Jonas Gray (RB - New England) (2 Viewers)

[rickyg]

He's not only worth a preemptive pickup but he might be worth starting this weekend. Either as a flex play with vereen as your rb2 or in favor of vereen. Vereen is sick and likely will play, but he might not be as effective. And belicheck wants to establish the ground game again this week vs Chicago. Gray is going to get every opportunity to seize the ridley role.

I can just see an 80 yard 2 td performance from gray this weekend.

If you're hurting at rb like I am and it's BW gray and the mason flip a coin

 

[SameSongNDance]

ESPN Boston's Mike Reiss confirms Jonas Gray now projects as the Patriots top "big back."

Gray is ahead of both Brandon Bolden and James White. The 2012 UDFA out of Notre Dame was expected to have a bigger role than the three carries he got in Week 7, but the Patriots got absolutely dominated in time of possession and didn't want to challenge the Jets' elite run defense. In different game-flow situations, Gray could have a real role. He's worth adding in deeper formats.

I was surprised that he went untouched in all of my ffpc leagues where the benches go 10 deep. Seems like there could be some value this year although it will obviously ebb and flow according to game flow much like Ridley's. Still seems odd that Bolden was rostered everywhere with this guy just chillin on the WW.

People probably shied away from Gray since Bolden has the name recognition. Belichick has his gamesmanship, but once he finds his guy like Ridley, he has stuck with him as long as he doesn't put the ball on the ground. Who knows if that will be any of the guys, but Gray is worth a pre-emptive pickup IMO.

The thing is, following that Thursday night game vs. the Jets, I think we were all made aware of who was filling Ridley's role.Gray saw 11 offensive snaps to Bolden's 1. Gray saw 6 ST snaps to Bolden's 21. This was with Gray called up on a short week from the PS. White is a Vereen copy, Bolden is the ST guy and Gray is the new hammer. [SIZE=13.63636302948px]I didn't place a bid on him because I just assumed he'd be grabbed everywhere (and I have essentially 0 FAAB left) but he passed through the waiver process untouched. Like I said though, I don't think there's any crazy value here. I actually drafted Vereen and Ridley in one league and understad how unpredictable the dynamic is. Still, for as shallow as the RB pool is this year, he seems like a good grab as anyone. A 20/100/1 game isn't outside the realm of possibility much like it wasn't for Ridley on two occasions. [/SIZE]

 

[Dr. Octopus]

He's not only worth a preemptive pickup but he might be worth starting this weekend. Either as a flex play with vereen as your rb2 or in favor of vereen. Vereen is sick and likely will play, but he might not be as effective. And belicheck wants to establish the ground game again this week vs Chicago. Gray is going to get every opportunity to seize the ridley role.

I can just see an 80 yard 2 td performance from gray this weekend.

If you're hurting at rb like I am and it's BW gray and the mason flip a coin

We have no idea how sick Vereen was/is. He cold have had a stomach ache or something on Friday and just sat out of practice.

 

[SoBeDad]

ESPN Boston's Mike Reiss confirms Jonas Gray now projects as the Patriots top "big back."

Gray is ahead of both Brandon Bolden and James White. The 2012 UDFA out of Notre Dame was expected to have a bigger role than the three carries he got in Week 7, but the Patriots got absolutely dominated in time of possession and didn't want to challenge the Jets' elite run defense. In different game-flow situations, Gray could have a real role. He's worth adding in deeper formats.

I was surprised that he went untouched in all of my ffpc leagues where the benches go 10 deep. Seems like there could be some value this year although it will obviously ebb and flow according to game flow much like Ridley's. Still seems odd that Bolden was rostered everywhere with this guy just chillin on the WW.

People probably shied away from Gray since Bolden has the name recognition. Belichick has his gamesmanship, but once he finds his guy like Ridley, he has stuck with him as long as he doesn't put the ball on the ground. Who knows if that will be any of the guys, but Gray is worth a pre-emptive pickup IMO.

The thing is, following that Thursday night game vs. the Jets, I think we were all made aware of who was filling Ridley's role.Gray saw 11 offensive snaps to Bolden's 1. Gray saw 6 ST snaps to Bolden's 21. This was with Gray called up on a short week from the PS. White is a Vereen copy, Bolden is the ST guy and Gray is the new hammer. [SIZE=13.63636302948px]I didn't place a bid on him because I just assumed he'd be grabbed everywhere (and I have essentially 0 FAAB left) but he passed through the waiver process untouched. Like I said though, I don't think there's any crazy value here. I actually drafted Vereen and Ridley in one league and understad how unpredictable the dynamic is. Still, for as shallow as the RB pool is this year, he seems like a good grab as anyone. A 20/100/1 game isn't outside the realm of possibility much like it wasn't for Ridley on two occasions. [/SIZE]

Have you done a video analysis of Gray in college. On this run vs Pitt in 2011, he juked, broke a tackle and outran the secondary. But his NFL grade wasn't that high.

 

[ROYALWITCHEESE]

Gray is not special. IMO he's not close to Bolden in talent, and is well behind Ridley. The beat writers can speculate that he is the guy, but that means little until the actual game. When the bullets start flying, I'm betting he face plants. Then Bolden is in. I'm holding Bolden with Vereen. Bolden is the guy who has actually shown lead back ability in college, and, when given carries, in the NFL.

 

[SameSongNDance]

Gray is not special. IMO he's not close to Bolden in talent, and is well behind Ridley. The beat writers can speculate that he is the guy, but that means little until the actual game. When the bullets start flying, I'm betting he face plants. Then Bolden is in. I'm holding Bolden with Vereen. Bolden is the guy who has actually shown lead back ability in college, and, when given carries, in the NFL.

No one is saying Gray is special; I don't think I've seen that stated once anywhere. I wouldn't say he's "not close" to Bolden in talent though, since I don't consider Bolden supremely talented either so if he "wasn't close" I'd wonder how he even had a job. According to this, he (Gray) compares most favorably to BJGE..a very interesting comparison. As NE has proven by leaning on BJGE in 2010 and partially in 2011, they don't care if the back is "special' or not. All they want when looking at the BGJE/Ridley types is a dude who can hold onto the ball, pound it in between the tackles and be effective at the GL. Judging by how quickly they signed him up from the PS and slotted him into the complementary role on a short week, NE believes Gray is their BGJE/Ridley, at least for the time being. I wouldn't count on Bolden, although I guess anything is possible with BB.

 

[ROYALWITCHEESE]

Gray is not special. IMO he's not close to Bolden in talent, and is well behind Ridley. The beat writers can speculate that he is the guy, but that means little until the actual game. When the bullets start flying, I'm betting he face plants. Then Bolden is in. I'm holding Bolden with Vereen. Bolden is the guy who has actually shown lead back ability in college, and, when given carries, in the NFL.

No one is saying Gray is special; I don't think I've seen that stated once anywhere. I wouldn't say he's "not close" to Bolden in talent though, since I don't consider Bolden supremely talented either so if he "wasn't close" I'd wonder how he even had a job. According to this, he (Gray) compares most favorably to BJGE..a very interesting comparison. As NE has proven by leaning on BJGE in 2010 and partially in 2011, they don't care if the back is "special' or not. All they want when looking at the BGJE/Ridley types is a dude who can hold onto the ball, pound it in between the tackles and be effective at the GL. Judging by how quickly they signed him up from the PS and slotted him into the complementary role on a short week, NE believes Gray is their BGJE/Ridley, at least for the time being. I wouldn't count on Bolden, although I guess anything is possible with BB.

Let me clarify. When I say "he isn't special", I mean he is not running away with this job. Ridley was barely usable as a RB3/4 prior to the injury. He's nowhere close to Ridley IMO, so expecting him to be a serviceable fantasy RB is a long shot. A good stash in case he's a 1 in 1000 hit, but I like Bolden more as the games become more intense late in the season.

 

[Dinsy Ejotuz]

He might not be as good as Ridley (though he was KILLING it as a senior at Notre Dame before he got hurt), but he's almost certainly better than BJGE was.

 

[BeTheMatch]

 

[RenegadeRoy]

Gray is not special. IMO he's not close to Bolden in talent, and is well behind Ridley. The beat writers can speculate that he is the guy, but that means little until the actual game. When the bullets start flying, I'm betting he face plants. Then Bolden is in. I'm holding Bolden with Vereen. Bolden is the guy who has actually shown lead back ability in college, and, when given carries, in the NFL.

No one is saying Gray is special; I don't think I've seen that stated once anywhere. I wouldn't say he's "not close" to Bolden in talent though, since I don't consider Bolden supremely talented either so if he "wasn't close" I'd wonder how he even had a job. According to this, he (Gray) compares most favorably to BJGE..a very interesting comparison. As NE has proven by leaning on BJGE in 2010 and partially in 2011, they don't care if the back is "special' or not. All they want when looking at the BGJE/Ridley types is a dude who can hold onto the ball, pound it in between the tackles and be effective at the GL. Judging by how quickly they signed him up from the PS and slotted him into the complementary role on a short week, NE believes Gray is their BGJE/Ridley, at least for the time being. I wouldn't count on Bolden, although I guess anything is possible with BB.

Let me clarify. When I say "he isn't special", I mean he is not running away with this job. Ridley was barely usable as a RB3/4 prior to the injury. He's nowhere close to Ridley IMO, so expecting him to be a serviceable fantasy RB is a long shot. A good stash in case he's a 1 in 1000 hit, but I like Bolden more as the games become more intense late in the season.

Bolden is a special teams guy... and it's pretty evident even with the minimal run game against the Jets.

 

[BustedKnuckles]

If he`s NOT a fumbler he should be ok

 

[Banger]

Also the Pats defense has taken some big injuries lately and regardless of talent they'll likely want to run to keep th clock rolling and their d off the field. Who's the most likely to do that? I'd say Gray.

 

[Baloney Sandwich]

I'm starting him but am being realistic about his performance, thinking around 14-132-3

 

[meatwad1]

This guy is going nowhere. Vereen is the man in this situation now.

 

[kencav]

This guy is going nowhere. Vereen is the man in this situation now.

And you are basing this on what meathead, oh I am sorry meatwad?

Vereens consistent scoring this year.....his stellar durability?

Come back with some facts next time.

 

[zftcg]

It is kind of funny that we all keep going gaga over these Patriot UDFAs who not only fail to impress, but who crash and burn spectacularly. It's like we have this unwarranted faith in BB's acumen for spotting talent.

And BTW, I hardly exempt myself from that. Last year I drafted Thompkins and "Studfeld", even starting the latter in Week 1 over Jordan Cameron. This year I drafted White. And I just took a WW flier on Gray.

 

[rickyg]

The beauty of all this is that we will have our answer tomorrow. We will know whether or not Jonas gray is going to be fantasy relevant this year or not. No need to keep yapping back and forth on the matter since none of us have a crystal ball.

 

[Bayhawks]

This guy is going nowhere. Vereen is the man in this situation now.

And you are basing this on what meathead, oh I am sorry meatwad?

Vereens consistent scoring this year.....his stellar durability?

Come back with some facts next time.

"Facts!?" Someone should come back with facts supporting the idea that Vereen is "the man" @RB in NE, when this entire thread ia about an UDFA who was called from the practice squad, got like 3 carries, and is now playing on the scout team offense? When the "facts" behind the argument is that posters think they know what BB is going to do?Right now, there aren't many "facts" involved, but what facts there are point to Vereen being "the man" way more than they do Gray. Come back with less condescension next time.

 

[devouredbychaos]

This guy is going nowhere. Vereen is the man in this situation now.

Only time will tell. We should know more after today's game obviously. I personally think Gray will get between 10-12 carries.

 

[kencav]

This guy is going nowhere. Vereen is the man in this situation now.

And you are basing this on what meathead, oh I am sorry meatwad?Vereens consistent scoring this year.....his stellar durability?

Come back with some facts next time.

"Facts!?" Someone should come back with facts supporting the idea that Vereen is "the man" @RB in NE, when this entire thread ia about an UDFA who was called from the practice squad, got like 3 carries, and is now playing on the scout team offense? When the "facts" behind the argument is that posters think they know what BB is going to do?Right now, there aren't many "facts" involved, but what facts there are point to Vereen being "the man" way more than they do Gray. Come back with less condescension next time.

This guy is going nowhere. Vereen is the man in this situation now.

And you are basing this on what meathead, oh I am sorry meatwad?Vereens consistent scoring this year.....his stellar durability?

Come back with some facts next time.

"Facts!?" Someone should come back with facts supporting the idea that Vereen is "the man" @RB in NE, when this entire thread ia about an UDFA who was called from the practice squad, got like 3 carries, and is now playing on the scout team offense? When the "facts" behind the argument is that posters think they know what BB is going to do?Right now, there aren't many "facts" involved, but what facts there are point to Vereen being "the man" way more than they do Gray. Come back with less condescension next time.

17,4,7,11,13,1,29.....Those are Vereens point totals first 7 games in my PPR league....pretty inconsistent and until last week unimpressiveShould I start quoting games missed and Blounts usage late last season....

The point is that the "facts" about Gray are insignificant right now......we know the usage history of Bolden and Vereen.....apparently White is not in the mix right now.

Gray is second on the depth chart and that can easily mean Joique Bell to Bush.....it is not Joseph Randle to Demarco Murray.

So the burden of proof is on the Verren owners with a rb with a usage and injury history to prove he is now a feature back/"man".

Hey if he's not I would be upset

as well having spent a late 3rd on him.

 

[need2know]

Vereen's active. Gray still not startable

 

[andyk803]

Starting with confidence

 

[Bayhawks]

This guy is going nowhere. Vereen is the man in this situation now.

And you are basing this on what meathead, oh I am sorry meatwad?Vereens consistent scoring this year.....his stellar durability?

Come back with some facts next time.

"Facts!?" Someone should come back with facts supporting the idea that Vereen is "the man" @RB in NE, when this entire thread ia about an UDFA who was called from the practice squad, got like 3 carries, and is now playing on the scout team offense? When the "facts" behind the argument is that posters think they know what BB is going to do?Right now, there aren't many "facts" involved, but what facts there are point to Vereen being "the man" way more than they do Gray. Come back with less condescension next time.

This guy is going nowhere. Vereen is the man in this situation now.

And you are basing this on what meathead, oh I am sorry meatwad?Vereens consistent scoring this year.....his stellar durability?

Come back with some facts next time.

"Facts!?" Someone should come back with facts supporting the idea that Vereen is "the man" @RB in NE, when this entire thread ia about an UDFA who was called from the practice squad, got like 3 carries, and is now playing on the scout team offense? When the "facts" behind the argument is that posters think they know what BB is going to do?Right now, there aren't many "facts" involved, but what facts there are point to Vereen being "the man" way more than they do Gray. Come back with less condescension next time.

17,4,7,11,13,1,29.....Those are Vereens point totals first 7 games in my PPR league....pretty inconsistent and until last week unimpressiveShould I start quoting games missed and Blounts usage late last season....

The point is that the "facts" about Gray are insignificant right now......we know the usage history of Bolden and Vereen.....apparently White is not in the mix right now.

Gray is second on the depth chart and that can easily mean Joique Bell to Bush.....it is not Joseph Randle to Demarco Murray.

So the burden of proof is on the Verren owners with a rb with a usage and injury history to prove he is now a feature back/"man".

Hey if he's not I would be upset

as well having spent a late 3rd on him.

Aaron Rodgers didn't do anything his first couple years, but the his situation changed. The numbers you cited for Vereen were before his situation changed. We have exactly one game to look at NEs current RB situation (for Vereen AND Gray) and the FACTS from that game say Vereen is the main guy, and Gray isn't. Could that change? Absolutely, no one knows what BB will do, but trying to predict what he will do is speculation, not fact. The only FACTS we have about Vereen and Gray is that Gray is, at best, the #2, right now.

And your belief that the "burden of proof" is on Vereen owners is ludicrous. The RB who has demonstrated that he can put up RB1 numbers on several occasions has to prove that he can be a viable FF RB, while the RB who has 3 career carries for 12 yards is suddenly Joique Bell?

Yeah, your argument is based on real solid facts.

 

[BigBlue_RI]

Starting with Vereen with confidence..because I'm not confident in any of my other options!

 

[SameSongNDance]

Arguing Vereen vs. Gray is just as stupid as debating Vereen vs. Ridley. Can we not ruin this thread?

 

[Bayhawks]

Arguing Vereen vs. Gray is just as stupid as debating Vereen vs. Ridley. Can we not ruin this thread?

Ruin this thread?

It's a thread discussing Jonas Gray. When poster or posters suggest that Gray will become the #1 RB & their only defense is "Vereen hasn't put up good points this year," or "Vereen can't carry the load," those points need to be discussed, because they aren't completely accurate, since Vereen was always sharing with Ridley.

I added Gray as a "let's see what he can do" type move. I'm not delusional enough to think that he's going to vault to the top of the depth chart, though.

 

[Kool-Aid Larry]

As the trade deadline approaches, the Patriots are indeed looking to upgrade their offense. But not at the receiver position.

Per a league source, the Pats and coach Bill Belichick are looking for a running back

 

[kencav]

This guy is going nowhere. Vereen is the man in this situation now.

And you are basing this on what meathead, oh I am sorry meatwad?Vereens consistent scoring this year.....his stellar durability?

Come back with some facts next time.

"Facts!?" Someone should come back with facts supporting the idea that Vereen is "the man" @RB in NE, when this entire thread ia about an UDFA who was called from the practice squad, got like 3 carries, and is now playing on the scout team offense? When the "facts" behind the argument is that posters think they know what BB is going to do?Right now, there aren't many "facts" involved, but what facts there are point to Vereen being "the man" way more than they do Gray. Come back with less condescension next time.

This guy is going nowhere. Vereen is the man in this situation now.

And you are basing this on what meathead, oh I am sorry meatwad?Vereens consistent scoring this year.....his stellar durability?

Come back with some facts next time.

"Facts!?" Someone should come back with facts supporting the idea that Vereen is "the man" @RB in NE, when this entire thread ia about an UDFA who was called from the practice squad, got like 3 carries, and is now playing on the scout team offense? When the "facts" behind the argument is that posters think they know what BB is going to do?Right now, there aren't many "facts" involved, but what facts there are point to Vereen being "the man" way more than they do Gray. Come back with less condescension next time.

17,4,7,11,13,1,29.....Those are Vereens point totals first 7 games in my PPR league....pretty inconsistent and until last week unimpressiveShould I start quoting games missed and Blounts usage late last season....

The point is that the "facts" about Gray are insignificant right now......we know the usage history of Bolden and Vereen.....apparently White is not in the mix right now.

Gray is second on the depth chart and that can easily mean Joique Bell to Bush.....it is not Joseph Randle to Demarco Murray.

So the burden of proof is on the Verren owners with a rb with a usage and injury history to prove he is now a feature back/"man".

Hey if he's not I would be upset

as well having spent a late 3rd on him.

Aaron Rodgers didn't do anything his first couple years, but the his situation changed. The numbers you cited for Vereen were before his situation changed. We have exactly one game to look at NEs current RB situation (for Vereen AND Gray) and the FACTS from that game say Vereen is the main guy, and Gray isn't. Could that change? Absolutely, no one knows what BB will do, but trying to predict what he will do is speculation, not fact. The only FACTS we have about Vereen and Gray is that Gray is, at best, the #2, right now.And your belief that the "burden of proof" is on Vereen owners is ludicrous. The RB who has demonstrated that he can put up RB1 numbers on several occasions has to prove that he can be a viable FF RB, while the RB who has 3 career carries for 12 yards is suddenly Joique Bell?

Yeah, your argument is based on real solid facts.

When now comparing Vereen breaking out or becoming elite to a talent like Aaron Rodgers......I would point the BS meter directly at yourself. The Patriots know to be careful with him.....thus "occasional" rb1 numbers. I never suggested that Gray would ascend to rb1 status himself.....but a Bell/Bush type of split. Again, last years Blount production is all you need to know about BB's rb usage.

 

[SameSongNDance]

Looks like James White is active today, didn't see him listed amongst the names of inactives.

 

[Bayhawks]

This guy is going nowhere. Vereen is the man in this situation now.

And you are basing this on what meathead, oh I am sorry meatwad?Vereens consistent scoring this year.....his stellar durability?

Come back with some facts next time.

"Facts!?" Someone should come back with facts supporting the idea that Vereen is "the man" @RB in NE, when this entire thread ia about an UDFA who was called from the practice squad, got like 3 carries, and is now playing on the scout team offense? When the "facts" behind the argument is that posters think they know what BB is going to do?Right now, there aren't many "facts" involved, but what facts there are point to Vereen being "the man" way more than they do Gray. Come back with less condescension next time.

This guy is going nowhere. Vereen is the man in this situation now.

And you are basing this on what meathead, oh I am sorry meatwad?Vereens consistent scoring this year.....his stellar durability?

Come back with some facts next time.

"Facts!?" Someone should come back with facts supporting the idea that Vereen is "the man" @RB in NE, when this entire thread ia about an UDFA who was called from the practice squad, got like 3 carries, and is now playing on the scout team offense? When the "facts" behind the argument is that posters think they know what BB is going to do?Right now, there aren't many "facts" involved, but what facts there are point to Vereen being "the man" way more than they do Gray. Come back with less condescension next time.

17,4,7,11,13,1,29.....Those are Vereens point totals first 7 games in my PPR league....pretty inconsistent and until last week unimpressiveShould I start quoting games missed and Blounts usage late last season....

The point is that the "facts" about Gray are insignificant right now......we know the usage history of Bolden and Vereen.....apparently White is not in the mix right now.

Gray is second on the depth chart and that can easily mean Joique Bell to Bush.....it is not Joseph Randle to Demarco Murray.

So the burden of proof is on the Verren owners with a rb with a usage and injury history to prove he is now a feature back/"man".

Hey if he's not I would be upset

as well having spent a late 3rd on him.

Aaron Rodgers didn't do anything his first couple years, but the his situation changed. The numbers you cited for Vereen were before his situation changed. We have exactly one game to look at NEs current RB situation (for Vereen AND Gray) and the FACTS from that game say Vereen is the main guy, and Gray isn't. Could that change? Absolutely, no one knows what BB will do, but trying to predict what he will do is speculation, not fact. The only FACTS we have about Vereen and Gray is that Gray is, at best, the #2, right now.And your belief that the "burden of proof" is on Vereen owners is ludicrous. The RB who has demonstrated that he can put up RB1 numbers on several occasions has to prove that he can be a viable FF RB, while the RB who has 3 career carries for 12 yards is suddenly Joique Bell?

Yeah, your argument is based on real solid facts.

When now comparing Vereen breaking out or becoming elite to a talent like Aaron Rodgers......I would point the BS meter directly at yourself. The Patriots know to be careful with him.....thus "occasional" rb1 numbers. I never suggested that Gray would ascend to rb1 status himself.....but a Bell/Bush type of split. Again, last years Blount production is all you need to know about BB's rb usage.

Maybe you should try to reading what I posted a little more carefully. When did I say Vereen was like Rodgers? When did I say he was elite? I said their SITUATIONS were similar, in that at one point, they were behind another player.

You have NO CLUE what the Patriots know or think, nor do I, nor do most reporters. That's one of the reasons there is unpredictability (outside of Brady) with what NE players will be involved in the weekly game plan. If you are trying to pretend you know what BB thinks, you're delusional.

 

[kencav]

This guy is going nowhere. Vereen is the man in this situation now.

And you are basing this on what meathead, oh I am sorry meatwad?Vereens consistent scoring this year.....his stellar durability?

Come back with some facts next time.

"Facts!?" Someone should come back with facts supporting the idea that Vereen is "the man" @RB in NE, when this entire thread ia about an UDFA who was called from the practirce squad, got like 3 carries, and is now playing on the scout team offense? When the "facts" behind the argument is that posters think they know what BB is going to do?Right now, there aren't many "facts" involved, but what facts there are point to Vereen being "the man" way more than they do Gray. Come back with less condescension next time.

t

This guy is going nowhere. Vereen is the man in this situation now.

And you are basing this on what meathead, oh I am sorry meatwad?Vereens consistent scoring this year.....his stellar durability?

Come back with some facts next time.

"Facts!?" Someone should come back with facts supporting the idea that Vereen is "the man" @RB in NE, when this entire thread ia about an UDFA who was called from the practice squad, got like 3 carries, and is now playing on the scout team offense? When the "facts" behind the argument is that posters think they know what BB is going to do?Right now, there aren't many "facts" involved, but what facts there are point to Vereen being "the man" way more than they do Gray. Come back with less condescension next time.

17,4,7,11,13,1,29.....Those are Vereens point totals first 7 games in my PPR league....pretty inconsistent and until last week unimpressiveShould I start quoting games missed and Blounts usage late last season....

The point is that the "facts" about Gray are insignificant right now......we know the usage history of Bolden and Vereen.....apparently White is not in the mix right now.

Gray is second on the depth chart and that can easily mean Joique Bell to Bush.....it is not Joseph Randle to Demarco Murray.

So the burden of proof is on the Verren owners with a rb with a usage and injury history to prove he is now a feature back/"man".

Hey if he's not I would be upset

as well having spent a late 3rd on him.

Aaron Rodgers didn't do anything his first couple years, but the his situation changed. The numbers you cited for Vereen were before his situation changed. We have exactly one game to look at NEs current RB situation (for Vereen AND Gray) and the FACTS from that game say Vereen is the main guy, and Gray isn't. Could that change? Absolutely, no one knows what BB will do, but trying to predict what he will do is speculation, not fact. The only FACTS we have about Vereen and Gray is that Gray is, at best, the #2, right now.And your belief that the "burden of proof" is on Vereen owners is ludicrous. The RB who has demonstrated that he can put up RB1 numbers on several occasions has to prove that he can be a viable FF RB, while the RB who has 3 career carries for 12 yards is suddenly Joique Bell?

Yeah, your argument is based on real solid facts.

When now comparing Vereen breaking out or becoming elite to a talent like Aaron Rodgers......I would point the BS meter directly at yourself. The Patriots know to be careful with him.....thus "occasional" rb1 numbers. I never suggested that Gray would ascend to rb1 status himself.....but a Bell/Bush type of split. Again, last years Blount production is all you need to know about BB's rb usage.

Maybe you should try to reading what I posted a little more carefully. When did I say Vereen was like Rodgers? When did I say he was elite? I said their SITUATIONS were similar, in that at one point, they were behind another player. You have NO CLUE what the Patriots know or think, nor do I, nor do most reporters. That's one of the reasons there is unpredictability (outside of Brady) with what NE players will be involved in the weekly game plan. If you are trying to pretend you know what BB thinks, you're delusional.

Perhaps you should choose a player more carefully when discussing situations that change. Rodgers was drafted as the heir apparent to one of the greatest qb's in NFL history. Bell and Bush is much better IMHO

That said....,White active could put a damper in everyone's plans.....

Sorry to be so opinionated here....forgot my Paxil this morning....

 

[Dinsy Ejotuz]

 

[rickyg]

This thread is going to be epic. Lol

 

[SameSongNDance]

This thread is going to be epic. Lol

 

[rickyg]

Here comes grays first nfl td

 

[Workhorse]

Gray looks very good. Downhill runner, hitting the hole decisively.

 

[rickyg]

Check out the Shane Vereen thread. Vereen owners wacking each other off about how vereen looks much more explosive than gray lol.

I own both and started vereen even though my gut told me it was a Jonas gray kind of day.

 

[need2know]

gray looked great getting stuffed at the one multiple times

 

[LargeMouthBass]

All those points and he couldn't snag a TD...

 

[GoBirds]

All those points and he couldn't snag a TD...

Did Vereen get one? I think Gray owners are pretty psyched about this split.

 

[Dinsy Ejotuz]

‏MikeReiss: Patriots RB snaps in win over Bears (penalties included, but not kneeldowns): Shane Vereen 33, Jonas Gray 29, James White 12.

Gray - 17 touches, Vereen 8 touches, Bolden, zero touches.

Same as it was with Ridley -- Vereen gets higher value touches and the split varies a ton from game to game. But Gray's the replacement guy to own.

 

[rickyg]

Most importantly he looked good again in blitz pickups and didn't fumble. If ne doesn't pull off a trade for a RB before the deadline we may have found ourselves a gem here.

 

[Run It Up]

Those snap counts become increasingly less relevant as the game progressed (obviously not for fantasy.)

Gray looked good though, throughout the entire game.

 

[GoBirds]

Most importantly he looked good again in blitz pickups and didn't fumble. If ne doesn't pull off a trade for a RB before the deadline we may have found ourselves a gem here.

Didnt think about the potential for a trade.....that would suck.

 

[kencav]

This guy is going nowhere. Vereen is the man in this situation now.

And you are basing this on what meathead, oh I am sorry meatwad?Vereens consistent scoring this year.....his stellar durability?

Come back with some facts next time.

"Facts!?" Someone should come back with facts supporting the idea that Vereen is "the man" @RB in NE, when this entire thread ia about an UDFA who was called from the practice squad, got like 3 carries, and is now playing on the scout team offense? When the "facts" behind the argument is that posters think they know what BB is going to do?Right now, there aren't many "facts" involved, but what facts there are point to Vereen being "the man" way more than they do Gray. Come back with less condescension next time.

This guy is going nowhere. Vereen is the man in this situation now.

And you are basing this on what meathead, oh I am sorry meatwad?Vereens consistent scoring this year.....his stellar durability?

Come back with some facts next time.

"Facts!?" Someone should come back with facts supporting the idea that Vereen is "the man" @RB in NE, when this entire thread ia about an UDFA who was called from the practice squad, got like 3 carries, and is now playing on the scout team offense? When the "facts" behind the argument is that posters think they know what BB is going to do?Right now, there aren't many "facts" involved, but what facts there are point to Vereen being "the man" way more than they do Gray. Come back with less condescension next time.

17,4,7,11,13,1,29.....Those are Vereens point totals first 7 games in my PPR league....pretty inconsistent and until last week unimpressiveShould I start quoting games missed and Blounts usage late last season....

The point is that the "facts" about Gray are insignificant right now......we know the usage history of Bolden and Vereen.....apparently White is not in the mix right now.

Gray is second on the depth chart and that can easily mean Joique Bell to Bush.....it is not Joseph Randle to Demarco Murray.

So the burden of proof is on the Verren owners with a rb with a usage and injury history to prove he is now a feature back/"man".

Hey if he's not I would be upset

as well having spent a late 3rd on him.

Aaron Rodgers didn't do anything his first couple years, but the his situation changed. The numbers you cited for Vereen were before his situation changed. We have exactly one game to look at NEs current RB situation (for Vereen AND Gray) and the FACTS from that game say Vereen is the main guy, and Gray isn't. Could that change? Absolutely, no one knows what BB will do, but trying to predict what he will do is speculation, not fact. The only FACTS we have about Vereen and Gray is that Gray is, at best, the #2, right now.And your belief that the "burden of proof" is on Vereen owners is ludicrous. The RB who has demonstrated that he can put up RB1 numbers on several occasions has to prove that he can be a viable FF RB, while the RB who has 3 career carries for 12 yards is suddenly Joique Bell?

Yeah, your argument is based on real solid facts.

When now comparing Vereen breaking out or becoming elite to a talent like Aaron Rodgers......I would point the BS meter directly at yourself. The Patriots know to be careful with him.....thus "occasional" rb1 numbers. I never suggested that Gray would ascend to rb1 status himself.....but a Bell/Bush type of split. Again, last years Blount production is all you need to know about BB's rb usage.

Maybe you should try to reading what I posted a little more carefully. When did I say Vereen was like Rodgers? When did I say he was elite? I said their SITUATIONS were similar, in that at one point, they were behind another player. You have NO CLUE what the Patriots know or think, nor do I, nor do most reporters. That's one of the reasons there is unpredictability (outside of Brady) with what NE players will be involved in the weekly game plan. If you are trying to pretend you know what BB thinks, you're delusional.

Obviously only slightly delusional....happy Gray owner.

 

[Faust]

Patriots RB Jonas Gray seizes the day

 

[Ketamine Dreams]

I'm not going to get involved in the Patriot's RB mess.

I'm not going to get involved in the Patriot's RB mess.

I'm not going to get involved in the Patriot's RB mess.

I'm not going to get involved in the Patriot's RB mess.

I'm not going to get involved in the Patriot's RB mess.

I'm not going to get involved in the Patriot's RB mess.

 

[ROYALWITCHEESE]

Patriots RB Jonas Gray seizes the day

Hahaha even HE didn't know how involved he would be! How can we?!!

 

[SameSongNDance]

"Man, it's crazy because when you go into the game you don't even know how many carries you are going to get," Gray said. "I'm thinking it could be like last week -- only a few carries, blitz protection, get some routes -- but when you get a heavy workload like that, your first run goes for a long gain, it's confidence, more and more confidence."

We're all ####ed.

 

[LongTimeSufferingVikingFan]

Grab him now. JMO. Could easily get 8 TD's and 600 by season's end. Nice RB2 or 3.