What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

NFC Championship Game - Philadelphia Eagles at Arizona Cardinals (1 Viewer)

Actually, I was going to comment that I liked going for 1 here. Coutning on Arizona not scoring again would be a mistake on Philly's part. Of course, Akers missed the EP, but still a good call, IMO.

 
Going for one here again is stupid.
With a whole quarter left? No way. If they take the one and score a TD they're up 3. If they go for two and miss then they're only up 2 if they score a TD, and a FG beats them.Also, if they get the 1 and Zona kicks a FG, they're only down 7. Miss the 2 and Zona gets the FG and now they're down 8, which is a big difference and now they have to go for 2 again.Not that it matters, since they missed the XP anyway.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why not go for the 2 point conversion there? No difference between 11 or 12 right? But down only 10 is better.
11 = 1 TD (with 2 pt) and FG12 = 2 TDs
Isn't a 2 point conversion attempt at the 1 easier than a 2 point conversion attempt at the 2?
For Philly? Not necessarily, because they're probably going to throw anyway.
So is it easier from the 2 than the 1 from the Eagles?I don't see the point in waiting to go for two unless you think it's easier to go for two at the two rather than the one. That's bad thinking, IMO.
 
Reid was either so certain that the Eagles could get a touchdown that he didn't want to cut the lead to three, or he was so certain that the Cards would get another field goal that he was afraid to give them a chance to take an eight point lead. Either way, with sixteen minutes left in the game, it makes no sense.

 
i love everyone yelling at Philly fans because of how they get on McNabb's case, and you read this thread and you see everyone does it. I don't know if everybody is a Philly fan who was bashing McNabb to start and now loves him, but it certainly is a lot of people. The guy starts slow sometimes

 
As a non-fan of either team, this one's a bunch of fun. I know you guys that are fans of either Philly or the Cards are biting your nails, but this is one hell of an appetizer for me while waiting for Ravens/Steelers. I hope the 2nd game is as entertaining for you as this one is for me.

 
Reid was either so certain that the Eagles could get a touchdown that he didn't want to cut the lead to three, or he was so certain that the Cards would get another field goal that he was afraid to give them a chance to take an eight point lead. Either way, with sixteen minutes left in the game, it makes no sense.
Once again, Reid shows his mastery of game management. At least he's got a QB who knows his way around overtime if it comes to that.
 
i love everyone yelling at Philly fans because of how they get on McNabb's case, and you read this thread and you see everyone does it. I don't know if everybody is a Philly fan who was bashing McNabb to start and now loves him, but it certainly is a lot of people. The guy starts slow sometimes
he is absolutely maddening to root for. watch the past 7 years of eagles football and you'll understand
 
I'd be careful with all the blitzes here by Philly. I understand their concept, but too much of anything isn't a good thing (especially blitzing a guy like Warner so much).

 
Why not go for the 2 point conversion there? No difference between 11 or 12 right? But down only 10 is better.
11 = 1 TD (with 2 pt) and FG12 = 2 TDs
Isn't a 2 point conversion attempt at the 1 easier than a 2 point conversion attempt at the 2?
For Philly? Not necessarily, because they're probably going to throw anyway.
So is it easier from the 2 than the 1 from the Eagles?I don't see the point in waiting to go for two unless you think it's easier to go for two at the two rather than the one. That's bad thinking, IMO.
Apparently Reid was on a different page than the rest of us by attempting the PAT there anway.
 
Reid was either so certain that the Eagles could get a touchdown that he didn't want to cut the lead to three, or he was so certain that the Cards would get another field goal that he was afraid to give them a chance to take an eight point lead. Either way, with sixteen minutes left in the game, it makes no sense.
Yes, but he really should have gone for two the first time.People act like it's such a scary decision to go for two and that you must wait. With the ball at the one, you should go for two unless the score and time clearly dictate otherwise. Down by 12 or 5 in the second half is a situation that makes it even more clear.
 
Why not go for the 2 point conversion there? No difference between 11 or 12 right? But down only 10 is better.
11 = 1 TD (with 2 pt) and FG12 = 2 TDs
Isn't a 2 point conversion attempt at the 1 easier than a 2 point conversion attempt at the 2?
For Philly? Not necessarily, because they're probably going to throw anyway.
So is it easier from the 2 than the 1 from the Eagles?I don't see the point in waiting to go for two unless you think it's easier to go for two at the two rather than the one. That's bad thinking, IMO.
I'm not saying it would be easier, I'm just saying it would probably be the same for them, and later on they actually know if they need to go for two at this point, as opposed to forcing yourself to go for 2 when you may not need it (and it may hurt you) for a reason that's not really going to help you much if at all. If they never kick a FG then that 2 pointer never helps them, and missing it can only hurt them since it could give them a 2 point lead instead of a 3 point lead if they score two more TDs.I'm not saying they definitely shouldn't have gone for 2, but the reasoning is certainly there to argue both ways.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top