What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Looting in Missouri after cops shoot 18 year old (1 Viewer)

The problem is if the police lie about one thing during an investigation people will not believe anything they say about the rest of the investigation. Just be truthful...do your job honestly and people will trust you(not all but most ).i

I have a lot of cop friends and when i see them on a face book post talking about shootings like this one they say things like the world is better off without people like Mike Brown.That makes my red flags go flying up....if thats the view they have then no wonder they are so fast to shoot and ask questions later. They really do view it as a war between us and them.
I think it's important to draw the distinction that the world is not necessarily better off without people like Mike Brown, but it is better off without behavior like Mike Brown showed that day. It shouldn't necessarily get you killed, but it may and that's a lesson too few seem to be getting out of all of this. If you want to teach your kids something out if this, it's not that the world is hopeless and unfair, it's that your actions have consequences and you have the opportunity to control them.

 
i used to donate my time at food shelters/banks in my area on tday. sometimes xmas. 99% imo of the patrons have been black. this year we decided not to donate our time. hands down, don't serve is my new motto.
It is your personal decision of course, but to alter you views on serving due to what has been happening the last few days is troubling. It means others may hold this view and homeless/deeply poor people will suffer due to things outside their control.

The above assumes you haven't been serving in Ferguson.

 
The problem is if the police lie about one thing during an investigation people will not believe anything they say about the rest of the investigation. Just be truthful...do your job honestly and people will trust you(not all but most ).i

I have a lot of cop friends and when i see them on a face book post talking about shootings like this one they say things like the world is better off without people like Mike Brown.That makes my red flags go flying up....if thats the view they have then no wonder they are so fast to shoot and ask questions later. They really do view it as a war between us and them.
If they are lying under oath I'd be especially incensed.

 
The problem is if the police lie about one thing during an investigation people will not believe anything they say about the rest of the investigation. Just be truthful...do your job honestly and people will trust you(not all but most ).i

I have a lot of cop friends and when i see them on a face book post talking about shootings like this one they say things like the world is better off without people like Mike Brown.That makes my red flags go flying up....if thats the view they have then no wonder they are so fast to shoot and ask questions later. They really do view it as a war between us and them.
Well, they're right. I bet that clerk he shoved around is glad Mr. Brown won't be coming around any more.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wilson has a history of never shooting his gun on duty before ever.

Brown has a history at least that very same day of stealing, assaulting people and flouting the law.

Who should we believe?
But CNN interviewed Brown's mother and father and asked them if they believe Brown could have ever done or said anything that Officer Wilson said in his testimony. They resoundingly said no. For some strange reason, the CNN report did not ask them if they believed their son was capable of robbing a store and assaulting a store employee.

Their little angel was incapable of calling a cop a ##### or assaulting an officer according to the parents, but capable of doing the aforementioned according to video.

 
I think what we really need is a list of things you should do to avoid being shot by LE:

1) Obey the law

2) Be respectful to LE

By following this short list, you too can avoid being killed by a police officer, HTH.
Yes let's put the onus on teaching everyone to avoid the dangerous men in uniform, instead of training the police to not shoot people.Shouldn't police officers be among the most respected members of society? Why is it that they are not?
Law enforcement are generally respected. Does the same level of respect carry over into some of the minority communities. No. But then, many also seem to adopt a "snitches get stitches" philosophy as well. So, at least they have that going for them...

 
squistion said:
TheWalkmen said:
You're really complaining now that he washed his hands? Wow. Desperation.
:sigh:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/11/25/ferguson-grand-jury-evidence-mistakes_n_6220814.html

1. Wilson washed away blood evidence.

In an interview with police investigators, Wilson admitted that after the shooting he returned to police headquarters and washed blood off his body -- physical evidence that could have helped to prove or disprove a critical piece of Wilsons testimony regarding his struggle with Brown inside the police car. He told his interrogator that he had blood on both of his hands. I think it was his blood, Wilson said referring to Brown. He added that he was not cut anywhere.
I would actually like to hear why this matters. Lets say it was browns blood, what does that prove? Lets say it was Wilson's blood, what does that prove?
what if there was no blood, and Wilson lied about washing it off?
Please explain how it would have mattered if Wilson had zero blood on him.
Means he is a liar. :shrug: but I think we already knew that, so I suppose it does not add anything new.The actions of Wilson, and the initial investigation do not pass the smell test imo. Too many rules broken. It sounds very much like he and his bosses got time to pull their story together, before he was interviewed by a detective. Even something as simple as whether Wilson knew about the prior robbery, or connected Brown changed as more information became known.

He took two punches to the head, while he was still in the car, and thought he was going to die? Seriously? This is a cop who has been briefed on how to beat these charges.

Officer involved in a shooting should be treated just like any other shooting suspect until cleared.
The moment you punch a police officer once in the head you are more than likely asking to get shot.

And here is why you and the other moronic ignorant tools around our country (and in this now stupid thread) are fighting. You think Police Officers are civilians. We grant our law enforcement and military with rights to use deadly force beyond the rights of you and me. You can't seem to grasp this concept. And the facts are clear he had the right to use deadly force as this young man assaulted a police officer, failed to obey direct commands and oh ***k it I don't even need to get into that anymore. There is zero point dealing with peanuts for brain people like yourself.

It's a complete joke that there is this movement to change a police officers right to use deadly force. We might has well take away their guns and tie their hands behind there back. People are talking like they go around looking to kill people. We can;t trust police officers anymore huh? Because there are so many bad officers in this country. It's crazy what is happening with th emir sets of some people.

Get over it. In fact get the ***k out of our country if you can't abide by the laws and procedures we have.

But we have paranoid nut bars like yourself thinking you can just stick your middle finger up to the law and get away with it. You think you can punch a police officer in the head twice and just think nothing is going to happen? Your out of your ****ing skull man. Plain nuts.

Go troll somewhere else.
Go #### yourself. No, we can't trust police officers. They are going around looking for people and trying to get them in trouble in any way possible. Today, they use leathal force at any threat whatsoever. Man, child, or dog. I would love to leave this country for one that actually had their act together and didn't imprission and murder so many people. It would be nice to live without fear that some cop will stop me someday and make my life hell on a whim. Too bad those nations actually have immigration policies they enforce because their governments still give a few ####s about their own citizens.

Our laws and "justice" system are out of control. We arrest and imprision more people than any other nation on the planet. It's sick for a nation that supposedly values freedom. And you people that try to act like our officers should be Judge Dredd are destroying our nation. I really feel sorry for our kids and grandkids. It's only going to get worse. But keep cheering on the police state.

 
squistion said:
TheWalkmen said:
You're really complaining now that he washed his hands? Wow. Desperation.
:sigh:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/11/25/ferguson-grand-jury-evidence-mistakes_n_6220814.html1. Wilson washed away blood evidence.

In an interview with police investigators, Wilson admitted that after the shooting he returned to police headquarters and washed blood off his body -- physical evidence that could have helped to prove or disprove a critical piece of Wilsons testimony regarding his struggle with Brown inside the police car. He told his interrogator that he had blood on both of his hands. I think it was his blood, Wilson said referring to Brown. He added that he was not cut anywhere.
I would actually like to hear why this matters. Lets say it was browns blood, what does that prove? Lets say it was Wilson's blood, what does that prove?
what if there was no blood, and Wilson lied about washing it off?
Please explain how it would have mattered if Wilson had zero blood on him.
Means he is a liar. :shrug: but I think we already knew that, so I suppose it does not add anything new.The actions of Wilson, and the initial investigation do not pass the smell test imo. Too many rules broken. It sounds very much like he and his bosses got time to pull their story together, before he was interviewed by a detective. Even something as simple as whether Wilson knew about the prior robbery, or connected Brown changed as more information became known.

He took two punches to the head, while he was still in the car, and thought he was going to die? Seriously? This is a cop who has been briefed on how to beat these charges.

Officer involved in a shooting should be treated just like any other shooting suspect until cleared.
The moment you punch a police officer once in the head you are more than likely asking to get shot.And here is why you and the other moronic ignorant tools around our country (and in this now stupid thread) are fighting. You think Police Officers are civilians. We grant our law enforcement and military with rights to use deadly force beyond the rights of you and me. You can't seem to grasp this concept. And the facts are clear he had the right to use deadly force as this young man assaulted a police officer, failed to obey direct commands and oh ***k it I don't even need to get into that anymore. There is zero point dealing with peanuts for brain people like yourself.

It's a complete joke that there is this movement to change a police officers right to use deadly force. We might has well take away their guns and tie their hands behind there back. People are talking like they go around looking to kill people. We can;t trust police officers anymore huh? Because there are so many bad officers in this country. It's crazy what is happening with th emir sets of some people.

Get over it. In fact get the ***k out of our country if you can't abide by the laws and procedures we have.

But we have paranoid nut bars like yourself thinking you can just stick your middle finger up to the law and get away with it. You think you can punch a police officer in the head twice and just think nothing is going to happen? Your out of your ****ing skull man. Plain nuts.

Go troll somewhere else.
Go #### yourself. No, we can't trust police officers. They are going around looking for people and trying to get them in trouble in any way possible. Today, they use leathal force at any threat whatsoever. Man, child, or dog. I would love to leave this country for one that actually had their act together and didn't imprission and murder so many people. It would be nice to live without fear that some cop will stop me someday and make my life hell on a whim. Too bad those nations actually have immigration policies they enforce because their governments still give a few ####s about their own citizens. Our laws and "justice" system are out of control. We arrest and imprision more people than any other nation on the planet. It's sick for a nation that supposedly values freedom. And you people that try to act like our officers should be Judge Dredd are destroying our nation. I really feel sorry for our kids and grandkids. It's only going to get worse. But keep cheering on the police state.
You write a long post that could be well written but after your 1st sentence I didnt even bother reading.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
squistion said:
TheWalkmen said:
You're really complaining now that he washed his hands? Wow. Desperation.
:sigh:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/11/25/ferguson-grand-jury-evidence-mistakes_n_6220814.html1. Wilson washed away blood evidence.

In an interview with police investigators, Wilson admitted that after the shooting he returned to police headquarters and washed blood off his body -- physical evidence that could have helped to prove or disprove a critical piece of Wilsons testimony regarding his struggle with Brown inside the police car. He told his interrogator that he had blood on both of his hands. I think it was his blood, Wilson said referring to Brown. He added that he was not cut anywhere.
I would actually like to hear why this matters. Lets say it was browns blood, what does that prove? Lets say it was Wilson's blood, what does that prove?
what if there was no blood, and Wilson lied about washing it off?
Please explain how it would have mattered if Wilson had zero blood on him.
Means he is a liar. :shrug: but I think we already knew that, so I suppose it does not add anything new.The actions of Wilson, and the initial investigation do not pass the smell test imo. Too many rules broken. It sounds very much like he and his bosses got time to pull their story together, before he was interviewed by a detective. Even something as simple as whether Wilson knew about the prior robbery, or connected Brown changed as more information became known.

He took two punches to the head, while he was still in the car, and thought he was going to die? Seriously? This is a cop who has been briefed on how to beat these charges.

Officer involved in a shooting should be treated just like any other shooting suspect until cleared.
The moment you punch a police officer once in the head you are more than likely asking to get shot.And here is why you and the other moronic ignorant tools around our country (and in this now stupid thread) are fighting. You think Police Officers are civilians. We grant our law enforcement and military with rights to use deadly force beyond the rights of you and me. You can't seem to grasp this concept. And the facts are clear he had the right to use deadly force as this young man assaulted a police officer, failed to obey direct commands and oh ***k it I don't even need to get into that anymore. There is zero point dealing with peanuts for brain people like yourself.

It's a complete joke that there is this movement to change a police officers right to use deadly force. We might has well take away their guns and tie their hands behind there back. People are talking like they go around looking to kill people. We can;t trust police officers anymore huh? Because there are so many bad officers in this country. It's crazy what is happening with th emir sets of some people.

Get over it. In fact get the ***k out of our country if you can't abide by the laws and procedures we have.

But we have paranoid nut bars like yourself thinking you can just stick your middle finger up to the law and get away with it. You think you can punch a police officer in the head twice and just think nothing is going to happen? Your out of your ****ing skull man. Plain nuts.

Go troll somewhere else.
Go #### yourself. No, we can't trust police officers. They are going around looking for people and trying to get them in trouble in any way possible. Today, they use leathal force at any threat whatsoever. Man, child, or dog. I would love to leave this country for one that actually had their act together and didn't imprission and murder so many people. It would be nice to live without fear that some cop will stop me someday and make my life hell on a whim. Too bad those nations actually have immigration policies they enforce because their governments still give a few ####s about their own citizens. Our laws and "justice" system are out of control. We arrest and imprision more people than any other nation on the planet. It's sick for a nation that supposedly values freedom. And you people that try to act like our officers should be Judge Dredd are destroying our nation. I really feel sorry for our kids and grandkids. It's only going to get worse. But keep cheering on the police state.
You write a long post that could be well written but after your 1st sentence I didnt even bother reading.
I read it, and it was enlightening. Apparently no dog is safe from unlawful "impissionment".

 
squistion said:
TheWalkmen said:
You're really complaining now that he washed his hands? Wow. Desperation.
:sigh:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/11/25/ferguson-grand-jury-evidence-mistakes_n_6220814.html1. Wilson washed away blood evidence.

In an interview with police investigators, Wilson admitted that after the shooting he returned to police headquarters and washed blood off his body -- physical evidence that could have helped to prove or disprove a critical piece of Wilsons testimony regarding his struggle with Brown inside the police car. He told his interrogator that he had blood on both of his hands. I think it was his blood, Wilson said referring to Brown. He added that he was not cut anywhere.
I would actually like to hear why this matters. Lets say it was browns blood, what does that prove? Lets say it was Wilson's blood, what does that prove?
what if there was no blood, and Wilson lied about washing it off?
Please explain how it would have mattered if Wilson had zero blood on him.
Means he is a liar. :shrug: but I think we already knew that, so I suppose it does not add anything new.The actions of Wilson, and the initial investigation do not pass the smell test imo. Too many rules broken. It sounds very much like he and his bosses got time to pull their story together, before he was interviewed by a detective. Even something as simple as whether Wilson knew about the prior robbery, or connected Brown changed as more information became known.

He took two punches to the head, while he was still in the car, and thought he was going to die? Seriously? This is a cop who has been briefed on how to beat these charges.

Officer involved in a shooting should be treated just like any other shooting suspect until cleared.
The moment you punch a police officer once in the head you are more than likely asking to get shot.And here is why you and the other moronic ignorant tools around our country (and in this now stupid thread) are fighting. You think Police Officers are civilians. We grant our law enforcement and military with rights to use deadly force beyond the rights of you and me. You can't seem to grasp this concept. And the facts are clear he had the right to use deadly force as this young man assaulted a police officer, failed to obey direct commands and oh ***k it I don't even need to get into that anymore. There is zero point dealing with peanuts for brain people like yourself.

It's a complete joke that there is this movement to change a police officers right to use deadly force. We might has well take away their guns and tie their hands behind there back. People are talking like they go around looking to kill people. We can;t trust police officers anymore huh? Because there are so many bad officers in this country. It's crazy what is happening with th emir sets of some people.

Get over it. In fact get the ***k out of our country if you can't abide by the laws and procedures we have.

But we have paranoid nut bars like yourself thinking you can just stick your middle finger up to the law and get away with it. You think you can punch a police officer in the head twice and just think nothing is going to happen? Your out of your ****ing skull man. Plain nuts.

Go troll somewhere else.
Go #### yourself. No, we can't trust police officers. They are going around looking for people and trying to get them in trouble in any way possible. Today, they use leathal force at any threat whatsoever. Man, child, or dog. I would love to leave this country for one that actually had their act together and didn't imprission and murder so many people. It would be nice to live without fear that some cop will stop me someday and make my life hell on a whim. Too bad those nations actually have immigration policies they enforce because their governments still give a few ####s about their own citizens. Our laws and "justice" system are out of control. We arrest and imprision more people than any other nation on the planet. It's sick for a nation that supposedly values freedom. And you people that try to act like our officers should be Judge Dredd are destroying our nation. I really feel sorry for our kids and grandkids. It's only going to get worse. But keep cheering on the police state.
You write a long post that could be well written but after your 1st sentence I didnt even bother reading.
I read it, and it was enlightening. Apparently no dog is safe from unlawful "impissionment".
"Today, they use leathal force at any threat whatsoever. Man, child, or dog."

Yep, that's what that meant. Great reading comprehension.

 
Go #### yourself. No, we can't trust police officers. They are going around looking for people and trying to get them in trouble in any way possible. Today, they use leathal force at any threat whatsoever. Man, child, or dog. I would love to leave this country for one that actually had their act together and didn't imprission and murder so many people. It would be nice to live without fear that some cop will stop me someday and make my life hell on a whim. Too bad those nations actually have immigration policies they enforce because their governments still give a few ####s about their own citizens.


Our laws and "justice" system are out of control. We arrest and imprision more people than any other nation on the planet. It's sick for a nation that supposedly values freedom. And you people that try to act like our officers should be Judge Dredd are destroying our nation. I really feel sorry for our kids and grandkids. It's only going to get worse. But keep cheering on the police state.
:lmao:

This has to be trolling

 
The problem is if the police lie about one thing during an investigation people will not believe anything they say about the rest of the investigation. Just be truthful...do your job honestly and people will trust you(not all but most ).i

I have a lot of cop friends and when i see them on a face book post talking about shootings like this one they say things like the world is better off without people like Mike Brown.That makes my red flags go flying up....if thats the view they have then no wonder they are so fast to shoot and ask questions later. They really do view it as a war between us and them.
I think it's important to draw the distinction that the world is not necessarily better off without people like Mike Brown, but it is better off without behavior like Mike Brown showed that day. It shouldn't necessarily get you killed, but it may and that's a lesson too few seem to be getting out of all of this. If you want to teach your kids something out if this, it's not that the world is hopeless and unfair, it's that your actions have consequences and you have the opportunity to control them.
Sadly, there are a great many people out there that will miss the opportunity to use what happened as a productive teachable moment and instead only point to the end result as evidence cops are out to get them.

squistion said:
TheWalkmen said:
You're really complaining now that he washed his hands? Wow. Desperation.
:sigh:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/11/25/ferguson-grand-jury-evidence-mistakes_n_6220814.html

1. Wilson washed away blood evidence.

In an interview with police investigators, Wilson admitted that after the shooting he returned to police headquarters and washed blood off his body -- physical evidence that could have helped to prove or disprove a critical piece of Wilsons testimony regarding his struggle with Brown inside the police car. He told his interrogator that he had blood on both of his hands. I think it was his blood, Wilson said referring to Brown. He added that he was not cut anywhere.
I would actually like to hear why this matters. Lets say it was browns blood, what does that prove? Lets say it was Wilson's blood, what does that prove?
what if there was no blood, and Wilson lied about washing it off?
Please explain how it would have mattered if Wilson had zero blood on him.
Means he is a liar. :shrug: but I think we already knew that, so I suppose it does not add anything new.The actions of Wilson, and the initial investigation do not pass the smell test imo. Too many rules broken. It sounds very much like he and his bosses got time to pull their story together, before he was interviewed by a detective. Even something as simple as whether Wilson knew about the prior robbery, or connected Brown changed as more information became known.

He took two punches to the head, while he was still in the car, and thought he was going to die? Seriously? This is a cop who has been briefed on how to beat these charges.

Officer involved in a shooting should be treated just like any other shooting suspect until cleared.
The moment you punch a police officer once in the head you are more than likely asking to get shot.

And here is why you and the other moronic ignorant tools around our country (and in this now stupid thread) are fighting. You think Police Officers are civilians. We grant our law enforcement and military with rights to use deadly force beyond the rights of you and me. You can't seem to grasp this concept. And the facts are clear he had the right to use deadly force as this young man assaulted a police officer, failed to obey direct commands and oh ***k it I don't even need to get into that anymore. There is zero point dealing with peanuts for brain people like yourself.

It's a complete joke that there is this movement to change a police officers right to use deadly force. We might has well take away their guns and tie their hands behind there back. People are talking like they go around looking to kill people. We can;t trust police officers anymore huh? Because there are so many bad officers in this country. It's crazy what is happening with th emir sets of some people.

Get over it. In fact get the ***k out of our country if you can't abide by the laws and procedures we have.

But we have paranoid nut bars like yourself thinking you can just stick your middle finger up to the law and get away with it. You think you can punch a police officer in the head twice and just think nothing is going to happen? Your out of your ****ing skull man. Plain nuts.

Go troll somewhere else.
Go #### yourself. No, we can't trust police officers. They are going around looking for people and trying to get them in trouble in any way possible. Today, they use leathal force at any threat whatsoever. Man, child, or dog. I would love to leave this country for one that actually had their act together and didn't imprission and murder so many people. It would be nice to live without fear that some cop will stop me someday and make my life hell on a whim. Too bad those nations actually have immigration policies they enforce because their governments still give a few ####s about their own citizens.

Our laws and "justice" system are out of control. We arrest and imprision more people than any other nation on the planet. It's sick for a nation that supposedly values freedom. And you people that try to act like our officers should be Judge Dredd are destroying our nation. I really feel sorry for our kids and grandkids. It's only going to get worse. But keep cheering on the police state.
Worst post in this thread, IMO.

Don't let the door hit you in the ### on the way out :bye:

 
Thanks for all the serious replies. Keep ignoring the situation. We'll be back here again in another couple of years when some other black kid gets killed, justifiably or not, and more riots will occur and more people will die. It's basically an American tradition at this point.

 
squistion said:
TheWalkmen said:
You're really complaining now that he washed his hands? Wow. Desperation.
:sigh:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/11/25/ferguson-grand-jury-evidence-mistakes_n_6220814.html

1. Wilson washed away blood evidence.

In an interview with police investigators, Wilson admitted that after the shooting he returned to police headquarters and washed blood off his body -- physical evidence that could have helped to prove or disprove a critical piece of Wilsons testimony regarding his struggle with Brown inside the police car. He told his interrogator that he had blood on both of his hands. I think it was his blood, Wilson said referring to Brown. He added that he was not cut anywhere.
I would actually like to hear why this matters. Lets say it was browns blood, what does that prove? Lets say it was Wilson's blood, what does that prove?
what if there was no blood, and Wilson lied about washing it off?
Please explain how it would have mattered if Wilson had zero blood on him.
Plot twist: Wilson never shot Brown at all. It was the one-armed man all along.
How bout this one? Lets say Wilson was on vacation that day. After knocking over the store, Brown and his buddy Dorian are walking down the middle of the street uninterrupted. They get to arguing over who gets to hit the blunt first. The argument eventually turns to a physical altercation and Dorian kills Brown. Do we expect there would be more or less protests/demonstrations/riots in not only Ferguson but around the country?

Reality is it probably doesn't even make the local news because murder is the leading cause of death of black males age 15-34 and upwards of 90% of the time its a black person doing the killing. I always wonder why there isn't more outrage over that? To take it a step further, not only would there be far less (if any) outrage, it isn't a stretch to believe Dorian would earn some street cred over the whole thing.

http://www.cdc.gov/men/lcod/2010/LCODBlackmales2010.pdf

http://online.wsj.com/articles/jason-riley-the-other-ferguson-tragedy-1416961287

http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2014/aug/24/juan-williams/juan-williams-no-1-cause-death-african-americans-1/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/10/leading-cause-of-death-young-black-men-homicide_n_3049209.html

How come no one is sitting in a street somewhere to draw attention to the death of these other young black people who have been killed? I mean, all lives matter, right?

 
Go #### yourself. No, we can't trust police officers. They are going around looking for people and trying to get them in trouble in any way possible. Today, they use leathal force at any threat whatsoever. Man, child, or dog. I would love to leave this country for one that actually had their act together and didn't imprission and murder so many people. It would be nice to live without fear that some cop will stop me someday and make my life hell on a whim. Too bad those nations actually have immigration policies they enforce because their governments still give a few ####s about their own citizens.


Our laws and "justice" system are out of control. We arrest and imprision more people than any other nation on the planet. It's sick for a nation that supposedly values freedom. And you people that try to act like our officers should be Judge Dredd are destroying our nation. I really feel sorry for our kids and grandkids. It's only going to get worse. But keep cheering on the police state.
Awesome post. Haven't laughed this hard in quite a while.

 
He took two punches to the head, while he was still in the car, and thought he was going to die? Seriously? This is a cop who has been briefed on how to beat these charges.

Officer involved in a shooting should be treated just like any other shooting suspect until cleared.
Well, I'll tell you this, since it takes only one punch to the temple to kill a person, his thought process is correct.

 
Reality is it probably doesn't even make the local news because murder is the leading cause of death of black males age 15-34 and upwards of 90% of the time its a black person doing the killing. I always wonder why there isn't more outrage over that?
Georgetown professor Michael Eric Dyson was on a Meet The Press panel Sunday with Rudy Giuliani, who made a similar point:

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2014/11/rudy_giuliani_doesn_t_understand_crime_the_former_new_york_city_mayor_is.html

"I find it very disappointing that youre not discussing the fact that 93 percent of blacks in America are killed by other blacks, said Giuliani, challenging the whole discussion of police violence. I would like the attention paid to that, paid to this."

This was Dyson's response:

"[F]irst of all, black people who commit crimes against other black people go to jail. No. 2, they are not sworn by the police department as an agent of the state to uphold the law, he said, calling Giulianis claim a false equivalency."

 
Thanks for all the serious replies. Keep ignoring the situation. We'll be back here again in another couple of years when some other black kid gets killed, justifiably or not, and more riots will occur and more people will die. It's basically an American tradition at this point.
I have no problem when a thief is shot dead.

 
Thanks for all the serious replies. Keep ignoring the situation. We'll be back here again in another couple of years when some other black kid gets killed, justifiably or not, and more riots will occur and more people will die. It's basically an American tradition at this point.
I have no problem when a thief is shot dead.
How about if an embezzler or crooked politician steals. Should they be shot dead as well? How about somebody who cheats say a couple hundred bucks on their taxes stating that they gave more to charity than they really did?

 
I think what we really need is a list of things you should do to avoid being shot by LE:

1) Obey the law

2) Be respectful to LE

By following this short list, you too can avoid being killed by a police officer, HTH.
The reason that there have been so many protests about this incident is that there is a perception that is widely held among blacks that your statement is not true in regard to them.
Fairly certain they aren't following the above rules if being shot.
Yes I realize you're fairly certain of this, but you're demonstrably wrong. Putting this incident aside, there are dozens of incidents over the past few years alone in which black youths follow your rules and are killed anyhow or otherwise badly mistreated.
Ummm........ More anecdotal evidence? I thought you didn't believe in anecdotal evidence? Guess what? Happens to Whites too. And Asians. Guess what color Doug Zerby was?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for all the serious replies. Keep ignoring the situation. We'll be back here again in another couple of years when some other black kid gets killed, justifiably or not, and more riots will occur and more people will die. It's basically an American tradition at this point.
I have no problem when a thief is shot dead.
How about if an embezzler or crooked politician steals. Should they be shot dead as well? How about somebody who cheats say a couple hundred bucks on their taxes stating that they gave more to charity than they really did?
if they attack a cop after they do it, sure.
 
Thanks for all the serious replies. Keep ignoring the situation. We'll be back here again in another couple of years when some other black kid gets killed, justifiably or not, and more riots will occur and more people will die. It's basically an American tradition at this point.
I have no problem when a thief is shot dead.
How about if an embezzler or crooked politician steals. Should they be shot dead as well? How about somebody who cheats say a couple hundred bucks on their taxes stating that they gave more to charity than they really did?
:lol: Now you are just being ridiculous. :lmao:

 
The problem is if the police lie about one thing during an investigation people will not believe anything they say about the rest of the investigation. Just be truthful...do your job honestly and people will trust you(not all but most ).i

I have a lot of cop friends and when i see them on a face book post talking about shootings like this one they say things like the world is better off without people like Mike Brown.That makes my red flags go flying up....if thats the view they have then no wonder they are so fast to shoot and ask questions later. They really do view it as a war between us and them.
Would you say that some of your best friends are cops?

 
Thanks for all the serious replies. Keep ignoring the situation. We'll be back here again in another couple of years when some other black kid gets killed, justifiably or not, and more riots will occur and more people will die. It's basically an American tradition at this point.
I have no problem when a thief is shot dead.
How about if an embezzler or crooked politician steals. Should they be shot dead as well? How about somebody who cheats say a couple hundred bucks on their taxes stating that they gave more to charity than they really did?
They're thieves. Shoot them all, obviously.

 
Reality is it probably doesn't even make the local news because murder is the leading cause of death of black males age 15-34 and upwards of 90% of the time its a black person doing the killing. I always wonder why there isn't more outrage over that?
Georgetown professor Michael Eric Dyson was on a Meet The Press panel Sunday with Rudy Giuliani, who made a similar point:http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2014/11/rudy_giuliani_doesn_t_understand_crime_the_former_new_york_city_mayor_is.html

"I find it very disappointing that youre not discussing the fact that 93 percent of blacks in America are killed by other blacks, said Giuliani, challenging the whole discussion of police violence. I would like the attention paid to that, paid to this."

This was Dyson's response:

"[F]irst of all, black people who commit crimes against other black people go to jail. No. 2, they are not sworn by the police department as an agent of the state to uphold the law, he said, calling Giulianis claim a false equivalency."
They do? Who puts them there? We all know by now that the racist white cops are too busy killing black people themselves to do it...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for all the serious replies. Keep ignoring the situation. We'll be back here again in another couple of years when some other black kid gets killed, justifiably or not, and more riots will occur and more people will die. It's basically an American tradition at this point.
I have no problem when a thief is shot dead.
Interesting viewpoint. Not often that I see someone advocating the death penalty for the crime of theft.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Reality is it probably doesn't even make the local news because murder is the leading cause of death of black males age 15-34 and upwards of 90% of the time its a black person doing the killing. I always wonder why there isn't more outrage over that?
Georgetown professor Michael Eric Dyson was on a Meet The Press panel Sunday with Rudy Giuliani, who made a similar point:

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2014/11/rudy_giuliani_doesn_t_understand_crime_the_former_new_york_city_mayor_is.html

"I find it very disappointing that youre not discussing the fact that 93 percent of blacks in America are killed by other blacks, said Giuliani, challenging the whole discussion of police violence. I would like the attention paid to that, paid to this."

This was Dyson's response:

"[F]irst of all, black people who commit crimes against other black people go to jail. No. 2, they are not sworn by the police department as an agent of the state to uphold the law, he said, calling Giulianis claim a false equivalency."
What do you know, a Georgetown professor that does not know what a false equivalency is.

 
Reality is it probably doesn't even make the local news because murder is the leading cause of death of black males age 15-34 and upwards of 90% of the time its a black person doing the killing. I always wonder why there isn't more outrage over that?
Georgetown professor Michael Eric Dyson was on a Meet The Press panel Sunday with Rudy Giuliani, who made a similar point:

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2014/11/rudy_giuliani_doesn_t_understand_crime_the_former_new_york_city_mayor_is.html

"I find it very disappointing that youre not discussing the fact that 93 percent of blacks in America are killed by other blacks, said Giuliani, challenging the whole discussion of police violence. I would like the attention paid to that, paid to this."

This was Dyson's response:

"[F]irst of all, black people who commit crimes against other black people go to jail. No. 2, they are not sworn by the police department as an agent of the state to uphold the law, he said, calling Giulianis claim a false equivalency."
What do you know, a Georgetown professor that does not know what a false equivalency is.
From the commentary of the Slate article:

"Hes right; most black people who commit crimes are arrested and convicted. Most cops who kill innocent people arent charged, much less criminally liable, as the world was reminded on Monday night as it watched a grand jury fail to decide that officer Darren Wilson should stand trial for killing Michael Brown."

 
i used to donate my time at food shelters/banks in my area on tday. sometimes xmas. 99% imo of the patrons have been black. this year we decided not to donate our time. hands down, don't serve is my new motto.
It is your personal decision of course, but to alter you views on serving due to what has been happening the last few days is troubling. It means others may hold this view and homeless/deeply poor people will suffer due to things outside their control. The above assumes you haven't been serving in Ferguson.
the point is to make people suffer. i do hope others take the same action.

 
Reality is it probably doesn't even make the local news because murder is the leading cause of death of black males age 15-34 and upwards of 90% of the time its a black person doing the killing. I always wonder why there isn't more outrage over that?
Georgetown professor Michael Eric Dyson was on a Meet The Press panel Sunday with Rudy Giuliani, who made a similar point:

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2014/11/rudy_giuliani_doesn_t_understand_crime_the_former_new_york_city_mayor_is.html

"I find it very disappointing that youre not discussing the fact that 93 percent of blacks in America are killed by other blacks, said Giuliani, challenging the whole discussion of police violence. I would like the attention paid to that, paid to this."

This was Dyson's response:

"[F]irst of all, black people who commit crimes against other black people go to jail. No. 2, they are not sworn by the police department as an agent of the state to uphold the law, he said, calling Giulianis claim a false equivalency."
What do you know, a Georgetown professor that does not know what a false equivalency is.
From the commentary of the Slate article:

"Hes right; most black people who commit crimes are arrested and convicted. Most cops who kill innocent people arent charged, much less criminally liable, as the world was reminded on Monday night as it watched a grand jury fail to decide that officer Darren Wilson should stand trial for killing Michael Brown."
What do you know, a non-reply reply.

 
From the commentary of the Slate article:

"Hes right; most black people who commit crimes are arrested and convicted. Most cops who kill innocent people arent charged, much less criminally liable, as the world was reminded on Monday night as it watched a grand jury fail to decide that officer Darren Wilson should stand trial for killing Michael Brown."
I actually agree with your point -- the "but black-on-black violence is so much more common so why isn't there more outcry about that?" is a dodge. But that said, why the hell are you quoting something from the comments section on another website?

 
From the commentary of the Slate article:

"Hes right; most black people who commit crimes are arrested and convicted. Most cops who kill innocent people arent charged, much less criminally liable, as the world was reminded on Monday night as it watched a grand jury fail to decide that officer Darren Wilson should stand trial for killing Michael Brown."
I actually agree with your point -- the "but black-on-black violence is so much more common so why isn't there more outcry about that?" is a dodge. But that said, why the hell are you quoting something from the comments section on another website?
It wasn't from the comments section, it was part of the Slate article I linked, in the same paragraph and directly following Dyson's quote. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2014/11/rudy_giuliani_doesn_t_understand_crime_the_former_new_york_city_mayor_is.html

"His co-panelist, Georgetown professor Michael Eric Dyson, shot back. “[F]irst of all, black people who commit crimes against other black people go to jail. No. 2, they are not sworn by the police department as an agent of the state to uphold the law,” he said, calling Giuliani’s claim a “false equivalency.” He’s right; most black people who commit crimes are arrested and convicted. Most cops who kill innocent people aren’t charged, much less criminally liable, as the world was reminded on Monday night as it watched a grand jury fail to decide that officer Darren Wilson should stand trial for killing Michael Brown."

Since it was editorializing/commentary by Slate, I didn't include it at the time. But since it explained why this was a false equivalency better than I could, I quoted it that rather than cut and paste the exact wording and be accused of plagiarism.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The problem is if the police lie about one thing during an investigation people will not believe anything they say about the rest of the investigation. Just be truthful...do your job honestly and people will trust you(not all but most ).i

I have a lot of cop friends and when i see them on a face book post talking about shootings like this one they say things like the world is better off without people like Mike Brown.That makes my red flags go flying up....if thats the view they have then no wonder they are so fast to shoot and ask questions later. They really do view it as a war between us and them.
Would you say that some of your best friends are cops?
i have 2 friends i grew up with that are cops ...ones white ,the other is black. The guys im talking about are acquaintances...but i wasnt surprised they said that to be honest...just eye opening in the grand scheme of things...im just glad im friends with cops as opposed to being enemies. The guys who have an issue with authority have the hardest times growing up without incident...i would never take a swing at a cop (im talking back in the day...im 50 now so that crap isnt even an option) I have always complied with police demands...even if it meant swallowing my pride...its a fight you just cant win..

 
Just caught some evening news...

Protesting which includes blocking traffic and also interfering with people doing their holiday shopping. This is how you win the public over! Smart people organizing these events...

 
Just caught some evening news...

Protesting which includes blocking traffic and also interfering with people doing their holiday shopping. This is how you win the public over! Smart people organizing these events...
Yeah, it's not like there haven't been protests about these problems in all kinds of peaceful ways for 50+ years. And the public has ignored them if they ever heard them and continue to vote on these "tough on crime" politicans who have kept arresting and imprisioning (and killing) more and more people, of course heavily biased racially. To the point where we arrest 4% of our entire population every year. But yeah, how dare these desperate people who can't get the majority to care about their issue try something to get people to listen.

And yes, it will backfire. People care more about themselves than any greater societal issue. They'll hate these people for slowing them up for a few hours more than any of these "public servants" harming people.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just caught some evening news...

Protesting which includes blocking traffic and also interfering with people doing their holiday shopping. This is how you win the public over! Smart people organizing these events...
Yeah, it's not like there haven't been protests about these problems in all kinds of peaceful ways for 50+ years. And the public has ignored them if they ever heard them and continue to vote on these "tough on crime" politicans who have kept arresting and imprisioning (and killing) more and more people, of course heavily biased racially. To the point where we arrest 4% of our entire population every year. But yeah, how dare these desperate people who can't get the majority to care about their issue try something to get people to listen.

And yes, it will backfire. People care more about themselves than any greater societal issue. They'll hate these people for slowing them up for a few hours more than any of these "public servants" harming people.
Racism is alive and well in 2014.

 
Mello, protestors who block traffic ARE doing harm, however worthy their cause might be. Bill Walton always tells of when he was at UCLA and was arrested for taking part in a student protest of the Vietnam War which blocked Wilshire Boulevard. John Wooden bailed him out of jail, and as they were driving home, Wooden said, "Bill, did you ever stop and think about if somebody needed to get to a hospital, or had some other serious emergency, and was prevented by your protest?"

Walton had no good answer to this. I suspect you don't either. The public thoroughfares are not for protest unless the protestors have special permission in a designated area. Anyone who violates this should be arrested. There are societies where things are so desperate that those who protest have no choice but to break the rules. Thankfully we don't live in one of those societies.

 
I'm surprised the white people didn't run the black people over, and claim that they felt their lives were in danger. I mean really, what's a few more dead black folks right?

 
Mello, protestors who block traffic ARE doing harm, however worthy their cause might be. Bill Walton always tells of when he was at UCLA and was arrested for taking part in a student protest of the Vietnam War which blocked Wilshire Boulevard. John Wooden bailed him out of jail, and as they were driving home, Wooden said, "Bill, did you ever stop and think about if somebody needed to get to a hospital, or had some other serious emergency, and was prevented by your protest?"

Walton had no good answer to this. I suspect you don't either. The public thoroughfares are not for protest unless the protestors have special permission in a designated area. Anyone who violates this should be arrested. There are societies where things are so desperate that those who protest have no choice but to break the rules. Thankfully we don't live in one of those societies.
So arresting and imprisioning more people people per capita than any nation on this planet, more than all those other nations we're taught to hate, in the supposed land of the free isn't that desperate? I disagree.

 
I'm surprised the white people didn't run the black people over, and claim that they felt their lives were in danger. I mean really, what's a few more dead black folks right?
Your issues here sound like a YOU problem, not an everyone else/USA problem.

You are the guy who jacked off in your daughters bed, right?
You don't like Tamron Hall?? Dude you gotta separate the Shtick from reality. Most people get it.

 
I'm surprised the white people didn't run the black people over, and claim that they felt their lives were in danger. I mean really, what's a few more dead black folks right?
You know, I've been spending most of my time in this thread criticizing some of the pro-Wilson posts. But even the very worst of those would have to really struggle to reach this level of obnoxiousness .
 
Mello, protestors who block traffic ARE doing harm, however worthy their cause might be. Bill Walton always tells of when he was at UCLA and was arrested for taking part in a student protest of the Vietnam War which blocked Wilshire Boulevard. John Wooden bailed him out of jail, and as they were driving home, Wooden said, "Bill, did you ever stop and think about if somebody needed to get to a hospital, or had some other serious emergency, and was prevented by your protest?"

Walton had no good answer to this. I suspect you don't either. The public thoroughfares are not for protest unless the protestors have special permission in a designated area. Anyone who violates this should be arrested. There are societies where things are so desperate that those who protest have no choice but to break the rules. Thankfully we don't live in one of those societies.
So arresting and imprisioning more people people per capita than any nation on this planet, more than all those other nations we're taught to hate, in the supposed land of the free isn't that desperate? I disagree.
Disagree all you want. Societies that shut down newspapers, that arrest political prisoners , that don't allow freedom of speech or rights for women- those are far worse than ours no matter how many people we arrest.
 
Thanks for all the serious replies. Keep ignoring the situation. We'll be back here again in another couple of years when some other black kid gets killed, justifiably or not, and more riots will occur and more people will die. It's basically an American tradition at this point.
I have no problem when a thief is shot dead.
Interesting viewpoint. Not often that I see someone advocating the death penalty for the crime of theft.
Maybe he did mean that they should be executed. More than likely he meant it is not really something to get too upset about when an aggressive thief is shot dead during an altercation with a cop.

 
Mello, protestors who block traffic ARE doing harm, however worthy their cause might be. Bill Walton always tells of when he was at UCLA and was arrested for taking part in a student protest of the Vietnam War which blocked Wilshire Boulevard. John Wooden bailed him out of jail, and as they were driving home, Wooden said, "Bill, did you ever stop and think about if somebody needed to get to a hospital, or had some other serious emergency, and was prevented by your protest?"

Walton had no good answer to this. I suspect you don't either. The public thoroughfares are not for protest unless the protestors have special permission in a designated area. Anyone who violates this should be arrested. There are societies where things are so desperate that those who protest have no choice but to break the rules. Thankfully we don't live in one of those societies.
So arresting and imprisioning more people people per capita than any nation on this planet, more than all those other nations we're taught to hate, in the supposed land of the free isn't that desperate? I disagree.
Disagree all you want. Societies that shut down newspapers, that arrest political prisoners , that don't allow freedom of speech or rights for women- those are far worse than ours no matter how many people we arrest.
You do realize that your statement and mine prior can both be true?

 
I'm surprised the white people didn't run the black people over, and claim that they felt their lives were in danger. I mean really, what's a few more dead black folks right?
You know, I've been spending most of my time in this thread criticizing some of the pro-Wilson posts. But even the very worst of those would have to really struggle to reach this level of obnoxiousness .
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: Come on Tim. This thread is full of obnoxiousness. Why can't I partake??

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top