rockaction
Footballguy
Hartford raise your hands…!!!!!Would be here but no one has listened to DMB in 10 years.There's the Dave Mathews band, I expected to see that about 50 times already
Hartford raise your hands…!!!!!Would be here but no one has listened to DMB in 10 years.There's the Dave Mathews band, I expected to see that about 50 times already
Will never got old to me. Just listened to Insomniac the other day and it was as good as day one.Whitesnake
New Order
Smashing Pumpkins
Floyd
GnR
Green Day
Dave Mathews Band
The Sums (You guys smoke? You do now) have also appreciated with time.Ilov80s said:Saw this on Wikipedia "There's a huge demographic of college kids thinking hard about music who consider Blink-182 one of the most important bands of all time, in about a decade, the band's best songs will achieve the respectable ubiquity of classic-rock radio. Blink-182 is anything but harmless, and they absolutely deserve their forthcoming revisionism." -LA Weeklyrockaction said:Funny that Blink-182 still resonates with the kids. (And they do, I've also noticed.) Back then, they were considered total poseurs and all that until about '99 or so. Liking Blink-182 meant you were another crappy suburb pop-punker with a penchant for liking terrible bands. But that would be for another thread. I really think Travis Barker fundamentally transformed that band.Ilov80s said:Loved them and I think it holds up still. The high school kids I teach really like them too. They wear their shirts along with Hendrix or Nirvana. That's a band from the late 90s/early aughts that will live on in future generations.cstu said:Actually like Blink 182 more than I did in the 90's.'90s pop punk with bad leads. Cannot stand. Stop playing crappy leads. Stop.
Yea the number band is out. Green day 75 is so done.Ilov80s said:Saw this on Wikipedia "There's a huge demographic of college kids thinking hard about music who consider Blink-182 one of the most important bands of all time, in about a decade, the band's best songs will achieve the respectable ubiquity of classic-rock radio. Blink-182 is anything but harmless, and they absolutely deserve their forthcoming revisionism." -LA Weeklyrockaction said:Funny that Blink-182 still resonates with the kids. (And they do, I've also noticed.) Back then, they were considered total poseurs and all that until about '99 or so. Liking Blink-182 meant you were another crappy suburb pop-punker with a penchant for liking terrible bands. But that would be for another thread. I really think Travis Barker fundamentally transformed that band.Ilov80s said:Loved them and I think it holds up still. The high school kids I teach really like them too. They wear their shirts along with Hendrix or Nirvana. That's a band from the late 90s/early aughts that will live on in future generations.cstu said:Actually like Blink 182 more than I did in the 90's.'90s pop punk with bad leads. Cannot stand. Stop playing crappy leads. Stop.
Liking Phish and having the energy to endure a 3 hour jam session are two entirely different things.I know what you mean. I used to drive across the country to see Phish. Now they are coming here to Miami for the NYE run and the tix are cheap on stubhub and I'm not sure whether I have the energy to go.Phish. Saw a ton of shows in the '90s but have no desire to listen anymore.
On the flip side, as I approach my late 40s I'm listening to a lot more metal - including death metal.
They could be talking about the Offspring or Alvin & the Chipmunks and it wouldn't be more absurd to me.Ilov80s said:Saw this on Wikipedia "There's a huge demographic of college kids thinking hard about music who consider Blink-182 one of the most important bands of all time, in about a decade, the band's best songs will achieve the respectable ubiquity of classic-rock radio. Blink-182 is anything but harmless, and they absolutely deserve their forthcoming revisionism." -LA Weeklyrockaction said:Funny that Blink-182 still resonates with the kids. (And they do, I've also noticed.) Back then, they were considered total poseurs and all that until about '99 or so. Liking Blink-182 meant you were another crappy suburb pop-punker with a penchant for liking terrible bands. But that would be for another thread. I really think Travis Barker fundamentally transformed that band.Ilov80s said:Loved them and I think it holds up still. The high school kids I teach really like them too. They wear their shirts along with Hendrix or Nirvana. That's a band from the late 90s/early aughts that will live on in future generations.cstu said:Actually like Blink 182 more than I did in the 90's.'90s pop punk with bad leads. Cannot stand. Stop playing crappy leads. Stop.
You're really not alone, and I can understand both sides. I didn't like them until about 2001 or 2002 and I pretty much had all their old recordings (eta* as they came out, that is. I had each release as it came out, including their really old ones). I'm really just trying not to muck up the thread and respect people's opinions of their own favorite bands. For the most part, they were treated exactly as other parts of the Wiki article notes: with scorn and derision from those who actually did like pop-punk and power pop and those genres. But then, to be fair, the younger generation of pop consumers really like them and they did get better as a band, IMO.They could be talking about the Offspring or Alvin & the Chipmunks and it wouldn't be more absurd to me.Ilov80s said:Saw this on Wikipedia "There's a huge demographic of college kids thinking hard about music who consider Blink-182 one of the most important bands of all time, in about a decade, the band's best songs will achieve the respectable ubiquity of classic-rock radio. Blink-182 is anything but harmless, and they absolutely deserve their forthcoming revisionism." -LA Weeklyrockaction said:Funny that Blink-182 still resonates with the kids. (And they do, I've also noticed.) Back then, they were considered total poseurs and all that until about '99 or so. Liking Blink-182 meant you were another crappy suburb pop-punker with a penchant for liking terrible bands. But that would be for another thread. I really think Travis Barker fundamentally transformed that band.Ilov80s said:Loved them and I think it holds up still. The high school kids I teach really like them too. They wear their shirts along with Hendrix or Nirvana. That's a band from the late 90s/early aughts that will live on in future generations.cstu said:Actually like Blink 182 more than I did in the 90's.'90s pop punk with bad leads. Cannot stand. Stop playing crappy leads. Stop.
Yeah, you tell him...it's Deborah GibsonSorry GB, but.....Debbie Gibson![]()
Ditto.I only know their horrible late 90's singles.![]()
WTF?The Who falls into this bucket for me.
Conversely, I didn't like The Rolling Stones when I was young but now really like them a lot.
WTF, WTF??Foosball God said:WTF?The Who falls into this bucket for me.
Conversely, I didn't like The Rolling Stones when I was young but now really like them a lot.
My son was 8 when I handed down my old iPhone to him. He was just getting into music, went through my whole itunes collection and fell in love with the first sum 41 album. Some objectionable lyrics, so had to have that talk, but he listened to it non stop. A year later, took him to his first concert for his bday. Yup. Sum 41 on their 10th anniversary tour of "Does this look infected?"Saw this on Wikipedia "There's a huge demographic of college kids thinking hard about music who consider Blink-182 one of the most important bands of all time, in about a decade, the band's best songs will achieve the respectable ubiquity of classic-rock radio. Blink-182 is anything but harmless, and they absolutely deserve their forthcoming revisionism." -LA WeeklyFunny that Blink-182 still resonates with the kids. (And they do, I've also noticed.) Back then, they were considered total poseurs and all that until about '99 or so. Liking Blink-182 meant you were another crappy suburb pop-punker with a penchant for liking terrible bands. But that would be for another thread. I really think Travis Barker fundamentally transformed that band.Loved them and I think it holds up still. The high school kids I teach really like them too. They wear their shirts along with Hendrix or Nirvana. That's a band from the late 90s/early aughts that will live on in future generations.Actually like Blink 182 more than I did in the 90's.'90s pop punk with bad leads. Cannot stand. Stop playing crappy leads. Stop.
My first college girlfriend was obsessed with her. We couldn't "do it" unless Deborah was playing. Now every time I hear her, I stand at attention, old habits die hard.Yeah, you tell him...it's Deborah GibsonSorry GB, but.....Debbie Gibson![]()
Everything after 2000 is a steaming pile of doggie doo.Their early stuff will always be top notchYeah, Pearl Jam.
Everything after Vitalogy is a steaming pile of doggie doo.Their early stuff will always be top notchYeah, Pearl Jam.
Well if YOU guys say they suck...beyond terribleGreen Day is terrible
RushPretentiousness? Huh? These seem like about the nicest bunch of down to earth guys you could find. I have no idea what you mean. I mean who else goes out and does 35 song long shows for the fans? Can you name even one?I find the pretentiousness unbearable now.UnpossiblePearl Jam.
One of the 10 greatest songs every recorded.I just heard Ten Years Gone earlier this morning. That and coffee got my day going.Yeah, strikes me as odd, too. There are certain songs that I don't like ("D'yer Maker") or are tired of ("Whole Lotta Love" for one) and make me immediately change the station or scroll past. But overall, Zep will forever be a band to savor.Unpossible.Led Zepplin
Yield was the last record I liked.Everything after 2000 is a steaming pile of doggie doo.Their early stuff will always be top notchYeah, Pearl Jam.
That is the craziest thing posted in this thread.One of the 10 greatest songs every recorded.Ever.I just heard Ten Years Gone earlier this morning. That and coffee got my day going.Yeah, strikes me as odd, too. There are certain songs that I don't like ("D'yer Maker") or are tired of ("Whole Lotta Love" for one) and make me immediately change the station or scroll past. But overall, Zep will forever be a band to savor.Unpossible.Led Zepplin
Why is it so crazy? Music means many different things to many different people.That is the craziest thing posted in this thread.One of the 10 greatest songs every recorded.Ever.I just heard Ten Years Gone earlier this morning. That and coffee got my day going.Yeah, strikes me as odd, too. There are certain songs that I don't like ("D'yer Maker") or are tired of ("Whole Lotta Love" for one) and make me immediately change the station or scroll past. But overall, Zep will forever be a band to savor.Unpossible.Led Zepplin
I remember playing "Blind in Texas" a lot
:shakeshead:Everything after 2000 is a steaming pile of doggie doo.Their early stuff will always be top notchYeah, Pearl Jam.
:shakesheadagain:Well if YOU guys say they suck...beyond terribleGreen Day is terrible
Ofcourse. I also am free to have my opinion.Why is it so crazy? Music means many different things to many different people.I love that song with a passion. It has so much meaning to me personally. It is one of my 10 favorite songs ever.That is the craziest thing posted in this thread.One of the 10 greatest songs every recorded.Ever.I just heard Ten Years Gone earlier this morning. That and coffee got my day going.Yeah, strikes me as odd, too. There are certain songs that I don't like ("D'yer Maker") or are tired of ("Whole Lotta Love" for one) and make me immediately change the station or scroll past. But overall, Zep will forever be a band to savor.Unpossible.Led Zepplin
Conversely, I played her music while doing it solo.My first college girlfriend was obsessed with her. We couldn't "do it" unless Deborah was playing. Now every time I hear her, I stand at attention, old habits die hard.Yeah, you tell him...it's Deborah GibsonSorry GB, but.....Debbie Gibson![]()
Stryper just finished touring in South America.I've read every band mentioned and I can't find a single one I agree with.
Probably the closest for me was a Christian band named Petra. They were pretty cheesy, but I was like 12-13 when I really liked them.
And yeah, Dave Matthews. Dave's singing style and Carter Beauford's drumming both irritate the hell out of me now.Liking Phish and having theI know what you mean. I used to drive across the country to see Phish. Now they are coming here to Miami for the NYE run and the tix are cheap on stubhub and I'm not sure whether I have the energy to go.Phish. Saw a ton of shows in the '90s but have no desire to listen anymore.
On the flip side, as I approach my late 40s I'm listening to a lot more metal - including death metal.energydrugs to endure a 3 hour jam session are two entirely different things.
Tom Servo said:Stryper just finished touring in South America.Jayrod said:I've read every band mentioned and I can't find a single one I agree with.
Probably the closest for me was a Christian band named Petra. They were pretty cheesy, but I was like 12-13 when I really liked them.
HFS. Around 30 years ago I was front stage for Stryper, can't remember if CC Deville was still with the band at the time. Isaiah 53:5I went from Stryper to Blackie(I had a Manowar kick around that time too). Loved the self titled album.Amused to Death said:
His first 2 albums are o.k., Soul Cages is still a great album. After that he became strictly EZ listening.saintfool said:Sting.
I loved the Police and they hold up really well still for me. Sting doesn't. In fact, the longer his career has dragged on, the worse it looks.