There was a good article in USAToday summarizing, but I can't find it online. Here is a quick one:http://www.ocregister.com/ocr/2005/04/19/s...icle_486735.phpHmm, I stand corrected. Thought SNF paid more.Either way, if you look a the schedule and how the NFL allows the flex scheduling at the end of the year, it would seem SNF is the premier game. Makes you wonder why MNF didn't get those options, with paying almost twice as much.Actually, ESPN is paying more for MNF....$1.1 B / year as compared to $600 M / year for NBC.But SNF seems like the premier game to me...especially considering they can change games later in the season.Losing its luster was sort of intentional. SNF is now the premier night game, according to the NFL and the price NBC paid.
Overall, the NFL earns $3.7 BILLION A YEAR in TV revenues!
![]()
yesIt's excellent with him and Boomer Esiason doing the game. I would much rather they were on the TV...I always liked Boomer, he didn't get along with Al Michaels, had way too much real world football knowledge and made Michaels appear pretty stupid on more than one occasion and that is when I started to dislike AM a lot...I have had to suffer thru his broadcasts for years now.Does Marv Albert still do MNF on the radio?
NBC did this once back in the 80s with a Saturday Jets/Miami game IIRC. I don't think they received positive reviews.I think I would like a game when the only sounds we hear are the crowd and field. Just mic the field or have us hear the PA announcer to keep us up to date on firstdowns, who made the tackle etc.
Simple...ESPN and ABC will begin their NBA broadcasting shortly...free advertising to a sports crowd. I agree that they need to get these people out of the broadcast booth who are not talking football. I could care less about the NBA or who can dance better (Emmit or Jerry).ESPN MNF Commentary has gone to pot. And why did they spen 15 minutes interviewing a basketball player in the booth?If I'd wanted basketball stuff, I wouldn' be watching MNF. Jeesh!
You're insane!Call me insane, but I liked the Gifford, Michaels and Dierdorf team.
I only watched the 1st half of that game and was pleasently surprised with those commentators...much better than that pompous ### Theiseman.Leviathan said:The crew that worked the Raiders/Chargers Monday Night double header should be the permanent MNF crew.![]()
I think Fox's production is pretty bad; the stupid dancing robot, weak stat updates and tickers. CBS is better than all the others in terms of production.It's OBVIOUSLY ESPN and it's whole production staff. From the graphics to the announcers, they're definitely a full step down from other networks.
Because ABC and ESPN both have NBA broadcast contracts. What you witnessed was a commercial during (and over) the game. It's like watching a FOX game, and they get a 'surprise' visit from Kiefer Sutherland the day before 'a very special episode of 24'.Let's list the worse elements of each broadcast:ESPN: commentatorsFOX: annoying 'special effects' (if I hear one more ding, whirr, bang, I'm going postal)NBC: studio crewCBS: Actually not bad. Only criticism is not enough info on the 'crawl' during the games.And why did they spen 15 minutes interviewing a basketball player in the booth?
I think three people is one to many. I like to see a team of **** Vermeil and Marshall Faulk.Monday Night Football first aired on ABC on September 21, 1970, with a match between the New York Jets and the Cleveland Browns, in Cleveland, Ohio. Advertisers were charged $65,000 per minute by ABC during the clash, a cost that proved to be a bargain when the contest collected 33 percent of the viewing audience.
We've been here almost weekly ranting about all the horrific gaffes Theeesman and Maguire made. They finally get someone in the booth willing to call him out on the same idiotic stuff everyone else notices, and you say he's "a little to quick to pounce"??? The real problem is Theesman, but if we have to deal with him, at least let Kornheiser point out what a buffoon he is.You couldn't come up with a worse mix if you tried. Theisman just spouts off stuff without thinking. Kornheiser is a little to quick to pounce on Theisman when he does it and is coming off as kind of a weasel by doing it.
Theisman - not to sharp
Kornheiser - kind of an ahole
Tirico - I like Tirico, but as a group
= very subpar telecast
Fair enough. I'm still not sure how Theisman still has a job. Thing is, I really don't like listening to a game when drama between the announcers takes away from the game. I almost felt sorry for Theisman a few times. Kornheiser really made him look like such a fool a few times it was uncomfortable just listening to it on national tv. Would of lead to fisticuffs on some streets.We've been here almost weekly ranting about all the horrific gaffes Theeesman and Maguire made. They finally get someone in the booth willing to call him out on the same idiotic stuff everyone else notices, and you say he's "a little to quick to pounce"??? The real problem is Theesman, but if we have to deal with him, at least let Kornheiser point out what a buffoon he is.You couldn't come up with a worse mix if you tried. Theisman just spouts off stuff without thinking. Kornheiser is a little to quick to pounce on Theisman when he does it and is coming off as kind of a weasel by doing it.
Theisman - not to sharp
Kornheiser - kind of an ahole
Tirico - I like Tirico, but as a group
= very subpar telecast
For the love of Pistol Pete Maravich, what the hell is wrong with you all?It's Football on Monday Night (in gorgeous Hi-Def)! Would you rather be watching Dancing with the Stars?I don't care if it's a trio of syphilis-ridden monkeys calling the game - It's Football on Monday Night!
I agree but the reason isn't MNF losing its luster but the fact that ESPN decided to put the together the worst possible announcing crew. First there is Joey T. who never stops talking but rarely says anything appropriate. Trico who totally clueless. Kornheiser should have not be involved with ESPN in any capacity because he know absolutely nothing about any sport. The only he can talk about his himself.I'm amazed that ESPN with all there expertise is sports could put together such a terrible crew. I bet the football guys could put together a far supperior crew off the street.I get so perturbed watching the three idiots I usually turn off the TV or least turn the sound off and watch the play by play on NFL.com which has proven to be much more accurate then the broadcast.However the B crew did a crediable job so maybe they should replace the three bozos.I am anti-kornheiser because I live the DC area and that all you here is him and he is useless and should go back to his style column because he is a terrible sport writer and commentator. If he ever says anything intelligent it purely by accident. Joey T. was good when he was in the studio a few years ago but as an announcer no way. Most of the time i have no clue what game he is talking about.There just seems to be something missing since MNF football moves to ESPN. I don't know if it's the lame play by play crew, the graphics they use, or something else. But the whole broadcast just seems flat the first 2 weeks. It lacks the excitement of when it was on ABC.The best thing MNF has going for it is when Cornhiser repeatedly calls out Theisman for making an assenine comment.
the announcing crew is BORING! Completely lame.MNF w/o Madden stinks.There just seems to be something missing since MNF football moves to ESPN. I don't know if it's the lame play by play crew, the graphics they use, or something else. But the whole broadcast just seems flat the first 2 weeks. It lacks the excitement of when it was on ABC.The best thing MNF has going for it is when Cornhiser repeatedly calls out Theisman for making an assenine comment.
My five year old LOVES the robot -- and guess what -- that's what Fox was looking for -- something silly to engage the younger viewers during their dad's game. I can't stand Kornhoser at all -- he bugs me and I can barely stomach him on PTI. He has NO place in this booth except to bag on Joe T who is ther only b/c he's someone non-football fans can recognise in name. I agree with folks who call for the late MNF crew to get a shot. But even they were so-so. MNF isn't as important as it once was, for many reasons already covered previously. ESPN knows this - and they know they don't have to worry so much about ratings (cable stations just don't - they make money off subscribers more than commercials - and the commercials on MNF are just pretty much the same as any other ESPN broadcast so the market is perfect for them anyway).It could be worse guys. Picture:BermanIrvinJim RomeCalBear said:I think Fox's production is pretty bad; the stupid dancing robot, weak stat updates and tickers. CBS is better than all the others in terms of production.G-Money said:It's OBVIOUSLY ESPN and it's whole production staff. From the graphics to the announcers, they're definitely a full step down from other networks.
Why not Jerome Bettis or Steve Young, Dan Marino, Robert Smith, Curtis Martin, Emmitt Smith, or Eric Allen, Steve Tasker...ya know...some of the likable guys that have retired.
shadow2k said:DVR it and watch it on a 10 second delay, or 5min...whatever. As long as you don't watch it live, it affects their ratings.Mr. Brownstone said:Are you guys really not going to watch your team play on Monday night because the ####### broadcast has changed? Call me crazy, but I'm thinking you'll watch.
Second, we all made such a fuss about ESPN's new Monday night announcing team ... and they ended up getting upstaged by the makeshift team for the second game (Brad Nessler, **** Vermeil and Ron Jaworski). Those guys sounded like they had been doing games for 20 years together. They were fantastic. That was, um ... what's the word ... ironic.
Only if you took them seriously. Personaly I thought they were truly hilarious in a laugh at kind of way - especially when the game was bad and they'd try and fill, you can't write that kind of comedy.In my opinion, Gifford, Simpson and Namath were easily the worst announcing team of all time.
I really enjoy their broadcasts as well, Albert does great play by play and for whatever reason Boomer is much more informative and less annoying on radio. I get tired of the Johnsonville Brats ads at every commercial break, but what can you do?It's excellent with him and Boomer Esiason doing the game.
Yep. I saw that game and I thought it was great - much more enjoyable than having to deal with the constant yammering of some halfwits in suits. It was better than muting because the crowd and ambient noises really drew me into the game. But the ratings on it were terrible so they haven't tried that experiment again.NBC did this once back in the 80s with a Saturday Jets/Miami game IIRC. I don't think they received positive reviews.I think I would like a game when the only sounds we hear are the crowd and field. Just mic the field or have us hear the PA announcer to keep us up to date on firstdowns, who made the tackle etc.
ESPN MNF Commentary has gone to pot. And why did they spen 15 minutes interviewing a basketball player in the booth?If I'd wanted basketball stuff, I wouldn' be watching MNF. Jeesh!
The interviews aren't new. How long ago was it that Howard Cosell interviewed John Lennon?ESPN MNF Commentary has gone to pot. And why did they spen 15 minutes interviewing a basketball player in the booth?If I'd wanted basketball stuff, I wouldn' be watching MNF. Jeesh!I abhor the stupid interviews they are now doing in the booth. They aren't even caring about the game for 1/2 an quarter... the problem is, I don't think they are leaving... each week we will be stuck with the next pointless celeb that is at the game, probably courtesy of ESPN... Sunday Night football feels more like Monday Night football to me. They should move the team that did the SD vs Oak 2nd Monday night game onto the normal Monday night game. They were extremely more talented to be in the booth and actually cared to notice there was a NFL football game in progress that they were covering!
Agree on coach interviews. Those things are almost always 100% worthless.Although I don't think that their presentation is top notch either, I don't think that it is horrible. I certainly will watch it because it is football as opposed to not watching it!There has to be some reason that their ratings are higher than ever before ... it can't be the sideline reports. Where's Goose?I want to know why they don't have a fixed camera at each goal line. Like the cyclops in tennis. It would sure help in many instances where the only available camera angle is insufficient to give conclusive evidence of whether the ball crossed the plane of the goal line or not. A perfect example is Heath Miller's touchdown. Was the ball over the plane of the goal line when his foot went out of bounds? Is doesn't look like it from the available camera angles, but we'll never know because the angle does not allow us to look perpendicular to the plane ...Actually I did not mind the interview with Governor Schwartzenagger or Dwayne Wade. They are better than interviewing the coaches. What do they really expect the coaches to say anyway?