STEADYMOBBIN 22
Footballguy
My buddy sent me this picture and we debated on who was the WORST QB and thought it would be interesting to see what others will say.
Last edited by a moderator:
I wanted to take Farve but his arm was such a cannon and he was mobile in his prime.I went with Favre, actually. Too many backbreaking decisions at the wrong time in my memory, anyway.
They're all great, I just think Favre was overhyped by the media at times.
I agree with you but a counter-argument: Those guys were asked to carry their teams more than the other guys were. Maybe? Hmmm, Miami had no running game or defense to speak of, either, for a number of years, and Marino carried them without the INTs, so...Who saw Staubach? I didn't.
Elway and Farve are bottom for the reasons listed above.
Won a lot of last minute games. Lot of those games were like that because they threw some bad picks earlier in the game.
Most overrated QB ever.I went with Favre, actually. Too many backbreaking decisions at the wrong time in my memory, anyway.
They're all great, I just think Favre was overhyped by the media at times.
Not sure it was the media. The guy was a fantastic and entertaining QB.Most overrated QB ever.
Great talent but a media made superstar.
Tony Romo was a better QB than Favre. (COME @ ME BROS! )
That's kind of the point.Not sure it was the media. The guy was a fantastic and entertaining QB.
Romo though? Please. Romo could not do half of what Favre did.
Id probably go Elway or Favre from this list (without really seeing Staubach. Favre had a better TD to INT ration than Elway.
Far superior train wreck?That's kind of the point.
Romo was a far superior QB, look it up.
Better NFL QB on the field across the board.Far superior train wreck?
Joe Namath says hello.Most overrated QB ever.
Great talent but a media made superstar.
Tony Romo was a better QB than Favre. (COME @ ME BROS! )
Yeah...no, just no way to ever agree with that.Better NFL QB on the field across the board.
Reggie Jackson is the all time leader in strikeouts. /notthreadFavre is the all-time leader in interceptions (336). /thread
Of course not, the Favre media blitz made sure of that.Yeah...no, just no way to ever agree with that.
Now, as much as we usually agree, that's wildly overstated, I think. Testaverde's best and really only good years came with Baltimore and then the Jets around that '96-'98 period when he was about thirty-six through thirty-eight or something like that. His numbers pale in comparison to Favre's, all around.Of course not, the Favre media blitz made sure of that.
Favre is Vinny Testaverde with a Super Bowl win under his belt.
You might mean that Namath is Testaverde with a Super Bowl win under his belt. Testaverde might have been better than Namath for the Jets.Of course not, the Favre media blitz made sure of that.
Favre is Vinny Testaverde with a Super Bowl win under his belt.
He was the worst of this group IMO. He played a shorter career and was never named 1st Team All NFL. He probably retired too early as the last few years were far better than the rest of his career.Who saw Staubach? I didn't.
Elway and Farve are bottom for the reasons listed above.
Won a lot of last minute games. Lot of those games were like that because they threw some bad picks earlier in the game.
Namath might not even be Trent Dilfer. Namath was good at branding & soaking up the spotlight. The NY media loved his fur coats & swagger.You might mean that Namath is Testaverde with a Super Bowl win under his belt. Testaverde might have been better than Namath for the Jets.
Oh, I remember the moment. My friend and I looked at each other like "Did that just happen on national television?"Namath might not even be Trent Dilfer. Namath was good at branding & soaking up the spotlight. The NY media loved his fur coats & swagger.
Then he said he wanted to kiss Suzie Kobler & it all went to ####
To be fair, who can blame him - she's a fox. I also want to kiss her.
In searching for the video, it referred to it as his "rock bottom moment", so I believe he uses it as a watershed moment for sobriety, using the embarrassment to not return to that place.Oh, I remember the moment. My friend and I looked at each other like "Did that just happen on national television?"
"I wanna kiss you..."
Got Namath to stop drinking. I'm not sure how he deals with all of that stuff now, whether he took the drink back up, etc., but he was really embarrassed by that.
I more meant that Favre was a stat complier. I agree he is probably better than Vinny but I am 100% that Romo>>FavreNow, as much as we usually agree, that's wildly overstated, I think. Testaverde's best and really only good years came with Baltimore and then the Jets around that '96-'98 period when he was about thirty-six through thirty-eight or something like that. His numbers pale in comparison to Favre's, all around.
Nothing about my thoughts on Favre have to do with a media blitz. And Romo was just not that good.Of course not, the Favre media blitz made sure of that.
Favre is Vinny Testaverde with a Super Bowl win under his belt.
All fair points. But the resulting numbers are what they are.Everyone should note that Roger Staubach didn't start his NFL career until he was 27 because he was y'know serving a tour of duty in Vietnam. He didn't start his first full season until 1973 when he was 31 because he was sitting behind Craig Morton who guided the Cowboys to the Super Bowl in '70. He came in for Morton in '71 (at 29 years old) and led the team to the Super Bowl but Morton started the following season went 10-4 and took the Cowboys to the conference round.
Fair.Nothing about my thoughts on Favre have to do with a media blitz. And Romo was just not that good.
I think comparing Staubach to those other guys is like comparing apples to space ships.All fair points. But the resulting numbers are what they are.
Between that & the more ground-oriented NFL, I believe he has the weakest resume here.
Not a slight against the dude by any means though.
Opening Day 1994I’m legit shocked Marino got a single vote, much less 5. Dude was an absolute baller. He never got a ring in a team sport. That shouldn’t diminish a single thing about his ability as a QB.
48 tds in a season when nobody was doing that.Opening Day 1994
Bledsoe 32 for 51, 421 yards, 4 TDs, 2 Ints
Marino 23 for 432, 473 yards, 5 TDs, 1 Int
Marino was ridiculously talented.
3 fair criticisms:Romo got a bad rap for a lot of undeserved reasons and Favre's status was elevated for a lot of equally undeserved reasons.
I think comparing Staubach to those other guys is like comparing apples to space ships.All fair points. But the resulting numbers are what they are.
Between that & the more ground-oriented NFL, I believe he has the weakest resume here.
Not a slight against the dude by any means though.
I hated the Cowboys, but Staubach was a God. He's was one of the most composed technologically advanced QBs of his day (or would have been in the current day) and so were the Cowboys. i know because i lived it.Everyone should note that Roger Staubach didn't start his NFL career until he was 27 because he was y'know serving a tour of duty in Vietnam. He didn't start his first full season until 1973 when he was 31 because he was sitting behind Craig Morton who guided the Cowboys to the Super Bowl in '70. He came in for Morton in '71 (at 29 years old) and led the team to the Super Bowl but Morton started the following season went 10-4 and took the Cowboys to the conference round.
I gotta be honest and say this is an extremely odd take. You’re going to look at the numbers - but not do any statistical analysis to compare Staubach to his contemporaries but simply compare his numbers to more recent players?There's no "worst", but Staubach's numbers aren't like the others on this list, primarily due to the era in which he played. I have no doubt that if he were in his prime on some of Montana's Niners teams or on the 2020 TB Bucs, he'd be an absolute beast. But he got my vote, because numbers.
Butt fumble was Sanchez.3 fair criticisms:
1. Butt fumble in the playoffs. Fair or not, he’s always going to be remembered for this above all other accolades. Especially since he doesn’t have a ring, and because that fumble directly cost him one of his best shots at getting one.
2. Injury-prone. He missed 36 games due to injury & played somewhat ineffectively through numerous other games due to various ailments.
3. 4th all-time in Cowboys career fumbles.
When he was at his best he was awesome. Highest QB rating of all non-SB-winning QBs.
but some of the criticism leveled at him is fair.
Oh - what was the playoff fumble as a holder that knocked the Cowboys off the playoffs? Maybe just a bad fumble and not the butt variety.Butt fumble was Sanchez.
Agree on the injuries.
Romo isn’t on this list.