The Shark move here is to take advantage of everyone else thinking Wynn won't score points from the IR.
I'd think that the more critical issue is Grant's projections going forward.As long as you know his value, why is this relevant?
Seriously?As long as you know his value, why is this relevant?
Purely as an improvement suggestion, couldn't players put on IR be zeroed out same day that happens?Year forward projections were submitted and should be live on the site. If not, check back soon and you'll be all set. Wynn and Morris have both been zero'd out and the other backs on GB and NE adjusted accordingly. Thanks.
Definitely. We try to get those updated asap. This one just didn't happen asap.Purely as an improvement suggestion, couldn't players put on IR be zeroed out same day that happens?Year forward projections were submitted and should be live on the site. If not, check back soon and you'll be all set. Wynn and Morris have both been zero'd out and the other backs on GB and NE adjusted accordingly. Thanks.
Thanks, sounds like FBGs already has it covered then.Definitely. We try to get those updated asap. This one just didn't happen asap.Purely as an improvement suggestion, couldn't players put on IR be zeroed out same day that happens?Year forward projections were submitted and should be live on the site. If not, check back soon and you'll be all set. Wynn and Morris have both been zero'd out and the other backs on GB and NE adjusted accordingly. Thanks.
Ahem... something is on your noseAs long as you know his value, why is this relevant?
Not kissing up. I just never understand why people complain about such silly things.We all know the guy is out, so we don't play him. Is this really that complex?ETA: To put it to you another way...the Original post said that he had sent 2 PM's and made a post in the correct forum already. That is pretty extreme in and of itself, but I can "see" that. Then to post it in this forum? That would be like you making a mistake at work, someone telling your boss and then after your boss did not do anything about it they told you boss' boss and when they did nothing about it they decide to contact the CEO to be sure that your error was appropriately recognized. Obviously we are using a web world here where standard rules do not apply, but the post on this forum seems a bit extreme to me especially given that EVERYONE knows the guy is not playing.Ahem... something is on your noseAs long as you know his value, why is this relevant?
LinkWhat gives?Green Bay Packers 10/30 DeShawn Wynn (RB) Placed on IR (shoulder).
DeShawn Wynn (RB) Taken off IR (shoulder).
I hear ya man but like it or not, people really do pay to NOT think for themselves so muchMDSkinner said:Not kissing up. I just never understand why people complain about such silly things.We all know the guy is out, so we don't play him. Is this really that complex?ETA: To put it to you another way...the Original post said that he had sent 2 PM's and made a post in the correct forum already. That is pretty extreme in and of itself, but I can "see" that. Then to post it in this forum? That would be like you making a mistake at work, someone telling your boss and then after your boss did not do anything about it they told you boss' boss and when they did nothing about it they decide to contact the CEO to be sure that your error was appropriately recognized. Obviously we are using a web world here where standard rules do not apply, but the post on this forum seems a bit extreme to me especially given that EVERYONE knows the guy is not playing.phthalatemagic said:Ahem... something is on your noseMDSkinner said:As long as you know his value, why is this relevant?
You are right. I guess I am just glad that my customers are not like this. We all make mistakes, I probably would have been fired eons ago with customers like this.I hear ya man but like it or not, people really do pay to NOT think for themselves so muchMDSkinner said:Not kissing up. I just never understand why people complain about such silly things.We all know the guy is out, so we don't play him. Is this really that complex?ETA: To put it to you another way...the Original post said that he had sent 2 PM's and made a post in the correct forum already. That is pretty extreme in and of itself, but I can "see" that. Then to post it in this forum? That would be like you making a mistake at work, someone telling your boss and then after your boss did not do anything about it they told you boss' boss and when they did nothing about it they decide to contact the CEO to be sure that your error was appropriately recognized. Obviously we are using a web world here where standard rules do not apply, but the post on this forum seems a bit extreme to me especially given that EVERYONE knows the guy is not playing.phthalatemagic said:Ahem... something is on your noseMDSkinner said:As long as you know his value, why is this relevant?
Yeah. That and accuracy.I hear ya man but like it or not, people really do pay to NOT think for themselves so muchMDSkinner said:Not kissing up. I just never understand why people complain about such silly things.We all know the guy is out, so we don't play him. Is this really that complex?ETA: To put it to you another way...the Original post said that he had sent 2 PM's and made a post in the correct forum already. That is pretty extreme in and of itself, but I can "see" that. Then to post it in this forum? That would be like you making a mistake at work, someone telling your boss and then after your boss did not do anything about it they told you boss' boss and when they did nothing about it they decide to contact the CEO to be sure that your error was appropriately recognized. Obviously we are using a web world here where standard rules do not apply, but the post on this forum seems a bit extreme to me especially given that EVERYONE knows the guy is not playing.phthalatemagic said:Ahem... something is on your noseMDSkinner said:As long as you know his value, why is this relevant?
I didn't say you had a wrong expectation or anything. I completely understand paying for info vs research for those that work long hours or have issues come up in life or whatever. I have no probs here with either side of the argumentYeah. That and accuracy.I hear ya man but like it or not, people really do pay to NOT think for themselves so muchMDSkinner said:Not kissing up. I just never understand why people complain about such silly things.We all know the guy is out, so we don't play him. Is this really that complex?ETA: To put it to you another way...the Original post said that he had sent 2 PM's and made a post in the correct forum already. That is pretty extreme in and of itself, but I can "see" that. Then to post it in this forum? That would be like you making a mistake at work, someone telling your boss and then after your boss did not do anything about it they told you boss' boss and when they did nothing about it they decide to contact the CEO to be sure that your error was appropriately recognized. Obviously we are using a web world here where standard rules do not apply, but the post on this forum seems a bit extreme to me especially given that EVERYONE knows the guy is not playing.phthalatemagic said:Ahem... something is on your noseMDSkinner said:As long as you know his value, why is this relevant?
Guys I'm sure Bob and David value you standing up in their defense, but they really don't need your chivalry. In this business model sometimes the easiest way to get on the radar is to post here in the Shark Pool - most of the FBG staff spent a significant amount of time here. I sent two notes to keep this off the boards but I don't know if they were seen or not (I have absolutely zero problem with that, by the way). I posted in the "correct" forum for application issues, and Bob responded to me, but I didn't realize at the time that he did the forward projections (I thought Dodds did that). Also, due to a data error the update he put together didn't resolve the problem. So as of Saturday morning the data was still wrong - I wanted to make sure it was recognized and resolved. As to why I wanted it resolved, I value the forward projections and the opinions of the staff here. I use the LD, I read threads in the Shark Pool, I listen to the Audible and I watch the 5 Minute Drill. I am fairly certain that a few other people value those opinions as well. All I wanted was for those opinions to be accurately reflected.You are right. I guess I am just glad that my customers are not like this. We all make mistakes, I probably would have been fired eons ago with customers like this.I hear ya man but like it or not, people really do pay to NOT think for themselves so muchMDSkinner said:Not kissing up. I just never understand why people complain about such silly things.We all know the guy is out, so we don't play him. Is this really that complex?ETA: To put it to you another way...the Original post said that he had sent 2 PM's and made a post in the correct forum already. That is pretty extreme in and of itself, but I can "see" that. Then to post it in this forum? That would be like you making a mistake at work, someone telling your boss and then after your boss did not do anything about it they told you boss' boss and when they did nothing about it they decide to contact the CEO to be sure that your error was appropriately recognized. Obviously we are using a web world here where standard rules do not apply, but the post on this forum seems a bit extreme to me especially given that EVERYONE knows the guy is not playing.phthalatemagic said:Ahem... something is on your noseMDSkinner said:As long as you know his value, why is this relevant?
I enjoy being patronized as much as you do.I did nothing to deserve it and I hardly posted anything supporting posting an incorrect ranking.Guys I'm sure Bob and David value you standing up in their defense, but they really don't need your chivalry.
I enjoy being patronized as much as you do.I did nothing to deserve it and I hardly posted anything supporting posting an incorrect ranking.Guys I'm sure Bob and David value you standing up in their defense, but they really don't need your chivalry.
OK then.I hear ya man but like it or not, people really do pay to NOT think for themselves so much
I didn't say you had a wrong expectation or anything. I completely understand paying for info vs research for those that work long hours or have issues come up in life or whatever. I have no probs here with either side of the argumentYeah. That and accuracy.I hear ya man but like it or not, people really do pay to NOT think for themselves so muchMDSkinner said:Not kissing up. I just never understand why people complain about such silly things.We all know the guy is out, so we don't play him. Is this really that complex?ETA: To put it to you another way...the Original post said that he had sent 2 PM's and made a post in the correct forum already. That is pretty extreme in and of itself, but I can "see" that. Then to post it in this forum? That would be like you making a mistake at work, someone telling your boss and then after your boss did not do anything about it they told you boss' boss and when they did nothing about it they decide to contact the CEO to be sure that your error was appropriately recognized. Obviously we are using a web world here where standard rules do not apply, but the post on this forum seems a bit extreme to me especially given that EVERYONE knows the guy is not playing.phthalatemagic said:Ahem... something is on your noseMDSkinner said:As long as you know his value, why is this relevant?
Now you're gonna be wise? Geesh....where is it? where am I defending them? Quit being defensive, I was actually proving you had a point. You also might want to look at the part you snipped and the reply from the other poster as wellI enjoy being patronized as much as you do.I did nothing to deserve it and I hardly posted anything supporting posting an incorrect ranking.Guys I'm sure Bob and David value you standing up in their defense, but they really don't need your chivalry.OK then.I hear ya man but like it or not, people really do pay to NOT think for themselves so much
Actually, I thought I was capitulating.Now you're gonna be wise? Geesh....where is it? where am I defending them? Quit being defensive, I was actually proving you had a point. You also might want to look at the part you snipped and the reply from the other poster as wellI enjoy being patronized as much as you do.I did nothing to deserve it and I hardly posted anything supporting posting an incorrect ranking.Guys I'm sure Bob and David value you standing up in their defense, but they really don't need your chivalry.OK then.I hear ya man but like it or not, people really do pay to NOT think for themselves so much
With all the information on this site, is it really important? The site can't be updated every second 24/7. If you know he is on the IR, why are you worried about projections for him?I agree with the complaint. Wynn has been placed on IR for days. Paying customers expect that ranking and projections reflect the fact that Wynn is on IR.
I guess I see the original guys point here, it is not so much this player as other projections. What is the sense of releasing new projections if we are not even sure that they are updated? You would think it would be easier to update a player who is out for the year with a zero then to move someone's projections just a hair because of something that went on during the week. If the IR guy is not updated, what is to convince me that the minor adjustment has been made?I don't use the projections for anything more than reinforcement for what I want to do, but if others put a lot of stock into them, I can see where the concern is.With all the information on this site, is it really important? The site can't be updated every second 24/7. If you know he is on the IR, why are you worried about projections for him?I agree with the complaint. Wynn has been placed on IR for days. Paying customers expect that ranking and projections reflect the fact that Wynn is on IR.![]()
That statements sums it up.if you can't get the obvious stuff right, why am I paying to hope you get the other stuff right?