What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Martz hired by San Fran (1 Viewer)

Couch Potato said:
This is my home team, and has been since the John Brodie days. I follow the details here, the press conferences, the little quotes that bubble up out of nowhere.Anyone who thinks someone other than Alex Smith will be the starting QB is very, very, mistaken. The mindset of the Yorks virtually demand he starts. They invested in him with the #1 overall and are nowhere near ready to give up on him. Smith may be the #1 reason they hired Martz. So, PLEASE trust me and ignore any crap you may hear about Hill or anyone else getting the job. It ain't happening.
Fair enough. Given the above, would give your opinion in a similar format to Bicycle Seat Sniffer a few posts above (i.e. skill position or player by player) as to how you see the move changing the fantasy values of the various offensive players. I am particularly curious about the WRs. DJax was 1,000 WR and a borderline WR1 with Seattle - and the wheels have fallen off. Then you have Battle, who has never truly lived up to expectations, then you have Lelie who had shown some promise than wilted. Of course you have the young Hill in the mix as well. Thoughts on them individually (I realize it's easy to say Martz = upgrade to WRs)?
I'll try to do this sometime today, time permitting. Lots of misconceptions in this thread. Anyone is permitted to post on a message board whether they know what they are talking about or not, and some here are very ignorant about the effect of Martz on various players in 2008.
:thumbup:
BTW, I wasn't referring to you BSS, but some other posts from guys who obviously neither know the 49ers or Martz well enough to comment reasonably. And when I use the term 'ignorant' I don't mean 'stupid' but only 'not knowing.' I don't equate ignorant with stupid but know that some people do, and I hope this clarification avoids folks taking offense with the word.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Couch Potato said:
This is my home team, and has been since the John Brodie days. I follow the details here, the press conferences, the little quotes that bubble up out of nowhere.Anyone who thinks someone other than Alex Smith will be the starting QB is very, very, mistaken. The mindset of the Yorks virtually demand he starts. They invested in him with the #1 overall and are nowhere near ready to give up on him. Smith may be the #1 reason they hired Martz. So, PLEASE trust me and ignore any crap you may hear about Hill or anyone else getting the job. It ain't happening.
Fair enough. Given the above, would give your opinion in a similar format to Bicycle Seat Sniffer a few posts above (i.e. skill position or player by player) as to how you see the move changing the fantasy values of the various offensive players. I am particularly curious about the WRs. DJax was 1,000 WR and a borderline WR1 with Seattle - and the wheels have fallen off. Then you have Battle, who has never truly lived up to expectations, then you have Lelie who had shown some promise than wilted. Of course you have the young Hill in the mix as well. Thoughts on them individually (I realize it's easy to say Martz = upgrade to WRs)?
I'll try to do this sometime today, time permitting. Lots of misconceptions in this thread. Anyone is permitted to post on a message board whether they know what they are talking about or not, and some here are very ignorant about the effect of Martz on various players in 2008.
:thumbup:
BTW, I wasn't referring to you BSS, but some other posts from guys who obviously neither know the 49ers or Martz well enough to comment reasonably. And wehn I use the term 'ignorant' I don't mean stupid, but only 'not knowing.' I don't equate ignorant with stupid but I do know some people do, and I hope this clarification avoids folks taking offense with the word.
I know. I think my take is pretty acurate I want to see what you have to say though being much closer to the SF situation than I.
 
I think this might be an upgrade for Davis. Two of the greatest tight ends of all time saw great success in this offense. If Davis has the talent to make it as a stud TE, Martz is a great hire for him.
Do you mean Winslow Sr for one of these guys?? Davis is not even close to Winslow in talent as a TE and Winslow has some of the greatest talent around him at that time. Dan Fouts, Wes Chandler, Charlie Joiner, John Jefferson, Chuck Muncie and a very talented line. Davis doesnt have that kind of talent around him and he like I said before not close to SR. Winlsow had a lot of open field to deal with with all that talent around himWould like to know who the other guy is you are talking about?? It might be Gonzo. In that case Davis could be compared because right now the Niners lack pass catchers like the Chefs have since Gonzo landed on the team. Davis maybe faster but in no way is he even in Gonzo's zone when it comes to TE.
 
Martz continues to live off his early success as an OC in St. Louis, which I attribute to the players more than his system. When he got the chance to showcase his "brilliance" he crapped the bed and was FIRED in St. Louis.

He then gets a second chance as the OC in Detroit to prove what he did as the OC in St. Louis was no joke and what did he do? NOTHING. His brilliant offensive scheme took Detroit to a 3-13 record 2 years ago and finished 7-9 this year after starting 6-2 and then completely imploding despite having quality offensive talent, then was fired again.
Detroit was 28th in the NFL in points scored in 2005. Martz was then hired to be the OC.

Detroit improved to 21st in point scored in 2006.

Detroit improved again to 16th in points scored in 2007.

Meanwhile, the defense has gotten worse over the last two years. But yeah, it was Martz's fault that the team still stunk. Keep telling yourself that.

There is a reason websites like:

http://dumpmartz.com/

http://firemartz.com/

were started.
Oh. So, if I start a website called www.norvturnersucks.com, will that prove once and for all that he sucks?
He was given a chance to reproduce what he did in St. Louis in Detroit with some quality talent at the skill positions and what did he do? He didn't utilize them correctly.
The offense improved both years under Martz in Detroit, but feel free to keep ignoring the facts.
The offense had to improve didn't it? With all the weapons they have been adding wouldn't you expect it to improve with or without Martz? Fact is it should have improved more if he is such a genius. There is a reason he was fired!Martz was then hired to be the OC.

Detroit improved to 21st in point scored in 2006.

Detroit improved again to 16th in points scored in 2007.

Detroit was 16th in the league, they were also behind such teams as Minn., Houston, Cleveland and the Saints. While being average might be O.K. it's clearly not what he did in St. Louis, thats all I'm trying to say. I think we could all agree that Detroit has more offensive talent than some of the teams ranked ahead of them, yet according to your stats they rank below these teams. He just wasn't doing a good job and maybe they realized that he wasn't capable of reproducing what he did in St. Louis, no matter what talent they gave him.

All this being said the talent in San Fran is also not comparable to what he had in St. Louis and I think that within two years you will see that he receive accolades because of his players and not really his system. Just my opinion.

 
MIKE MARTZ: Hired by 49ers, says NFL-worst San Fran offense 'much further along' than Lions

January 9, 2008

FREE PRESS STAFF AND NEWS SERVICES

SAN FRANCISCO -- The San Francisco 49ers hired Mike Martz as their offensive coordinator, and he took a few parting shots at the Lions.

The San Francisco Chronicle posted some of Martz’s comments early Wednesday.

When asked if the 49ers were comparable to the Lions offense, Martz said. "No, no, no. This is much further along. This is totally different. This is not even close to where we were with the Lions. This is a much different situation."

:)

 
BusterTBronco said:
BusterTBronco said:
[quote name='fruity pebbles' Kevin Johnson

2006 689 yards rushing (3.8 avg)

2007 581 yards rushing (3.8 avg)

You're right. Mike Martz was a godsend for Kevin Johnson owners.
Do you not get points for receiving yards or TDs?
KJ had 8 TD's in both '06 and '07. Are we supposed to be impressed by that? I kind of expect a STARTING runningback to do a little better than that. Perhaps you have lower expectations.
he didnt play a full season in 06 or 07

considering that his TD numbers are decent

 
49ers | Martz to build offense around GoreWed, 9 Jan 2008 10:06:58 -0800Matt Maiocco, of The Santa Rosa Press Democrat, reports San Francisco 49ers offensive coordinator Mike Martz said he will build the team's offense around RB Frank Gore because he is the centerpiece.
:mellow:
 
This is an upgrade for EVERY SF offensive player relative to last years team. That isn't saying much, but for those saying it's bad for Gore/Davis/etc, i don't see that as likely due to how bad they were this past season.

Also about Martz not using the TE...he's never had a really talented TE who can be a dangerous weapon on offense. NFL coaches can adapt based on their teams makeup, and Martz isn't going to ignore a weapon like Davis who can own the middle of the field.

 
Despite what some will think, this raises Frank Gore's value. If he stays healthy, he will now catch 60-70 balls (at least), he will run for at least 1,200 yards, and he will score more.Yes, Martz loves throwing the ball, but when he has had a stud at RB, he has used him. Gore is a stud, and Martz will use him like crazy.
Like it did Kevin Jones?
 
I thought Martz was a great hire until I listened to Jim Miller on the NFL channel on Sirius. He made some valid points.

1. Martz's system is so complicated for running backs that Tatum Bell said he never knew if he was in the right spot or where exactly he was supposed to line up...ultimately cost him his job. He also mentioned that Martz had to "dumb down" the playbook for the back there because it was too complex for them. That would explain the lack of running plays...

2. The receivers Martz has had success with were great receivers or ones that were already familiar with his system. He has neither in San Fran.

3. The TE plays virtually no part in the passing game. Vernon Davis' stock just went in the ground.

 
Sometimes I think people make things too complicated.

*** Jim Hostler was calling the plays in SF last year.

*** The 49ers were the worst offense in the league last year.

Does anyone REALLY think SF won't improve under Martz? Seriously?

 
Sometimes I think people make things too complicated.*** Jim Hostler was calling the plays in SF last year.*** The 49ers were the worst offense in the league last year.Does anyone REALLY think SF won't improve under Martz? Seriously?
This is the bottom line, though I don't think he's an ideal fit.Other thoughts:Davis is their 2nd best offensive player, Martz isn't going to ignore him.I also don't think Smith has a guaranteed starters job like mentioned earlier in this thread. While his ability to scramble might be a plus in an offense that doesn't give him a lot of protection, he's just not very accurate (which I imagine would be a big problem w/ Martz). I wouldn't be surprised to see Hill start. I don't think it was just coincidence that when Hill came in, guys like Jackson and Davis were suddenly catching passes.
 
Sometimes I think people make things too complicated.*** Jim Hostler was calling the plays in SF last year.*** The 49ers were the worst offense in the league last year.Does anyone REALLY think SF won't improve under Martz? Seriously?
In 2005, the Niners had the worst offense in the league. Under Norv Turner in 2006, they improved--to the #26 offense in the league.They might not be #32, but they'll still be pretty dang bad.
 
Despite what some will think, this raises Frank Gore's value. If he stays healthy, he will now catch 60-70 balls (at least), he will run for at least 1,200 yards, and he will score more.Yes, Martz loves throwing the ball, but when he has had a stud at RB, he has used him. Gore is a stud, and Martz will use him like crazy.
Like it did Kevin Jones?
Kevin Jones is no Frank Gore; never has been, never will be. I thought everyone knew that already.
 
Sometimes I think people make things too complicated.*** Jim Hostler was calling the plays in SF last year.*** The 49ers were the worst offense in the league last year.Does anyone REALLY think SF won't improve under Martz? Seriously?
:lmao: The "downgrade Gore" crowd is laughable.
 
A Martz led offense will move the ball better than they did last year but that is the only thing that is certain. Without the correct personnel and enough time to learn the system your still going to be looking at a terrible offense. Fantasy wise they will put up yardage, but in the actual game of football his system will not help them win games.

 
Martz hired by San Fran, New OC
As a Seahawks fan all I can say is...awesome.
:yes: I wouldve rather had CC and Martz doesnt seem to be a good fit for the personell but Hostler was horrendous.
It could work short-term but Nolan is in trouble with this hire. Martz is notorious for his demands for autonomy but I'm guessing they addressed Gore and his role before putting pen to paper. I think you'll be happy at times and ready to kill him at times. I really like Nolan personally, I think he is a guy with a ton of integrity. Having Martz around is gonna be tough but the 49ers have the personnel.
 
Sometimes I think people make things too complicated.*** Jim Hostler was calling the plays in SF last year.*** The 49ers were the worst offense in the league last year.Does anyone REALLY think SF won't improve under Martz? Seriously?
In 2005, the Niners had the worst offense in the league. Under Norv Turner in 2006, they improved--to the #26 offense in the league.They might not be #32, but they'll still be pretty dang bad.
Sure...and under Norv Turner, Frank Gore had*** 2,180 yards from scrimmage*** 61 receptions*** 9 TDsAgain, if you read through the entire thread I think I clearly state my view that Martz, to my mind, wasn't the best hire possible b/c he puts his QBs in dangerous situations. However, the debate somehow devolved into lots of people suggesting this would be BAD for Gore and the rest of the SF offense. That's just silliness. The 49ers offense this year was the definition of ineptitude. Will Gore be an uber stud? I won't know that until I see what they do in the offseason and, to that point, what the offensive line looks like. But I can tell you that if he's healthy, he'll be a viable (if not studly) fantasy RB.Let's not forget that Gore caught 53 passes THIS YEAR and ran for 1,200+ yards...I can only hope that he falls into the mid- to late-first round this year's drafts.
 
Sometimes I think people make things too complicated.

*** Jim Hostler was calling the plays in SF last year.

*** The 49ers were the worst offense in the league last year.

Does anyone REALLY think SF won't improve under Martz? Seriously?
Just saying that they improve is not an indicator of how successful Martz will be. They were the worst and have no where to go but up. Sure they are going to improve but at what cost? Alienating a young and talented TE who you used a high draft pick to get? Frustrating a young QB who you used the 1st pick in the draft to get? Going away from what proved to be successful 2 years ago, the power running game.

I don't care how much Martz says he will use Gore as the "centerpiece". As the old saying goes, you can't teach an old dog new tricks and Martz's one-dimensional offense is old and predictable.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sometimes I think people make things too complicated.

*** Jim Hostler was calling the plays in SF last year.

*** The 49ers were the worst offense in the league last year.

Does anyone REALLY think SF won't improve under Martz? Seriously?
Just saying that they improve is not an indicator of how successful Martz will be. They were the worst and have no where to go but up. Sure they are going to improve but at what cost? Alienating a young and talented TE who you used a high draft pick to get? Frustrating a young QB who you used the 1st pick in the draft to get? Going away from what proved to be successful 2 years ago, the power running game.

I don't care how much Martz says he will use Gore as the "centerpiece". As the old saying goes, you can't teach an old dog new tricks and Martz's one-dimensional offense is old and predictable.
These guys are professional football players on a terrible team and they need to worry about winning games. Coach's coach and the players play and who cares if everyone is happy. In reality who's to say they won't be happy, this is totally your opinion that the players will be alienated. Winning tends to make teams happy and cures a lot of ills. Even when they had the power running game they were 7-9 and this year they regressed to 5-11, so they need to worry about winning games.

 
Guys and Gals, Nolan's job is on the line, do you think he would have made this hire if he thought this would make them worse. A year like last year and Nolan is gone, and Martz's credibility is crushed. Martz would not have taken this job if he did not think there was potential. Let's wait and see! As a Gore owner I am very excited. The guy can catch balls, and he is a much better runner than Jones

Jason Wood said:
Sometimes I think people make things too complicated.*** Jim Hostler was calling the plays in SF last year.*** The 49ers were the worst offense in the league last year.Does anyone REALLY think SF won't improve under Martz? Seriously?
 
Otis said:
Frank Gore's return to studness.
Or maybe the FG K becomes the stud because in Detroit, when they had opportunities to pound it in the redzone for TD's Martz foolishly tried to throw. Thus Hansen with his best year since 98. I predict the same in SF. If Martz has to try and make Smith into something, Smith may want to take out extra medical insurance. He sucks as is, with Martz he will be worse. Martz blows and this group is far worse than Detroit. When does he bring in McDonald and the rejects he brought in before McDonald. He's not going to sit with Jackson, Lelie and the rest of them. Battle may have a spot.
 
I see this as the perfect example of the ineptitude of the 49ers FO. Unless Cameron told the FO he would not take the job, they should have atleast interviewed him first. The personnel do not fit Martz system, but this will probably be the end of Smith. He will now have had 4 different OC in 4 years, each with a completely different system. Atleast Cameron's would have been able to piggyback off of Norvs system.

I have my doubts about Smith's ability to be a quality QB, but I would bet Manning, Brady, Montana, etc would be struggling if they started their careers out trying to run four different systems in four years.

Frustrated Niner fan :lmao:

 
I see this as the perfect example of the ineptitude of the 49ers FO. Unless Cameron told the FO he would not take the job, they should have atleast interviewed him first. The personnel do not fit Martz system, but this will probably be the end of Smith. He will now have had 4 different OC in 4 years, each with a completely different system. Atleast Cameron's would have been able to piggyback off of Norvs system.

I have my doubts about Smith's ability to be a quality QB, but I would bet Manning, Brady, Montana, etc would be struggling if they started their careers out trying to run four different systems in four years.

Frustrated Niner fan :headbang:
Agreed. Smith seems like a bright, likable guy. It is too bad has not really had a chance to truly develop.
 
I thought Martz was a great hire until I listened to Jim Miller on the NFL channel on Sirius. He made some valid points. 1. Martz's system is so complicated for running backs that Tatum Bell said he never knew if he was in the right spot or where exactly he was supposed to line up...ultimately cost him his job. He also mentioned that Martz had to "dumb down" the playbook for the back there because it was too complex for them. That would explain the lack of running plays...2. The receivers Martz has had success with were great receivers or ones that were already familiar with his system. He has neither in San Fran.3. The TE plays virtually no part in the passing game. Vernon Davis' stock just went in the ground.
People are assuming Martz is an inflexible idiot. We all know the current roster doesn't fit his system, lets see how he adjusts. Nolan doesn't have the time to allow a total turnover of offensive personnel, and Martz has to know this going in.
 
I thought Martz was a great hire until I listened to Jim Miller on the NFL channel on Sirius. He made some valid points.

1. Martz's system is so complicated for running backs that Tatum Bell said he never knew if he was in the right spot or where exactly he was supposed to line up...ultimately cost him his job. He also mentioned that Martz had to "dumb down" the playbook for the back there because it was too complex for them. That would explain the lack of running plays...

2. The receivers Martz has had success with were great receivers or ones that were already familiar with his system. He has neither in San Fran.

3. The TE plays virtually no part in the passing game. Vernon Davis' stock just went in the ground.
People are assuming Martz is an inflexible idiot. We all know the current roster doesn't fit his system, lets see how he adjusts. Nolan doesn't have the time to allow a total turnover of offensive personnel, and Martz has to know this going in.
He is kind of inflexible, I left the idiot part out. That is why he is not longer in Detroit, he runs his system and doesn't adjust to what he has. We'll see if getting fired again has changed him
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I see this as the perfect example of the ineptitude of the 49ers FO. Unless Cameron told the FO he would not take the job, they should have atleast interviewed him first. The personnel do not fit Martz system, but this will probably be the end of Smith. He will now have had 4 different OC in 4 years, each with a completely different system. Atleast Cameron's would have been able to piggyback off of Norvs system. I have my doubts about Smith's ability to be a quality QB, but I would bet Manning, Brady, Montana, etc would be struggling if they started their careers out trying to run four different systems in four years.Frustrated Niner fan :thumbup:
You do realize that Martz, Cameron and Turner all run derivatives of the same system, right? They are all devout Don Coryell disciples.
 
I see this as the perfect example of the ineptitude of the 49ers FO. Unless Cameron told the FO he would not take the job, they should have atleast interviewed him first. The personnel do not fit Martz system, but this will probably be the end of Smith. He will now have had 4 different OC in 4 years, each with a completely different system. Atleast Cameron's would have been able to piggyback off of Norvs system. I have my doubts about Smith's ability to be a quality QB, but I would bet Manning, Brady, Montana, etc would be struggling if they started their careers out trying to run four different systems in four years.Frustrated Niner fan :thumbup:
You do realize that Martz, Cameron and Turner all run derivatives of the same system, right? They are all devout Don Coryell disciples.
JW you are correct, but I think anyone watching mad Martz's system is at an extreme end of Coryell's system. Another reason I see failure for Smith is the supporting cast around him is not good (OL is weak and the Niners WRs are terrible). Even with the addition of DJax, there is no #1 level WR, maybe a slightly above average #2 in Battle (if he can get a #1 that will pull coverage away), and the rest of the receiving core is low level #3s and #4s. Unless V Davis is split out a lot or the Niners pick up a quality FA #1 WR, who will run the normal 4 WR set of Martz's system? The offense was horrendous this year with no direction, but I can see Martz and his system with a lot of 3 and outs next year. Yardage will be up, but I am not sure they will score much more than this season. Should be another long season for 49er fans just like every other one since York stuck their noses into the football operations.
 
You would be hard pressed to name a team that had less talent on the field on offense last year than Detroit. If you had to pick one, though, you might pick SF.

Probably the biggest factor in Martz's favor in SF is that - assuming at least some competence on Nolan's part - he will no longer have to stand around watching his team's defense give up clock-killing TD drive after clock-killing TD drive knowing he's going to get blamed for it the next day.

 
Martz on Vernon Davis:

Q: How will you utilize Vernon Davis?

A: In this system, you have so much flexibility within the numbers that you can be creative with a guy like him. You've got to be careful not to put too much on him, but it's a great opportunity to use him in different venues, so to speak. The system allows that kind of flexibility.

Q: Do you mean as far as lining him up as a receiver?

A: Getting him in the slot and putting him on the line of scrimmage. You can put him in the backfield and those kinds of things.

Q: As an H-back?

A: Yeah, you can do those kinds of things with him. The other thing about him is that normally those kinds of guys aren't good in-line blockers. But he can do that. He's talented.

 
A little late here but this will be a :no:

He does not have a QB on roster that can make the quick thinking, strong arm throws his system demands. The O-line is not quality enough to hold up without help from TE and RB max protect. He has no where near the talent in the WR corps that is needed to make his system work. On top of all of that, the system is very complex and the first year will be a struggle. This will be the death of Nolan.

 
A little late here but this will be a :tfp: He does not have a QB on roster that can make the quick thinking, strong arm throws his system demands. The O-line is not quality enough to hold up without help from TE and RB max protect. He has no where near the talent in the WR corps that is needed to make his system work. On top of all of that, the system is very complex and the first year will be a struggle. This will be the death of Nolan.
Shaun Hill looked pretty impressive last season.
 
I see this as the perfect example of the ineptitude of the 49ers FO. Unless Cameron told the FO he would not take the job, they should have atleast interviewed him first. The personnel do not fit Martz system, but this will probably be the end of Smith. He will now have had 4 different OC in 4 years, each with a completely different system. Atleast Cameron's would have been able to piggyback off of Norvs system. I have my doubts about Smith's ability to be a quality QB, but I would bet Manning, Brady, Montana, etc would be struggling if they started their careers out trying to run four different systems in four years.Frustrated Niner fan :rolleyes:
You do realize that Martz, Cameron and Turner all run derivatives of the same system, right? They are all devout Don Coryell disciples.
JW you are correct, but I think anyone watching mad Martz's system is at an extreme end of Coryell's system. Another reason I see failure for Smith is the supporting cast around him is not good (OL is weak and the Niners WRs are terrible). Even with the addition of DJax, there is no #1 level WR, maybe a slightly above average #2 in Battle (if he can get a #1 that will pull coverage away), and the rest of the receiving core is low level #3s and #4s. Unless V Davis is split out a lot or the Niners pick up a quality FA #1 WR, who will run the normal 4 WR set of Martz's system? The offense was horrendous this year with no direction, but I can see Martz and his system with a lot of 3 and outs next year. Yardage will be up, but I am not sure they will score much more than this season. Should be another long season for 49er fans just like every other one since York stuck their noses into the football operations.
Martz's roots in the Coryell system seem to be limited to the terminology and the staple pass routes. The best representatives of the system in recent years have been Saunders, Turner and Zampese. Gibbs is on the other end of the spectrum from Martz.
 
SANTA CLARA – When Vernon Davis watches film of Mike Martz's past offenses, he doesn't follow the tight end. He is told instead to watch receivers Isaac Bruce or Torry Holt streaking downfield.

And therein lies one of the biggest differences between Martz's St. Louis Rams offenses from early this decade and the one he is building in San Francisco. He'll still use four receivers to put pressure on defensive backs. Two of those receivers just might happen to be tight ends.

"I don't know if anyone in the league can run like he can at that position," Martz, the 49ers' first-year offensive coordinator, said of Davis. "He gets down the field so fast. I don't know who beats him in a footrace."

Martz said none of his offensive players worked harder this spring than Davis, who was on the field before practice started and hung around after it ended to hone his receiving skills.

Davis entered the NFL in 2006 very much the opposite of most young tight ends. He was a willing and able blocker who relished the opportunity to put an opposing linebacker on his back.

But sometimes that ability worked against him.

Davis caught a respectable 52 passes for 509 yards last season, but he disappeared from the passing game for long stretches because he was being used as a blocker.

"I would say I didn't have many opportunities to really showcase my talent," Davis said.

That shouldn't be an issue in Martz's offense. Davis said his biggest task this offseason has been polishing his pass routes. And he has used film of Bruce, Holt and other former Martz receivers as a model, signaling that the 49ers' tight end will run routes atypical for his position.

"Instead of breaking down and head-faking and doing all these things, we're going to use his speed," Martz said. "And I think he understands that really well at this point."

While Martz was familiar with Davis upon joining the 49ers, he said he has been pleasantly surprised by another 49ers tight end, Delanie Walker. A wide receiver in college, Walker always has shown quick hands and elusiveness after the catch in practice. But he has been lightly utilized in games.

Martz was so impressed with Walker during organized team activities (OTAs) that Martz has over the past two weeks installed new plays just for him.

"He has some real wow factor to him," Martz said. " … You talk about some jets and some ability to run and eat up the field. Holy cow. I didn't know anything about Delanie until I got here."

Having Davis and Walker in the game also will keep defenses guessing.

Davis in particular is one of the league's premier blocking tight ends, and that ability meshes well with what running back Frank Gore, the focal point of the offense, does best.

"He's such a violent, physical blocker," Martz said, noting that many modern tight ends are more finesse-oriented, content to simply keep defenders at bay. "Vernon will try to knock you out. He's such a pleasant blend of power and physical with speed.

"He's such an unusual player in that respect."

With that, Martz caught himself and said he realized everything out of his mouth had been a compliment. But in the afterglow of successful June practices, Martz said he can't help it.

"I can't hold down my enthusiasm," he said. "These guys are pretty special."
 
how long can this guy swing from warner, faulk, holt and bruces jock. Faulk could have been way better fantasy wise and real life if it weren't for martz, the guy just doesn't run the ball. I don't see this as a good thing for gore or san fran at all, he just not a good coach imo...
Faulk is actually one of the few HOF caliber backs where that kind of comparison can be made pretty easily; by virtue of Faulk's time with the Colts. People seem to forget that Faulk went to 3 of his 7 Pro Bowls as a Colt, and earned 3 of his 6 All Pro nods in Indy.Let's compare his All Pro seasons against one another:

*** Faulk, the Colt ['94, '95, '98]

47 games played

927 attempts

3,679 rushing yards (78 per game)

3.97 yards per rush

28 rushing TDs

194 receptions

1,905 receiving yards (41 per game)

8 receiving TDs

16.5 fantasy points per game (non-PPR)

20.6 fantasy points per game (PPR)

*** Faulk, the Ram ['99, '00, '01]

44 games played

766 attempts

4122 rushing yards (94 per game)

5.4 yards per rush

37 rushing TDs

251 receptions

2643 receiving yards (60 per game)

22 receiving TDs

23.4 fantasy points per game (non-PPR)

29.1 fantasy points per game (PPR)

Faulk was an ELITE NFL back, an All Pro in three of his first five seasons in the league as a Colt. In those three years, he was the 4th, 6th and 3rd best fantasy RB. There was little reason to think he could improve much from those tallies upon his trade to St. Louis. Yet, under Martz' play-calling, he not only improved, but he demolished his personal records in nearly every category.

*** 21% more rushing yards per game (on fewer attempts)

*** 35% improvement in average yards per carry

*** 32% more rushing TDs (again in fewer attempts)

*** 29% more receptions

*** 46% more receiving yards per game

*** 3x the receiving TDs

*** 42% more fantasy points per game (non PPR)

*** 41% more fantasy points per game (PPR)

Say what you will about Martz (and I'm not his biggest fan), but there's absolutely no indication that Faulk could've or would've had better fantasy numbers under another coach.
You're also not taking into account the surrounding players. I still don't attribute Faulks success to Martz. Defenses having more weapons to cover in St. Louis giving Faulk more running room could have just as much to do with Faulks success. Or how about having an improved offesive line in St. Louis?When you compare the two teams Faulk played for you have to also compare the surrounding talent and how that could affect defenses, which in turn effects Faulks performance.

 
Sometimes I think people make things too complicated.*** Jim Hostler was calling the plays in SF last year.*** The 49ers were the worst offense in the league last year.Does anyone REALLY think SF won't improve under Martz? Seriously?
Sure but where at J? Lets not forget this is the system that made Mike Furrey and Shaun McDonald valuable in fantasy formats and left Kevin Jones in the dust. Maybe VD has a chance if Martz splits him out but I have serious doubts that this man who never valued the RB as a Head Coach or as a Coordinator under a defensive minded coach suddenly starts pounding the ball.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top