Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
NFL trade rumors: Who are you stashing in case they are moved? ...Who would you pick up as they fill the void? (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Scooby1974
- Start date
GroveDiesel
Footballguy
I guess if they are doing it with a longer term plan in mind I get it a bit more, but the Cowboys making these trades like it will give them a chance to be a contender seems a bit nutty to me.
Gatorman
Supreme Elite Maximum Tier
agreed. I guess jerry the drama queen wants to look like he is doing something, but they still have no corners.
Agree, but at the same time that looks like an outstanding class and I like it more for the Jets especially since they likely don't need to trade up if they want a QB in this year's class. So they could in theory get a QB with their first and still have the extra second and 4 firsts. Really think what the Jets are doing is ideal, its' the kind of thing I'd do if this was Madden Franchise mode but you rarely see NFL teams really tear it down like this.
Today feels like when free agency opens up. News cycle is wild.
Great for the Jets. I hate that though. Teams should have to pick now. What happens if Dallas wants to trade 1 of those picks between now and then?
Great question. I can only assume this handicaps them and they can't trade one now.
Unless the Jets get their choice.....if there is a choice to be had. The wording could be that way.
ETA: Or the Jets could get the choice if Dallas makes another trade and tells them which pick they can trade.
Insein
Footballguy
Breece wants to be traded. "Wants to be out" Only an hour left to do it.
Rig24
Footballguy
As the saying goes, you can want in one had,
in the other...Really surprised by nothing out of Tennessee yet. Pollard, Ridley, Okonkwo, Zeitler.
No Browns either, with Ford, Njoku, any of Bitonio/Pocic/Teller/Conklin, who are all impending FAs.
Thought we might see more Dolphins as well. Just Phillips so far. Achane was always a pipe dream, and Waddle likely was as well, but Chubb or Minkah?
Really no RB market at all it seems.
No Browns either, with Ford, Njoku, any of Bitonio/Pocic/Teller/Conklin, who are all impending FAs.
Thought we might see more Dolphins as well. Just Phillips so far. Achane was always a pipe dream, and Waddle likely was as well, but Chubb or Minkah?
Really no RB market at all it seems.
Insein
Footballguy
Breece tweet after Sauce and Quinnen were traded.As the saying goes, you can want in one had,
Rig24
Footballguy
I really hope he gets his wishBreece tweet after Sauce and Quinnen were traded.As the saying goes, you can want in one had,
Insein
Footballguy
Honestly if they only want a 3rd, Chiefs would be morons not to give that.I really hope he gets his wishBreece tweet after Sauce and Quinnen were traded.As the saying goes, you can want in one had,
SeniorVBDStudent
Footballguy
Pollard to NE is an interesting rabbit hole.
The web first talked about Ridley to NE and then Pollard to NE starting in earnest a week ago. Reddit has a whole thread about it started by someone with a 5 month old account who swears the "deal is done" but the thread is also including the rumor that the owner has a "no way will we help Vrable" mentality.
Per Mike Giardi “I was also told there has been some conversation league-wide that Tennessee might be unwilling to make deals with New England because the owner, Amy Adams Strunk, continues to think too much about how things ended with Vrabel and is not inclined to help his new team. We'll find out soon enough with the likes of edge Arden Key, RB Tony Pollard, and even WR Calvin Ridley available.”
I guess we'll have to wait and see. Would be a great trade.
It would be really stupid ownership, to not trade with Vrabel out of pettiness. Also, didn't they fire him? If anyone is petty, shouldn't it be Vrabel?
JohnnyU
Footballguy
Please don't go to KC or NE.
I guess the logic would be the same as with Wilson. If you are acquiring all this capital for your long-term QB, it makes some sense to have weapons for said QB. There has extension talk for Hall, though we'll see if he's even interested in that.
he clearly doesn’t want to stay,
and unless they tag/overpay him, he’s signing elsewhere.
Mr. Peterson
Footballguy
i think the Jets are going to try and keep Hall hopefully. Him and Wilson with a new qb next year.
this is clearly the move.
FarFromHome
Footballguy
Behold NFL owners. Imagine the book that could be written on NFL owners petty moments never before heard. It would be a thick book.
Last edited:
FarFromHome
Footballguy
Surpised we haven't heard from Chiefs haters blasting about how even their bye placement gives them an advantage by allowing them to acclimate players acquired at deadline. Ha ha
2027 draft: Ryan Williams, Jeremiah Smith, Dylan Stewart. Some very good QBs, including the Manning kid. It's early.
>>Another thing to note—Scouts are already grousing on the quality of the top of the 2026 draft ... 2027, on the other hand, will likely have Jeremiah Smith, Ryan Williams, Dylan Stewart, Collin Simmons and Leonard Moore in it, and some promising QBs will be eligible then, too.<<
>>Another thing to note—Scouts are already grousing on the quality of the top of the 2026 draft ... 2027, on the other hand, will likely have Jeremiah Smith, Ryan Williams, Dylan Stewart, Collin Simmons and Leonard Moore in it, and some promising QBs will be eligible then, too.<<
Or they just don't care about RB. The only real investment they've made since Reid has been there was spending that 1st on CEH, which was an awful decision at the time, and aged horribly.
Credible people I follow are all putting the kabosh on Wilson getting traded.
Apparently most of the league thought like us and thought they had an opening to go after him but were told he's untouchable, that he's central to helping their new QB.
I'm always 50-50 on that.
Does untouchable mean untouchable, or does it mean offer us a lot more?
I think it means that while almost no one is truly untouchable, they have zero interest in moving him.
Was actually just having the same thought specifically regarding the Titans, Browns and the RB market.
For the Titans especially IMO to be doing nothing is malpractice and I just say them specifically because of the parts they have.
Maybe this means we are going to get an awesome 20 minutes coming up....
looks like Breece is gone! Either that, or he’s disgusted they didn’t trade him and is stuck. This sums up things for Wilson and Breece: https://x.com/britishbilldawg/status/1985795953157132648?s=46
Does make some sense, but on the surface sure seems like they've burned their bridges with Breece after extending Wilson/Sauce and all the talk about Allen/Davis.
But maybe now the Jets are thinking that with the money they've saved moving Sauce & Q they can throw a big enough extension at Breece to make him want to stay. Lots of bad blood gets forgotten quickly if the $$$ is big enough.
He’s not Glenn’s guy and never has been—would be shocked if he’s there next year
ignatiusjreilly
Footballguy
Pretty sure I remember hearing once that conditional picks are locked up. You can't do anything with them until their status is clarified.
I think the example I heard was more of the "You get a second rounder if he plays 95% of snaps, otherwise a third" variety, but I would imagine the same logic would apply to the Dallas pick
Hu-Tang Clan
Footballguy
So who can we go ahead and cut now that trades didn't happen instead of stashing?
Jets are the most dysfunctional franchise in the league…
Hu-Tang Clan
Footballguy
Don't forget that the NFL uses fax machines and carrier pigeons still so we could still see moves come through for the next while.
Similar threads
