timschochet
Footballguy
And we got ourselves a ballgame. Too bad we already know McNabb will choke it away.
@ Akers. What a boob.What's with these kickers?![]()

Fixed.And we got ourselves a ballgame. Too bad we already know McNabb Akers will choke it away.
Although I guess I understand the logic behind taking the automatic two.Going for one here again is stupid.
For Philly? Not necessarily, because they're probably going to throw anyway.Isn't a 2 point conversion attempt at the 1 easier than a 2 point conversion attempt at the 2?11 = 1 TD (with 2 pt) and FG12 = 2 TDsWhy not go for the 2 point conversion there? No difference between 11 or 12 right? But down only 10 is better.
Especially since Akers missed it.Going for one here again is stupid.
I'm just stating the logic behind itIsn't a 2 point conversion attempt at the 1 easier than a 2 point conversion attempt at the 2?11 = 1 TD (with 2 pt) and FG12 = 2 TDsWhy not go for the 2 point conversion there? No difference between 11 or 12 right? But down only 10 is better.

That or maybe he owes some people money - wow.Akers have money on the game?
With a whole quarter left? No way. If they take the one and score a TD they're up 3. If they go for two and miss then they're only up 2 if they score a TD, and a FG beats them.Also, if they get the 1 and Zona kicks a FG, they're only down 7. Miss the 2 and Zona gets the FG and now they're down 8, which is a big difference and now they have to go for 2 again.Not that it matters, since they missed the XP anyway.Going for one here again is stupid.
Despite Akers missing the kick, I think going for on was the right call. There's a whole quarter to go.Going for one here again is stupid.
So is it easier from the 2 than the 1 from the Eagles?I don't see the point in waiting to go for two unless you think it's easier to go for two at the two rather than the one. That's bad thinking, IMO.For Philly? Not necessarily, because they're probably going to throw anyway.Isn't a 2 point conversion attempt at the 1 easier than a 2 point conversion attempt at the 2?11 = 1 TD (with 2 pt) and FG12 = 2 TDsWhy not go for the 2 point conversion there? No difference between 11 or 12 right? But down only 10 is better.
If he doesn't pay up, will they break his leg? And does he care?That or maybe he owes some people money - wow.Akers have money on the game?
yep. AZ is going to piss this game away.Whoever wins AFC game is probably going to slaughter the NFC team.Arizona is melting. They really need a score on this next drive. Their defense is running out of gas.
Arizona is melting. They really need a score on this next drive. Their defense is running out of gas.
I am not sure they can handle this pressure now...who wants to choke first?Once again, Reid shows his mastery of game management. At least he's got a QB who knows his way around overtime if it comes to that.Reid was either so certain that the Eagles could get a touchdown that he didn't want to cut the lead to three, or he was so certain that the Cards would get another field goal that he was afraid to give them a chance to take an eight point lead. Either way, with sixteen minutes left in the game, it makes no sense.
he is absolutely maddening to root for. watch the past 7 years of eagles football and you'll understandi love everyone yelling at Philly fans because of how they get on McNabb's case, and you read this thread and you see everyone does it. I don't know if everybody is a Philly fan who was bashing McNabb to start and now loves him, but it certainly is a lot of people. The guy starts slow sometimes
Heh, awesome:2-7 ARI2311) (Shotgun) K.Warner pass short middle to K.Warner to ARI 27 for 4 yards (T.Cole).
you think he really wanted to catch that?Apparently Reid was on a different page than the rest of us by attempting the PAT there anway.So is it easier from the 2 than the 1 from the Eagles?I don't see the point in waiting to go for two unless you think it's easier to go for two at the two rather than the one. That's bad thinking, IMO.For Philly? Not necessarily, because they're probably going to throw anyway.Isn't a 2 point conversion attempt at the 1 easier than a 2 point conversion attempt at the 2?11 = 1 TD (with 2 pt) and FG12 = 2 TDsWhy not go for the 2 point conversion there? No difference between 11 or 12 right? But down only 10 is better.
Despite Akers missing the kick, I think going for on was the right call. There's a whole quarter to go.Going for one here again is stupid.
many scenerios can still play out...Yes, but he really should have gone for two the first time.People act like it's such a scary decision to go for two and that you must wait. With the ball at the one, you should go for two unless the score and time clearly dictate otherwise. Down by 12 or 5 in the second half is a situation that makes it even more clear.Reid was either so certain that the Eagles could get a touchdown that he didn't want to cut the lead to three, or he was so certain that the Cards would get another field goal that he was afraid to give them a chance to take an eight point lead. Either way, with sixteen minutes left in the game, it makes no sense.
He is reminding me of the English kicker from "The Replacements".If he doesn't pay up, will they break his leg? And does he care?That or maybe he owes some people money - wow.Akers have money on the game?
I'm not saying it would be easier, I'm just saying it would probably be the same for them, and later on they actually know if they need to go for two at this point, as opposed to forcing yourself to go for 2 when you may not need it (and it may hurt you) for a reason that's not really going to help you much if at all. If they never kick a FG then that 2 pointer never helps them, and missing it can only hurt them since it could give them a 2 point lead instead of a 3 point lead if they score two more TDs.I'm not saying they definitely shouldn't have gone for 2, but the reasoning is certainly there to argue both ways.So is it easier from the 2 than the 1 from the Eagles?I don't see the point in waiting to go for two unless you think it's easier to go for two at the two rather than the one. That's bad thinking, IMO.For Philly? Not necessarily, because they're probably going to throw anyway.Isn't a 2 point conversion attempt at the 1 easier than a 2 point conversion attempt at the 2?11 = 1 TD (with 2 pt) and FG12 = 2 TDsWhy not go for the 2 point conversion there? No difference between 11 or 12 right? But down only 10 is better.