When you have the #1 pick you have a good idea which way you're going by the time you hire a coach.He won't have any say in the pick. He's probably 10 levels removed.
Hopefully he's a coach though.
yea okWhen you have the #1 pick you have a good idea which way you're going by the time you hire a coach.He won't have any say in the pick. He's probably 10 levels removed.
Hopefully he's a coach though.
The pick is Mariota, mark it down.
yea okWhen you have the #1 pick you have a good idea which way you're going by the time you hire a coach.He won't have any say in the pick. He's probably 10 levels removed.
Hopefully he's a coach though.
The pick is Mariota, mark it down.
The Tampa Bay Buccaneers have hired a new quarterbacks coach. Mike Bajakian comes from Tennessee and he used to work with Lovie Smith in Chicago.
Now that the team has some coaching concerns taking care of, they’ll look to prepare for the draft. As pointed out by Bruce Feldman of Fox Sports, the hiring of Bajakian might lead them to a specific quarterback in the draft.
Since Bajakian is known for running a spread offense, one that keeps the quarterback in the shotgun formation, and spreads the defense horizontally, he may want to continue that style in his new job. Marcus Mariota comes from a team that utilizes this offensive style, including practicing a no-huddle approach.
In addition to Bajakian’s offensive style, new Bucs OC Dirk Koetter has ties to Oregon coach Mark Helfrich.
Read more at http://www.sportstalkflorida.com/does-new-bucs-hire-point-towards-drafting-mariota/#yjbWjJAfvzYqGjBv.99
I'm not alone in seeing this:Premier said:Yes that's all nice. They're still not taking Mariotta.
Bruce FeldmanVerified account @BruceFeldmanCFB
The Bucs hiring Mike Bajakian, a spread guy, as new QB coach gives some legs to the notion TB's intrigued w Marcus Mariota.
where does that say they are taking him?cstu said:Premier said:yea okcstu said:When you have the #1 pick you have a good idea which way you're going by the time you hire a coach.He won't have any say in the pick. He's probably 10 levels removed.
Hopefully he's a coach though.
The pick is Mariota, mark it down.The Tampa Bay Buccaneers have hired a new quarterbacks coach. Mike Bajakian comes from Tennessee and he used to work with Lovie Smith in Chicago.
Now that the team has some coaching concerns taking care of, they’ll look to prepare for the draft. As pointed out by Bruce Feldman of Fox Sports, the hiring of Bajakian might lead them to a specific quarterback in the draft.
Since Bajakian is known for running a spread offense, one that keeps the quarterback in the shotgun formation, and spreads the defense horizontally, he may want to continue that style in his new job. Marcus Mariota comes from a team that utilizes this offensive style, including practicing a no-huddle approach.
In addition to Bajakian’s offensive style, new Bucs OC Dirk Koetter has ties to Oregon coach Mark Helfrich.
Read more at http://www.sportstalkflorida.com/does-new-bucs-hire-point-towards-drafting-mariota/#yjbWjJAfvzYqGjBv.99
I wonder if they'll cover her request for 7 mil from him.Erica Kinsman, Winston's accuser, will be part of a documentary called "The Hunting Ground."
No reasonable person believes that. Cstu has some anti-Jameis hard-on.There are reasonable explanations for these coaching hires that connect them to either QB.
There is no way anyone will get me to believe that the Bucs are sold on MM 4 months before the draft after his performance in the CFP.
thats kindof what I am thinking and also MM not throwing at combine probably isnt going to help his case esp if there are questions about accuracy.There are reasonable explanations for these coaching hires that connect them to either QB.
There is no way anyone will get me to believe that the Bucs are sold on MM 4 months before the draft after his performance in the CFP.
I don't think any of the recent #1's besides Cam have thrown at the combine - Bradford, Stafford, Russell, Alex Smith. Griffin at #2 and Matt Ryan at #3 didn't either. Cam was an anomaly rather than that rule.thats kindof what I am thinking and also MM not throwing at combine probably isnt going to help his case esp if there are questions about accuracy.There are reasonable explanations for these coaching hires that connect them to either QB.
There is no way anyone will get me to believe that the Bucs are sold on MM 4 months before the draft after his performance in the CFP.
If you want to be the #1 pick you have to have the mentality that you are a bad ### and will throw any time any place for whoever. Cam Newton stepped up and threw and Luck was going to until the Colts said no.
Nope, I think he could be good but is too much of a risk. I'm not against him, just like Mariota much more.No reasonable person believes that. Cstu has some anti-Jameis hard-on.There are reasonable explanations for these coaching hires that connect them to either QB.
There is no way anyone will get me to believe that the Bucs are sold on MM 4 months before the draft after his performance in the CFP.
You're really comfortable with Glennon as the future?Honestly watching Wilson and Seattle makes me think if the Bucs took MM they could be successful. You have to be smart about it though and build a great OL and running game. They aren't asking Wilson to throw 40 times a game and I doubt he could do it if they did. Same with MM.
I would just prefer the potential drop back stud. But I would be homicidal if they take either. But JW is clearly better.
I think he left off an "N."You're really comfortable with Glennon as the future?Honestly watching Wilson and Seattle makes me think if the Bucs took MM they could be successful. You have to be smart about it though and build a great OL and running game. They aren't asking Wilson to throw 40 times a game and I doubt he could do it if they did. Same with MM.
I would just prefer the potential drop back stud. But I would be homicidal if they take either. But JW is clearly better.
I get you Winston supporters - he's definitely the potential drop back stud but Mariota has the all around game you can build around and the character issue is a big one when it comes to your QB.
I have no idea who TB is going to take but how does the quarterback coach's "offensive style" come into play?yea okWhen you have the #1 pick you have a good idea which way you're going by the time you hire a coach.He won't have any say in the pick. He's probably 10 levels removed.
Hopefully he's a coach though.
The pick is Mariota, mark it down.The Tampa Bay Buccaneers have hired a new quarterbacks coach. Mike Bajakian comes from Tennessee and he used to work with Lovie Smith in Chicago.
Now that the team has some coaching concerns taking care of, they’ll look to prepare for the draft. As pointed out by Bruce Feldman of Fox Sports, the hiring of Bajakian might lead them to a specific quarterback in the draft.
Since Bajakian is known for running a spread offense, one that keeps the quarterback in the shotgun formation, and spreads the defense horizontally, he may want to continue that style in his new job. Marcus Mariota comes from a team that utilizes this offensive style, including practicing a no-huddle approach.
In addition to Bajakian’s offensive style, new Bucs OC Dirk Koetter has ties to Oregon coach Mark Helfrich.
Read more at http://www.sportstalkflorida.com/does-new-bucs-hire-point-towards-drafting-mariota/#yjbWjJAfvzYqGjBv.99
most definitely not ok with GlennonI think he left off an "N."You're really comfortable with Glennon as the future?Honestly watching Wilson and Seattle makes me think if the Bucs took MM they could be successful. You have to be smart about it though and build a great OL and running game. They aren't asking Wilson to throw 40 times a game and I doubt he could do it if they did. Same with MM.
I would just prefer the potential drop back stud. But I would be homicidal if they take either. But JW is clearly better.
I get you Winston supporters - he's definitely the potential drop back stud but Mariota has the all around game you can build around and the character issue is a big one when it comes to your QB.
We're all just speculating. Trying to connect the dots. Koetter has a background with Helfrich. Bajakian has a background with several running QB's and spread offenses. Tony Dungy has a connection to Oregon, Mariota, and Lovie Smith.I have no idea who TB is going to take but how does the quarterback coach's "offensive style" come into play?
They're taking Mariota and I applaud them for getting the perfect coordinator for him.None of Mariota’s predecessors in the Kelly era had his accuracy, decision-making, or arm. It is possible that Helfrich, who coached under “four verticals system” guru Dirk Koetter at Boise State, is determined that Oregon make the vertical passing game an offensive staple. Kelly generally limited the scope of Oregon’s vertical passing game, but that might have because of his quarterbacks’ limitations, rather than his offensive philosophy (especially considering the high volume of deep passes the Eagles have completed in his tenure with them). When Kelly recruited Mariota, he could have seen the Hawaiian native as the final missing piece to take his offense to its greatest heights.
This is how you run an organization into the ground. You draft a QB, he puts up better numbers as a rookie than any rookie QB in the last couple decades (correct me if I'm wrong). You bench him for a journeyman QB who was targeted by a HC who has never accomplished anything. He proceeds to do worse while your rookie QB sits during a year he should be being evaluated for his long term potential. Then you cut said journeyman QB and you still don't know what you have in your 2013 rookie. You prepare to draft another QB that isn't proven at all.Josh McCown cut.
On to the next loser.
Glennon finally gets his shot! Draft Leonard Williams!Josh McCown cut.
On to the next loser.
I don't understand why cut McCown now? Why not have him be the "other" QB? 5 Mil isn't totally out of hand for a backup.Josh McCown cut.
On to the next loser.
It is if you already have a backup.I don't understand why cut McCown now? Why not have him be the "other" QB? 5 Mil isn't totally out of hand for a backup.Josh McCown cut.
On to the next loser.
Trade Glennon for a 4th - 5th rounder on draft day.
After the release of Josh McCown, ESPN's Adam Schefter tweeted if there were questions about the Bucs taking a QB with the No. 1 pick, "there are none now."
This was everyone's conclusion from the end of the season, but Schefter puts a cap on it. Now the debate will be between Jameis Winston and Marcus Mariota, with ESPN's Pat Yasinskas already reporting Lovie Smith prefers Winston. Buckle up.
Source: Adam Schefter on Twitter
Feb 12 - 3:53 PM
If you didn't trust Glennon to start last year, why ask him to start if Winston/Mariota isn't ready?It is if you already have a backup.I don't understand why cut McCown now? Why not have him be the "other" QB? 5 Mil isn't totally out of hand for a backup.Josh McCown cut.
On to the next loser.
Trade Glennon for a 4th - 5th rounder on draft day.
Two posts up indicates that cap space really isn't a problem. Who starts if your future franchise QB stinks up the joint in pre-season?Continuing to start McCown got the Bucs the #1 pick. Spending $5M in cap space for a lame duck is pointless.
It was definitely wise to throw McCown out to the wolves instead of Glennon. Glennon wasn't going to do any better, so you might as well keep him healthy.Grahamburn said:Continuing to start McCown got the Bucs the #1 pick. Spending $5M in cap space for a lame duck is pointless.
EDS, Mankins and VJax will be back, but yea the rest are gonzo.Quez said:http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-nfl-salary-cap-space-2015-2
The Bucs have abut 31 mil in cap space. They will likely cut Goldson, EDS, Collins, Koennen freeing up another 14mil. Cutting Mankins could free up another 7. So they would be +/- 52mil under. Cutting Vjax could free up another 7, but I think they try and restructure him.
Whaaaaat? 5M is nothing to a football team.JaxBill said:If you didn't trust Glennon to start last year, why ask him to start if Winston/Mariota isn't ready?It is if you already have a backup.I don't understand why cut McCown now? Why not have him be the "other" QB? 5 Mil isn't totally out of hand for a backup.Josh McCown cut.
On to the next loser.
Trade Glennon for a 4th - 5th rounder on draft day.
Besides you might actually get something for Glennon.
Cutting McCown reeks of Glazers trying to recoup the ManU offseason spending.
And you reasoning is? I'd really love to hear it.There is 18 or 19 games worth of film on Glennon. More than enough to know he sucks too.
Lol. Sure they do.And you reasoning is? I'd really love to hear it.Just to clue you in, his numbers (other than passing yardage) compare favorably to Andrew Luck thru 19 games. look it up.There is 18 or 19 games worth of film on Glennon. More than enough to know he sucks too.
This is true, and I've made that point in the past. The problem is the Bucs didn't commit to him, and when he did get an opportunity in 2014 he botched it. Luck obviously improved exponentially after his rookie season. Would Glennon have done that if he received the same support system as Luck? We'll never know, but I doubt it.lod01 said:And you reasoning is? I'd really love to hear it.There is 18 or 19 games worth of film on Glennon. More than enough to know he sucks too.
Just to clue you in, his numbers (other than passing yardage) compare favorably to Andrew Luck thru 19 games. look it up.
They were leaning toward Winston yesterday.Faust said:Report: Buccaneers leaning toward Marcus Mariota with No. 1 pick
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/25068126/report-buccaneers-leaning-toward-marcus-mariota-with-no-1-pick
I thought he earned the opportunity to start in 2014. That opportunity is gone now. He'll either be a decent backup option or be traded if they get an offer.Honestly not trying to be a #### but if you have watched Glennon play and think he's comparable to Luck, you don't know #### about football.
I get that his rookie TD/int ratio was good. That's because his YPA was almost historically bad. He never pushed the ball down the field (because he can't), he helmed the worst offense in the nfl in 2013 and showed no ability to make nfl caliber throws. His deep passes are awful and he simply cannot throw a 20-yard out. Dumping the ball off to your RB or TE in the flat 25 times a game isn't going to get anybody anywhere.
It's crazy to me that anybody who has watched this guy play thinks they would want to see more. His game against Cleveland this year was the worst quarterbacked game I've ever seen. I actually went back to watch the All-22 to confirm if it was as bad as I thought. It was even worse.
I don't totally disagree but the 2013 tape on him was pretty bad. It wasn't the rookie mistakes, it was the clear showing that he can't make the throws needed. I can see why they made the change if they thought they could win. I don't understand why they held on to Josh starting the last 4-5 games.I thought he earned the opportunity to start in 2014. That opportunity is gone now. He'll either be a decent backup option or be traded if they get an offer.Honestly not trying to be a #### but if you have watched Glennon play and think he's comparable to Luck, you don't know #### about football.
I get that his rookie TD/int ratio was good. That's because his YPA was almost historically bad. He never pushed the ball down the field (because he can't), he helmed the worst offense in the nfl in 2013 and showed no ability to make nfl caliber throws. His deep passes are awful and he simply cannot throw a 20-yard out. Dumping the ball off to your RB or TE in the flat 25 times a game isn't going to get anybody anywhere.
It's crazy to me that anybody who has watched this guy play thinks they would want to see more. His game against Cleveland this year was the worst quarterbacked game I've ever seen. I actually went back to watch the All-22 to confirm if it was as bad as I thought. It was even worse.