, for sure.  She's also bat-#### crazy, though, so they would have sent her back.

 
I refuse to rate my wife. She's a 10 in my eyes obviously because I love her and am still attracted to her. She's short with big boobs and great ### and beautiful hair and smile. She's also overweight and always has been so Im sure you guys wouldnt rate her high and I honestly dont care what other guys rate her. That being said guys hit on her all the time (lot of guys like curvy wimmens including me). Still looks great for 39 too.

http://i.imgur.com/BfnSPlV.jpg

 
I posted my wife before. Then a few years later someone posted a collage of all the pictures posted on FBG.   Not happening again :unsure:

 
I refuse to rate my wife. She's a 10 in my eyes obviously because I love her and am still attracted to her. She's short with big boobs and great ### and beautiful hair and smile. She's also overweight and always has been so Im sure you guys wouldnt rate her high and I honestly dont care what other guys rate her. That being said guys hit on her all the time (lot of guys like curvy wimmens including me). Still looks great for 39 too.

http://i.imgur.com/BfnSPlV.jpg
:thumbup:  

 
I refuse to rate my wife. She's a 10 in my eyes obviously because I love her and am still attracted to her. She's short with big boobs and great ### and beautiful hair and smile. She's also overweight and always has been so Im sure you guys wouldnt rate her high and I honestly dont care what other guys rate her. That being said guys hit on her all the time (lot of guys like curvy wimmens including me). Still looks great for 39 too.

http://i.imgur.com/BfnSPlV.jpg
This is always the correct answer.

 
I refuse to rate my wife. She's a 10 in my eyes obviously because I love her and am still attracted to her. She's short with big boobs and great ### and beautiful hair and smile. She's also overweight and always has been so Im sure you guys wouldnt rate her high and I honestly dont care what other guys rate her. That being said guys hit on her all the time (lot of guys like curvy wimmens including me). Still looks great for 39 too.

http://i.imgur.com/BfnSPlV.jpg
:thumbup:

If your wife is not busy later :wub: ....  Just kidding.  I can't objectively rate my wife either.  She's gained a few pounds after 3 kids but she's my best friend and I love her more every day. I think she's sexier at 40 than she was at 30.   She's held it better than I have over the years and was/is always going to be hotter than me.   I can honestly say that after some inital ups and downs (I was a mess in my 20's.. Hit some serious depression after my mom died and went a little crazy) that there isn't a woman in this world I would trade my wife for. Wouldn't trade her for any ofdee 9's.  I know I hit a home run 17 years ago...

 
Why exactly is that?  
We've done this many time but the simplest way to put it is that you would expect a scale to at least resemble something close to a bell curve.  His scale has 80% or more of the eligible female population at 5 or worst.  I think that is BS and should a more even distribution.

 
I got no issues....I know I out punted my coverage. I've known/wanted her since high school, but didn't date until well after. 2 kids and +25 years later and still killing it. Plus (from the income thread) she makes more then me and has better benefits all around...makes me wonder what she's even doing with me sometimes lol.

Link1

Link2

one more

 
I knew there would be a Disney pic in there, lol.

 
We've done this many time but the simplest way to put it is that you would expect a scale to at least resemble something close to a bell curve.  His scale has 80% or more of the eligible female population at 5 or worst.  I think that is BS and should a more even distribution.
http://s280.photobucket.com/user/offdee/media/offdee Scale/IMAG0136.jpg.html

Um, have you looked around when you're out and about....majority of women ARE veering towards the unattractive side.  A woman who is obviously not attractive, doesn't just become "attractive" (6 or higher) just to fill a numbers quota and make a perfect bell curve.  There are more unattractive women in the world then there are attractive women.    

 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://s280.photobucket.com/user/offdee/media/offdee Scale/IMAG0136.jpg.html

Um, have you looked around when you're out and about....majority of women ARE veering towards the unattractive side.  A woman who is obviously not attractive, doesn't just become "attractive" (6 or higher) just to fill a numbers quota and make a perfect bell curve.  There are more unattractive women in the world then there are attractive women.    
Which renders your scale meaningless because it can't distinguish well enough between everybody in the 1-5 range.  Let's take an extreme example:

Pic 1

Pic 2

What are you rating these?  If Rosie becomes a 2 or 3 then any attractive overweight woman has to be a four or five and it throws your whole scale off.  

 
Which renders your scale meaningless because it can't distinguish well enough between everybody in the 1-5 range.  Let's take an extreme example:

Pic 1

Pic 2

What are you rating these?  If Rosie becomes a 2 or 3 then any attractive overweight woman has to be a four or five and it throws your whole scale off.  


Have you read the descriptions associated with each rating?  It explains exactly what you're referencing to distinguish the numbers....someone who has some promise, but are being knocked down due to flaws (the bigger the flaws, the lower you're knocked down)

To answer your question directly:

- Rosie (pic 1):  Read the description and click on the reference pic....falls right in line.

4: Not attractive. Major flaws start piling up (overweight, blemishes, etc.)http://i280.photobuc...Scale/TOS4c.jpg

- Big Brit (pic 2): 

2: The ugliest girl in school, the ugliest girl at work (couldn't even get into a club)http://i280.photobuc...0Scale/TOS2.jpg

 
Which renders your scale meaningless because it can't distinguish well enough between everybody in the 1-5 range.  Let's take an extreme example:

Pic 1

Pic 2

What are you rating these?  If Rosie becomes a 2 or 3 then any attractive overweight woman has to be a four or five and it throws your whole scale off.  
Rosie is a 3, Michelin Man is a 1.

 
Which is fine until you start rating more and you realize you are categorizing your average Hooters waitress as a 7.
In all honesty I think numeric rating of women is pretty dumb. There is not much I think of that is more subjective to personal tastes. But obviously a much more fun way to pass the time in here compared to say, politics.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top