What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Man of Steel (5 Viewers)

I thought it was pretty disjointed throughout, and the last half hour really dragged. It got to be like a transformers movie: 2-3 super beings duking it out with lots of collateral damage and collapsing skyscrapers. Yay. The ending was really corny.

The first hour or so was money, though.
yay for misinformed opinions

 
I thought it was pretty disjointed throughout, and the last half hour really dragged. It got to be like a transformers movie: 2-3 super beings duking it out with lots of collateral damage and collapsing skyscrapers. Yay. The ending was really corny.

The first hour or so was money, though.
yay for misinformed opinions
Misinformed....opinion. Okay, guy. Why don't you scamper on back to the Tebow thread.

 
I thought it was pretty disjointed throughout, and the last half hour really dragged. It got to be like a transformers movie: 2-3 super beings duking it out with lots of collateral damage and collapsing skyscrapers. Yay. The ending was really corny.

The first hour or so was money, though.
yay for misinformed opinions
Misinformed....opinion. Okay, guy. Why don't you scamper on back to the Tebow thread.
yes, misinformed opinion, what you said was

"first hour was good then it reminded me of a movie that had one of the best special effects ever to grace the screen"

if you were informed you wouldn't have made that statement as a way to negatively review superman

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I thought it was pretty disjointed throughout, and the last half hour really dragged. It got to be like a transformers movie: 2-3 super beings duking it out with lots of collateral damage and collapsing skyscrapers. Yay. The ending was really corny.

The first hour or so was money, though.
yay for misinformed opinions
Misinformed....opinion. Okay, guy. Why don't you scamper on back to the Tebow thread.
yes, misinformed opinion, what you said was "first hour was good then it reminded me of a movie that had one of the best special effects ever to grace the screen"

if you were informed you wouldn't have made that statement as a way to negatively review superman
A moron might interpret it that way, sure. I said nothing about the CGI or special effects being poor, or anything of the sort. I said it had a very Transformers-like penchant for throwing a mind-numbing amount of repetitive city destruction into the final hour.

 
I thought it was pretty disjointed throughout, and the last half hour really dragged. It got to be like a transformers movie: 2-3 super beings duking it out with lots of collateral damage and collapsing skyscrapers. Yay. The ending was really corny.

The first hour or so was money, though.
yay for misinformed opinions
Misinformed....opinion. Okay, guy. Why don't you scamper on back to the Tebow thread.
yes, misinformed opinion, what you said was "first hour was good then it reminded me of a movie that had one of the best special effects ever to grace the screen"

if you were informed you wouldn't have made that statement as a way to negatively review superman
A moron might interpret it that way, sure. I said nothing about the CGI or special effects being poor, or anything of the sort. I said it had a very Transformers-like penchant for throwing a mind-numbing amount of repetitive city destruction into the final hour.
repetitive city destruction with amazing special effects --you admitted they were-- is a bad thing? Another words, repetitive fun? I guess if I was an elitist moron --who can't just enjoy a movie that is fun-- I could see how your review is very informed, rather than uninformed trash.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
the cornell tune was great

hadnt heard that in a while

I did like the movie but agree the fight scenes were excessive. could've had more character building instead.

 
the cornell tune was great

hadnt heard that in a while

I did like the movie but agree the fight scenes were excessive. could've had more character building instead.
After the Transformers films and the Avengers, studios realized audiences will pay over $1 billion to see a film filled with little more than fights and special effects now. That's what they modeled Man of Steel to accomplish. Looks like they succeeded.

Pacific Rim is another one, coming in July. It'll probably exceed box office expectations because its full of giant robots fighting giant monsters.

 
I liked it, but its not in the same league as any if the Batmans, avengers or the first ironman.

He became superman way too fast. There was no development there. I'd have liked to see a bit more of the loner searching for himself and then more explanation/training/discovering of powers with jor el. The action scenes were good but they were too long. The Clark kent reporter disguise cannot work here. It's because people already knew Clark kent as this weakling, that he's never suspected if bring superman. Here, Lois knows him, she interviewed his whole town, zod destroys smallville first of all places, the police dropped lois off at the Kent's, the Kent's house is destroyed, they got the phantom #### from their barn, lois calls him clark the whole movie (in frint of others i think?) then he shows up at the daily planter with a pair if glasses still calling himself Clark kent.

 
the cornell tune was great

hadnt heard that in a while

I did like the movie but agree the fight scenes were excessive. could've had more character building instead.
After the Transformers films and the Avengers, studios realized audiences will pay over $1 billion to see a film filled with little more than fights and special effects now. That's what they modeled Man of Steel to accomplish. Looks like they succeeded.

Pacific Rim is another one, coming in July. It'll probably exceed box office expectations because its full of giant robots fighting giant monsters.
The avengers had a lot of background for the characters in the film and in the other movies leading up to it.

 
the cornell tune was great

hadnt heard that in a while

I did like the movie but agree the fight scenes were excessive. could've had more character building instead.
After the Transformers films and the Avengers, studios realized audiences will pay over $1 billion to see a film filled with little more than fights and special effects now. That's what they modeled Man of Steel to accomplish. Looks like they succeeded.

Pacific Rim is another one, coming in July. It'll probably exceed box office expectations because its full of giant robots fighting giant monsters.
The avengers had a lot of background for the characters in the film and in the other movies leading up to it.
Most people just liked the fights. How else do you explain the Transformers series?

 
They are comparing superman to Jesus now? #### the world.
Less of a comparison...more of a bludgeoning over the head the entire film. That said, all of the father/son stuff hit home, and I liked it quite a bit. I could have gone without the extra one-on-one with Zod...as someone mentioned earlier, he could have been taken care of with the rest of the group, and I would have been fine with that.
Yea I see the parallel pretty clearly now, having seen it last night.

 
There's at least 3 more films filled with fight scenes coming in 2014 too. Godzilla, Transformers 4, and All you need is Kill. The last one is with Tom Cruise and the premise is he is caught in a loop where he fights a big battle and dies over and over and over.

 
the cornell tune was great

hadnt heard that in a while

I did like the movie but agree the fight scenes were excessive. could've had more character building instead.
After the Transformers films and the Avengers, studios realized audiences will pay over $1 billion to see a film filled with little more than fights and special effects now. That's what they modeled Man of Steel to accomplish. Looks like they succeeded.

Pacific Rim is another one, coming in July. It'll probably exceed box office expectations because its full of giant robots fighting giant monsters.
The avengers had a lot of background for the characters in the film and in the other movies leading up to it.
Most people just liked the fights. How else do you explain the Transformers series?
Transformers 1 = good movie

Transformers 2 = okay movie

Transformers 3 = terrible movie

Maybe "more fights" = less of a movie

 
I thought it was pretty disjointed throughout, and the last half hour really dragged. It got to be like a transformers movie: 2-3 super beings duking it out with lots of collateral damage and collapsing skyscrapers. Yay. The ending was really corny.

The first hour or so was money, though.
yay for misinformed opinions
Misinformed....opinion. Okay, guy. Why don't you scamper on back to the Tebow thread.
yes, misinformed opinion, what you said was "first hour was good then it reminded me of a movie that had one of the best special effects ever to grace the screen"

if you were informed you wouldn't have made that statement as a way to negatively review superman
A moron might interpret it that way, sure. I said nothing about the CGI or special effects being poor, or anything of the sort. I said it had a very Transformers-like penchant for throwing a mind-numbing amount of repetitive city destruction into the final hour.
repetitive city destruction with amazing special effects --you admitted they were-- is a bad thing? Another words, repetitive fun? I guess if I was an elitist moron --who can't just enjoy a movie that is fun-- I could see how your review is very informed, rather than uninformed trash.
You are the worst. Seriously. The worst.

 
the cornell tune was great

hadnt heard that in a while

I did like the movie but agree the fight scenes were excessive. could've had more character building instead.
After the Transformers films and the Avengers, studios realized audiences will pay over $1 billion to see a film filled with little more than fights and special effects now. That's what they modeled Man of Steel to accomplish. Looks like they succeeded.

Pacific Rim is another one, coming in July. It'll probably exceed box office expectations because its full of giant robots fighting giant monsters.
The avengers had a lot of background for the characters in the film and in the other movies leading up to it.
Most people just liked the fights. How else do you explain the Transformers series?
Transformers 1 = good movieTransformers 2 = okay movie

Transformers 3 = terrible movie

Maybe "more fights" = less of a movie
Transformers 2 was really bad. 3 was better, but was only ok. The first was pretty good but the sequels kind of take away from it.

 
I enjoyed it. Didn't care for the new Lois-Clark angle - but it is new.

I appreciate the plot and story. I know people rave about Avengers - which I thoroughly enjoyed - but that movie seriously lacked for a story.

Sounds like DC is more interested in a Supes-Bats film in the short term than a JLA movie (the first to be the predecessor to the latter).

And I think those calling out the Savior references are over-reacting. It was there but they weren't beating people over the heads with it

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I saw this last night, I thought it was pretty bad. Way too much focus on the alien backstory, way too little time spent on earth and then the battle scenes were super repetitive, race as fast as you can at each, other, collide, destroy some city, lather, rinse, repeat. Not a good superhero movie, not a good superman movie.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I enjoyed it. Didn't care for the new Lois-Clark angle - but it is new.

I appreciate the plot and story. I know people rave about Avengers - which I thoroughly enjoyed - but that movie seriously lacked for a story.

Sounds like DC is more interested in a Supes-Bats film in the short term than a JLA movie (the first to be the predecessor to the latter).

And I think those calling out the Savior references are over-reacting. It was there but they weren't beating people over the heads with it
Except for Clark going to church for guidance with Jesus over his shoulder and the cross pose.

 
I saw this last night, I thought it was pretty bad. Way too much focus on the alien backstory, way too little time spent on earth and then the battle scenes were super repetitive, race as fast as you can at each, other, collide, destroy some city, lather, rinse, repeat. Not a good superhero movie, not a good superman movie.
You were hoping for a pillow fight?

 
I absolutely loved it.

I am a huge Superman fan.....this is the Superman movie. And again I am a huge fan of Superman The Movie and Superman II.

But this was on an entirely a different level.

Acting was superb.

Look forward to the sequel.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I saw this last night, I thought it was pretty bad. Way too much focus on the alien backstory, way too little time spent on earth and then the battle scenes were super repetitive, race as fast as you can at each, other, collide, destroy some city, lather, rinse, repeat. Not a good superhero movie, not a good superman movie.
You were hoping for a pillow fight?
I was hoping not every fight scene would be exactly the same.

 
I saw this last night, I thought it was pretty bad. Way too much focus on the alien backstory, way too little time spent on earth and then the battle scenes were super repetitive, race as fast as you can at each, other, collide, destroy some city, lather, rinse, repeat. Not a good superhero movie, not a good superman movie.
You were hoping for a pillow fight?
I was hoping not every fight scene would be exactly the same.
I was yanking your chain - but how else would you see the fight scenes taking place between two supermen?

 
The Transformers movies have been uniformly awful, even by mindless summer movie blockbuster standards
"WHY WASTE SPLEEN on Michael Bay? He’s a real visionary—perhaps mindless in some ways (he’s never bothered filming a good script), but Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen is more proof he has a great eye for scale and a gift for visceral amazement."

I suggest reading the rest of this article http://nypress.com/bad-boys-and-toys-transformers-revenge-of-the-fallen/ and educating yourself before making another silly statement

 
The Transformers movies have been uniformly awful, even by mindless summer movie blockbuster standards
"WHY WASTE SPLEEN on Michael Bay? He’s a real visionary—perhaps mindless in some ways (he’s never bothered filming a good script), but Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen is more proof he has a great eye for scale and a gift for visceral amazement."

I suggest reading the rest of this article http://nypress.com/bad-boys-and-toys-transformers-revenge-of-the-fallen/ and educating yourself before making another silly statement
"Great eye for scale" sounds like the best backhanded compliment for a director I've ever heard

And the only "visceral amazement" I took from those movies was how poorly done they were

 
The Transformers movies have been uniformly awful, even by mindless summer movie blockbuster standards
"WHY WASTE SPLEEN on Michael Bay? He’s a real visionary—perhaps mindless in some ways (he’s never bothered filming a good script), but Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen is more proof he has a great eye for scale and a gift for visceral amazement."

I suggest reading the rest of this article http://nypress.com/bad-boys-and-toys-transformers-revenge-of-the-fallen/ and educating yourself before making another silly statement
"Great eye for scale" sounds like the best backhanded compliment for a director I've ever heard

And the only "visceral amazement" I took from those movies was how poorly done they were
I read only the first part of that review. Couldn't tell if he was being sarcastic or not.

 
The Transformers movies have been uniformly awful, even by mindless summer movie blockbuster standards
"WHY WASTE SPLEEN on Michael Bay? He’s a real visionary—perhaps mindless in some ways (he’s never bothered filming a good script), but Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen is more proof he has a great eye for scale and a gift for visceral amazement."

I suggest reading the rest of this article http://nypress.com/bad-boys-and-toys-transformers-revenge-of-the-fallen/ and educating yourself before making another silly statement
"Great eye for scale" sounds like the best backhanded compliment for a director I've ever heard

And the only "visceral amazement" I took from those movies was how poorly done they were
I read only the first part of that review. Couldn't tell if he was being sarcastic or not.
It's Armond White...it's what he does

He's like The Onion of film review

http://filmdrunk.uproxx.com/2013/03/armond-white-room-237-calls-everyone-nerds

 
I have never read any superman comics - was Krypton really a Star-Wars/Lord of the Rings hybrid type of planet?

I know they were obviously advanced.. but it seemed portrayed in a really weird way in this movie, but i'm not sure what's Canon.

Overall I did not like the movie very well.

I did not like the way they bounced around in time to tell the story.

As an origin story movie, I far preferred the original Superman with Reeve. I think that was a solid origin movie with a solid story line. It was wrapped up in a strange way with the whole turning back time thing... but the entire idea that superman has to make choices.. he can't save everyone... save a city, or save lois... that has to weigh on someone with his powers.

 
I saw this last night with my son (9); it was better than okay but not quite good. I far preferred the original Superman movie to this but this movie had its moments. I agree that the depiction of Krypton was over the top. I would also note how fantastic Puzo's original screenplay, and original story, was that it is still "borrowed" from here. I thought the fight scenes were a distraction but much more realistic of how a "Superman" fight would look. Was Jimmy Olsen in the movie?

 
No Jimmy Olsen was not in the movie.

I loved Superman The Movie. I was 8 years old when it came out...went and saw it in the theater (at that time it was a $1.50 to see a flick) 8 times. I was in awe. It was my childhood....and Superman is my favorite all time super hero.

I felt Man of Steel was a marvelous update. The acting was second to none of any Superman movie ever made. Zod was brilliant. I like that this movie took a darker turn. It was made with the same type of darker style that Nolan's Batman trilogy took.

As an orgin story.....it was solid. Not as good in some aspects as Reeves original Superman but very solid.

Costner was so good as Kents father. A very nice low key performance for Kevin. Crowe was as always fantastic and the perfect Jorel.

I loved the vision of Krypton in this movie. Of course they were far more advanced than us!!! And the visuals were stunning for the Krypton scenes. I would have loved a little more time on Krypton......but we all know the story. At least we got to really see Zod's story fleshed out a lot more than the couple of minutes they got in Superman The Movie. We never knew anything about the "why" (unless you read the comics) with Zod and his crew in Superman II. And this movie was great at making you actually feel for Zod and his unwaivering loyalty to his race although he was a madman and being portrayed as a potential Hitler type of dictator.

The movie was great and such a leap from the abysmal Superman III, IV and the huge dissapointment of Supeman Returns.

Again....to me this is The Superman Movie I had been hoping for as far as acting, effects and overall feel.

A real telling scene of the inner-struggle he had with his powers and his commitment to Earth/human race.

Was when he finally broke Zods neck. Excellent scene.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Man of Steal My Eight Bucks.

Big disappointment.

They fly around for the last 45 minutes completely destroying an entire city only to find out he can kill the bad guy by snapping his neck?

Dumb.

 
Wtf is a star wars / lord of the rings planet?
it's when the creators of Man of Steel rip off the creators of star wars and LOTR and create a Krypton that looks like a Hybrid of Coruscant, The outer rim, and Middle Earth.

 
The Transformers movies have been uniformly awful, even by mindless summer movie blockbuster standards
"WHY WASTE SPLEEN on Michael Bay? He’s a real visionary—perhaps mindless in some ways (he’s never bothered filming a good script), but Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen is more proof he has a great eye for scale and a gift for visceral amazement."

I suggest reading the rest of this article http://nypress.com/bad-boys-and-toys-transformers-revenge-of-the-fallen/ and educating yourself before making another silly statement
"Great eye for scale" sounds like the best backhanded compliment for a director I've ever heard

And the only "visceral amazement" I took from those movies was how poorly done they were
I read only the first part of that review. Couldn't tell if he was being sarcastic or not.
It's Armond White...it's what he does

He's like The Onion of film review

http://filmdrunk.uproxx.com/2013/03/armond-white-room-237-calls-everyone-nerds
i love how people think "oh he likes movies i dislike and hates movies i like he is the onion of film review"

 
Northern Voice said:
jdoggydogg said:
I liked the movie. But I think it could have used more character development and less explosions.
:goodposting: And for all I disliked about the movie, I do think it set the table well for future movies, which hopefully focus more on characters (on planet earth).
Yes.

I like Zack Snyder. But aside from 300 and Legend of the Guardians, I think he needs help on the script level.

 
Next movie would be good if they introduced Lex as a Trump type - but more ruthelss - and somehow Supes actions run afoul of Luthors ambitions. And then Lex makes his Superman hit squad - including the Parasite, Metallo and maybe one other.

And of course it cannot be traced back to Lex.

 
"Ooh look, another skyscraper just fell!!! Whoa they're punching each other while smashing through a bunch of stuff again!!! Awesome!!!"

 
Next movie would be good if they introduced Lex as a Trump type - but more ruthelss - and somehow Supes actions run afoul of Luthors ambitions. And then Lex makes his Superman hit squad - including the Parasite, Metallo and maybe one other.

And of course it cannot be traced back to Lex.
Well, we know he owns trucks.

 
I'm really beginning to wonder if I saw the same movie everyone else saw. The one I saw had Amy Adams looking good, cool visual effects, fun entertaining scenes and great performances by Russel Crowe and Kevin Costner all mixed in a reboot of a classic character using modern special effects. You know, fun.

IS there like an underground version of this thing that is getting released in some theaters?

 
I'm really beginning to wonder if I saw the same movie everyone else saw. The one I saw had Amy Adams looking good, cool visual effects, fun entertaining scenes and great performances by Russel Crowe and Kevin Costner all mixed in a reboot of a classic character using modern special effects. You know, fun.

IS there like an underground version of this thing that is getting released in some theaters?
:goodposting: some people take #### a little too seriously.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top