What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Missing Malaysian jet news (1 Viewer)

More comments.

He's talking about the test the nazi's did by putting a few men in a box without 02 and used a diferent gas, they lived on their own flesh and when asked to come out they would not. they kept saying turn the air back on. It's one hell of a creepy thin to see.
The gas was helium and made them talk funny. They all died of laughter and running out of livers.
 
Anyone else see Fox News attempt to blame this on the metric system?
"Temperatures --- Farenheit or Celsius?"

"kilometers or miles?"

:lmao:

link

The former FAA official is trying to make the point that the large reliance on autopilot by other countries might be a cause of accidents.

 
Anyone else see Fox News attempt to blame this on the metric system?
:lmao:
I've often wondered why we never moved to the metric system. Now we know the culprits.

The metric system is the devil's plaything, gentlemen.
Actually American resistance to the metric system goes back to the 18th century and that with Thomas Jefferson as one of it's main supporters. Jefferson thought we would be on the metric system within a matter of years but it wasn't to be. The metric system was politically charged at it's inception as a universal measure. Conservatives saw it as part of the French Revolution and they didn't care for that. Later on silly nationalistic stubbornness and sheer cost killed it. Now in the digital age it really doesn't matter much as the conversions are so easy to make when neccesary.

 
Anyone else see Fox News attempt to blame this on the metric system?
:lmao:
I've often wondered why we never moved to the metric system. Now we know the culprits.

The metric system is the devil's plaything, gentlemen.
Actually American resistance to the metric system goes back to the 18th century and that with Thomas Jefferson as one of it's main supporters. Jefferson thought we would be on the metric system within a matter of years but it wasn't to be. The metric system was politically charged at it's inception as a universal measure. Conservatives saw it as part of the French Revolution and they didn't care for that. Later on silly nationalistic stubbornness and sheer cost killed it. Now in the digital age it really doesn't matter much as the conversions are so easy to make when neccesary.
You could have just said I was right.

 
Anyone else see Fox News attempt to blame this on the metric system?
:lmao:
I've often wondered why we never moved to the metric system. Now we know the culprits.

The metric system is the devil's plaything, gentlemen.
Actually American resistance to the metric system goes back to the 18th century and that with Thomas Jefferson as one of it's main supporters. Jefferson thought we would be on the metric system within a matter of years but it wasn't to be. The metric system was politically charged at it's inception as a universal measure. Conservatives saw it as part of the French Revolution and they didn't care for that. Later on silly nationalistic stubbornness and sheer cost killed it. Now in the digital age it really doesn't matter much as the conversions are so easy to make when neccesary.
You could have just said I was right.
I suppose I could have but I thought we should give some credit to those who went before the bubble headed bleached blondes on the TV.

 
Hey CNN is showing The Mystery of Malasian 370 tonight @ 6 pm PT, if you need to refresh your memory about the status of that plane... :moneybag: :deadhorse:

 
Interesting theory about a possible Russian hijack. Maybe they were after the 20 important engineers working for Freescale Semiconductors that were on the flight. I read Freescale wouldn't comment whether or not the employees were working on defense technology, so they may have been.

There was a partial conspiracy theory regarding the Freescale employees & royalties for a patent filed right after the crash. This was proved to be bs because the names listed on the patent were not on the plane. However, if the 20 Freescale passengers were some super defense tech geniuses, then they would definitely be valuable.

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2015/02/jeff-wise-mh370-theory.html

 
Interesting theory about a possible Russian hijack. Maybe they were after the 20 important engineers working for Freescale Semiconductors that were on the flight. I read Freescale wouldn't comment whether or not the employees were working on defense technology, so they may have been.

There was a partial conspiracy theory regarding the Freescale employees & royalties for a patent filed right after the crash. This was proved to be bs because the names listed on the patent were not on the plane. However, if the 20 Freescale passengers were some super defense tech geniuses, then they would definitely be valuable.

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2015/02/jeff-wise-mh370-theory.html
Absolutely fascinating and well put together theory.

A bit too loose with the small 3 sentences re: motive however.

I can't come up with a motive for Russia to do this. Russia has their own airliners, military and passenger planes they could use for whatever devious plot the writer thinks possible.

Hijacking a plane because they needed information from a passenger on it? I would think it would be a lot easier to just hijack a person as opposed to going through all of this to hijack a plane.

I know Putin may be crazy, but the motives to pull something like this off don't seem to outweigh any reward for capturing a commercial airliner from Malaysia, successfully allow it to avoid detection on it's location and flying it over 3-4 countries undetected by "sticking to the borders".

 
Theories but no debris: A year on, where is MH370?
By Ben Brumfield, Michael Martinez and Steve Almasy, CNN
Updated 4:35 PM ET, Sat March 7, 2015
(CNN)"Good night Malaysian three-seven-zero." It was a routine sign-off, an all-is-well.

On March 8, 2014, at 1:19 a.m., someone spoke those last words from Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 to air traffic controllers before the Boeing 777 vanished.

A year later, searchers have no new clues as to where it went with 239 people on board.

Radar and satellite reports have provided hints, but searchers still have nothing to hold in their hands. No wreckage seen floating at sea or beached on shore. No fuselage resting on the sea floor.

Experts say the data indicate the flight path from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, to Beijing unexpectedly veered, putting the commercial jet over the southern Indian Ocean.

But the water's vast and intricate depths have revealed no secrets. And as clarity has eluded grasp, analysts have made many speculations about what happened.

The most controversial idea: Is the maritime search area all wrong? Did the plane land clandestinely on solid ground?

Here are some expert theories about what happened to MH370.

The pilot suicide theory

Who radioed those last words to air traffic control? Capt. Zaharie Ahmad Shah? First officer Fariq Abdul Hamid?

The pilots were supposed to check in with new air traffic controllers in Vietnam, but never did. One theory is that one pilot may have incapacitated the other, then guided the plane to its end, taking the passengers down with him in a dramatic suicide.

Mark Weiss, a retired American Airlines captain, has flown a Boeing 777. He believes there may have been a struggle. "It was one of the pilots that maybe had a meltdown or did something nefarious to the airplane," he said.

But Malaysia Airlines Chief Executive Ahmad Jauhari Yahya has vehemently defended his employees, particularly the pilot. "We do not suspect any one of our crew until there's such evidence. ... Captain Zaharie is a very capable man," he said. "We have no reason to suspect (him)."

The cockpit guest theory

Weiss also thinks there could have been another person -- a crew member or someone else -- in the cockpit who "was bent on perhaps committing suicide or doing some destruction on the aircraft."

Copilot Hamid, 27, reportedly once invited a woman and her friend into the cockpit on a 2011 flight between Thailand and Malaysia.

"That's an enormous breach of security," Weiss said.

The commandeering and hijacking theory

The difference between hijacking and commandeering is nuanced. The former term is often used when the hijacker issues a demand such as being taken to a safe-haven country or receiving ransom to release passengers.

When people commandeer a plane, they might keep the motives secret, said political analyst Peter Bergen.

They may want to steer it themselves at a target, like the September 11, 2001, terrorists did.

In 1994, a FedEx employee burst into the cockpit of FedEx Flight 705 with a hammer and spear gun. He wanted to crash the plane into the company's Memphis, Tennessee, headquarters. The crew thwarted that takeover.

"Commandeering would fit with the few facts that we do know, and (it's) certainly a theory that we haven't heard a lot of that isn't a conspiracy," Bergen said.

Experts are divided on this theory, partly because no terrorists have claimed responsibility at a moment when they would have the world's attention -- unless potential terrorists were waiting for something.

The Kazakhstan theory
MH370 went to Kazakhstan. Outlandish conjecture or genius insight?

The theory that Russian actors on board MH370 found a way to get the plane through the border territory of China, Pakistan and India to a Kazakh landing strip leased to Russia comes from science journalist and private pilot Jeff Wise.

Fleets of ships and search aircraft are looking in the wrong direction, he says. The airliner went north, not south. Investigators may have misinterpreted a key component of the Inmarsat satellite data.

"This is not a normal investigation. They need to throw out the book," Wise has said.

Another aviation analyst, David Soucie, also casts doubt on the most widely held belief that the plane hit the Indian Ocean.

"If it had crashed in the way that we think it did, which is to run out of fuel and hit the water and break up into pieces, there would be pieces somewhere," he said.

But Michael Exner, an engineer with decades of experience in the mobile satellite communications industry, says the data "accurately and unambiguously" shows MH370 went down near the so-called 7th arc, a path along which the search has been focused.

"The current ATSB search strategy remains the best search strategy," he said.

The mechanical failure theory

In a less sinister but equally lethal explanation, some experts theorize the plane mysteriously crashed somewhere because of mechanical malfunction.

Perhaps the electronics died, or a fire broke out, preventing the pilots from communicating. Maybe they turned to look for a landing strip but couldn't steer the plane properly.

Pilots have trouble embracing the thought.

"I've been running that in my brain now ever since this thing happened," said Jim Tilmon, an aviation expert and retired American Airlines pilot.

"One possibility would be a total electrical failure which is very, very hard to imagine because (the plane) has so many generators coming from different places," Tilmon said. If they fail, there are other backups.

He says he's never heard of anything like it happening before.

Anniversary report

For months after MH370 disappeared, Malaysian officials reported details of the search to next of kin and the public. Something would be spotted, hopes rose, and then it didn't pan out. Hopes were dashed; anguish returned.

Sunday, a year to the day after the plane disappeared, Malaysia Airlines plans to release a statement. There has been no indication the airline will offer new evidence or hope.
 
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-31978578

MH17 disaster: Missile fragment 'found at crash site'
Dutch broadcaster RTL says it has new evidence that the Malaysia Airlines plane shot down over Ukraine last July was hit by a surface-to-air missile.

Forensic analysis of a metal fragment found at the crash site of flight MH17 by a journalist indicated it was from the warhead of a Russian-made Buk.

This would support the theory the plane was downed by pro-Russian rebels, over whose territory the plane was flying.

All 298 people on board the flight from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur were killed.

A preliminary report published in September by the Dutch Safety Board, which is investigating the crash, said the plane broke up after being penetrated by "high-velocity objects".

On Thursday, RTL reported that a metal fragment was recovered by Dutch journalist Jeroen Akkermans several months ago from the crash site, near the village of Hrabove in eastern Ukraine.

The broadcaster said it had the shrapnel tested by international forensic and weapons experts, who concluded that it had come from the warhead of a 9M317 Buk missile.

Nicholas de Larrinaga of IHS Jane's told RTL: "From the hour-glass form we can gather all the characteristics of an impact of a 9N314 warhead fragment. This fits perfectly."

_81782551_81782546.jpg


The Ukrainian government and the West have accused the Russian authorities of supplying the separatists with Buk missile launchers.

The claim is supported by witness statements, as well as photographs and videos. However, it has been denied by Moscow, which has suggested that Ukrainian forces were responsible for the crash.

The Dutch prosecutor leading the criminal case said earlier this month that a Buk missile may have hit the airliner, although it was "too early to rule out other possibilities".

In reaction to RTL's report, the Dutch Safety Board noted that the link to flight MH17 had to be demonstrated for each piece of evidence, in part because it crashed in a conflict zone.

"The investigation into the cause of the accident is ongoing and is focusing on many more sources than just the pieces of shrapnel," a statement on its website said.

"Additional material for investigation is welcome for this, but it is important that it be irrefutably demonstrated that there is a relationship between any material and the aeroplane that crashed."

The results of the Dutch Safety Board investigation are due to be released in October.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Any speculation about the speed at which the plane hit the water is just speculation...we don't even know that it DID hit water.

If your presumption is that this plane hit the water not in an stall/spin condition, I really don't think there would be a large portion of the fuselage in tact. We're talking about 500 mph vs. probably 200 mph or so for a stall/spin situation. Just too many forces at play. To me, the more violent the impact with the water, the MORE likely we are to find floating debris. We'd probably find the least debris in a hypothetical situation where the plane actually had a controlled landing into water and subsequently sank in one piece.

But heck...who the F knows at this point.
That's what I would have thought until I saw the WTC plane cut thru the buildings and read that the fuselage of the Air France plane was still somewhat intact. Air France was slightly different however as it was spinning in.

I am presuming that this plane flew straight down at 500+ mph and hit the water and did not leave debris. I see no other logical conclusion. It didn't land anywhere, there is no smoke from a crash on land.
Water does have an impact and becomes essentially hard when matter hits it at great speeds and great distance.

It's not like an Olympic diver slipping through with a perfect swan dice, hardly leaving a ripple, at all.
Then why didn't Air France shatter into a million pieces. The fuselage was still partly in tact. We all know hitting water at great sppeds is like hitting concrete. That is why the Sunshine Skyway jumpers are almost always dead. It's like hitting concrete. But a missile cuts thru the water. The diver is like the plane. sans the wings.
Air France hit the water at 173 MPH.
And ValueJet hit at 507 MPH.

Once again - stating that Flight 592 seemed to "disappear" after impacting the swamp and they could see nothing but scattered small debris and part of an engine near the crash site.

Now what's the difference between swampy and water? I'm telling ya, this thing is under water and there is at best a small debris field that they are going to have a tough time finding.
https://www.yahoo.com/travel/mathematician-may-have-just-solved-the-mystery-of-121124580772.html

Dr. Chen suggests that the plane’s body and wings sank rapidly — explaining the lack of an oil slick on the surface.

“But forensics strongly supports that MH370 plunged into the ocean in a nosedive.”

Probably read my theory on FBG.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top