What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Jordan Reed - TE - SF (2 Viewers)

In the league I have Gronk and Eifert in, I moved Reed + thompkins for Larry. I feel ok with that.

I would not have made a similar move in a league I have Gonzo and Cook in.

 
14 targets, more than anyone else on the team. 8 rec, 90 yards, significantly more snaps than all skill players except Garcon. This train is rolling!

 
What is Reed's value? I've really only seen the last couple of games from him, he looks good...worth a late rookie 1st?
Worth more than that.
Depends on starting lineup. If you can start more than one TE, he's worth a mid to high first. If you start 1 TE and 2-3 RB, 3-4 WR, then a late first might be okay but I'd still want more.

Where did Eifert get drafted in your league? Reed is worth a little more than that now. 2014 appears to be a Better year for rookies but reed is proven.
I think the realistic upside for the 2014 rookie TEs is that, a year from now, they're where Jordan Reed is right now. Why sell a player for a rookie pick that, in a year, might hopefully yield an asset as good as the player you just sold?

I can't think of any format where I'd trade Reed for a pick in the bottom 3rd of the 1st round.

 
I don't know if I would take a mid 1st for him right now. The people that have him in dynasty leagues probably got him relatively cheap. Sometimes the best way to maximize value on a asset you got relatively cheap is to keep them and start them. Right?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
What is Reed's value? I've really only seen the last couple of games from him, he looks good...worth a late rookie 1st?
Worth more than that.
Depends on starting lineup. If you can start more than one TE, he's worth a mid to high first. If you start 1 TE and 2-3 RB, 3-4 WR, then a late first might be okay but I'd still want more.

Where did Eifert get drafted in your league? Reed is worth a little more than that now. 2014 appears to be a Better year for rookies but reed is proven.
I think the realistic upside for the 2014 rookie TEs is that, a year from now, they're where Jordan Reed is right now. Why sell a player for a rookie pick that, in a year, might hopefully yield an asset as good as the player you just sold?

I can't think of any format where I'd trade Reed for a pick in the bottom 3rd of the 1st round.
You're right on the upside for rookie TEs. But, if only 12 TEs can start in a league, while 36 WRs and/or RBs do, it wouldn't be inconceivable to trade Reed for a 1st if you're targeting WRs or RB. Consider, right now according to at least some "Experts" in the 2014 draft there will be ~ 5 WRs with first round grades, 5 RBs with first or second round grades, and I've seen up to 7 QBs with first round grades. At least a few of those QBs appear to be franchise types. If TE is devalued as a position in your league, Reed for a player like Marcus Marriota or Mike Evans (who actually bears some resemblance to Reed), it could be a fair deal. OTOH, while it may be tempting to trade him for a chance at Ebron, I wouldn't do it.

FWIW, I have Reed in 3 dynasty leagues, and am very unlikely to trade him in any. But as the question is value, I maintain that "fair" value depends on the league format. Honestly, it would be easier to trade Reed for a veteran player than a pick but even that is tough.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't know if I would take a mid 1st for him right now. The people that have him in dynasty leagues probably got him relatively cheap. Sometimes the best way to maximizes value on a asset you got relatively cheap is to keep them and start them. Right?
No way is anything but an early first round rookie pick worth it at this point, and even that isn't something I'd jump at. The odds of me drafting something as good as Reed right now probably aren't very high. We've only seen two games of his breakout, but it looks really promising.

 
I don't know if I would take a mid 1st for him right now. The people that have him in dynasty leagues probably got him relatively cheap. Sometimes the best way to maximizes value on a asset you got relatively cheap is to keep them and start them. Right?
Sometimes. Other times, the best way to maximize the value of an asset you got relatively cheaply is to sell it for a huge profit. I mean, if you could keep turning 3rd round rookie picks into pretty dang good players, you'd soon have a very good team. If you could keep turning 3rd round rookie picks into 1st round rookie picks, though, you'd also soon have a very good team. At this point, Jordan Reed owners should expect a tidy profit no matter what they choose to do with him.

 
I don't know if I would take a mid 1st for him right now. The people that have him in dynasty leagues probably got him relatively cheap. Sometimes the best way to maximizes value on a asset you got relatively cheap is to keep them and start them. Right?
Sometimes. Other times, the best way to maximize the value of an asset you got relatively cheaply is to sell it for a huge profit. I mean, if you could keep turning 3rd round rookie picks into pretty dang good players, you'd soon have a very good team. If you could keep turning 3rd round rookie picks into 1st round rookie picks, though, you'd also soon have a very good team. At this point, Jordan Reed owners should expect a tidy profit no matter what they choose to do with him.
To me that seems like we are trying to get to fancy. I mean if you have a top 3-4 TE in the league who is a "rookie" the only thing more valuable is what? You just hit a 2 run homer. Don't throw the ball back and try to hit a grand slam.

 
I was going to trade draft picks for Gronkowski, now I'm not sure i need to. Reed is on the more productive offense right now anyway.

 
I would try to make a deal for him after this upcoming game. I suspect the Chargers will put Weddle on him who has a great track record of shutting down TEs.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I moved Eifert and Seattle D for Reed and Dallas D (I already have Kansas City D). Maybe I could've gotten more for Seattle, but I'm not sure how to value those things.

 
I would try to make a deal for him after this upcoming game. I suspect the Chargers will put Weddle on him who has a great track record of shutting down TEs.
Chargers look to be middle of the road for production this year given up to the TE position. Not good, not bad, about average. Are you seeing something different?

 
I would try to make a deal for him after this upcoming game. I suspect the Chargers will put Weddle on him who has a great track record of shutting down TEs.
Chargers look to be middle of the road for production this year given up to the TE position. Not good, not bad, about average. Are you seeing something different?
The main TE production came from the Houston game when they had a special teamer covering TE's (Bront Bird). They gave up 2 TD's to TE's that game. They have since moved Weddle back to his regular safety position and rarely have him play at ILB so he's been locking down TE's. Considering Reed is their only threat, I suspect he does this again like when he was matched up with Witten and shut him down.

 
I would try to make a deal for him after this upcoming game. I suspect the Chargers will put Weddle on him who has a great track record of shutting down TEs.
Chargers look to be middle of the road for production this year given up to the TE position. Not good, not bad, about average. Are you seeing something different?
The main TE production came from the Houston game when they had a special teamer covering TE's (Bront Bird). They gave up 2 TD's to TE's that game. They have since moved Weddle back to his regular safety position and rarely have him play at ILB so he's been locking down TE's. Considering Reed is their only threat, I suspect he does this again like when he was matched up with Witten and shut him down.
There may be some merit to your Weddle theory but I think Reed is a more explosive athlete than Witten. Who else have you seen him "shut down"?

 
Tight ends are rarely "shut down" by a single player. For one, they are typically covered by more than one player on each play: a LB typically passes the TE off to a safety - a form of zone coverage. Hence the point SSOG made about TE production.

 
Chargers have been shutting down TE's since last season. TE's ranked 26th vs. them last season as well. It's not a one time occurrence. He very well could have a decent game, due to the large volume of targets he's getting. Like I said though, I expect him to get the bulk of the attention from the defense.

http://fftoday.com/stats/fantasystats.php?Season=2012&GameWeek=Season&PosID=40&Side=Allowed&LeagueID=1
Translation: They cover NO ONE, so the first read is open. I would not be worried about Reed. Essentially a WR2 and does not play inline.

 
Chargers have been shutting down TE's since last season. TE's ranked 26th vs. them last season as well. It's not a one time occurrence. He very well could have a decent game, due to the large volume of targets he's getting. Like I said though, I expect him to get the bulk of the attention from the defense.

http://fftoday.com/stats/fantasystats.php?Season=2012&GameWeek=Season&PosID=40&Side=Allowed&LeagueID=1
Who were the TEs in their division last year?

 
Tight ends are rarely "shut down" by a single player. For one, they are typically covered by more than one player on each play: a LB typically passes the TE off to a safety - a form of zone coverage. Hence the point SSOG made about TE production.
In addition, teams all use their TEs so differently. How San Diego defended Jason Witten doesn't say a ton about how they'll defend Jordan Reed, because they're such different players- it'd be like saying that a cornerback is going to shut down Desean Jackson because he just shut down Larry Fitzgerald. That, and so many teams simply don't feature their TE, so it's easy for a defense to rank very high in "points allowed to a TE" without doing anything special, just because of who they faced. Add it all together, and SoS winds up having very little predictive power for weekly TE performance. I'm not saying it has NO predictive power- if San Diego routinely singles Weddle up on TEs, then that very well might carry over from week to week. I know when Denver first got Champ Bailey, they used to have him shadow Tony Gonzalez and Antonio Gates, and he reliably held them well below their season averages. I'm just saying, SoS values should be taken with a boulder-sized grain of salt when it comes to TEs.

 
Chargers have been shutting down TE's since last season. TE's ranked 26th vs. them last season as well. It's not a one time occurrence. He very well could have a decent game, due to the large volume of targets he's getting. Like I said though, I expect him to get the bulk of the attention from the defense.

http://fftoday.com/stats/fantasystats.php?Season=2012&GameWeek=Season&PosID=40&Side=Allowed&LeagueID=1
Who were the TEs in their division last year?
Best tight ends they faced last season:

1. Jimmy Graham: 1 rec, 4 yds (injured early 2nd quarter, came back for some of 2nd half)

2. Tony Gonzales: 9 rec, 91 yds, 1 TD

3. Greg Olsen: 5 rec, 56 yds

4. Health Miller: 5 rec, 66 yds

5. Dennis Pitta: 6 rec, 42 yds, 1 TD

Decent production. Plus think about the TEs for the Chiefs, Raiders, Broncos last year. No talent. Before 2012 they have always been below average vs TE's. (Weddle has been on Chargers since 2007)

2011: 9th most points allowed to TEs

2010: 12th

2009: 16th

2008: 1st

2007: 7th

2006: 1st

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This kid has really stepped in nicely. My team was screwed at TE with Hernandez and not much else and Reed is one of the factors that has saved my season. He's become a target monster.

 
This kid has really stepped in nicely. My team was screwed at TE with Hernandez and not much else and Reed is one of the factors that has saved my season. He's become a target monster.
Couldn't agree more here. I was stuck with Jared Cook and this guy could easily save my season, not having to rely on the 3-5 points Cook was graciously providing.

 
I have an excellent dynasty team that was being killed at TE last year. I drafted Eifert in the 1st this season to address the need, figured on rolling with Finley and M.Bennet TEBC this year. Decided to take a flyer on Reed in the 3rd and J.Thomas in free agency for the 3rd straight year... Quite the turnaround. Traded Eifert and Bennet, rolling with Thomas and Reed at TE and flex (Amendola was supposed to be my flex difference maker...).

Reed looks great. I would trade J.Cameron (own him in other 2 dynasties) for him if I could get a little value back. Might even consider it straight up...

 
Reed got a rush attempt on an option pitch from Griffin. We'll see if that was just a gimmick play or something they'll add going forward.

 
Reed got a rush attempt on an option pitch from Griffin. We'll see if that was just a gimmick play or something they'll add going forward.
Florida used to do that all the time with Hernandez under Urban Meyer. For that matter, I wouldn't be surprised if the Shanaclan cribbed that play straight from Urban's old playbook.

 
Reed got a rush attempt on an option pitch from Griffin. We'll see if that was just a gimmick play or something they'll add going forward.
Very Hernandez-esque. Reed reminds me of Hernandez in a lot of ways (minus the homicidal tendencies, of course).

 
Kyle Shanahan has a way of getting cute and going away from what's working, both from week to week and in-game. It's frustrating sometimes.

 
I expected to see an injury with Paulsen out there as much as he seemed to be. Jordan disappeared

 
This guy keeps coming up big at big moments--earning more and more of RG3's trust, if that's even possible. Played great today for the most part.

 
Weddle struggled to cover Reed today. Not so much a criticism of Weddle; Reed just would make quick moves and leave Weddle for long enough to make receptions.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top