What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Missing Malaysian jet news (2 Viewers)

mr. furley said:
Doctor Detroit said:
mr. furley said:
fantasycurse42 said:
SacramentoBob said:
bigmarc27 said:
Can someone give me a quick summation of this entire story?

Plane disappears and no one knows where it went... is that about the gist of it or am I missing something?
Click to expand...
That about sums up all the reliable info we have.
Click to expand...
To follow-up... It is either in the ocean, landed somewhere, or sucked into a black-hole.
Click to expand...
:no: if my last ex-gf had done this she would have posted about it on facebook by now
Click to expand...
Sherry from LaPointe?
Click to expand...
short tall chick brunette with brown highlights?
Click to expand...
She liked Chunky Soup because it was "homestyle" and Danzig because they were "complex?"

 
Doctor Detroit said:
mr. furley said:
Doctor Detroit said:
mr. furley said:
fantasycurse42 said:
SacramentoBob said:
bigmarc27 said:
Can someone give me a quick summation of this entire story?

Plane disappears and no one knows where it went... is that about the gist of it or am I missing something?
Click to expand...
That about sums up all the reliable info we have.
Click to expand...
To follow-up... It is either in the ocean, landed somewhere, or sucked into a black-hole.
Click to expand...
:no: if my last ex-gf had done this she would have posted about it on facebook by now
Click to expand...
Sherry from LaPointe?
Click to expand...
short tall chick brunette with brown highlights?
Click to expand...
She liked Chunky Soup because it was "homestyle" and Danzig because they were "complex?"
Click to expand...
you really do have eyes everywhere

 
tjnc09 said:
KCitons said:
Breaking News ‏@BreakingNews 17m
Fire reported in cargo hold on a Fedex plane about to land at Spokane Airport; an extrication has been requested - @KHQLocalNew

Lithium Batteries?

The plane hasn't even landed yet, but we are getting twitter updates.
Click to expand...
Scary
Click to expand...
Breaking News ‏@BreakingNews 8m
Spokane Airport: No open flames or smoke on FedEx plane; all 3 on board safe and disembarked - @kxly4news http://bit.ly/1lbqKKt

Non story. But I wonder if CNN will check the pilots phone records and computer.

No

 
Banger said:
Don Lemons black hole theory is the most plausible scenario
Click to expand...
No. This is. It's thoroughly researched and well-sourced.

Bribes made to Chinese authorities?
It has been brought to my attention that a possible link between the White House and China occured in the days before MH370 went missing. Is it possible that our "First Lady" greased the palms of Chinese Communist officials, in order to allow our "President" to sacrifice the Chinese citizens, in order to attract attention away from Benghazi AND Crimea?
Click to expand...
And of course

Is this Malaysian man Barry Soetero's real father?
Click to expand...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
T Bell said:
Sinn Fein said:
Telegraph report of transcript between plane and various ATC

A couple of oddities pointed out. But keep in mind its a translated transcript.
Click to expand...
I believe that all international ATC communications is in English.

EDIT- nevermind, I see the footnote about this being translated from Mandarin. My statement above is correct, however, which means that the actual communications were in English, translated to Mandarin, and then translated back into English.
Click to expand...
So all this time I've been saying it was Bane, now you're telling me it was the Mandarin??

 
fatness said:
Banger said:
Don Lemons black hole theory is the most plausible scenario
Click to expand...
No. This is. It's thoroughly researched and well-sourced.

Bribes made to Chinese authorities?
It has been brought to my attention that a possible link between the White House and China occured in the days before MH370 went missing. Is it possible that our "First Lady" greased the palms of Chinese Communist officials, in order to allow our "President" to sacrifice the Chinese citizens, in order to attract attention away from Benghazi AND Crimea?
Click to expand...
And of course

Is this Malaysian man Barry Soetero's real father?
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Awesome. The Internet - "A Bullhorn for the Terminally Insane".

 
Chinese satellites spot a large 70 ft piece of debris 75 miles from where Australian satellites spotted one - only TWO days later. The piece is traveling (if its the same) almost 40 miles a day.. The search has to be near impossible

 
tjnc09 said:
Chinese satellites spot a large 70 ft piece of debris 75 miles from where Australian satellites spotted one - only TWO days later. The piece is traveling (if its the same) almost 40 miles a day.. The search has to be near impossible
Click to expand...
What about the 6 billion Chinese fisherman. How can they all miss it?

 
No new news. Currents are moving some large of debris 40 miles a day and conditions are making the search very difficult.

Theories were fun for a week but now seems unlikely anyone will know what really happened

 
Ok I have reached a conclusion here (of course before all the facts are in...):

  • The plane was hijacked by terrorists, 1-2 on board (though not necessarily the fake passport guys). We know the pilots were susceptible to this because they brought the Aussie chicks up front previously; in fact they may have been targeted for just this reason.
  • The copilot was ordered to say 'good night' after the turn west was programmed
  • After crossing the peninsula, the plan was to turn the plane south, replot the course once near Kuala Lumpur, and fly them into the Kuala Lumpur towers, tallest or almost tallest in the world, a la WTC
  • The pilot or copilot tricked the hijacker by resetting the flight path; the plane turned south but it needed another turn to head towards KL.
  • The pilots or passengers realized the dastardly plot and sought to save KL from destruction and devastations and additional deaths. Something happened in the interim, either the hijacker(s) killed the pilots, or the pilots or passengers took on the hijackers, but in any event whoever was left standing could not change the flight path, so the plane kept going on its trajectory, tragically into the south Indian Ocean.
  • This explains why there has been no credit by any terror group. The terrorists never claimed credit because the plot failed and they don't want to reveal their idea and they're embarrassed.
  • This explains why the pilot had no real signs he was going to do this in advance.
I freely admit I don't know all the timeline, but what fails here in this scenario?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
SaintsInDome2006 said:
Ok I have reached a conclusion here (of course before all the facts are in...):

  • The plane was hijacked by terrorists, 1-2 on board (though not necessarily the fake passport guys). We know the pilots were susceptible to this because they brought the Aussie chicks up front previously; in fact they may have been targeted for just this reason.
  • The copilot was ordered to say 'good night' after the turn west was programmed
  • After crossing the peninsula, the plan was to turn the plane south, replot the course once near Kuala Lumpur, and fly them into the Kuala Lumpur towers, tallest or almost tallest in the world, a la WTC
  • The pilot or copilot tricked the hijacker by resetting the flight path; the plane turned south but it needed another turn to head towards KL.
  • The pilots or passengers realized the dastardly plot and sought to save KL from destruction and devastations and additional deaths. Something happened in the interim, either the hijacker(s) killed the pilots, or the pilots or passengers took on the hijackers, but in any event whoever was left standing could not change the flight path, so the plane kept going on its trajectory, tragically into the south Indian Ocean.
  • This explains why there has been no credit by any terror group. The terrorists never claimed credit because the plot failed and they don't want to reveal their idea and they're embarrassed.
  • This explains why the pilot had no real signs he was going to do this in advance.
I freely admit I don't know all the timeline, but what fails here in this scenario?
Click to expand...
1. Too many ways for the pilot to signal they were hi-jacked.

2. Does not explain why they went up to 45,000 feet.

3. Terrorists often do not claim credit for acts.

 
SaintsInDome2006 said:
Ok I have reached a conclusion here (of course before all the facts are in...):

  • The plane was hijacked by terrorists, 1-2 on board (though not necessarily the fake passport guys). We know the pilots were susceptible to this because they brought the Aussie chicks up front previously; in fact they may have been targeted for just this reason.
  • The copilot was ordered to say 'good night' after the turn west was programmed
  • After crossing the peninsula, the plan was to turn the plane south, replot the course once near Kuala Lumpur, and fly them into the Kuala Lumpur towers, tallest or almost tallest in the world, a la WTC
  • The pilot or copilot tricked the hijacker by resetting the flight path; the plane turned south but it needed another turn to head towards KL.
  • The pilots or passengers realized the dastardly plot and sought to save KL from destruction and devastations and additional deaths. Something happened in the interim, either the hijacker(s) killed the pilots, or the pilots or passengers took on the hijackers, but in any event whoever was left standing could not change the flight path, so the plane kept going on its trajectory, tragically into the south Indian Ocean.
  • This explains why there has been no credit by any terror group. The terrorists never claimed credit because the plot failed and they don't want to reveal their idea and they're embarrassed.
  • This explains why the pilot had no real signs he was going to do this in advance.
I freely admit I don't know all the timeline, but what fails here in this scenario?
Click to expand...
Nothing fails in this scenario. This is exactly what happened... maybe not minute for minute... but I'm sold.

 
SaintsInDome2006 said:
Ok I have reached a conclusion here (of course before all the facts are in...):

  • The plane was hijacked by terrorists, 1-2 on board (though not necessarily the fake passport guys). We know the pilots were susceptible to this because they brought the Aussie chicks up front previously; in fact they may have been targeted for just this reason.
  • The copilot was ordered to say 'good night' after the turn west was programmed
  • After crossing the peninsula, the plan was to turn the plane south, replot the course once near Kuala Lumpur, and fly them into the Kuala Lumpur towers, tallest or almost tallest in the world, a la WTC
  • The pilot or copilot tricked the hijacker by resetting the flight path; the plane turned south but it needed another turn to head towards KL.
  • The pilots or passengers realized the dastardly plot and sought to save KL from destruction and devastations and additional deaths. Something happened in the interim, either the hijacker(s) killed the pilots, or the pilots or passengers took on the hijackers, but in any event whoever was left standing could not change the flight path, so the plane kept going on its trajectory, tragically into the south Indian Ocean.
  • This explains why there has been no credit by any terror group. The terrorists never claimed credit because the plot failed and they don't want to reveal their idea and they're embarrassed.
  • This explains why the pilot had no real signs he was going to do this in advance.
I freely admit I don't know all the timeline, but what fails here in this scenario?
Click to expand...
I think that is a fairly logical outcome.

my link

 
Otis said:
CNN has had the BREAKING NEWS banner up for two weeks now, but really there has been no news since the plane disappeared. THIS JUST IN -- A GUY HAS A THEORY.
Click to expand...
CNN cannot keep the breaking news banner up for the zombie plane forever. Most likely media coverage will continue until the black box pings stop after 30 days.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
jon_mx said:
SaintsInDome2006 said:
Ok I have reached a conclusion here (of course before all the facts are in...):

  • The plane was hijacked by terrorists, 1-2 on board (though not necessarily the fake passport guys). We know the pilots were susceptible to this because they brought the Aussie chicks up front previously; in fact they may have been targeted for just this reason.
  • The copilot was ordered to say 'good night' after the turn west was programmed
  • After crossing the peninsula, the plan was to turn the plane south, replot the course once near Kuala Lumpur, and fly them into the Kuala Lumpur towers, tallest or almost tallest in the world, a la WTC
  • The pilot or copilot tricked the hijacker by resetting the flight path; the plane turned south but it needed another turn to head towards KL.
  • The pilots or passengers realized the dastardly plot and sought to save KL from destruction and devastations and additional deaths. Something happened in the interim, either the hijacker(s) killed the pilots, or the pilots or passengers took on the hijackers, but in any event whoever was left standing could not change the flight path, so the plane kept going on its trajectory, tragically into the south Indian Ocean.
  • This explains why there has been no credit by any terror group. The terrorists never claimed credit because the plot failed and they don't want to reveal their idea and they're embarrassed.
  • This explains why the pilot had no real signs he was going to do this in advance.
I freely admit I don't know all the timeline, but what fails here in this scenario?
Click to expand...
1. Too many ways for the pilot to signal they were hi-jacked.

2. Does not explain why they went up to 45,000 feet.

3. Terrorists often do not claim credit for acts.
Click to expand...
About no. 2: I was actually on a plane that did that kind of hairpin turn. I was on a flight to Paris, basically settled in for a long flight, doze off.... my lady friend nudges me awake, points to the screen that shows the flight path, we've basically done a turnabout that looks like the angle of a hanger, we were in the Atlantic but now we're pointing back to Newfoundland. What occurs to you then? Yep, briefly after thinking that it could be something normal the possibility of a hijack does creep into your head... it was at that moment that the stewardess gets on the intercom and asks if there is a doctor on the plane, turned out an elderly gent had had a heart attack. This was a flight to Paris so of course like 6 guys walk to the back.

I'm guessing this event occurred after the turn west? I'm guessing the flying up to 45,000 feet situation occurred after the flight turned west. At some point the people begin to wonder what's going on, especially once they cross back to the peninsula instead of heading back to KL. I wonder what they were told if anything. Maybe the passengers begin to panic, turn frantic even. But at any rate at that point maybe the hijacker instructs the pilot to take the flight up and down to sicken the crowd or maybe to thin the air so they become sick, knocked off their feet or at least tired. I think this is consistent with the scenario.

About No. 1, I'm thinking the hijacker has a weapon of some kind, basically the pilot and copilot are threatened into compliance by the point of the turn west and are closely watched by the hijacker.

About no. 3, that's true, while the failure to take credit does not prove the hypothesis the fact that terrorists do not always take credit also does not exclude the hypothesis.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
SaintsInDome2006 said:
jon_mx said:
SaintsInDome2006 said:
Ok I have reached a conclusion here (of course before all the facts are in...):

  • The plane was hijacked by terrorists, 1-2 on board (though not necessarily the fake passport guys). We know the pilots were susceptible to this because they brought the Aussie chicks up front previously; in fact they may have been targeted for just this reason.
  • The copilot was ordered to say 'good night' after the turn west was programmed
  • After crossing the peninsula, the plan was to turn the plane south, replot the course once near Kuala Lumpur, and fly them into the Kuala Lumpur towers, tallest or almost tallest in the world, a la WTC
  • The pilot or copilot tricked the hijacker by resetting the flight path; the plane turned south but it needed another turn to head towards KL.
  • The pilots or passengers realized the dastardly plot and sought to save KL from destruction and devastations and additional deaths. Something happened in the interim, either the hijacker(s) killed the pilots, or the pilots or passengers took on the hijackers, but in any event whoever was left standing could not change the flight path, so the plane kept going on its trajectory, tragically into the south Indian Ocean.
  • This explains why there has been no credit by any terror group. The terrorists never claimed credit because the plot failed and they don't want to reveal their idea and they're embarrassed.
  • This explains why the pilot had no real signs he was going to do this in advance.
I freely admit I don't know all the timeline, but what fails here in this scenario?
Click to expand...
1. Too many ways for the pilot to signal they were hi-jacked.

2. Does not explain why they went up to 45,000 feet.

3. Terrorists often do not claim credit for acts.
Click to expand...
About no. 2: I was actually on a plane that did that kind of hairpin turn. I was on a flight to Paris, basically settled in for a long flight, doze off.... my lady friend nudges me awake, points to the screen that shows the flight path, we've basically done a turnabout that looks like the angle of a hanger, we were in the Atlantic but now we're pointing back to Newfoundland. What occurs to you then? Yep, briefly after thinking that it could be something normal the possibility of a hijack does creep into your head... it was at that moment that the stewardess gets on the intercom and asks if there is a doctor on the plane, turned out an elderly gent had had a heart attack. This was a flight to Paris so of course like 6 guys walk to the back.

I'm guessing this event occurred after the turn west? I'm guessing the flying up to 45,000 feet situation occurred after the flight turned west. At some point the people begin to wonder what's going on, especially once they cross back to the peninsula instead of heading back to KL. I wonder what they were told if anything. Maybe the passengers begin to panic, turn frantic even. But at any rate at that point maybe the hijacker instructs the pilot to take the flight up and down to sicken the crowd or maybe to thin the air so they become sick, knocked off their feet or at least tired. I think this is consistent with the scenario.

About No. 1, I'm thinking the hijacker has a weapon of some kind, basically the pilot and copilot are threatened into compliance by the point of the turn west and are closely watched by the hijacker.

About no. 3, that's true, while the failure to take credit does not prove the hypothesis the fact that terrorists do not always take credit also does not exclude the hypothesis.
Click to expand...
Seriously?

And for like the 501st time, wrong_mx, getting hung up on whether responsibility is claimed or not completely misses the point. If the media are reporting that it's terrorism, it's not necessary to risk the exposure to claim responsibility. But associates would be very likely to now due to the fact that the news is not talking terrorism.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
SaintsInDome2006 said:
jon_mx said:
SaintsInDome2006 said:
Ok I have reached a conclusion here (of course before all the facts are in...):

  • The plane was hijacked by terrorists, 1-2 on board (though not necessarily the fake passport guys). We know the pilots were susceptible to this because they brought the Aussie chicks up front previously; in fact they may have been targeted for just this reason.
  • The copilot was ordered to say 'good night' after the turn west was programmed
  • After crossing the peninsula, the plan was to turn the plane south, replot the course once near Kuala Lumpur, and fly them into the Kuala Lumpur towers, tallest or almost tallest in the world, a la WTC
  • The pilot or copilot tricked the hijacker by resetting the flight path; the plane turned south but it needed another turn to head towards KL.
  • The pilots or passengers realized the dastardly plot and sought to save KL from destruction and devastations and additional deaths. Something happened in the interim, either the hijacker(s) killed the pilots, or the pilots or passengers took on the hijackers, but in any event whoever was left standing could not change the flight path, so the plane kept going on its trajectory, tragically into the south Indian Ocean.
  • This explains why there has been no credit by any terror group. The terrorists never claimed credit because the plot failed and they don't want to reveal their idea and they're embarrassed.
  • This explains why the pilot had no real signs he was going to do this in advance.
I freely admit I don't know all the timeline, but what fails here in this scenario?
Click to expand...
1. Too many ways for the pilot to signal they were hi-jacked.

2. Does not explain why they went up to 45,000 feet.

3. Terrorists often do not claim credit for acts.
Click to expand...
About no. 2: I was actually on a plane that did that kind of hairpin turn. I was on a flight to Paris, basically settled in for a long flight, doze off.... my lady friend nudges me awake, points to the screen that shows the flight path, we've basically done a turnabout that looks like the angle of a hanger, we were in the Atlantic but now we're pointing back to Newfoundland. What occurs to you then? Yep, briefly after thinking that it could be something normal the possibility of a hijack does creep into your head... it was at that moment that the stewardess gets on the intercom and asks if there is a doctor on the plane, turned out an elderly gent had had a heart attack. This was a flight to Paris so of course like 6 guys walk to the back.

I'm guessing this event occurred after the turn west? I'm guessing the flying up to 45,000 feet situation occurred after the flight turned west. At some point the people begin to wonder what's going on, especially once they cross back to the peninsula instead of heading back to KL. I wonder what they were told if anything. Maybe the passengers begin to panic, turn frantic even. But at any rate at that point maybe the hijacker instructs the pilot to take the flight up and down to sicken the crowd or maybe to thin the air so they become sick, knocked off their feet or at least tired. I think this is consistent with the scenario.

About No. 1, I'm thinking the hijacker has a weapon of some kind, basically the pilot and copilot are threatened into compliance by the point of the turn west and are closely watched by the hijacker.

About no. 3, that's true, while the failure to take credit does not prove the hypothesis the fact that terrorists do not always take credit also does not exclude the hypothesis.
Click to expand...
How does this make you feel?

 
SaintsInDome2006 said:
jon_mx said:
SaintsInDome2006 said:
Ok I have reached a conclusion here (of course before all the facts are in...):

  • The plane was hijacked by terrorists, 1-2 on board (though not necessarily the fake passport guys). We know the pilots were susceptible to this because they brought the Aussie chicks up front previously; in fact they may have been targeted for just this reason.
  • The copilot was ordered to say 'good night' after the turn west was programmed
  • After crossing the peninsula, the plan was to turn the plane south, replot the course once near Kuala Lumpur, and fly them into the Kuala Lumpur towers, tallest or almost tallest in the world, a la WTC
  • The pilot or copilot tricked the hijacker by resetting the flight path; the plane turned south but it needed another turn to head towards KL.
  • The pilots or passengers realized the dastardly plot and sought to save KL from destruction and devastations and additional deaths. Something happened in the interim, either the hijacker(s) killed the pilots, or the pilots or passengers took on the hijackers, but in any event whoever was left standing could not change the flight path, so the plane kept going on its trajectory, tragically into the south Indian Ocean.
  • This explains why there has been no credit by any terror group. The terrorists never claimed credit because the plot failed and they don't want to reveal their idea and they're embarrassed.
  • This explains why the pilot had no real signs he was going to do this in advance.
I freely admit I don't know all the timeline, but what fails here in this scenario?
Click to expand...
1. Too many ways for the pilot to signal they were hi-jacked.

2. Does not explain why they went up to 45,000 feet.

3. Terrorists often do not claim credit for acts.
Click to expand...
About no. 2: I was actually on a plane that did that kind of hairpin turn. I was on a flight to Paris, basically settled in for a long flight, doze off.... my lady friend nudges me awake, points to the screen that shows the flight path,
Click to expand...
Is this an international flight thing?... I haven't seen a display like that in a plane.

 
JetBlue planes have TVs for every seat and there is a channel that shows the plane's location on a map, as well as speed and altitude.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The transcript of exchanges between the pilots and air traffic control, which has been obtained by The Telegraph, has been the focus of the investigation – in particular the 14 minutes between 1.07am and 1.21am, during which the first signs emerged that something was amiss aboard MH370.

At 1.07am, 26 minutes after take-off, the plane’s Acars automatic signalling device sent its last message before being disabled at some point in the next half an hour. The device was timed to send a signal every 30 minutes.

Then at 1.19am, Mr Hamid, the co-pilot, spoke his last known message of “All right, good night” to air traffic control in Malaysia as the plane shifted into Vietnamese airspace. Investigators are still completing analysis of Hamid’s voice pattern to determine whether the 27-year-old, who was planning to marry his 26-year-old pilot girlfriend, was being coerced or was speaking under duress.

Two minutes after the final message at 1.21am, the plane’s transponder was turned off, apparently deliberately disabled. MH370 slipped off Malaysian radar screens nine minutes later and it never made it on to those of Vietnam. Instead, the plane took a sharp and unexpected turn westward and flew silently for almost seven hours, probably in a southerly direction.

If passengers had seized control of the plane, they would likely have done so in the two-minute window between the point when Mr Hamid spoke to air traffic control and the moment the transponder was switched off.
Click to expand...
So if one of the passengers had a gun, bomb, grenade, etc and told the co-pilot to call in all clear or everyone is dead, that's not possible? Ok.

 
All joking aside, this is still about people.

One man's quiet reckoning

(I know tl:dr, but it's worth a read)

If one were not directly and personally involved, one could have marveled at evil genius that authored a plot such as this, and the craft and research that supported it. Presently, it only brings to the fore how little we actually know, how vulnerable we are, and the things we take for granted about people, places, and things.

As individuals, we can do very little. We wait patiently. With every passing day and each fragment of information that comes in, we revise the narrative strung together, and articulate the new set of perplexing and urgent questions that inevitably come up. My friends and family mostly do this for me, leaving me to take stock at the day's end in what seems like a 45-minute feature of "Face the Facts."

For now, I remain open to news that point to clear, incontrovertible evidence of what happened, and actions taken or afoot that can bring the whole incident to a satisfactory close. What is priority is information that is a step closer to bringing Chandrika back, and for us to plan our next steps to redesign our life from here on.

I remain focused on what we have at hand by way of information, and stay with the knowledge that Chandrika is strong and courageous, that her goodness must count for something, somewhere. I carry firmly the faith that the forces of life are eternal, immutable and ever present to keep the drama ever moving. In the ultimate analysis, I am neither favored nor deserted. No one is.

As family, we are not given to histrionics/theatrics. We suffer, we agonize, we tether on the edge, but seldom allow ourselves to be overwhelmed. I don't say this with any sense of self-congratulation or offer it as recommendation. I am merely saying this for those who know us from a distance or fleetingly.
Click to expand...
 
fatness said:
. This is. It's thoroughly researched and well-sourced.
Bribes made to Chinese authorities?
It has been brought to my attention that a possible link between the White House and China occured in the days before MH370 went missing. Is it possible that our "First Lady" greased the palms of Chinese Communist officials, in order to allow our "President" to sacrifice the Chinese citizens, in order to attract attention away from Benghazi AND Crimea?
Click to expand...
And of course

Is this Malaysian man Barry Soetero's real father?
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
More news from El Genius.

3/22/2014
A Frightening Turn of Events

Dear Friends and fellow Patriots. Yesterday evening, not too long after starting this website and, something startling and scary happened. A black van, with dark tinted windows, appeared in my neighborhood. Very mysterious, as I have never seen this van before. It was parked several houses down.

Needless to say, this frightened me. Could the NSA, FBI, CIA, or all of them, working in concert together, have been able to mobilize that fast? It is well known that they have the ability to monitor the citizens of this country, so it's not beyond the realm of reason that Obama has his goons sent to my home to watch me and intimidate me.

I slipped out of a back window in the middle of the night, and climbed over the fence in my backyard, traveled through a few back yards, and stayed over at a friend's house for the night. I drove through my neighborhood earlier this morning, and the van was still there. I was even more frightened than before. Finally, this afternoon, the van was gone. I went home, grabbed some clothes and my laptop, packed a bag, and left. I am now at a motel, and I will hop from motel to motel for several days before I even think about going back home. Pray for me, Friends and Patriots.
Click to expand...
 
Rohn Jambo said:
Otis said:
CNN has had the BREAKING NEWS banner up for two weeks now, but really there has been no news since the plane disappeared. THIS JUST IN -- A GUY HAS A THEORY.
Click to expand...
CNN cannot keep the breaking news banner up for the zombie plane forever. Most likely media coverage will continue until the black box pings stop after 30 days.
Click to expand...
Anyone in on a class action lawsuit for CNN Logo burn-in? I didn't even realize it since I haven't been off the channel in 2 weeks. How can anyone expect to tune out when there's BREAKING NEWS??

 
fatness said:
fatness said:
. This is. It's thoroughly researched and well-sourced.

Bribes made to Chinese authorities?

It has been brought to my attention that a possible link between the White House and China occured in the days before MH370 went missing. Is it possible that our "First Lady" greased the palms of Chinese Communist officials, in order to allow our "President" to sacrifice the Chinese citizens, in order to attract attention away from Benghazi AND Crimea?
Click to expand...
And of course
Is this Malaysian man Barry Soetero's real father?
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
More news from El Genius.

3/22/2014A Frightening Turn of Events

Dear Friends and fellow Patriots. Yesterday evening, not too long after starting this website and, something startling and scary happened. A black van, with dark tinted windows, appeared in my neighborhood. Very mysterious, as I have never seen this van before. It was parked several houses down.

Needless to say, this frightened me. Could the NSA, FBI, CIA, or all of them, working in concert together, have been able to mobilize that fast? It is well known that they have the ability to monitor the citizens of this country, so it's not beyond the realm of reason that Obama has his goons sent to my home to watch me and intimidate me.

I slipped out of a back window in the middle of the night, and climbed over the fence in my backyard, traveled through a few back yards, and stayed over at a friend's house for the night. I drove through my neighborhood earlier this morning, and the van was still there. I was even more frightened than before. Finally, this afternoon, the van was gone. I went home, grabbed some clothes and my laptop, packed a bag, and left. I am now at a motel, and I will hop from motel to motel for several days before I even think about going back home. Pray for me, Friends and Patriots.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
What a dope. He should be a good neighbor and offer them a cup of coffee.
 
DiStefano said:
Apple Jack said:
JetBlue planes have TVs for every seat and there is a channel that shows the plane's location on a map, as well as speed and altitude.
Click to expand...
And corporate jets have mainly first class type seats. Irrelevant, but I thought since JetBlue...
Click to expand...
Southwest doesn't have screens on their seats. They know people bring their screens with them in the form of tablets/phones/computers. The added weight would cost more in fuel. That's how they offer $69 flights.
 
DiStefano said:
Apple Jack said:
JetBlue planes have TVs for every seat and there is a channel that shows the plane's location on a map, as well as speed and altitude.
Click to expand...
And corporate jets have mainly first class type seats. Irrelevant, but I thought since JetBlue...
Click to expand...
You thought since JetBlue what?

The average age of Southwest planes is 11.3 years. Smart phones and iPads were not in play when the majority of their planes were manufactured. The screens are small and the impact on fuel costs is nearly non-existent on a per fare basis. All things being equal, JetBlue is still a better way to travel if you want to watch ESPN, a game, or whatever on one of the 30 or so channels.

 
Apple Jack said:
DiStefano said:
Apple Jack said:
JetBlue planes have TVs for every seat and there is a channel that shows the plane's location on a map, as well as speed and altitude.
Click to expand...
And corporate jets have mainly first class type seats. Irrelevant, but I thought since JetBlue...
Click to expand...
You thought since JetBlue what?

The average age of Southwest planes is 11.3 years. Smart phones and iPads were not in play when the majority of their planes were manufactured. The screens are small and the impact on fuel costs is nearly non-existent on a per fare basis. All things being equal, JetBlue is still a better way to travel if you want to watch ESPN, a game, or whatever on one of the 30 or so channels.
Click to expand...
JetBlue just sold their in flight TV rights... Not a fan of this move:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/13/us-jetblue-airways-sale-idUSBREA2C0PX20140313

 
fantasycurse42 said:
Apple Jack said:
DiStefano said:
Apple Jack said:
JetBlue planes have TVs for every seat and there is a channel that shows the plane's location on a map, as well as speed and altitude.
Click to expand...
And corporate jets have mainly first class type seats. Irrelevant, but I thought since JetBlue...
Click to expand...
You thought since JetBlue what?

The average age of Southwest planes is 11.3 years. Smart phones and iPads were not in play when the majority of their planes were manufactured. The screens are small and the impact on fuel costs is nearly non-existent on a per fare basis. All things being equal, JetBlue is still a better way to travel if you want to watch ESPN, a game, or whatever on one of the 30 or so channels.
Click to expand...
JetBlue just sold their in flight TV rights... Not a fan of this move:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/13/us-jetblue-airways-sale-idUSBREA2C0PX20140313
Click to expand...
Since they are keeping the LiveTV on the planes, I guess this means that fares will probably stay the same and this will end up a pay service?

 
FWIW: I had a dream last night that I was aiding in the search on board an American research boat -- I barely remember the dream, and have no new details to share. That is all.

 
avoiding injuries said:
DiStefano said:
Apple Jack said:
JetBlue planes have TVs for every seat and there is a channel that shows the plane's location on a map, as well as speed and altitude.
Click to expand...
And corporate jets have mainly first class type seats. Irrelevant, but I thought since JetBlue...
Click to expand...
Southwest doesn't have screens on their seats. They know people bring their screens with them in the form of tablets/phones/computers. The added weight would cost more in fuel. That's how they offer $69 flights.
Click to expand...
Someone has been watching march madness

 
fatness said:
fatness said:
. This is. It's thoroughly researched and well-sourced.
Bribes made to Chinese authorities?
It has been brought to my attention that a possible link between the White House and China occured in the days before MH370 went missing. Is it possible that our "First Lady" greased the palms of Chinese Communist officials, in order to allow our "President" to sacrifice the Chinese citizens, in order to attract attention away from Benghazi AND Crimea?
Click to expand...
And of course

Is this Malaysian man Barry Soetero's real father?
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
More news from El Genius.

3/22/2014
A Frightening Turn of Events

Dear Friends and fellow Patriots. Yesterday evening, not too long after starting this website and, something startling and scary happened. A black van, with dark tinted windows, appeared in my neighborhood. Very mysterious, as I have never seen this van before. It was parked several houses down.

Needless to say, this frightened me. Could the NSA, FBI, CIA, or all of them, working in concert together, have been able to mobilize that fast? It is well known that they have the ability to monitor the citizens of this country, so it's not beyond the realm of reason that Obama has his goons sent to my home to watch me and intimidate me.

I slipped out of a back window in the middle of the night, and climbed over the fence in my backyard, traveled through a few back yards, and stayed over at a friend's house for the night. I drove through my neighborhood earlier this morning, and the van was still there. I was even more frightened than before. Finally, this afternoon, the van was gone. I went home, grabbed some clothes and my laptop, packed a bag, and left. I am now at a motel, and I will hop from motel to motel for several days before I even think about going back home. Pray for me, Friends and Patriots.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Well, I sure hope his motels have WiFi and he's able to keep us all informed. I'd hate to lose this outstanding source of news and truth.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Dr Oadi
Looks like there is a trend going on in Philly.
Replies
7
Views
805
Dr Oadi
Dr Oadi
popsecret
Disgusting Behavior
Replies
14
Views
998
Al O'Pecia
Al O'Pecia
Raider Nation
Amazing new study: Men like women in high heels!
Replies
38
Views
1K
Hang 10
Hang 10

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top