Jerry Sandusky accused of child molestation (1 Viewer)

[timschochet]

NBC is reporting that 2 weeks after the incident that McQueary supposedly saw the sexual assault which, according to his grand jury testimony, "horrified" him, McQueary played in a charity football game organized by Sandusky. Later that same year he played in a charity golf tournament organized by Sandusky.

Michael Isikoff also wants to know why McQueary's email written last week and released to the press a few days ago seems to completely contradict his grand jury testimony. In his testimony, McQueary testified that he did nothing to stop the rape other than to contact his father that night and Joe Paterno a day later. In the email McQueary wrote that he put a stop to it before leaving the showers, and that he had "conversations with the police."

This whole thing gets more and more bizarre...

 

[Aaron Rudnicki]

NBC is reporting that 2 weeks after the incident that McQueary supposedly saw the sexual assault which, according to his grand jury testimony, "horrified" him, McQueary played in a charity football game organized by Sandusky. Later that same year he played in a charity golf tournament organized by Sandusky.

good job NBC. this thread covered that about 30 pages ago.

Michael Isikoff also wants to know why McQueary's email written last week and released to the press a few days ago seems to completely contradict his grand jury testimony. In his testimony, McQueary testified that he did nothing to stop the rape other than to contact his father that night and Joe Paterno a day later. In the email McQueary wrote that he put a stop to it before leaving the showers, and that he had "conversations with the police."

Hey Mike> did you hear about Sandusky's book?

 

[johnnycakes]

OK, so which one of these guys have posted in this thread?

I don't know about that, but from the police description of the riot, it sounded like what happens in Boston whenever the Red Sox beat the
after they lost to the Bruins.

 

[culdeus]

Not sure why McQueary's recent actions are still being discussed. The guy is trying to have it both ways. You don't participate in a cover-up and get benefits from that and then when your involvement comes out reap the benefits of being a whistleblower at the same time. The dude just wants to have a life after this, and I hate to be the one to tell him he won't. I'm sure a PSU booster cuts him a huge check on the side to #### and not come out with a book at a later date.

Best case is he goes and coaches from some middle of nowhere juco and is never heard from again. Worst case someone makes him vanish.

 

[NCCommish]

NBC is reporting that 2 weeks after the incident that McQueary supposedly saw the sexual assault which, according to his grand jury testimony, "horrified" him, McQueary played in a charity football game organized by Sandusky. Later that same year he played in a charity golf tournament organized by Sandusky.

Michael Isikoff also wants to know why McQueary's email written last week and released to the press a few days ago seems to completely contradict his grand jury testimony. In his testimony, McQueary testified that he did nothing to stop the rape other than to contact his father that night and Joe Paterno a day later. In the email McQueary wrote that he put a stop to it before leaving the showers, and that he had "conversations with the police."

This whole thing gets more and more bizarre...

Because he came off like a gutless ******* who let a child be raped and did virtually nothing in his testimony?

 

[Sinn Fein]

NBC is reporting that 2 weeks after the incident that McQueary supposedly saw the sexual assault which, according to his grand jury testimony, "horrified" him, McQueary played in a charity football game organized by Sandusky. Later that same year he played in a charity golf tournament organized by Sandusky.

Michael Isikoff also wants to know why McQueary's email written last week and released to the press a few days ago seems to completely contradict his grand jury testimony. In his testimony, McQueary testified that he did nothing to stop the rape other than to contact his father that night and Joe Paterno a day later. In the email McQueary wrote that he put a stop to it before leaving the showers, and that he had "conversations with the police."

This whole thing gets more and more bizarre...

Because he came off like a gutless ******* who let a child be raped and did virtually nothing in his testimony?

He gave Sandusky the evil eye imo

 

[Fat Nick]

Here's what I'm tired of: PSU supporters now complaining about this being a witch hunt against Joe Paterno (and the school) and not enough focus on Sandusky. These are the same people that want to point out what a pillar Joe Paterno was/is to the PSU community, how his 60 years of service has done yadda yadda yadda for the school, students, etc. so he desrves to be treated better, blah blah, blah.

So, for someone so integral (and upstanding) to have this happen on "his watch" it is absolutely justifiable for him to be held accountable and the main lightning rod in the public and media's eyes.

You can't have it both ways.

Here's what I'm tired of: People not recognizing that A LOT of this HAS been a witch hunt against Joe Paterno. (i.e. the whole "did he transfer his house to his wife" thing). Search the number of times Paterno's name has been mentioned vs. Sandusky's, and I think you'll see the point. And I was one of those people supporting Paterno, and while I get the firing (which I didn't earlier), I still think he deserved better than a phone call. The line that people have a hard time getting is that someone can be integral and upstanding and influence a university without having hard, defined, written power. It's like the Queen of England vs. the PM. The Queen is much more recognizable, and very well regarded, etc...but the Prime Minister has more real power in day-to-day affairs. Paterno, on paper, was JUST THE HEAD FOOTBALL COACH. Hell, one could even argue that even that was just a title as he hadn't REALLY coached for a while. Nowhere in PSU by-laws is it written that Joe Paterno can do whatever he wants. This isn't a black/white issue. Joe Paterno CAN be revered as a man with a great, moral history, AND a man who made one horrible mistake that undoubtedly tarnished that legacy. I AM a PSU alum, and if you ask me what I think about Paterno, I'd say exactly that...he's a GREAT man who made a HORRIBLE mistake. To try and strip the man of everything plays back into the witch hunt mentality.

I think at this point, the PSU community has been kicked around in this thread enough that you're kind of beating a dead horse at this point. I haven't even commented on this aspect of this thread for several days because I think the point has been made.

ETA: Ugh. Forget it. I don't even feel like discussing this aspect anymore.

 

[Dexter Manley]

I hope that one of the things that results from this is that PSU, Pitt and Temple lose their ability to stay exempted from PA's Right To Know Law.Too much secrecy going on at some of these places.

And guess who pressured the state government to get this law passed a few years ago? Spanier. Heard that on the radio last night. The yahoo sports reporter who investigates all the colleges involved in big scandals apparently reported this.

 

[mad sweeney]

Here's what I'm tired of: PSU supporters now complaining about this being a witch hunt against Joe Paterno (and the school) and not enough focus on Sandusky. These are the same people that want to point out what a pillar Joe Paterno was/is to the PSU community, how his 60 years of service has done yadda yadda yadda for the school, students, etc. so he desrves to be treated better, blah blah, blah.

So, for someone so integral (and upstanding) to have this happen on "his watch" it is absolutely justifiable for him to be held accountable and the main lightning rod in the public and media's eyes.

You can't have it both ways.

Here's what I'm tired of: People not recognizing that A LOT of this HAS been a witch hunt against Joe Paterno. (i.e. the whole "did he transfer his house to his wife" thing). Search the number of times Paterno's name has been mentioned vs. Sandusky's, and I think you'll see the point. And I was one of those people supporting Paterno, and while I get the firing (which I didn't earlier), I still think he deserved better than a phone call. The line that people have a hard time getting is that someone can be integral and upstanding and influence a university without having hard, defined, written power. It's like the Queen of England vs. the PM. The Queen is much more recognizable, and very well regarded, etc...but the Prime Minister has more real power in day-to-day affairs. Paterno, on paper, was JUST THE HEAD FOOTBALL COACH. Hell, one could even argue that even that was just a title as he hadn't REALLY coached for a while. Nowhere in PSU by-laws is it written that Joe Paterno can do whatever he wants. This isn't a black/white issue. Joe Paterno CAN be revered as a man with a great, moral history, AND a man who made one horrible mistake that undoubtedly tarnished that legacy. I AM a PSU alum, and if you ask me what I think about Paterno, I'd say exactly that...he's a GREAT man who made a HORRIBLE mistake. To try and strip the man of everything plays back into the witch hunt mentality.

I think at this point, the PSU community has been kicked around in this thread enough that you're kind of beating a dead horse at this point. I haven't even commented on this aspect of this thread for several days because I think the point has been made.

There is no point to that, it's been gone over and over. Sandusky has been charged and will be punished. The fact that Paterno wasn't being punished (at the time) was reason for the ire of many. Once he was sacked, much of the attention turned to the coward McQueary. The Sandusky ratio is useless because he's been caught, is being punished and the feelings about him are universal, thus no need to talk much about him.

 

[NCCommish]

Here's what I'm tired of: PSU supporters now complaining about this being a witch hunt against Joe Paterno (and the school) and not enough focus on Sandusky. These are the same people that want to point out what a pillar Joe Paterno was/is to the PSU community, how his 60 years of service has done yadda yadda yadda for the school, students, etc. so he desrves to be treated better, blah blah, blah.So, for someone so integral (and upstanding) to have this happen on "his watch" it is absolutely justifiable for him to be held accountable and the main lightning rod in the public and media's eyes.You can't have it both ways.

Here's what I'm tired of: People not recognizing that A LOT of this HAS been a witch hunt against Joe Paterno. (i.e. the whole "did he transfer his house to his wife" thing). Search the number of times Paterno's name has been mentioned vs. Sandusky's, and I think you'll see the point. And I was one of those people supporting Paterno, and while I get the firing (which I didn't earlier), I still think he deserved better than a phone call. The line that people have a hard time getting is that someone can be integral and upstanding and influence a university without having hard, defined, written power. It's like the Queen of England vs. the PM. The Queen is much more recognizable, and very well regarded, etc...but the Prime Minister has more real power in day-to-day affairs. Paterno, on paper, was JUST THE HEAD FOOTBALL COACH. Hell, one could even argue that even that was just a title as he hadn't REALLY coached for a while. Nowhere in PSU by-laws is it written that Joe Paterno can do whatever he wants. This isn't a black/white issue. Joe Paterno CAN be revered as a man with a great, moral history, AND a man who made one horrible mistake that undoubtedly tarnished that legacy. I AM a PSU alum, and if you ask me what I think about Paterno, I'd say exactly that...he's a GREAT man who made a HORRIBLE mistake. To try and strip the man of everything plays back into the witch hunt mentality.I think at this point, the PSU community has been kicked around in this thread enough that you're kind of beating a dead horse at this point. I haven't even commented on this aspect of this thread for several days because I think the point has been made.

Really? Paterno had no power at PSU? Come on.

 

[Aaron Rudnicki]

Sandusky

Sandusky

Sandusky

Just trying to get his name mentioned in here more to satisfy some people.

 

[Joe Summer]

NBC is reporting that 2 weeks after the incident that McQueary supposedly saw the sexual assault which, according to his grand jury testimony, "horrified" him, McQueary played in a charity football game organized by Sandusky. Later that same year he played in a charity golf tournament organized by Sandusky.

Michael Isikoff also wants to know why McQueary's email written last week and released to the press a few days ago seems to completely contradict his grand jury testimony. In his testimony, McQueary testified that he did nothing to stop the rape other than to contact his father that night and Joe Paterno a day later. In the email McQueary wrote that he put a stop to it before leaving the showers, and that he had "conversations with the police."

This whole thing gets more and more bizarre...

Tim, it's been pointed out several times in the thread that McQueary didn't say that he "put a stop to it".

"I didn't just turn and run," McQueary says in the e-mail. "I made sure it stopped."

http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/college/penn-state-mike-mcqueary-made-stopped-talking-jerry-sandusky-alleged-sex-abuse-shower-article-1.977525

The statement above does not "completely contradict his grand jury testimony".

 

[Addai's Adidas]

It is my guess that those with the most posts in this thread were also assaulted by Sandusky or their uncle.

 

[Ignoratio Elenchi]

Fat Nick, don't just do a strikethrough on that badposting, just delete the whole thing.

 

[Wadsworth]

Here's what I'm tired of: People not recognizing that A LOT of this HAS been a witch hunt against Joe Paterno. (i.e. the whole "did he transfer his house to his wife" thing). Search the number of times Paterno's name has been mentioned vs. Sandusky's, and I think you'll see the point. And I was one of those people supporting Paterno, and while I get the firing (which I didn't earlier), I still think he deserved better than a phone call.

The line that people have a hard time getting is that someone can be integral and upstanding and influence a university without having hard, defined, written power. It's like the Queen of England vs. the PM. The Queen is much more recognizable, and very well regarded, etc...but the Prime Minister has more real power in day-to-day affairs. Paterno, on paper, was JUST THE HEAD FOOTBALL COACH. Hell, one could even argue that even that was just a title as he hadn't REALLY coached for a while. Nowhere in PSU by-laws is it written that Joe Paterno can do whatever he wants. This isn't a black/white issue. Joe Paterno CAN be revered as a man with a great, moral history, AND a man who made one horrible mistake that undoubtedly tarnished that legacy. I AM a PSU alum, and if you ask me what I think about Paterno, I'd say exactly that...he's a GREAT man who made a HORRIBLE mistake. To try and strip the man of everything plays back into the witch hunt mentality.

I think at this point, the PSU community has been kicked around in this thread enough that you're kind of beating a dead horse at this point. I haven't even commented on this aspect of this thread for several days because I think the point has been made.

Well here is how it works since you and Joe seem to be a bit confused. When is comes to adults molesting children and people choosing to look the other way the general public is going to give no quarter to any involved. Like it or not you can count on it.

 

[Dr. Awesome]

Here's what I'm tired of: People not recognizing that A LOT of this HAS been a witch hunt against Joe Paterno. (i.e. the whole "did he transfer his house to his wife" thing). Search the number of times Paterno's name has been mentioned vs. Sandusky's, and I think you'll see the point. And I was one of those people supporting Paterno, and while I get the firing (which I didn't earlier), I still think he deserved better than a phone call.

The line that people have a hard time getting is that someone can be integral and upstanding and influence a university without having hard, defined, written power. It's like the Queen of England vs. the PM. The Queen is much more recognizable, and very well regarded, etc...but the Prime Minister has more real power in day-to-day affairs. Paterno, on paper, was JUST THE HEAD FOOTBALL COACH. Hell, one could even argue that even that was just a title as he hadn't REALLY coached for a while. Nowhere in PSU by-laws is it written that Joe Paterno can do whatever he wants. This isn't a black/white issue. Joe Paterno CAN be revered as a man with a great, moral history, AND a man who made one horrible mistake that undoubtedly tarnished that legacy. I AM a PSU alum, and if you ask me what I think about Paterno, I'd say exactly that...he's a GREAT man who made a HORRIBLE mistake. To try and strip the man of everything plays back into the witch hunt mentality.

I think at this point, the PSU community has been kicked around in this thread enough that you're kind of beating a dead horse at this point. I haven't even commented on this aspect of this thread for several days because I think the point has been made.

I can't imagine how hard this must be for you. It's got to be tough coming to terms with the fact the icon of your college helped a monster molest children thanks to repeated inaction.I'll let others rightfully criticize your post but I understand where you're coming from. It was painfully obvious you're a PSU alumni long before I got to that sentence.

 

[ClownCausedChaos]

Here's what I'm tired of: People not recognizing that A LOT of this HAS been a witch hunt against Joe Paterno. (i.e. the whole "did he transfer his house to his wife" thing). Search the number of times Paterno's name has been mentioned vs. Sandusky's, and I think you'll see the point. And I was one of those people supporting Paterno, and while I get the firing (which I didn't earlier), I still think he deserved better than a phone call.

The line that people have a hard time getting is that someone can be integral and upstanding and influence a university without having hard, defined, written power. It's like the Queen of England vs. the PM. The Queen is much more recognizable, and very well regarded, etc...but the Prime Minister has more real power in day-to-day affairs. Paterno, on paper, was JUST THE HEAD FOOTBALL COACH. Hell, one could even argue that even that was just a title as he hadn't REALLY coached for a while. Nowhere in PSU by-laws is it written that Joe Paterno can do whatever he wants. This isn't a black/white issue. Joe Paterno CAN be revered as a man with a great, moral history, AND a man who made one horrible mistake that undoubtedly tarnished that legacy. I AM a PSU alum, and if you ask me what I think about Paterno, I'd say exactly that...he's a GREAT man who made a HORRIBLE mistake. To try and strip the man of everything plays back into the witch hunt mentality.

I think at this point, the PSU community has been kicked around in this thread enough that you're kind of beating a dead horse at this point. I haven't even commented on this aspect of this thread for several days because I think the point has been made.

Well here is how it works since you and Joe seem to be a bit confused. When is comes to adults molesting children and people choosing to look the other way the general public is going to give no quarter to any involved. Like it or not you can count on it.

Son of a #####! Thank you, now I can cross that one of my "How does it work?" list.

Next up: Quantum theory and wave mechanics.

 

[Fat Nick]

Here's what I'm tired of: PSU supporters now complaining about this being a witch hunt against Joe Paterno (and the school) and not enough focus on Sandusky. These are the same people that want to point out what a pillar Joe Paterno was/is to the PSU community, how his 60 years of service has done yadda yadda yadda for the school, students, etc. so he desrves to be treated better, blah blah, blah.

So, for someone so integral (and upstanding) to have this happen on "his watch" it is absolutely justifiable for him to be held accountable and the main lightning rod in the public and media's eyes.

You can't have it both ways.

Here's what I'm tired of: People not recognizing that A LOT of this HAS been a witch hunt against Joe Paterno. (i.e. the whole "did he transfer his house to his wife" thing). Search the number of times Paterno's name has been mentioned vs. Sandusky's, and I think you'll see the point. And I was one of those people supporting Paterno, and while I get the firing (which I didn't earlier), I still think he deserved better than a phone call. The line that people have a hard time getting is that someone can be integral and upstanding and influence a university without having hard, defined, written power. It's like the Queen of England vs. the PM. The Queen is much more recognizable, and very well regarded, etc...but the Prime Minister has more real power in day-to-day affairs. Paterno, on paper, was JUST THE HEAD FOOTBALL COACH. Hell, one could even argue that even that was just a title as he hadn't REALLY coached for a while. Nowhere in PSU by-laws is it written that Joe Paterno can do whatever he wants. This isn't a black/white issue. Joe Paterno CAN be revered as a man with a great, moral history, AND a man who made one horrible mistake that undoubtedly tarnished that legacy. I AM a PSU alum, and if you ask me what I think about Paterno, I'd say exactly that...he's a GREAT man who made a HORRIBLE mistake. To try and strip the man of everything plays back into the witch hunt mentality.

I think at this point, the PSU community has been kicked around in this thread enough that you're kind of beating a dead horse at this point. I haven't even commented on this aspect of this thread for several days because I think the point has been made.

Really? Paterno had no power at PSU? Come on.

Jesus man...did you even READ what I said? Where did I say Paterno had no power?

 

[Fat Nick]

And I clearly should've just ignored the post. I'm done in this thread. Have fun everyone.

 

[JZilla]

Nick wait

 

[The Noid]

In case you haven't noticed, the Pope and the church get all the flack and outrage. The guilty priests are hardly ever mentioned. There's precedence. It's not a witch hunt.

 

[Leroy Hoard]

In case you haven't noticed, the Pope and the church get all the flack and outrage. The guilty priests are hardly ever mentioned. There's precedence. It's not a witch hunt.

Harry Truman had that sign on his desk for a reason.

 

[The Future Champs]

Not sure why McQueary's recent actions are still being discussed. The guy is trying to have it both ways. You don't participate in a cover-up and get benefits from that and then when your involvement comes out reap the benefits of being a whistleblower at the same time. The dude just wants to have a life after this, and I hate to be the one to tell him he won't. I'm sure a PSU booster cuts him a huge check on the side to #### and not come out with a book at a later date.

Best case is he goes and coaches from some middle of nowhere juco and is never heard from again. Worst case someone makes him vanish.

This is ridiculous.

 

[E-Z Glider]

In case you haven't noticed, the Pope and the church get all the flack and outrage. The guilty priests are hardly ever mentioned. There's precedence. It's not a witch hunt.

I guess this is a decent analogy with Joe being the Pope, Spanier/Shultz/Curley being the church, and Sandusky being the guilty priest. I would also guess that those most venomously spewing their misguided outrage towards the Pope had an anti-religion agenda, just like those most venomously spewing their misguided outrage towards Joe have an anti-PSU football agenda.

 

[Aaron Rudnicki]

I would also guess that those most venomously spewing their misguided outrage towards the Pope had an anti-religion agenda, just like those most venomously spewing their misguided outrage towards Joe have an anti-PSU football agenda.

I don't really think this is true at all. Just seems like a way for the PSU and Paterno fans to try and deflect from the issue.

 

[Sconch]

Has anybody mentioned that this is all just a witch-hunt aimed at Paterno?

 

[Disco Stu]

In case you haven't noticed, the Pope and the church get all the flack and outrage. The guilty priests are hardly ever mentioned. There's precedence. It's not a witch hunt.

I guess this is a decent analogy with Joe being the Pope, Spanier/Shultz/Curley being the church, and Sandusky being the guilty priest. I would also guess that those most venomously spewing their misguided outrage towards the Pope had an anti-religion agenda, just like those most venomously spewing their misguided outrage towards Joe have an anti-PSU football agenda.

Why do Penn St fans keep saying this? Maybe that makes it easier, but you're also giving yourselves way too much credit. The vast majority don't care about Penn St football one way or the other. Or at least they didn't prior to this.

 

[Sinn Fein]

Has anybody mentioned that this is all just a witch-hunt aimed at Paterno?

It was 28 pages ago, in Colorado, outside a ####'s store in full PSU regalia, while reading Touched, and thinking about the elementary school just 1000 yards from my home.

 

[beer 30]

Nick wait

but wouldn't it be Fat SanduskySanduskySandusky28Colorado22TexasTouched

 

[The Noid]

In case you haven't noticed, the Pope and the church get all the flack and outrage. The guilty priests are hardly ever mentioned. There's precedence. It's not a witch hunt.

I guess this is a decent analogy with Joe being the Pope, Spanier/Shultz/Curley being the church, and Sandusky being the guilty priest. I would also guess that those most venomously spewing their misguided outrage towards the Pope had an anti-religion agenda, just like those most venomously spewing their misguided outrage towards Joe have an anti-PSU football agenda.

Why do Penn St fans keep saying this? Maybe that makes it easier, but you're also giving yourselves way too much credit. The vast majority don't care about Penn St football one way or the other. Or at least they didn't prior to this.

I'm not a college football fan, totally agnostic, but live in the Delaware Valley area, so have always been aware of Joe Paterno and Penn State. I even saw him in the halls of my high school when he was on a recruiting trip and there was a buzz around the school that day. Outside of PSU alum/fans and their football rivals, a large majority of the people outraged by everything and everyone involved are likely in the same boat as me. There's no anti-PSU bias behind it. At all.

 

[Wadsworth]

In case you haven't noticed, the Pope and the church get all the flack and outrage. The guilty priests are hardly ever mentioned. There's precedence. It's not a witch hunt.

I guess this is a decent analogy with Joe being the Pope, Spanier/Shultz/Curley being the church, and Sandusky being the guilty priest. I would also guess that those most venomously spewing their misguided outrage towards the Pope had an anti-religion agenda, just like those most venomously spewing their misguided outrage towards Joe have an anti-PSU football agenda.

Why do Penn St fans keep saying this? Maybe that makes it easier, but you're also giving yourselves way too much credit. The vast majority don't care about Penn St football one way or the other. Or at least they didn't prior to this.

Exactly. I live in Florida and it's all about FSU, UF, UGA, the U, etc. Almost no one here cares about Penn State at all. Penn State football has a rich history but they have only occasionally been relevant for the last 2 decades. Why in the world would I have an anti-Penn State agenda? Hubris much? People are outraged because the behavior by people in positions of power at Penn State was deserving of outrage.

 

[17seconds]

Starting to move toward what non-sports people like Howard Stern and Bill Maher have been saying...

Get rid of everybody who had knowledge and don't play football games until further notice. Hero/celebrity worship and the jock mentality of playing games under "team solidarity" is pretty disgusting right now.

 

[Giant Wooden Badger]

The statement above does not "completely contradict his grand jury testimony".

It also doesn't mean he took any action.Making sure it stopped could simply mean it ended before he left.

 

[belljr]

Wait.... Joe Paterno retired? That was sudden wasn't it?

 

[CrossEyed]

It is my guess that those with the most posts in this thread were also assaulted by Sandusky or their uncle.

Never molested, thank God. But have seen the effects on many people who I've known. And have seen how the men who have done it have mostly been allowed to skate with no repercussions. It amazes me how our society continues to allow this to be the dirty little secret that nobody wants to talk about.Then again, when the Roman Catholic Church sets the example that they have set, I guess I shouldn't be that surprised.

 

[culdeus]

Not sure why McQueary's recent actions are still being discussed. The guy is trying to have it both ways. You don't participate in a cover-up and get benefits from that and then when your involvement comes out reap the benefits of being a whistleblower at the same time. The dude just wants to have a life after this, and I hate to be the one to tell him he won't. I'm sure a PSU booster cuts him a huge check on the side to #### and not come out with a book at a later date.

Best case is he goes and coaches from some middle of nowhere juco and is never heard from again. Worst case someone makes him vanish.

This is ridiculous.

It's happened before here. Just saying.

 

[yellowdog]

/thread

 

[Jobber]

I know that every time this day forward, when I hear someone use the term "horsing around" I'm going to think of PSU.

 

[17seconds]

I know that every time this day forward, when I hear someone use the term "horsing around" I'm going to think of PSU.

I told my 4yo and 2yo to stop horsing around last night and had a Sandsuky thought. I shant use it again.

 

[Tremendous Upside]

http://www.whosay.com/darrenrovell/photos/93450

Unfortunate NCAA12 screencap

 

[culdeus]

man this sportsbybrooks guy needs to maybe think about possibly chilling out

 

[CrossEyed]

By the way, has the Catholic Diocese of Altoona-Johnstown chimed in on their feelings about what has happened at PSU?

 

[The Future Champs]

Not sure why McQueary's recent actions are still being discussed. The guy is trying to have it both ways. You don't participate in a cover-up and get benefits from that and then when your involvement comes out reap the benefits of being a whistleblower at the same time. The dude just wants to have a life after this, and I hate to be the one to tell him he won't. I'm sure a PSU booster cuts him a huge check on the side to #### and not come out with a book at a later date.

Best case is he goes and coaches from some middle of nowhere juco and is never heard from again. Worst case someone makes him vanish.

This is ridiculous.

It's happened before here. Just saying.

Are you going to try to link the Gricar disappearance to this scandal? Others have failed miserably at it, but please give it a shot.

 

[ClownCausedChaos]

man this sportsbybrooks guy needs to maybe think about possibly chilling out

And coming out of this thread, that's saying something.

 

[cstu]

Here's what I'm tired of: PSU supporters now complaining about this being a witch hunt against Joe Paterno (and the school) and not enough focus on Sandusky. These are the same people that want to point out what a pillar Joe Paterno was/is to the PSU community, how his 60 years of service has done yadda yadda yadda for the school, students, etc. so he desrves to be treated better, blah blah, blah.So, for someone so integral (and upstanding) to have this happen on "his watch" it is absolutely justifiable for him to be held accountable and the main lightning rod in the public and media's eyes.You can't have it both ways.

Here's what I'm tired of: People not recognizing that A LOT of this HAS been a witch hunt against Joe Paterno. (i.e. the whole "did he transfer his house to his wife" thing). Search the number of times Paterno's name has been mentioned vs. Sandusky's, and I think you'll see the point. And I was one of those people supporting Paterno, and while I get the firing (which I didn't earlier), I still think he deserved better than a phone call. The line that people have a hard time getting is that someone can be integral and upstanding and influence a university without having hard, defined, written power. It's like the Queen of England vs. the PM. The Queen is much more recognizable, and very well regarded, etc...but the Prime Minister has more real power in day-to-day affairs. Paterno, on paper, was JUST THE HEAD FOOTBALL COACH. Hell, one could even argue that even that was just a title as he hadn't REALLY coached for a while. Nowhere in PSU by-laws is it written that Joe Paterno can do whatever he wants. This isn't a black/white issue. Joe Paterno CAN be revered as a man with a great, moral history, AND a man who made one horrible mistake that undoubtedly tarnished that legacy. I AM a PSU alum, and if you ask me what I think about Paterno, I'd say exactly that...he's a GREAT man who made a HORRIBLE mistake. To try and strip the man of everything plays back into the witch hunt mentality.I think at this point, the PSU community has been kicked around in this thread enough that you're kind of beating a dead horse at this point. I haven't even commented on this aspect of this thread for several days because I think the point has been made.ETA: Ugh. Forget it. I don't even feel like discussing this aspect anymore.

A witch hunt? The facts are that he knew someone he worked closely with was caught raping a boy in the PSU shower and continued worked with the rapist for years, further enabling him to rape more boys. How on earth anyone - even a PSU alum - can still revere Paterno as a 'man with great, moral history' is beyond me.

 

[CrossEyed]

Another reason I hate politics and most politicians:

Local democrats are expressing their moral outrage at Corbett and demanding an investigation. Haven't heard anything from any republicans.

If Rendell were still the governor the roles would be completely reversed.

 

[BroadwayG]

A witch hunt? The facts are they he knew that someone he worked closely with was caught raping a boy in the PSU shower and continued worked with the rapist for years, further enabling him to rape more boys. How on earth anyone - even a PSU alum - can still revere Paterno as a 'man with great, moral history' is beyond me.

We have no facts except someone published a book back in '28 for $1.

 

[B-Deep]

ok

i was gonna stop posting in here but i have a question

and it may have been asked and answered..

what is the title of Sandusky's....

just kidding

seriously though

it seems like there's a position being taken my McQueary now that he did contact police, and the police seem to be saying otherwise

We do not know exactly what he said to the grand jury. Will anyone other than the grand jury itself have access to his exact testimony to see exactly what he told them? Or is that all top secret private. What if he tesifies against sandusky, then would either side have access? What if the DA wants to bring him (mcqueary) up on charges, whould they have access?

just not sure how it works

 

[Tiny Dancer]

it seems like there's a position being taken my McQueary now that he did contact police, and the police seem to be saying otherwiseWe do not know exactly what he said to the grand jury. Will anyone other than the grand jury itself have access to his exact testimony to see exactly what he told them? Or is that all top secret private. What if he tesifies against sandusky, then would either side have access? What if the DA wants to bring him (mcqueary) up on charges, whould they have access?just not sure how it works

Yes, the parties should have access to the transcript of his grand jury testimony. If there's a jury trial the grand jury testimony usually isn't admissible unless McQueary is dead/unavailable or if he testifies to something different and then it can be used to impeach him.

 

[B-Deep]

it seems like there's a position being taken my McQueary now that he did contact police, and the police seem to be saying otherwiseWe do not know exactly what he said to the grand jury. Will anyone other than the grand jury itself have access to his exact testimony to see exactly what he told them? Or is that all top secret private. What if he tesifies against sandusky, then would either side have access? What if the DA wants to bring him (mcqueary) up on charges, whould they have access?just not sure how it works

Yes, the parties should have access to the transcript of his grand jury testimony. If there's a jury trial the grand jury testimony usually isn't admissible unless McQueary is dead/unavailable or if he testifies to something different and then it can be used to impeach him.

interestingthanks