Tenderknee
Footballguy
I understand why the policy is in effect, though it seems hypocritical for the league to say that drug use by the players is the only way it becomes detrimental to the league. I would think that it is unfair to put this only on the players. If this is for the good of the game, aren't the coaches, and ownership, part of the whole "face of the game"? What about the referees? What about the trainers?
Wouldn't it be detrimental for any of the previously mentioned groups of people to be involved in drug abuse? Couldn't it possibly negatively affect any of them?
I think it is hard to manage people with one set of rules, when you live by another set, especially when you hold your employees to such a high standard while being under such pressures such as money, sex, and fame.
Wouldn't it be detrimental for any of the previously mentioned groups of people to be involved in drug abuse? Couldn't it possibly negatively affect any of them?
I think it is hard to manage people with one set of rules, when you live by another set, especially when you hold your employees to such a high standard while being under such pressures such as money, sex, and fame.