Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Bloom already has him in the Graham/Gronk tier (in the Week 4 review show last night).
Eventually, defenses will try to take him away. Soon. If he belongs in that tier, nothing will work, and he'll continue to produce. It bodes well that he's playing all over the field, so mismatches will always happen. Hell, he's a walking mismatch. I think he will prove to belong in that tier, the question is, will his QB continue to get him the ball.
Which is music to the ears of Gordon owners. As if he wasn't awesome enough already.
Good point. Hopefully they continue to feed off each other. But I will say, there are more conventional ways to take away a receiver like Gordon, even as good as he is already, than there are ways to attempt to combat the versatile usage of a guy like Cameron.Which is music to the ears of Gordon owners. As if he wasn't awesome enough already.
My point, in case it was missed (and maybe it wasn't), was that making what amounts to a Godfather offer now, at his current value, could look like a steal in a month or two. It's a gamble, but it's cheaper than he'll be if he keeps it up. The whole idea is to pay what looks to be a lot for Cameron now, to avoid paying Graham/Gronk level prices later.
I really haven't figured it out yet and I'd hate to mislead, so if I put an offer on the table I'll report it in this thread. But I won't be moving a stud for him, yet. I'll probably start by offering multiple startable players who are not universally considered elite, and add draft picks as much as I have to. And I'm only considering this approach because in one league, a rebuilding owner has both Graham and Cameron, so I'm hoping he'll see multiple guys that will improve his roster across the board and not require a stud back. I'm not talking about garbage players, but guys like Miller who have their believers and lots of appeal to certain owners. But again, I don't have a specific offer in mind so I could change my mind.
Unless that 1st was pretty much guaranteed to be top 3, I'd pay that. I'd pay more than that, easily.
WTF? Is it a return league??
As a dynasty owner of both Graham and Cameron, I would laugh at that weak ### offer. In Dynasty it would take a minimum of 2 1st, all money that Cameron earns for 2 years (we pay out $ for the top 3 at each position), and 1 stud RB or WR. Why? Because it is real hard to find a TE at this caliber and if Graham goes down the week after I trade Cameron, I want to make sure I was well compensated for losing all my TE points.
spiller hasnt been all that impressive this year and isnt he nursing a ankle now?
Graham lover who thinks Graham is 1000 times better than Gronk. God forbid their be a 2 or 3 dominant tight ends in the league.bicycle_seat_sniffer said:
Yeah I'm pretty happy with the deal. Like I said I wasn't looking to trade Cameron but couldn't pass up what was offered.
Green and Gonzo haven't been producing consistant numbers like Nelson and Cameron. Ironically, it was put back on the table for Nelson or Fitzgerald. Now you are making me think twice!
Redraft I can understand turning it down. Nelson is already past his bye and maybe you like his chances better this year. Dynasty I think I have to take Green
You won that one big.Cam >> Rivers
I am assuming redraft.
