What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

It's a Wonderful Life (1 Viewer)

Ayn Rand helped analyze the film for the FBI as communist propaganda:

“IT’S A WONDERFUL LIFE”

Released by RKO Pictures, Inc. on December 19, 1946
Producer — Frank Capra
Director — Frank Capra
Screen play — Frances Goodrick, Albert Hackett, Frank Capra
Cast: Starring — James Stewart, Donna Reed, Lionel Barrymore

According to the Informants [redacted] in this picture the screen credits again fail to reflect the Communist support given to the screen writer. According to [redacted] the writers Frances Goodrick and Albert Hackett were very close to known Communists and on one occasion in the recent past while these two writers were doing a picture for Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Goodrick and Hackett practically lived with known Communists as Lester Cole, screen writer, and Earl Robinson, screen writer. Both of these individuals are identified in Section I of this memorandum as Communists.

With regard to the picture “It’s A Wonderful Life”, [redacted] stated in substance that the film represented a rather obvious attempt to discredit bankers by casting Lionel Barrymore as “scrooge-type” so that he would be the most hated man in the picture. This, according to these sources, is a common trick used by Communists.

In addition, [redacted] stated that, in his opinion, this picture deliberately maligned the upper class, attempting to show the people who had money were mean and despicable characters. [redacted] related that if he had made this picture portraying the banker, he wold have shown this individual to have been following the rules as laid down by the State Bank Examiners in connection with making loans. Further, [redacted] stated that the scene woundn’t have “suffered at all” in portraying the banker as a man who was protecting funds put in his care by private individuals and adhering to the rules governing the loan of that money rather than portraying the part as it was shown. In summary, [redacted] stated that it was not necessary to make the banker such a mean character and “I would never have done it that way”.

[redacted] recalled that approximately 15 years ago, the picture entitled “The Letter” was made in Russia and was later shown in this country. He recalled that in this Russian picture, an individual who had lost his self-respect as well as that of his friends and neighbors because of drunkeness, was given one last chance to redeem himself by going to the bank to get some money to pay off a debt. The old man was sympathetic character and was so pleased at this opportunity that he was extremely, inferring he might lose the letter of credit or the money itself. In summary, the old man made the journey of several days duration to the bank and back with no mishap until he fell asleep on the homeward journey because of his determination to succeed. On this occasion the package of money dropped out of his pocket. Upon arriving home, the old man was so chagrined he hung himself. The next day someone returned the package of money to his wife saying it had been found. [redacted] draws a parallel of this scene and that of the picture previously discussed, showing that Thomas Mitchell who played the part of the man losing the money in the Capra picture suffered the same consequences as the man in the Russian picture in that Mitchell was too old a man to go out and make money to pay off his debt to the banker.
 
flapgreen said:
Baa Baa Baa"I like the movie because everyone says that I have to and it plays during Christmas even though it isn't a Christmas film"

The movie is tripe
:fishing:
Not fishingIt isn't a Christmas film and the movie is not good. It's sugar filled crap
I disagree with you.
Awesome that you do but the movie sucks. ####### guardian angel should have let his ### drown
 
Last edited by a moderator:
flapgreen said:
Baa Baa Baa"I like the movie because everyone says that I have to and it plays during Christmas even though it isn't a Christmas film"

The movie is tripe
:fishing:
Not fishingIt isn't a Christmas film and the movie is not good. It's sugar filled crap
I disagree with you.
Awesome that you do but the movie sucks. ####### guardian angel should have let his ### drown
That makes no sense. Then he wouldn't've gotten his wings.

 
flapgreen said:
Baa Baa Baa"I like the movie because everyone says that I have to and it plays during Christmas even though it isn't a Christmas film"

The movie is tripe
:fishing:
Not fishingIt isn't a Christmas film and the movie is not good. It's sugar filled crap
I disagree with you.
Awesome that you do but the movie sucks. ####### guardian angel should have let his ### drown
That makes no sense. Then he wouldn't've gotten his wings.
I mean, what the #### is the point of a guardian angel, if you aren't going to go for the wings?

 
whoknew said:
Jules Winnfield said:
whoknew said:
Baa Baa Baa"I like the movie because everyone says that I have to and it plays during Christmas even though it isn't a Christmas film"

The movie is tripe
:fishing:
Not fishingIt isn't a Christmas film and the movie is not good. It's sugar filled crap
I disagree with you.
Awesome that you do but the movie sucks. ####### guardian angel should have let his ### drown
That makes no sense. Then he wouldn't've gotten his wings.
And the movie would have been a lot shorter.

 
This movie, Christmas Vacation, Elf & A Christmas Story are now the Mt Rushmore of Christmas movies.

And Jules can suck it.

 
I think it's worth seeing.

Now, White Christmas is another "classic". I tried to watch it last night for the first time, and couldn't make it through it. Even though as a kid I watched Danny Kaye movies whenever they were on Saturday/Sunday tv.

 
I think it's worth seeing.

Now, White Christmas is another "classic". I tried to watch it last night for the first time, and couldn't make it through it. Even though as a kid I watched Danny Kaye movies whenever they were on Saturday/Sunday tv.
try to find "Holiday Inn" instead. It preceeded WC, and was the film that originally contained the song White Christmas. I think HI is much better.

 
I think it's worth seeing.

Now, White Christmas is another "classic". I tried to watch it last night for the first time, and couldn't make it through it. Even though as a kid I watched Danny Kaye movies whenever they were on Saturday/Sunday tv.
I watched it twice in a row the other night.

 
I think it's worth seeing.

Now, White Christmas is another "classic". I tried to watch it last night for the first time, and couldn't make it through it. Even though as a kid I watched Danny Kaye movies whenever they were on Saturday/Sunday tv.
try to find "Holiday Inn" instead. It preceeded WC, and was the film that originally contained the song White Christmas. I think HI is much better.
Good post. WC was kind of a cash grab on the popularity of the song itself.

 
I think it's worth seeing.

Now, White Christmas is another "classic". I tried to watch it last night for the first time, and couldn't make it through it. Even though as a kid I watched Danny Kaye movies whenever they were on Saturday/Sunday tv.
try to find "Holiday Inn" instead. It preceeded WC, and was the film that originally contained the song White Christmas. I think HI is much better.
Good post. WC was kind of a cash grab on the popularity of the song itself.
White Christmas is just an excuse to string together a bunch of Irving Berlin songs with a thin plot. Fred Astaire was originally offered the Danny Kaye role, but turned it down because he didn't like the script.

As far as Wonderful Life is concerned, typical "Capra-corn" (as Capra's critics called his films).

 
Last edited by a moderator:
As far as Wonderful Life is concerned, typical "Capra-corn" (as Capra's critics called his films).
Capra certainly knew how to play with the audience's emotions but that doesn't make IAWL a bad movie. A lot of it is over the top (partially due to the era and partially to Capra) but if you view the film as an allegorical fantasy (there's a freaking guardian angel in it) then it works much better.

 
As far as Wonderful Life is concerned, typical "Capra-corn" (as Capra's critics called his films).
Capra certainly knew how to play with the audience's emotions . A lot of it is over the top (partially due to the era and partially to Capra) but if you view the film as an allegorical fantasy (there's a freaking guardian angel in it) then it works much better.
plus lack of nudity <_<

 
On top of the sentimentality, the movie is an allegory for Keynesian economic theory so that will turn a lot of people off.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top