What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Jerry Sandusky accused of child molestation (3 Viewers)

99.9 percent of the employees and students of Penn State University had nothing to do with this. Any lawsuit filed against Penn State will end up punishing them. Is that a just outcome?
So the people who run the athletic department and the university spend years covering up and enabling a child rapist in order to protect their football program and the reputation of the coach and you think it's unjust for the victims to get monetary compensation from the organization they were acting for?
You're talking about a handful of people who enabled this crime. I'm talking about thousands of students, teachers, university employees, all of whom will be adversely affected as a result of these lawsuits. I just don't think that's right.
By your logic, no company/organization should be sued for any negligence/wrongdoing because it would hurt lots of uninvolved people and customers.You're painting yourself into yet another corner, Tim.
I wouldn't make it illegal. I'm sure Penn State will be sued, and I wouldn't blame any of the victims for doing so. But I don't like that even more innocent people are going to be hurt by this affair. To me a university is not the same as a corporation. It exists, not to make a profit, but to educate and enrich its students.
It might exist not to make a profit but they still make a tidy profit. They'll survive and I doubt anyone will be terribly impacted to pay for it.
 
99.9 percent of the employees and students of Penn State University had nothing to do with this. Any lawsuit filed against Penn State will end up punishing them. Is that a just outcome?
So the people who run the athletic department and the university spend years covering up and enabling a child rapist in order to protect their football program and the reputation of the coach and you think it's unjust for the victims to get monetary compensation from the organization they were acting for?
You're talking about a handful of people who enabled this crime. I'm talking about thousands of students, teachers, university employees, all of whom will be adversely affected as a result of these lawsuits. I just don't think that's right.
Your answer boils down to thinking the real victims don't deserve compensation. The individuals involved probably don't have anywhere near the assets to justly compensate the victims, if that's even possible. By the time the cases got thru the courts the individuals assets probably get eaten up in legal fees so the victims would get nothing. They might end up even further in debt due to their own legal fees.
 
Tim also comes off as pretty naive thinking that a University doesn't think and act like a corporation. In many ways they are worse. A college is a business and how could anyone not conclude that money was the primary reason people at Penn State didn't do the right thing. The football program was their cash cow and nobody wanted to upset the gravy train.
I never said they don't think and act like a corporation. Stop putting words in my mouth. I wrote that I don't regard them the same, because ultimately the goals are different.. But whatever. You guys seem eager to punish the university. I think the result of that will be more innocent people hurt over this.
 
Tim, a loss has already happened. It is impossible to put a real number on how much of a loss getting raped as a kid is, but for simplicity say that $10 million would be an appropriate number. If Sandusky and his enablers don't have enough to pay that to all the victims, some innocent parties are going to bear the cost of that loss. I would prefer that the loss be spread across the entire university than to have the abuse victims suffer it all themselves.

 
Tim also comes off as pretty naive thinking that a University doesn't think and act like a corporation. In many ways they are worse. A college is a business and how could anyone not conclude that money was the primary reason people at Penn State didn't do the right thing. The football program was their cash cow and nobody wanted to upset the gravy train.
I never said they don't think and act like a corporation. Stop putting words in my mouth. I wrote that I don't regard them the same, because ultimately the goals are different.. But whatever. You guys seem eager to punish the university. I think the result of that will be more innocent people hurt over this.
It's not about "punishing the university." It's about people who were harmed by the university receiving compensation for the damages they suffered. There's no reason why Penn State should be exempt from tort law just because it's a university.
 
Tim, a loss has already happened. It is impossible to put a real number on how much of a loss getting raped as a kid is, but for simplicity say that $10 million would be an appropriate number. If Sandusky and his enablers don't have enough to pay that to all the victims, some innocent parties are going to bear the cost of that loss. I would prefer that the loss be spread across the entire university than to have the abuse victims suffer it all themselves.
I agree. I just don't like it.
 
Tim also comes off as pretty naive thinking that a University doesn't think and act like a corporation. In many ways they are worse. A college is a business and how could anyone not conclude that money was the primary reason people at Penn State didn't do the right thing. The football program was their cash cow and nobody wanted to upset the gravy train.
I never said they don't think and act like a corporation. Stop putting words in my mouth. I wrote that I don't regard them the same, because ultimately the goals are different.. But whatever. You guys seem eager to punish the university. I think the result of that will be more innocent people hurt over this.
It's not about "punishing the university." It's about people who were harmed by the university receiving compensation for the damages they suffered. There's no reason why Penn State should be exempt from tort law just because it's a university.
I agree that it shouldn't be exempt. Again, the fact that I don't like it doesn't mean that laws should be changed.
 
Tim also comes off as pretty naive thinking that a University doesn't think and act like a corporation. In many ways they are worse. A college is a business and how could anyone not conclude that money was the primary reason people at Penn State didn't do the right thing. The football program was their cash cow and nobody wanted to upset the gravy train.
I never said they don't think and act like a corporation. Stop putting words in my mouth. I wrote that I don't regard them the same, because ultimately the goals are different.. But whatever. You guys seem eager to punish the university. I think the result of that will be more innocent people hurt over this.
It's not about "punishing the university." It's about people who were harmed by the university receiving compensation for the damages they suffered. There's no reason why Penn State should be exempt from tort law just because it's a university.
I agree that it shouldn't be exempt. Again, the fact that I don't like it doesn't mean that laws should be changed.
:lmao:

You're right. Your likes just aren't that important.

 
Tim, a loss has already happened. It is impossible to put a real number on how much of a loss getting raped as a kid is, but for simplicity say that $10 million would be an appropriate number. If Sandusky and his enablers don't have enough to pay that to all the victims, some innocent parties are going to bear the cost of that loss. I would prefer that the loss be spread across the entire university than to have the abuse victims suffer it all themselves.
I agree. I just don't like it.
Thoughts on a death penalty for football and removal of Paterno from Campus. Would that be an acceptable settlement?
 
I don't know how he walks, based on the limited information I have heard.But, I am probably in the minority in thinking is/was criminally insane. I think all child molesters are clearly incapable of either determining right from wrong, or from refraining from acting on those impulses. I believe there is something not connecting in the brain. I don't mean to suggest, at all, that child molesters should be running free, simply because they lack the ability to chose right from wrong - but I don't think most child molesters are inherently "evil" or deserving of the death penalty (from the state or other means). I just think they need treatment more than punishment - because I don't believe punishment is a deterrent here. And, I would be fine if that meant treatment for 20+ years in an institution under lock and key.
I think most of the molesters think they love the child, but I think it is very difficult to treat, maybe almost impossible. And with the consequences of a relapse, I think they need to be locked up for life.
 
Tim, a loss has already happened. It is impossible to put a real number on how much of a loss getting raped as a kid is, but for simplicity say that $10 million would be an appropriate number. If Sandusky and his enablers don't have enough to pay that to all the victims, some innocent parties are going to bear the cost of that loss. I would prefer that the loss be spread across the entire university than to have the abuse victims suffer it all themselves.
I agree. I just don't like it.
Thoughts on a death penalty for football and removal of Paterno from Campus. Would that be an acceptable settlement?
But that would hurt the cheerleaders, food vendors, and ticket-takers.
 
Tim, a loss has already happened. It is impossible to put a real number on how much of a loss getting raped as a kid is, but for simplicity say that $10 million would be an appropriate number. If Sandusky and his enablers don't have enough to pay that to all the victims, some innocent parties are going to bear the cost of that loss. I would prefer that the loss be spread across the entire university than to have the abuse victims suffer it all themselves.
I agree. I just don't like it.
Thoughts on a death penalty for football and removal of Paterno from Campus. Would that be an acceptable settlement?
But that would hurt the cheerleaders, food vendors, and ticket-takers.
The real victims in all of this.
 
Anyone expecting prison justice for Jerry Sandusky is going to be disappointed. Protection is always for sale in the can and Sando has plenty of jack. Plus, he's minimum security/PC all the way. With or without a conviction, he'll die of natural causes.
What's your basis for that? And all it took, iirc, was a little "mistake" for Dahmer to end up where others could get to him. Got plunged to death with a broomstick.
My understanding is minimum security prisons only take blue collar criminals. Sex offenders get their own area of "pound you in the a** prison."His money may buy him the "top" position.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Tim, a loss has already happened. It is impossible to put a real number on how much of a loss getting raped as a kid is, but for simplicity say that $10 million would be an appropriate number. If Sandusky and his enablers don't have enough to pay that to all the victims, some innocent parties are going to bear the cost of that loss. I would prefer that the loss be spread across the entire university than to have the abuse victims suffer it all themselves.
I agree. I just don't like it.
Thoughts on a death penalty for football and removal of Paterno from Campus. Would that be an acceptable settlement?
I don't know.
 
Tim, a loss has already happened. It is impossible to put a real number on how much of a loss getting raped as a kid is, but for simplicity say that $10 million would be an appropriate number. If Sandusky and his enablers don't have enough to pay that to all the victims, some innocent parties are going to bear the cost of that loss. I would prefer that the loss be spread across the entire university than to have the abuse victims suffer it all themselves.
I agree. I just don't like it.
Thoughts on a death penalty for football and removal of Paterno from Campus. Would that be an acceptable settlement?
I don't know.
Not sure how that would be an acceptable settlement for the victims.
 
99.9 percent of the employees and students of Penn State University had nothing to do with this. Any lawsuit filed against Penn State will end up punishing them. Is that a just outcome?
Do you feel equally as bad about the employees and kids of the 2nd mile?
I would feel the same way about any innocent person who is hurt somehow in this affair. Punish Sandusky and his enablers. Sue them for every cent they have, including Paterno's estate, if he was at all legally culpable. But by suing the university you are taking money away from people who had nothing to with this. They will be forced, likely, to cut or reduce worthy programs, fire teachers and other employees, and raise tuitions. That seems very unfair to me.
:lmao: 99 POINT 9????? Hmm.... I might quibble with THAT high of a percentage. But lets face facts, this university and all major universities operate as great shams. They charge their students hundreds of thousands (out of state :thumbup: ) for a degree, shake down alumni and corporate donors and sit on huge endowments. Penn State's when I last checked, over 1.5 billion. I'm not remotely worried about the financial impact whatsoever. Double the price of Peachy Paterno at the Creamery if you need funds.I do agree with you though Tim, that the money is a bit hollow and you can't really get that life and legacy back and I'm seriously wondering what you would think of this. How about the death penalty for football for 2 years and the removal of any mentions of Paterno and his statue on campus?I know its incredibly harsh, but more than money, THAT would be a significant message to those affected that the University community would REALLY understand the magnitude and gravity of what they REALLY love and value and thats not money, but its the football program. The same program that was too big to fail so a systemic turning of heads occurred so that the machine would operate at all costs. Money will come and go and all the dollars in the world can't wipe the memory of Sandusky from your mind. But an acknowledgement in a very real way the system that probably contributed to your unintended seduction, the system that led to it being covered, to know that system IS NOT truly bigger than you or more important than YOUR soul, as a victim, well, maybe that would be a proper penalty.
People also aren't considering how much revenue those that covered up the scandal were protecting. Innocent faculty will be hurt by a lawsuit against the University, but they also benefited from those that covered it up. That's the breaks.
 
Tim, a loss has already happened. It is impossible to put a real number on how much of a loss getting raped as a kid is, but for simplicity say that $10 million would be an appropriate number. If Sandusky and his enablers don't have enough to pay that to all the victims, some innocent parties are going to bear the cost of that loss. I would prefer that the loss be spread across the entire university than to have the abuse victims suffer it all themselves.
I agree. I just don't like it.
Thoughts on a death penalty for football and removal of Paterno from Campus. Would that be an acceptable settlement?
I don't know.
Not sure how that would be an acceptable settlement for the victims.
I hear you, but how is money necessarily any better, when you REALLY get down to it? This entire scenario is admittedly unlikely, as lawyers who will advocate for the victims are interested in percentage of a settlement and there is nothing to be gained for them in this scenario. However, in essence, you are a retroactive prostitute in the financial scenario. I think the school would gladly give over hundreds of millions before doing a thing to the football program, the magnitude of which was reason we ended up in this situation in the first place. However, if you want to talk about a community acknowledging your pain in a meaningful way, THIS would be it.
 
I hear you, but how is money necessarily any better, when you REALLY get down to it? This entire scenario is admittedly unlikely, as lawyers who will advocate for the victims are interested in percentage of a settlement and there is nothing to be gained for them in this scenario. However, in essence, you are a retroactive prostitute in the financial scenario.
WTF?
 
Tim, a loss has already happened. It is impossible to put a real number on how much of a loss getting raped as a kid is, but for simplicity say that $10 million would be an appropriate number. If Sandusky and his enablers don't have enough to pay that to all the victims, some innocent parties are going to bear the cost of that loss. I would prefer that the loss be spread across the entire university than to have the abuse victims suffer it all themselves.
I agree. I just don't like it.
Thoughts on a death penalty for football and removal of Paterno from Campus. Would that be an acceptable settlement?
But that would hurt the cheerleaders, food vendors, and ticket-takers.
Give the victims a percentage of the revenue the football program generates for life.
 
Tim, a loss has already happened. It is impossible to put a real number on how much of a loss getting raped as a kid is, but for simplicity say that $10 million would be an appropriate number. If Sandusky and his enablers don't have enough to pay that to all the victims, some innocent parties are going to bear the cost of that loss. I would prefer that the loss be spread across the entire university than to have the abuse victims suffer it all themselves.
I agree. I just don't like it.
Thoughts on a death penalty for football and removal of Paterno from Campus. Would that be an acceptable settlement?
I don't know.
Well, please Google it and report back to us.
 
I hear you, but how is money necessarily any better, when you REALLY get down to it? This entire scenario is admittedly unlikely, as lawyers who will advocate for the victims are interested in percentage of a settlement and there is nothing to be gained for them in this scenario. However, in essence, you are a retroactive prostitute in the financial scenario.
WTF?
I don't begrudge the victims at all, I fully support them getting a significant punitive settlement but at the end of the day, you got paid to be raped by this man. I have no firsthand knowledge, thank god, but to me, its not like money undoes that. Nothing does, I would imagine, apart from love and support of those around you. The community around you has already done much too much sweep up and damage control. I can't think of a more significant means of doing so than to strike a real blow to the culture that causes this.But considering they wouldn't even skip a bowl last year, I'm not holding my breath. if my comments are harsh about the victims, I do apologize, its just that putting myself in their shoes, I would want more than money for my trouble.
 
Judge John Cleland ordered a pre-sentencing report, which will take anywhere from one to two months to complete. During that time, Sandusky will be examined by the state Sexual Offenders Assessment Board to decide if he should be treated as a sexually violent predator, and prosecutors could ask the judge for a hearing. The judge determines whether someone is a sexually violent predator — it carries stiffer reporting and treatment requirements once someone is out of prison — and can use information from the board's investigation in a sentencing decision.

If he's sentenced to state prison — which appears to be certain in this case — then Sandusky will be transferred to Camp Hill, in south-central Pennsylvania, which has 3,000 to 4,000 inmates, about 1,000 of whom are held temporarily for classification. New inmates are put through a battery of medical, dental, psychiatric, psychological, vocational and educational testing, according to Department of Corrections spokeswoman Sue Bensinger, who spoke generally about a male inmate convicted in Centre County and not of Sandusky's case in particular. He would then be placed in a state prison based on his treatment plan and the available beds. Sex offenders must undergo mandatory treatment programs, she said. A judge can request placement near an inmate's home, but the department cannot necessarily honor those requests, she said.
link
 
"I looked at him during the reading of the verdict, and the look on his face, no real emotion, just kind of accepting, you know, because he knew it was true," juror Joshua Harper told the NBC Today Show.

The 12-member jury in Bellefonte, Pennsylvania, deliberated over 21 hours and found the 68-year-old former football coach guilty of sexually abusing 10 boys over 15 years, sometimes at Penn State University facilities.
link
 
The jury did its job nicely. If they rushed through this and only deliberated for a couple of hours, I would have some reservations about the process. Congrats to the jury for doing their own due diligence.

And, are we going to see any jury members on talk shows now similar to the Anthony jury members?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Tim also comes off as pretty naive thinking that a University doesn't think and act like a corporation. In many ways they are worse. A college is a business and how could anyone not conclude that money was the primary reason people at Penn State didn't do the right thing. The football program was their cash cow and nobody wanted to upset the gravy train.
I never said they don't think and act like a corporation. Stop putting words in my mouth. I wrote that I don't regard them the same, because ultimately the goals are different.. But whatever. You guys seem eager to punish the university. I think the result of that will be more innocent people hurt over this.
I don't know that I have an opinion on whether suits on the University are right are not but you aren't punishing some entity if the University is sued. The taxpayers of PA will foot the bill. Maybe justifiably so as to push them to see that the state university is run in a more appropriate way. I don't really know. For those thinking death penalty or any moratorium on football, dream on. There's too much money in Penn State football and it won't happen.
 
Tim also comes off as pretty naive thinking that a University doesn't think and act like a corporation. In many ways they are worse. A college is a business and how could anyone not conclude that money was the primary reason people at Penn State didn't do the right thing. The football program was their cash cow and nobody wanted to upset the gravy train.
I never said they don't think and act like a corporation. Stop putting words in my mouth. I wrote that I don't regard them the same, because ultimately the goals are different.. But whatever. You guys seem eager to punish the university. I think the result of that will be more innocent people hurt over this.
It's not about "punishing the university." It's about people who were harmed by the university receiving compensation for the damages they suffered. There's no reason why Penn State should be exempt from tort law just because it's a university.
Has the tort question been answered? Penn State is a State University and there is (at least was) a debate if they would have traditional State immunity.
 
Tim also comes off as pretty naive thinking that a University doesn't think and act like a corporation. In many ways they are worse. A college is a business and how could anyone not conclude that money was the primary reason people at Penn State didn't do the right thing. The football program was their cash cow and nobody wanted to upset the gravy train.
I never said they don't think and act like a corporation. Stop putting words in my mouth. I wrote that I don't regard them the same, because ultimately the goals are different.. But whatever. You guys seem eager to punish the university. I think the result of that will be more innocent people hurt over this.
It's not about "punishing the university." It's about people who were harmed by the university receiving compensation for the damages they suffered. There's no reason why Penn State should be exempt from tort law just because it's a university.
Has the tort question been answered? Penn State is a State University and there is (at least was) a debate if they would have traditional State immunity.
Penn State is a "state-related" university, part of Pennsylvania's Commonwealth System of Higher Education. As such, although it receives funding from the Commonwealth and is connected to the state through its board of trustees, it is otherwise independent and not subject to the state's direct control
.
 
Tim, a loss has already happened. It is impossible to put a real number on how much of a loss getting raped as a kid is, but for simplicity say that $10 million would be an appropriate number. If Sandusky and his enablers don't have enough to pay that to all the victims, some innocent parties are going to bear the cost of that loss. I would prefer that the loss be spread across the entire university than to have the abuse victims suffer it all themselves.
I agree. I just don't like it.
Thoughts on a death penalty for football and removal of Paterno from Campus. Would that be an acceptable settlement?
I don't know.
Not sure how that would be an acceptable settlement for the victims.
I hear you, but how is money necessarily any better, when you REALLY get down to it? This entire scenario is admittedly unlikely, as lawyers who will advocate for the victims are interested in percentage of a settlement and there is nothing to be gained for them in this scenario. However, in essence, you are a retroactive prostitute in the financial scenario. I think the school would gladly give over hundreds of millions before doing a thing to the football program, the magnitude of which was reason we ended up in this situation in the first place. However, if you want to talk about a community acknowledging your pain in a meaningful way, THIS would be it.
I have always been told that money can't buy you happiness but that doesn't change the fact that I would like the opportunity to determine that for myself.
 
Tim, a loss has already happened. It is impossible to put a real number on how much of a loss getting raped as a kid is, but for simplicity say that $10 million would be an appropriate number. If Sandusky and his enablers don't have enough to pay that to all the victims, some innocent parties are going to bear the cost of that loss. I would prefer that the loss be spread across the entire university than to have the abuse victims suffer it all themselves.
I agree. I just don't like it.
Thoughts on a death penalty for football and removal of Paterno from Campus. Would that be an acceptable settlement?
I don't know.
Not sure how that would be an acceptable settlement for the victims.
I hear you, but how is money necessarily any better, when you REALLY get down to it? This entire scenario is admittedly unlikely, as lawyers who will advocate for the victims are interested in percentage of a settlement and there is nothing to be gained for them in this scenario. However, in essence, you are a retroactive prostitute in the financial scenario. I think the school would gladly give over hundreds of millions before doing a thing to the football program, the magnitude of which was reason we ended up in this situation in the first place. However, if you want to talk about a community acknowledging your pain in a meaningful way, THIS would be it.
I have always been told that money can't buy you happiness but that doesn't change the fact that I would like the opportunity to determine that for myself.
Money won't fix things but it can buy a lot of therapy and compensate these troubled young adults who may have not gone on to do the things they wanted to due to the trauma Sandusky caused. Money is the best way they can get the care they need. I suppose Penn State could or should employ the victims, give them free education, pay for therapy and lifetime healthcare coverage.
 
Legal and financial issues facing Penn State.

Answers the Nittany Lions hopeful long for are more likely to come from a report that former FBI Director Louis Freeh’s investigators — hired by Penn State — are set to release in late summer or fall.

Several people interviewed by the investigators have told The Patriot-News the questions seemed centered on the workings of the athletic department and former head football coach Joe Paterno. They’ve interviewed people going as far back as Bryce Jordan, the 87-year-old Texas resident who was university president from 1983 to 1990. And they have recovered emails once thought to be lost during technology upgrades that are said to show conversations between administrators. The attorney general’s office in court filings said the emails show that former President Graham Spanier was involved in the decision not to tell police about an allegation made against Sandusky in 2001.
But there is no indication that the board was ever told McQueary’s story back then. There is an indication, however, that the feds want to know how much they knew. A subpoena from the Department of Justice requested records of any payments by board members to the university or to third parties on the university’s behalf.
In four months — November, December, January and February — Penn State dipped into its own resources to pay more than $7.5 million in legal fees, crisis communications and other expenses related to the Sandusky scandal.
And then there are the lawsuits. Already there are five. And Penn State’s insurance carrier is suing to limit its coverage. Penn State is suing back, but if any top administration officials are found guilty of knowing about the allegations, the insurance company probably won’t have to pay for claims that were made after 2001.
Penn State has spent more than $5 million trying to get back control of the story since the scandal broke, but many times university officials seem to say the wrong thing. What the university failed to learn early on is that it was never in control of the story in the first place. When it became clear the scandal wouldn’t disappear in a 24-hour news cycle, the university tried three public relations firms to help but never really got it right.
Gov. Tom Corbett has given the university an ultimatum: Open your records or abandon state funding.
In 2010, Penn State had an endowment of $1.52 billion, and this year it has a budget of about $4 billion. That’s a lot of money. But because of the university’s current exemption from state open-records laws, it’s impossible to follow money trails and distinguish how much is needed for everyday operations versus how much cash is tucked away for a rainy day.
 
Victim 4, however, who is now 28, testified at trial that there was one time Matt Sandusky was present when Jerry Sandusky began a soap fight, something that often led to abuse. Matt left the shower when it started and had a nervous look on his face, Victim 4 testified.

Now 33, Matt would have been 17 or 18 at the time, said Victim 4's civil attorney, Ben Andreozzi. "(Victim 4) felt like when he was testifying, he exchanged a glance with Matt and just got that sixth-sense like feeling," Andreozzi said. "I believe that (Victim 4's) testimony is what put Matt over the edge, and he made a personal decision that he had to be honest and up front when he saw Victim 4’s moving testimony."
Matt was sequestered with Dottie Sandusky -- who did take the stand for the defense -- but broke that sequestration to listen to the first prosecution witness, Victim 4. After that, Matt never returned to the courtroom, and 10 days after that testimony, his attorney released a statement saying he had spoken to investigators and told them he also was victimized.
link
 
Jail Inmates Serenaded Sandusky With "Hey, Teacher, Leave Those Kids Alone"

Convicted child molester Jerry Sandusky had a surprise waiting for him when he was sent to jail the first time, reports Andrew Strickler of The Daily. As soon as the lights went out at night, Sandusky's fellow inmates at the Centre County Correctional Facility serenaded him with a chorus from Pink Floyd's "The Wall":

"Hey, teacher, leave those kids alone!"

Similar humiliations are expected to continue now that Sandusky is back in jail having been convicted of the crimes. Jerry Sandusky is currently on suicide watch. He'll be sentenced in 90 days.
http://www.businessinsider.com/jail-inmates-serenaded-sandusky-with-hey-teacher-leave-those-kids-alone-2012-6
 
Jail Inmates Serenaded Sandusky With "Hey, Teacher, Leave Those Kids Alone"

Convicted child molester Jerry Sandusky had a surprise waiting for him when he was sent to jail the first time, reports Andrew Strickler of The Daily. As soon as the lights went out at night, Sandusky's fellow inmates at the Centre County Correctional Facility serenaded him with a chorus from Pink Floyd's "The Wall":

"Hey, teacher, leave those kids alone!"

Similar humiliations are expected to continue now that Sandusky is back in jail having been convicted of the crimes. Jerry Sandusky is currently on suicide watch. He'll be sentenced in 90 days.
http://www.businessinsider.com/jail-inmates-serenaded-sandusky-with-hey-teacher-leave-those-kids-alone-2012-6
It's amazing the guy has not committed suicide already.
 
Jail Inmates Serenaded Sandusky With "Hey, Teacher, Leave Those Kids Alone"

Convicted child molester Jerry Sandusky had a surprise waiting for him when he was sent to jail the first time, reports Andrew Strickler of The Daily. As soon as the lights went out at night, Sandusky's fellow inmates at the Centre County Correctional Facility serenaded him with a chorus from Pink Floyd's "The Wall":

"Hey, teacher, leave those kids alone!"

Similar humiliations are expected to continue now that Sandusky is back in jail having been convicted of the crimes. Jerry Sandusky is currently on suicide watch. He'll be sentenced in 90 days.
http://www.businessinsider.com/jail-inmates-serenaded-sandusky-with-hey-teacher-leave-those-kids-alone-2012-6
Awesome inmate schtick
 
Jail Inmates Serenaded Sandusky With "Hey, Teacher, Leave Those Kids Alone"Convicted child molester Jerry Sandusky had a surprise waiting for him when he was sent to jail the first time, reports Andrew Strickler of The Daily. As soon as the lights went out at night, Sandusky's fellow inmates at the Centre County Correctional Facility serenaded him with a chorus from Pink Floyd's "The Wall":"Hey, teacher, leave those kids alone!"Similar humiliations are expected to continue now that Sandusky is back in jail having been convicted of the crimes.
Awesome.I wonder what they'll sing now that he's back in the same jail.
 
Jail Inmates Serenaded Sandusky With "Hey, Teacher, Leave Those Kids Alone"Convicted child molester Jerry Sandusky had a surprise waiting for him when he was sent to jail the first time, reports Andrew Strickler of The Daily. As soon as the lights went out at night, Sandusky's fellow inmates at the Centre County Correctional Facility serenaded him with a chorus from Pink Floyd's "The Wall":"Hey, teacher, leave those kids alone!"Similar humiliations are expected to continue now that Sandusky is back in jail having been convicted of the crimes.
Awesome.I wonder what they'll sing now that he's back in the same jail.
Theme from Welcome Back Kotter? :shrug:
 
I have not followed this case as closely as I am sure many others in this thread have over the previous months, but all it took for me to be convinced he is guilty was listening to the Bob Costas interview...I have since followed here and there reading a few article updates about the case and victims and such.

This guy deserves everything coming his way. Prison is no place for a coward.

 
Jail Inmates Serenaded Sandusky With "Hey, Teacher, Leave Those Kids Alone"

Convicted child molester Jerry Sandusky had a surprise waiting for him when he was sent to jail the first time, reports Andrew Strickler of The Daily. As soon as the lights went out at night, Sandusky's fellow inmates at the Centre County Correctional Facility serenaded him with a chorus from Pink Floyd's "The Wall":

"Hey, teacher, leave those kids alone!"

Similar humiliations are expected to continue now that Sandusky is back in jail having been convicted of the crimes. Jerry Sandusky is currently on suicide watch. He'll be sentenced in 90 days.
http://www.businessinsider.com/jail-inmates-serenaded-sandusky-with-hey-teacher-leave-those-kids-alone-2012-6
Did he shout back, "If you don't eat your meat, you can't have any pudding" ?
 
Jerry Sandusky wants out of isolation in jail, attorney says

Also:

Rominger also said there is a 25-minute taped interview between Sandusky's adopted son, Matt, and police that Rominger and Amendola heard before making the decision not to have Sandusky testify at trial. Matt announced through his attorneys last week for the first time that he was abused by Sandusky. Rominger wouldn't get into the details of the tape, but said that Matt supported the testimony of Victim 4 -- the 28-year-old who was first to take the stand -- and also alleged his own abuse.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top