What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

NFL Betting - (more focused than general thread) (1 Viewer)

Any thoughts on how I can connect into this circle?   The sports betting message boards out there are garbage.
Real answer is to get to know actual pros. Easiest way to do that is to offer to provide them with outs. People who do this for a living eventually get accounts limited to death and need fresh accounts to move money through. You can provide those accounts and then begin to learn the trade. 

 
Real answer is to get to know actual pros. Easiest way to do that is to offer to provide them with outs. People who do this for a living eventually get accounts limited to death and need fresh accounts to move money through. You can provide those accounts and then begin to learn the trade. 
Shocking to me that it would be this difficult...two minds are better than one etc. etc.

 
Shocking to me that it would be this difficult...two minds are better than one etc. etc.
It's easy to find people to discuss handicapping with you, there are forums all over the internet for that.  As you noted, they're garbage.  The people who actually know what they're doing have no use for discussing it with randos on the internet.  :shrug:  

 
Any thoughts on how I can connect into this circle?   The sports betting message boards out there are garbage.
Honestly--if there were successful professional gamblers in here--my guess is that they'd be far more inclined to share information privately than publically.   Maybe invite them to pm you and once you both "vet" each other and feel like you respect each other's knowledge--you can figure out ways to exchange info (maybe via email, phone calls..etc).   It sucks that I'm recommending this as I would personally love to see a discussion amongst successful sports betters (and I'm a person that rarely bets on sports)---but I just don't think you'll find that here.  You'll basically get what you've already seen so far in this thread--which doesn't suck for an amateur like me--but I can see how it's not exactly what you were looking for.  

 
yeah, I get that as the odds boost (free money) bet they are allowing up to $50

But he said he made a second bet and it pay 50.50, which is -10000.   If you look at the bet on DK, it has -10000 lined out and replaced with the -110

I was just surprised you could actually bet it at -10000.   Easiest 1% 1 day turnaround ever?
Hmmm, yeah I played it too at -110. 
 

I wasn’t aware you could play it more than once 

 
It's easy to find people to discuss handicapping with you, there are forums all over the internet for that.  As you noted, they're garbage.  The people who actually know what they're doing have no use for discussing it with randos on the internet.  :shrug:  
Yeah, makes sense...thought I would give it a go but wasn't expecting much.

 
Honestly--if there were successful professional gamblers in here--my guess is that they'd be far more inclined to share information privately than publically.   Maybe invite them to pm you and once you both "vet" each other and feel like you respect each other's knowledge--you can figure out ways to exchange info (maybe via email, phone calls..etc).   It sucks that I'm recommending this as I would personally love to see a discussion amongst successful sports betters (and I'm a person that rarely bets on sports)---but I just don't think you'll find that here.  You'll basically get what you've already seen so far in this thread--which doesn't suck for an amateur like me--but I can see how it's not exactly what you were looking for.  
Yeah, thought I would give it a try to see if there were any hanging around.

 
1) there are real, legit pro gamblers/+ev semi-pro gamblers on Twitter. they're not TOO hard to find, but they also aren't putting 30 emojis and 3 gifs after every 5u play.

2) if you haven't built a mathematical model to beat NFL sides/totals, you're pretty much dead in the water long-term. It's too big of a market, the opening line's too good already, and then the people that move that line are even better still. The days of just having a good eye and a reasonably good understanding of statistics and being able to eyeball a line are long-gone.

 
1) there are real, legit pro gamblers/+ev semi-pro gamblers on Twitter. they're not TOO hard to find, but they also aren't putting 30 emojis and 3 gifs after every 5u play.
Yep, I follow a lot of them on Twitter and have even had some private conversations with them via Twitter messaging.   Almost ended up writing for a prominent betting website as a result of some of those conversations, but not as interesting in writing and am more interested in just winning.

Ideally I'd like to find other guys and form a think tank of sorts.  At a minimum to see if they spot similar edges when the lines come out or just to bounce modeling ideas off of one another...you have to hit that opening number fast.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
1) there are real, legit pro gamblers/+ev semi-pro gamblers on Twitter. they're not TOO hard to find, but they also aren't putting 30 emojis and 3 gifs after every 5u play.

2) if you haven't built a mathematical model to beat NFL sides/totals, you're pretty much dead in the water long-term. It's too big of a market, the opening line's too good already, and then the people that move that line are even better still. The days of just having a good eye and a reasonably good understanding of statistics and being able to eyeball a line are long-gone.
100% agree. That's why I stick to lotto ticket parlays to add some fun to Sundays lol. 

 
2) if you haven't built a mathematical model to beat NFL sides/totals, you're pretty much dead in the water long-term. It's too big of a market, the opening line's too good already, and then the people that move that line are even better still. The days of just having a good eye and a reasonably good understanding of statistics and being able to eyeball a line are long-gone.
Modeling is my favorite part and I have my own, but you can win without models IMHO just difficult to do it over time with real volume.   Factors such as cluster injuries/circumstantial factors and trend analysis provide edges that models can't capture.

 
Baltimore -8

Browns still blow. Baltimore is still butthurt from how their season ended. They are going to put on a show.

 
Modeling is my favorite part and I have my own, but you can win without models IMHO just difficult to do it over time with real volume.   Factors such as cluster injuries/circumstantial factors and trend analysis provide edges that models can't capture.
Why don't you just make your bets, then post them here.  You will have gotten "the best of the number."  After all, you are a dedicated and profitable NFL bettor.   Eventually you can parlay that (get it?) into a private "buy my picks" monthly subscriber base and go tout like every one else in this brave new world.  PM me for details.

 
Good one. I agree. Maybe not so much a big deal for the home team offense, but definitely for the visitor offense.

Going OVER on some visitor team totals might work out. 
I wonder how the disruption of traveling to another city and having your regular travel routine be all messed up will impact those visitors.  Which do you think is harder, arizona flying across the country, or your first team flight to a new city during a pandemic when all the hotels and restaurants and whatever else you would normally do are all jacked up?  Because arizona flying across the country used to be pretty reliably impactful. 

I would guess that bad franchises and new or bad coaches traveling will get smoked this week. 

I will also guess that offenses do better than expected overall, because a busted offensive play can mean a turnover and possibly a touchdown, and a busted defensive play means a big gain or a touchdown.  Sure there will be some punt fests, but I expect good teams to benefit from sloppy play. 

 
The best way to build connections is to post your plays and keep an accurate record. Do not past post, do not post stale lines. Track how your plays do against the closing line. There are several FBG who bet professionally, wagering thread may seem like a #### show but some really sharp people have come and gone in that thread and everyone starts somewhere.

 
The best way to build connections is to post your plays and keep an accurate record. Do not past post, do not post stale lines. Track how your plays do against the closing line. There are several FBG who bet professionally, wagering thread may seem like a #### show but some really sharp people have come and gone in that thread and everyone starts somewhere.
Thanks man.

 
One thing that I honestly don’t believe gets factored in that should is the way home field advantage leaves as a game goes on. The data is clear in many sports, but definitely NFL, if you like a home team look at 1q and 1h. If you like a road team look at game. 
 

Besides the narratives about getting comfortable and used to it, simple math over the last 10 years says home teams are +1.0 ppg in Q1, +0.7 ppg in Q2, +0.4 ppg in Q3, +0.4 ppg in Q4. 
 

Vegas doesn’t care because people don’t care. For example, Ravens are -8 at home and colts are -8 on the road this week. Both have identical -4.5 (-121) halftime lines. That just shows they treat HFA as equal in halves (it isn’t). 

 
Yep, I follow a lot of them on Twitter and have even had some private conversations with them via Twitter messaging.   Almost ended up writing for a prominent betting website as a result of some of those conversations, but not as interesting in writing and am more interested in just winning.

Ideally I'd like to find other guys and form a think tank of sorts.  At a minimum to see if they spot similar edges when the lines come out or just to bounce modeling ideas off of one another...you have to hit that opening number fast.
Everyone guards their own sauce pretty closely. Football is especially valuable because even though a double-digit ROI probably isn't realistic long-term, limits are crazy high and your outs are practically limitless.

I would say if you're NFL. find someone who is independent and specializes in CFB. Or find someone who models baseball or hoops and share ideas w them, even though they're different sports. Most syndicates are an originator or a group of originators who specialize in different sports, and then someone who gathers PPH accounts to bet on/burn through.

I (try) to beat MLB openers, for a few years now (up big this year, basically even the last two), and it's like level 1. Actually, level 1 is props/small sports, level 2 is openers. Level 3 is beating un-circled games once the limits are raised. If you're maxing openers, you're nowhere close in terms of volume to what the biggest guys are doing. And because a lot of price discovery has happened, it's a lot tougher.

 
Don't see anyone talking edges in hoops. Like ever. I suppose that's due to late game clock variance. Exception is ncaa hoops with tiny schools nobody has heard of. 

 
culdeus said:
Don't see anyone talking edges in hoops. Like ever. I suppose that's due to late game clock variance. Exception is ncaa hoops with tiny schools nobody has heard of. 
Huge public sides in the NCAA tournament...definitely edges there IMHO.  College hoops probably my second best sport.  Hoops models so much easier to develop than football too.

 
Huge public sides in the NCAA tournament...definitely edges there IMHO.  College hoops probably my second best sport.  Hoops models so much easier to develop than football too.
The pro bettors all love playing the NBA, especially 1q, 1h.  That edge is gone with the bubble this year.  

 
I'd be interested in your reasoning.  I think that is a low probability play.  I am not sure they could print an O/U where I would take the under on this game. 
...that's partly why I like it.  

Edit: that wasn't a dig at you, by the way.  Realizing now it might read that way.  To elaborate on my comment:

1) Betting markets have varying levels of efficiency, but a big 3 NFL market a few hours before kickoff is likely among the most efficient markets you'll ever find.  There's no way the under on an NFL game is ever a "low probability play," it's basically always by definition close to a 50/50 shot.  

2) If you have a game where the general public sentiment is along the lines of "I am not sure they could print an O/U where I would take the under," then I would basically blind bet the under without even trying to handicap the game.  I don't think "fade the public" is a viable betting strategy in general but in this case it would be an indication that there's value in the under.  

All that said, I'm not actually betting the total tonight.  Just saying if I had to place a bet on a widely available market, that's probably what I'd take.  Just throwing it out there for discussion.   

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'd be interested in your reasoning.  I think that is a low probability play.  I am not sure they could print an O/U where I would take the under on this game. 
No preseason would be the biggest reason for me to play under.  No one will be sharp for a couple weeks or so.  Heck a 34-20 game is high scoring, but a loser.

Played Tenn -2-120 at Denver Monday night.  Think this game goes to -3.  Denver has lost Von Miller for the season, and now Courtland Sutton hurt his shoulder.  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
No preseason would be the biggest reason for me to play under.  No one will be sharp for a couple weeks or so.  Heck a 34-20 game is high scoring, but a loser.
yeah, I guess I can see that.  KC offense is pretty much intact.  Offense is timing, and I think they have that down pretty well.  

I think it is the defenses that suffer a bit more not having a preseason.  I think you are going to see more blown coverages than usual.  If the offenses can exploit that, we could see a pretty high scoring week 1.

Different sides of the same argument, I guess. 

 
yeah, I guess I can see that.  KC offense is pretty much intact.  Offense is timing, and I think they have that down pretty well.  

I think it is the defenses that suffer a bit more not having a preseason.  I think you are going to see more blown coverages than usual.  If the offenses can exploit that, we could see a pretty high scoring week 1.

Different sides of the same argument, I guess. 
Houston took a downgrade on offense with D Johnson for Hopkins.  Since they have Johnson, I would expect them to slow tempo at Arrowhead.   Speaking of Arrowhead, the place isn't near as intimidating at 22% capacity, so playcalling and audibles shouldn't be an issue.  

I don't play soccer, but unders seemed to hit at a higher rate, namely the road team is rested (cant go out), and home teams start flat.  Ive been thinking about blind unders with new coaches/new qbs.

 
No preseason would be the biggest reason for me to play under.  No one will be sharp for a couple weeks or so.  Heck a 34-20 game is high scoring, but a loser.
Cuts both ways.   If you are assuming that offenses and defenses are equally affected by limited reps, then your theory may hold up.  I'm not sure that's true.  Texans have a rookie defensive coordinator.   Chiefs offense hasn't changed a whole lot outside of RB.    Shortened preparation time seems like it may be a whole lot worse for the defense in that matchup.

 
Which books do you find the best lines and most betting options at?
If you mean of the legal US sportsbooks I can only speak to NJ but I think the most betting options tend to be FanDuel, bet365, DraftKings (roughly in that order, depending on sport).  And I guess PointsBet if you count all their weird markets.  Best lines will vary all over, that's why you have to shop.  Offshore you'll find better prices.  

 
Played Tenn -2-120 at Denver Monday night.  Think this game goes to -3.  Denver has lost Von Miller for the season, and now Courtland Sutton hurt his shoulder.  
With you on this. PFF just rated Drew Lock the worst QB in the league.

I used to NEVER bet against Monday night home dogs. Now, who the hell knows.

 
Real answer is to get to know actual pros. Easiest way to do that is to offer to provide them with outs. People who do this for a living eventually get accounts limited to death and need fresh accounts to move money through. You can provide those accounts and then begin to learn the trade. 
This.  The pros share little on forums.   The big reason they go on them is the battle for new outs.

 
No preseason would be the biggest reason for me to play under.  No one will be sharp for a couple weeks or so.  Heck a 34-20 game is high scoring, but a loser.

Played Tenn -2-120 at Denver Monday night.  Think this game goes to -3.  Denver has lost Von Miller for the season, and now Courtland Sutton hurt his shoulder.  
:jawdrop:          :tebow:            That darn missed 2pt conversion.

 
Can someone explain "outs" in this context? :bag:  
Some books will limit sharp players action.  The player doesn't even have to win, just get the best number to get limited or booted.  The sharps look for people who are not using their account for a price.  Example You using my account and the book thinks its me.  You may have a $100 limit on a bet while I have $1000 limits because I'm  not profiled as a sharp.  Sharps also sign up friends, family, etc to max their chances of winning.  In Vegas, they use runners to place bets on their behalf.

 
Will make three picks per week.

Week 1

Raiders -3. Carolina has new QB and new coach, couple this with no preseason and this is the type of game that that the Raiders must win.

Cardinals +7. Would not be shocked to see Arizona win this outright but fully expect a back-door cover here.

Cleveland +8. Either Baltimore wins by 20 or this is a 5-point game, here is hoping for the latter.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top