3 hour lunch
Footballguy
Yeah I like those along with maybe some AZ and Sea, which basically become moneylinesWong teaser for ya, Rams and Browns.
Rams would be -1.5 at Washington, and the Browns would be +8.5 against the Colts
Yeah I like those along with maybe some AZ and Sea, which basically become moneylinesWong teaser for ya, Rams and Browns.
Rams would be -1.5 at Washington, and the Browns would be +8.5 against the Colts
2-1-1 for 12-6-1YTD: 10-4
Week 4
Tampa -7. The Bucs seem to be rolling now and the the Chargers QB Justin Herbert came back to earth last week and he gets a top defense this week.
Seattle -7. Will not bet against Seattle until proven otherwise and Miami has nothing that makes me worried (I know, I bet against Seattle last week).
Dallas -5.5. If the Browns running game piles up huge numbers here, Dallas could be in trouble. I figure Dallas will do enough here to cover this modest line.
Indy -2.5. The Bears are the worst 3-0 team in the league. What Nick Foles shows up this week is anyone's guess.
@TripItUp Brian is giving you more than you could have hoped for.
Look, with all due respect, if you think the bets and analysis brian posted is what OP was looking for, you really did not read the initial portion of the thread carefully.@TripItUp is looking for more SERIOUS handicapping. 66% not quite up to his standards.
Look, with all due respect, if you think the bets and analysis brian posted is what OP was looking for, you really did not read the initial portion of the thread carefully.
Again no disrespect to brian, congrats on his early season start, but the rationale for his picks is maybe one level above a hunch. That is not the type of analysis long term winning pro handicappers are basing their wagers on, and that is far from the type of conversation OP was looking to have. Sorry, not trying to be an ####### here but that's the reality.
On the other hand I'm just a square bettor so that's just the type of conversation I enjoy!
I hear what you are saying, but this was his OP. Brian is pretty much meeting those criteria.I wanted to gage the interest in having a standalone thread for NFL betting in particular in this forum. The general wagering thread is not very interesting or useful to me. NFL lines typically aren't discussed at all until the day of games.
Please post if you have interest.
I am also the Bengals at that number. I'm sorry.Despite not being serious enough...onward I go...
YTD: 12-5-1
Pittsburgh -7. Pittsburgh coming off a bye but they usually seem to play down to the level of their opponent. Roethlisberger has not been overly impressive but neither have the Eagles. Both D's are solid but I will go with the team with more on O.
Arizona -7. Arizona is 6-2-2 versus the spread as the away team since last year. Jets played decently enough versus Denver last week but who are we fooling here unless they find a running game and keep Murray off the field.
Bengals +13.5. In the last 10 years of this series (20 games), the Ravens have only won by 13.5+, three times. This plus my usual allergy to large spreads and add in the fact the Baltimore is 3-6-1 as a home fav since Lamar became the Man, and back door cover it is.
Seattle -7. Due to some quirk in the schedule, this is the third year in a row that Minnesota has played in Seattle. Seattle was favoured by 3 in each of the previous two (covered both). I'm a Vikings fan and not sold on this team despite last weeks win over Houston.
keep it rockin Brian. I'm gonna follow you this week:YTD: 14-7-1
Steelers -3.5. Browns haven't won in Pittsburgh in 17 years. I'll take the home fav with this modest line.
NE -9.5. Denver are only slightly better than the Jets. If Cam plays, the Pats win big.
Green Bay -1.5. Should be close high scoring game but GB comes out on top.
Miami -8. Miami's smashing of the Niners last week was impressive, the Jets are a mess and have not covered a game thus far in 2020 and it won't start here.
Take this with a grain of salt, but my understanding is those numbers mean essentially nothing. It might reflect the total number of bets of one book, or even just one casino. But it does not reflect the totality of the market in my opinion - none of these websites have the total number of bets of Vegas and/or the off-shores.This novice needs some schooling from you betting experts. How do you interpret this situation in terms of the line movement. NE opened at -10 vs Denver. I am currently seeing -8. I also see the betting trend showing 76% of the spread bets on NE and 67% money on NE. Shouldn't the spread be moving the other way to entice people to bet on the Denver side?
ETA...or am I misinterpreting what these percentages mean? Was looking at Vegasinsider
This novice needs some schooling from you betting experts. How do you interpret this situation in terms of the line movement. NE opened at -10 vs Denver. I am currently seeing -8. I also see the betting trend showing 76% of the spread bets on NE and 67% money on NE. Shouldn't the spread be moving the other way to entice people to bet on the Denver side?
ETA...or am I misinterpreting what these percentages mean? Was looking at Vegasinsider
Correct...ignore those #s.Take this with a grain of salt, but my understanding is those numbers mean essentially nothing. It might reflect the total number of bets of one book, or even just one casino. But it does not reflect the totality of the market in my opinion - none of these websites have the total number of bets of Vegas and/or the off-shores.
The traditional thought would call that "reverse line movement" meaning what you said, and yet the number is going Denver's way so that is the "smart" or "sharp" side. Not necessarily true. At this point I generally ignore those numbers. YMMV.
I also bet Pit -2, but I see they are +1 now.YTD: 16-9-1
BUF -13. Yikes, this spread might be too big for this Bills team but the Jets are 0-6 versus the spread this year. The spreads are slowly creeping up in these Jets games but will ride the anti-Jets sentiment one more week.
PIT -2. Battle of undefeated teams here. While the Titans have been sneaky good, will take the Steelers here with this modest line.
Green Bay- 3.5. Packers had their ### handed to them last week versus Tampa. Houston is a near perfect tonic here for the Packers. The Texans D is nowhere as good as the Bucs D.
Sea -3.5. Road team is 9-1-1 against the spread in this series (Seattle is on the road in this game). While the Cards were impressive over a woeful Cowboys team, I'm not sure in this spot. Cards are 4-2 but have wins over SF, Washington, Jets and Dallas with losses to Lions and Panthers.
KC -9. Chiefs are 12-2 against the spread in their last 14 games. Denver pulled a borderline shocker last week beating the Pats. Can they do it twice in a row ? Doubtful. Can they cover the spread ? Maybe.
TB -2.5. Simply put, the Bucs D is superior to the Raiders O. I know the Raiders beat the vaunted KC team two weeks ago but I don't see lighting striking twice.
Was looking like a decent group of selections before the falcons did what they always do. And this folks is why I don't bet on sports more than maybe once or twice a year. LolSo far--2-1 in my posts here. Let's see if I can transform that into a hugely losing record.
I like falcons -2 against detroit. The falcons are just a completely different team with Julio jones healthy and playing
I like the panthers +7 against the saints. No michael thomas, no emmanuel sanders..etc. I think the saints most likely win the game--but I think their offense not being at full power makes the 7 point spread hard to cover.
I like Dallas +1. I don't see zeke fumbling twice in a row again, and i think a second week of practice does a lot to improve Dalton's chemistry with the wr's. Frankly--I just don't trust any facet of Washingtons game enough to bet on them and give up a point. (Unless they are playing the Jets).
A stat correction that changed a sack to a tackle for loss in the Chicago Bears-Los Angeles Rams game Monday caused a $997,000 fantasy football heartbreak for a 41-year-old insurance agent in St. Louis.
For 30 minutes after Monday's game ended, Rob Huntze thought he had won the $1 million first prize in a DraftKings contest.
Everything had worked out perfectly for Huntze down the stretch of the Rams' 24-10 win. One of Huntze's lineups that featured both the Bears' and Rams' defenses had scored 92.79 points, the most out of the 176,470 entries. His computer screen showed a $1 million first prize.
He texted with friends and called his parents to share the exciting news and took his dog Achilles for a quick walk.
When he returned, he wanted to refresh his computer screen again, "just to see myself on top," he said. "And, then, boom."
A sack that had been credited to the Bears' defense late in the fourth quarter was changed to a running play, a 3-yard loss by Rams quarterback Jared Goff. That 3-yard loss dropped Huntze into a tie for sixth place with 18 other entries, and his prize money dropped from $1 million to $3,078.94.
"Heartbreaking on many levels," a resigned Huntze told ESPN on Tuesday.
The play in question occurred with three minutes left in the fourth quarter. On third down, Goff faked a handoff to the right side and bootlegged back to the left. Bears linebacker James Vaughters didn't bite on the fake and teamed with defensive tackle Akiem Hicks to bring Goff down 3 yards behind the line of scrimmage.
Hicks was initially credited with a sack, but the official scorer later changed the play to a 3-yard loss on a run by Goff. Rams wide receivers appeared to be blocking downfield, an indication of a designed run. Sacks are not credited on designed runs.
"It had to be a sack," Huntze said. "There's no other way to look at it."
"Plays such as this one are routinely discussed by the Stats Crew and updated accordingly," Michael Signora, NFL senior vice president of football and international communications, told ESPN in an email. "In this instance, because the play happened so close to the end of the game, it was reviewed by the Stats Crew and then updated prior to publishing the Game Summary, commonly referred to as the Game Book."
Stats corrections are not uncommon and regularly affect fantasy contests. Huntze said he lost out on $5,000 due to a stat correction in a previous fantasy contest, but this time it was much more painful.
After the correction, five entries finished tied for first with 91.19 points and split the $1 million prize. Huntze's entry, robocles (37), would have won first by itself, earning him the entire $1 million. Instead, he said his 43 entries won a total of $3,554.
Wild swings on late plays happen weekly in fantasy football, but going from winning $1 million to just over $3,000 had the daily fantasy community buzzing over Huntze's bad fortune.
An avid daily fantasy player who has qualified three times for DraftKings' world championship, Huntze said he believed Monday's contest was going to be his "big breakthrough." Despite the $997,000 letdown, he plans to be back in action Thursday night.
"I want a little redemption story," he said.
Bills and Pats offenses have been dreadful of late. October Cam is not September Cam (same goes for Josh Allen for that matter). Even with Cam having zero weapons, this smells like a close-ish game.How are the bills only -3.5 against pats? People now down on the bills after last week and the game vs ten? Or something we are not seeing with New England?
Under 41?Bills and Pats offenses have been dreadful of late. October Cam is not September Cam (same goes for Josh Allen for that matter). Even with Cam having zero weapons, this smells like a close-ish game.
Wish I had bet this one bigger, it was a no brainer.Ravens basically a pickem against the Colts eh?
I feel your pain my friendtook the Bucs +26.5 in live betting against the Saints.... Didn't think that was possible to give up that easily.
You were 22-17-1 on November 5th--and your predictions went 1-5 that week. How are you 21-16-1 now? You are 23-22-1 according to my math.YTD: 21-16-1
The last two weeks have been dreadful thus the slow decent to .500 continues...
Cincy +7.5. The Bengals have only won 3 games in this series in the past 10 years but have been a surprisingly decent 6-1-1 ATS this year. This is either a 5 point game or Pittsburgh wins by double digits, here's hoping the former.
LAR -2. Rams have won the last 4 of 5 versus Seattle. Seattle are 6-2 but have dreadful D and they are a bit of mirage record wise having early wins versus Atlanta/NE/Dallas and a last minute win versus Minnesota. Think the Rams have enough to get the W here.
Baltimore -7. Not sure how New England keeps this one close here.
Raiders -5. Raiders have won the last 4 at home versus the Broncos. In the past 10 games in this series, the average margin of victory is 7.1 points.
SF +9.5. Saints are 6-2 but have only won two games by this big a margin all year and that was both wins over Tampa. Will take the points and hope for a backdoor cover.
I think the 22-17-1 was an error. I remember reading that and thinking the Ls were high.You were 22-17-1 on November 5th--and your predictions went 1-5 that week. How are you 21-16-1 now? You are 23-22-1 according to my math.
I don't think so. He might have been 22-16-1--but it wasn't enough to make him 21-16-1 now. I'll have to go back and check when I have some free time after work todayI think the 22-17-1 was an error. I remember reading that and thinking the Ls were high.
Maybe edit your most recent prediction post with your updated correct record so those of us following along are all on the same page--if you don't mind.brianj74 said:its 23-21-1 by my quick re-count.
Circa moved it to 13, then 14. VegasInsider shows no other changes yet.What’s the line in the Saints/Broncos game? I don’t gamble and my score site hasn’t adjusted the spread.
Denver has no QBs active for the game.. Should be an interesting gameDEN +6 :gunshot