Raiderfan32904
Footballguy
How far would you de-rate Hilton, Gore, and with a short week coming, could this be a two week situation?
I have that data on my Tandy 2000 computer. Seriously though, I think Hasselback's tendencies from Seattle or even Tenn are irrelevant to him as a QB now. I wouldn't expect much yardage and I would think that MH will only make shorter throws.Any FBG's have any historical tendencies of Matt Hasslebeck? Like does he like to check down to his TE's? I'm trying to imagine his primary read behind that jailbreak offensive line.
Not sure film was invented the last time Hasselbeck played. He needs to shake off the rust, dirt, rigamortis, etcRaiderfan32904 said:Any FBG's have any historical tendencies of Matt Hasslebeck? Like does he like to check down to his TE's? I'm trying to imagine his primary read behind that jailbreak offensive line.
Honestly it likely wouldn't be very relevant. The last time he played he wasn't 40 years and was playing with a different team in a different system - other than some garbage time since he's been with the Colts.Raiderfan32904 said:Any FBG's have any historical tendencies of Matt Hasslebeck? Like does he like to check down to his TE's? I'm trying to imagine his primary read behind that jailbreak offensive line.
I don't know about this. I'm benching him for Allen Robinson if Luck is out, but if my next best option is Ted Ginn or Travis Benjamin, I'm playing Moncrief.shady inc said:moncrief is un-startable IMO without luck.
exactly. Bell went off with Vick in.Why would anyone sit Gore in this scenario? If anything, his touches would likely go up.
they are potentially playable on the sole fact that there would probably be a lot of check downs creating a lot of ppr.Are the WRs not playable on DFS now?
True. And everyone in the jags secondary is injured.Rubi said:Slight downgrade,but they're playing The Jags,not the '85 Bears
Based on all reports Ive read or heard, he didnt practice today. Pagano says he's been "limited" all week.Is Luck sitting looking like a real possibility? I wasn't paying much attention to this as a Luck owner because I thought it was mostly just precautionary. It's Friday, did he practice today?
they signed a 3rd qb... so that typically shows they are not confident Luck will be available despite pagano telling the press what he said.Is Luck sitting looking like a real possibility? I wasn't paying much attention to this as a Luck owner because I thought it was mostly just precautionary. It's Friday, did he practice today?
And the Jags D will be more aggressive knowing they are maybe playing elder Kerry Collins II not Andrew Luck.Slight downgrade,but they're playing The Jags,not the '85 Bears
That is the shark playBackup WR do ok with backup Qbs sometimes....
Got no other options so starting Dorsett.
I see everyone as a downgrade, less opportunities. Sitting Gore for Gordon on FanDuel because of the news.Why would anyone sit Gore in this scenario? If anything, his touches would likely go up.
You nuts? Gore's value goes up!!!!! He'll get a lot more touches,and more targets. Matt H will be in to manage the game.I look for the TE's to get more targets as well.How far would you de-rate Hilton, Gore, and with a short week coming, could this be a two week situation?
I had Luck and Moncrief in, now going with Rivers and Brandon cooks. UghI had Moncrief in over John Brown, gonna switch now
Trying to go through Hasselbeck's passes on gamepass, but it keeps freezing when I try to go to the second page.Bump Gore up just based on volume and check downs, bump all the receivers down a little except for Hilton I would bump him down a lot. I haven't seen Hasselback play in ages, but I have a hard time believing he could throw a 40 or 50 yard bomb to Hilton.
Now that would be a sneaky start. But I could see why you would be tempted. Did someone already roster Carr? I tried to get Carr this week and lost out on him on blind bid waivers at start of this week. He has a good match up against the Bears today. If he is not available, you just might have a good idea there with starting Hass.I'm debating picking Hasselbeck up for a spot start, got Big Ben hurt and Mariota on a bye. Think he might do alright
Awesome machine.I have that data on my Tandy 2000 computerAny FBG's have any historical tendencies of Matt Hasslebeck? Like does he like to check down to his TE's? I'm trying to imagine his primary read behind that jailbreak offensive line.
The limited 1st team reps makes me nervous, not that the Jags D is the 85 Bears or anything but it's just the unknown. My angle is any somewhat close option at Colts skill positions, I'm avoiding if I can. If your WW is picked clean at QB with the recent injuries and bye, it is the Jags after all.I'm debating picking Hasselbeck up for a spot start, got Big Ben hurt and Mariota on a bye. Think he might do alright
Yeah sorry to hijack the thread but it's a 14 teamer with big rosters... Cutler is out there but the risk of reinjury is scary, and the Bears don't exactly inspire good vibes. Jeffrey being out pushed me to going with Weeden instead, but the late news has me wondering about Hass' prospects. He's certainly old but is plenty experienced, is at home ,and has good weapons. I think he might play a real nice, smart, efficient game. Really curious about what smarter people think about him lol....not trying to WDIS just discuss Hass in particularThe limited 1st team reps makes me nervous, not that the Jags D is the 85 Bears or anything but it's just the unknown. My angle is any somewhat close option at Colts skill positions, I'm avoiding if I can. If your WW is picked clean at QB with the recent injuries and bye, it is the Jags after all.I'm debating picking Hasselbeck up for a spot start, got Big Ben hurt and Mariota on a bye. Think he might do alright