This just got a lot more interesting.J
The economic impact Young would have on that franchise is something that will now be heavily considered, assuming Young delcares himself eligible for the draft. That franchise needs a ton of help and trading that #1 pick makes the most sense in terms of X's and O's. Holding the pick and drafting Young is the smart marketing and sales decision. It is a unique dichotomy. Play to win. Play to be profitable or play to have a balance between the two.
You folks that live outside of Texas have no idea the icon status that Young thrust himself into with last night's game. Outside of College Station Young could pretty much do whatever he wanted from here until eternity. Trust that Mcnair, who is a savvy business man, sees this. I do not think the #1 pick is a simple matter of taking R. Bush or trading down any longer.
I was shocked the Pokes based on DJ. SHOCKED but you are right. Ware and Spears have been fan favorites all season. Young's status, though, is WAY beyond what DJ achieved, while at UT. It is going to be damn near impossible for McNair to ignore that come draft day. I agree, though, that the Texans should trade down. The team just needs too much help but the situation is extremely compounded at this point.I agree. I thought this would work well for the Cowboys if they had drafted Derrick Johnson this past April... however, Ware and Spears endeared themselves to the fans quickly.
I believe that teams can trade draft picks at any time; however, the # 1 pick will likely only increase in value closer to the draft.Dumb draft question: When can teams trade picks? Can they trade today?
J
Hi Faust,I believe you're right. Although if I'm Houston, I'm trying to deal Vince Young this morning....I believe that teams can trade draft picks at any time; however, the # 1 pick will likely only increase in value closer to the draft.Dumb draft question: When can teams trade picks? Can they trade today?
J
However, since Vince hasn't declared, none of the powers that be can even mention him. (strange NFL rule. Applies to owners, coaches and front office staff, but not to the players.)Hi Faust,I believe you're right. Although if I'm Houston, I'm trying to deal Vince Young this morning....I believe that teams can trade draft picks at any time; however, the # 1 pick will likely only increase in value closer to the draft.Dumb draft question: When can teams trade picks? Can they trade today?
J
J
I believe that once the trade deadline passes, no deal can be made until the next NFL season which is March 2 or so.I believe that teams can trade draft picks at any time; however, the # 1 pick will likely only increase in value closer to the draft.Dumb draft question: When can teams trade picks? Can they trade today?
J
No way do those 2 teams draft QB's in the first round 2 years in a row without even starting the one from last year.I would say that you try and deal Young to :
Minnesota
Green Bay - Aaron Rodgers, 1st round pick 2005
Washington - Jason Cambell, 1st round pick in 2005.
You never know unless you ask ...
Out of that list I would think it could be whittled down toDetroitI would say that you try and deal Young to :
Minnesota
Green Bay
Detroit
Cleveland
Oakland
Arizona
Miami
Dallas
Kansas City
Washington
You never know unless you ask ...
Green Bay wasn't willing to throw Rodgers into the wolves when number 4 was still there. And they aren't willing to give up on him yet either.Rayderr,
If Green Bay is so high on Aaron Rodgers, then why did he get only 16 passing attempts all season?
They could have easily spared some wear and tear on Favre and let him play the 2nd half of each game [at least the last six games].
Brunell led the Redskins to the 21st rated Passing Offense in the league. He helped them win games, but ...
If I am the Texans, then both of these teams are both on my list of folks to call for a possible trade down.
Being high on someone does not necessarily equate into being the best at that particular moment. It takes most QB's a couple seasons to get acclimmated to the NFL. Yes there are some that are starting QB's from day 1. But more often than not, they fail miserably. For every Peyton Manning, there's a dozen Ryan Leafs. Generaly consesus around the NFL is that you need to give QB's time to develop. Neither Rodgers, or Campbell have had that opportunity.Rayderr,
If Green Bay is so high on Aaron Rodgers, then why did he get only 16 passing attempts all season?
They could have easily spared some wear and tear on Favre and let him play the 2nd half of each game [at least the last six games].
Brunell led the Redskins to the 21st rated Passing Offense in the league. He helped them win games, but ...
If I am the Texans, then both of these teams are both on my list of folks to call for a possible trade down.
The Baltimore game, where Rodgers had 15 of his passing attempts, has been the only one where GB was in a non-winning position. The other games they lost they had still had a chance of winning up until the very end.Rayderr,
I would agree with the fact that Washington had a lot to loose by playing Campbell, but mostly because they were in a playoff race.
The Packers have been out of the playoff race for weeks. Rodgers should have had at least the 4th Quarter in the last 5 to 6 games for the Packers.
As you state, Rodgers will not get better without snaps. What better way to give him live snaps? He got 16 all season ...
You can not bench Brett Favre just to give the rookie a few snaps before next season. He is a God in those parts and you would be a fool to ever try and deny him the right to leave the game on his own terms. With everything he has done and meant to that franchise he could probably ask to play for the next 5 years and GB would be forced to simply say "yes sir".Rayderr,
I would agree with the fact that Washington had a lot to loose by playing Campbell, but mostly because they were in a playoff race.
The Packers have been out of the playoff race for weeks. Rodgers should have had at least the 4th Quarter in the last 5 to 6 games for the Packers.
As you state, Rodgers will not get better without snaps. What better way to give him live snaps? He got 16 all season ...
Sorry to Hijack but I completely disagree. I don't think you put Rodgers in their with that poor offensive line and practice squad WR's (with the exception of Driver of course). I think that would've shattered the young guys confidence.I like the approach of bringing him along slowly. That approach seems to have worked well for Carson Palmer.Rayderr,
Please know that I mean no disrespect to Brett Favre.
But when the Packers were 2-7 with no chance for the playoffs they should have been using Rodgers for between 1 and 2 quarters each of the last 7 games; whether or not they were in a position to win.
They ended up 2-5 the last 7 games with Brett taking all but 15 snaps. How much worse could they have done with Rodgers in the game. For 2006, 2007 and beyond Rodgers should have been taking live snaps ...
Extremely (A slight modification, in bold.)Joe,
I voted for: Trade the pick for other draft choices.
This all seems erriely similar to the 2001 draft with Michael Vick and LaDainian Tomlinson. If the Texans are smart and play their cards right, they try and trade down with the Titans and grab Bush or whomever ends up at no. 3 spot.
That's not always the case........where you think you can just take who's ever left over and be OK. The Chargers thought that with Phillip Rivers and let Eli go. Sure, unexpectedly Drew Brees has played well but that wasn't the plan. They were banking on Rivers being just as good as Manning and so far, that hasn't come close to being the case.When you've got the chance to take a potential superstar, someone that could turn your organization around......I say take that chance.Extremely (A slight modification, in bold.)Joe,
I voted for: Trade the pick for other draft choices.
This all seems erriely similar to the 2001 draft with Michael Vick and LaDainian Tomlinson. If the Texans are smart and play their cards right, they try and trade down with the Titans and grab Bush or whomever ends up at no. 3 spot.
That would be one scary team!That's not always the case........where you think you can just take who's ever left over and be OK. The Chargers thought that with Phillip Rivers and let Eli go. Sure, unexpectedly Drew Brees has played well but that wasn't the plan. They were banking on Rivers being just as good as Manning and so far, that hasn't come close to being the case.When you've got the chance to take a potential superstar, someone that could turn your organization around......I say take that chance.Extremely (A slight modification, in bold.)Joe,
I voted for: Trade the pick for other draft choices.
This all seems erriely similar to the 2001 draft with Michael Vick and LaDainian Tomlinson. If the Texans are smart and play their cards right, they try and trade down with the Titans and grab Bush or whomever ends up at no. 3 spot.
I wish Dallas would trade 2 or 3 No. 1 draft picks to move up and get Vince Young, I'd love it!
You really can't use the Chargers as an argument not to trade down, it's worked extremely well for them. What would have happened if they kept Eli, and he wanted to be a Charger? IMO the team would be in a worse position than they are now, Eli isn't much better than Brees if at all, and the extra pick has helped. Not to say you're wrong, but the example is flawed.I agree with your point here, take the superstar when you have the chance. The thing is, there's 3 players with superstar potential here, why not trade down from 1 to 3 and still land one of them, plus additional help?That's not always the case........where you think you can just take who's ever left over and be OK. The Chargers thought that with Phillip Rivers and let Eli go. Sure, unexpectedly Drew Brees has played well but that wasn't the plan. They were banking on Rivers being just as good as Manning and so far, that hasn't come close to being the case.
When you've got the chance to take a potential superstar, someone that could turn your organization around......I say take that chance.
I wish Dallas would trade 2 or 3 No. 1 draft picks to move up and get Vince Young, I'd love it!
OK, let's say you're right, and everybody else here is wrong. And that the reason why Rodgers and Campbell played hardly at all this season, is because after they were drafted, their respective teams looked at them and said "Damn, this kid sucks. WTF were we thinking using a first round pick on him?" With their first round draft pick from last year getting a pretty sizeable contract, how do you manage the salary cap of taking a QB with one of the top 3 picks? Keep in mind that even in SD, where they had the disaster at QB in Ryan Leaf, and what they thought was a disaster in Drew Brees (who actually was a 2nd round pick), they waited 3 years in between picking a QB in the top 32.Rayderr,
Please know that I mean no disrespect to Brett Favre.
But when the Packers were 2-7 with no chance for the playoffs they should have been using Rodgers for between 1 and 2 quarters each of the last 7 games; whether or not they were in a position to win.
They ended up 2-5 the last 7 games with Brett taking all but 15 snaps. How much worse could they have done with Rodgers in the game. For 2006, 2007 and beyond Rodgers should have been taking live snaps ...
Ok, sure. And then start a bunch of rookies on O-line and D and secure that Carr beats his rookie sack total and the Texans get the first pick of the 2007 draft. Good idea. Franchise players are at the top three. Take one of them. They can build a team, or at least improve it, with the picks they have.trade down for the mother of all picks and focus them on the o and d lines. it's time to properly BUILD this team.
I see what you're saying........but to be honost I don't think Bush is going to be a superstar. I think he'll be good I guess, but not a top 5 fantasy back type guy. I did not like that he was often on the bench in that game last night. I have to wonder why....sure the other guys good but he's supposed to be the best, isn't he?Anyway Oz,You really can't use the Chargers as an argument not to trade down, it's worked extremely well for them. What would have happened if they kept Eli, and he wanted to be a Charger? IMO the team would be in a worse position than they are now, Eli isn't much better than Brees if at all, and the extra pick has helped. Not to say you're wrong, but the example is flawed.I agree with your point here, take the superstar when you have the chance. The thing is, there's 3 players with superstar potential here, why not trade down from 1 to 3 and still land one of them, plus additional help?That's not always the case........where you think you can just take who's ever left over and be OK. The Chargers thought that with Phillip Rivers and let Eli go. Sure, unexpectedly Drew Brees has played well but that wasn't the plan. They were banking on Rivers being just as good as Manning and so far, that hasn't come close to being the case.
When you've got the chance to take a potential superstar, someone that could turn your organization around......I say take that chance.
I wish Dallas would trade 2 or 3 No. 1 draft picks to move up and get Vince Young, I'd love it!
I know Brees wasn't part of the trade, but he's part of the equation. It's a completely different situation than the Pistons, even though I agree with you on that point.I see what you're saying........but to be honost I don't think Bush is going to be a superstar. I think he'll be good I guess, but not a top 5 fantasy back type guy. I did not like that he was often on the bench in that game last night. I have to wonder why....sure the other guys good but he's supposed to be the best, isn't he?Anyway Oz,You really can't use the Chargers as an argument not to trade down, it's worked extremely well for them. What would have happened if they kept Eli, and he wanted to be a Charger? IMO the team would be in a worse position than they are now, Eli isn't much better than Brees if at all, and the extra pick has helped. Not to say you're wrong, but the example is flawed.I agree with your point here, take the superstar when you have the chance. The thing is, there's 3 players with superstar potential here, why not trade down from 1 to 3 and still land one of them, plus additional help?That's not always the case........where you think you can just take who's ever left over and be OK. The Chargers thought that with Phillip Rivers and let Eli go. Sure, unexpectedly Drew Brees has played well but that wasn't the plan. They were banking on Rivers being just as good as Manning and so far, that hasn't come close to being the case.
When you've got the chance to take a potential superstar, someone that could turn your organization around......I say take that chance.
I wish Dallas would trade 2 or 3 No. 1 draft picks to move up and get Vince Young, I'd love it!
Brees wasn't part of that draft. If you just isolate the draft........I think the Chargers made a mistake. Sure Brees worked out, but that didn't mean they didn't do well by taking Rivers.
It's like the Pistons, they have a good team. But they did draft Darco, the Human Victory Cigar No. 2 overall 3 years ago ahead of Carmello and D. Wade. Just because the Pistons brought in Rasheed Wallace doesn't mean that wasn't a bad draft pick.
When did Matt Millen start running the Jets?I think Reggie Bush is going to end up closer to Warrick Dunn production wise than Barry Sanders. Absolutely NOTHING wrong with that, but I'm still not sure I see the "once in a lifetime talent!" angle.
If I had the #1, and I'm the Texans w/ a new coach, an impatient fan base, and the chance to get started all over (so to speak), I send David Carr and another later pick (or two) to the Jets for the #4 and CHad Pennington. I select Young first overall and Ferguson 4th. (I know, it's ridiculous).
Colin
I wish Dallas would trade 2 or 3 No. 1 draft picks to move up and get Vince Young, I'd love it!
How so? of all the highly touted college QB's to be top picks in the early rounds the past few years, who has really produced at a high level, or been worth the monetary investment by the team that drafted him?This just got a lot more interesting.
J