What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*** OFFICIAL *** 13/14 Off-Season Dynasty Trade Thread (1 Viewer)

Coeur de Lion said:
ghostguy123 said:
Coeur de Lion said:
ghostguy123 said:
Has rodgers been outscoring staffors by a ton the past few years?
Click to expand...
IMO Rodgers' production is much safer moving forward. He's actually an elite player; Stafford is just a guy who throws more than anyone else.
Click to expand...
And will continue to keep throwing as much or more than anyone else. Of course rodgers is safer. Which is why there is a top stud WR coming back in the deal to make it a no brainer.
Click to expand...
I personally don't think it's 100% that Stafford continues to set records for attempts moving forward with a new regime in place. Likely, given the personnel there, but they'd be better served asking him to do less IMO.As far as that deal, I take Jeffrey and Stafford in a slam dunk too, but not because I think Stafford and Rodgers are close in value.
Click to expand...
Who said they are close in value? I just don't think the points per game decrease is nearly as significant as adding a stud WR.

 
ghostguy123 said:
Coeur de Lion said:
ghostguy123 said:
Coeur de Lion said:
ghostguy123 said:
Has rodgers been outscoring staffors by a ton the past few years?
Click to expand...
IMO Rodgers' production is much safer moving forward. He's actually an elite player; Stafford is just a guy who throws more than anyone else.
Click to expand...
And will continue to keep throwing as much or more than anyone else.Of course rodgers is safer. Which is why there is a top stud WR coming back in the deal to make it a no brainer.
Click to expand...
I personally don't think it's 100% that Stafford continues to set records for attempts moving forward with a new regime in place. Likely, given the personnel there, but they'd be better served asking him to do less IMO.As far as that deal, I take Jeffrey and Stafford in a slam dunk too, but not because I think Stafford and Rodgers are close in value.
Click to expand...
Who said they are close in value? I just don't think the points per game decrease is nearly as significant as adding a stud WR.
Click to expand...
Michael is coming back on the Rodgers side and is not an insignificant piece. Looking at it another way, Jeffery vs. Rodgers (advantage Jeffery) and Michael vs. Stafford (advantage Michael), makes the deal seem pretty close to me.

 
Concept Coop said:
menobrown said:
Two potential studs for [proven] one.
Click to expand...
There is risk on both sides. But one of the 3 is the best ever at his position(PPG), and one of the best ever outside of it, too. Hardly seems logical to chalk the deal up to a 2 for 1.
Click to expand...
Seems pretty logical to me when that proven stud you speak off has had more surgeries this early in his career than any relevant fantasy football player I can ever recall. And all this after he missed a year of college and was removed on the NFL teams draft boards citing his back would lead to a shortened career.

 
 

menobrown said:
Concept Coop said:
menobrown said:
Two potential studs for [proven] one.
Click to expand...
There is risk on both sides. But one of the 3 is the best ever at his position(PPG), and one of the best ever outside of it, too. Hardly seems logical to chalk the deal up to a 2 for 1.
Click to expand...
Seems pretty logical to me when that proven stud you speak off has had more surgeries this early in his career than any relevant fantasy football player I can ever recall. And all this after he missed a year of college and was removed on the NFL teams draft boards citing his back would lead to a shortened career.
Click to expand...
What affect do you think the surgeries on his arm will have moving forward? Do root canals count as a surgery? Ingrown toenail removal?

The ACL and arm were freak accidents. He has recovered fully from both back surgeries.

I wouldn't put much stock in the opinions of those who removed Gronk from their draftboards, if those rumors are even accurate.

His injury history is a collection of freak injuries, an infection that cleared, and the back stuff which is concerning, but not damning.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
One More Rep said:
Mingooch said:
10 team PPR league

Team A M Crabtree WR and CJ Spiller RB

Team B L Bell RB and Patterson WR
Click to expand...
Crabtree and Spiller
Click to expand...
why? Isn't Spiller still in a horrible timeshare coming off a terrible year and isn't Crabtree at best decent, but will never be elite and is most likely overrated? At least Patterson has the chance to be elite and Bell will get about 6000 carries a year for awhile.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
JohnnyU said:
One More Rep said:
Mingooch said:
10 team PPR league

Team A M Crabtree WR and CJ Spiller RB

Team B L Bell RB and Patterson WR
Click to expand...
Crabtree and Spiller
Click to expand...
why? Isn't Spiller still in a horrible timeshare coming off a terrible year and isn't Crabtree at best decent, but will never be elite? At least Patterson has the chance to be elite and Bell will get about 6000 carries a year for awhile.
Click to expand...
Even if Crabtree is not elite, I still think his numbers will be close to Patterson if not better. Not sold on Bell at all. I do think you can get more for Bell/Patterson at the moment though

 
Concept Coop said:
 

menobrown said:
Concept Coop said:
menobrown said:
Two potential studs for [proven] one.
Click to expand...
There is risk on both sides. But one of the 3 is the best ever at his position(PPG), and one of the best ever outside of it, too. Hardly seems logical to chalk the deal up to a 2 for 1.
Click to expand...
Seems pretty logical to me when that proven stud you speak off has had more surgeries this early in his career than any relevant fantasy football player I can ever recall. And all this after he missed a year of college and was removed on the NFL teams draft boards citing his back would lead to a shortened career.
Click to expand...
What affect do you think the surgeries on his arm will have moving forward? Do root canals count as a surgery? Ingrown toenail removal?

The ACL and arm were freak accidents. He has recovered fully from both back surgeries.

I wouldn't put much stock in the opinions of those who removed Gronk from their draftboards, if those rumors are even accurate.

His injury history is a collection of freak injuries, an infection that cleared, and the back stuff which is concerning, but not damning.
Click to expand...
I think the surgeries stand a strong chance of diminishing his production next season and shortening his career in the long term. It makes him not clean in terms of grading his future or immediate present, it makes him a player with issues. If you think his injuries don't cloud his short and long term outlook or you just want to wash them all away as freak occurrences that is your call but not an opinion I agree with in the least.

 
ghostguy123 said:
Deuceman said:
Nothing bigger than this one......I'm not involved but I'm speechless......Incredible.

Team A got: Gio Bernard, DeMarco Murray, Ty Hilton, Rob Gronkowski, 2.8 and 2015 2nd

Team B got: Jamaal Charles, Matt Forte, Vernon Davis and 2015 3rd
Click to expand...
At the end of that negotiation process, did it really come down to the 2015 upgrade from a 3rd to a 2nd?

I have no idea which side I like. Would take me an hour to figure it out.
Click to expand...
Haha I feel the same. My first thought was "how in the world does a 3rd rounder get tossed into this trade?"

 
Hankmoody said:
ghostguy123 said:
Deuceman said:
Nothing bigger than this one......I'm not involved but I'm speechless......Incredible.

Team A got: Gio Bernard, DeMarco Murray, Ty Hilton, Rob Gronkowski, 2.8 and 2015 2nd

Team B got: Jamaal Charles, Matt Forte, Vernon Davis and 2015 3rd
Click to expand...
At the end of that negotiation process, did it really come down to the 2015 upgrade from a 3rd to a 2nd?

I have no idea which side I like. Would take me an hour to figure it out.
Click to expand...
Haha I feel the same. My first thought was "how in the world does a 3rd rounder get tossed into this trade?"
Click to expand...
Razor's edge. If not for the 3rd would you even do it? Totally unbalanced without it

 
This ones a bit complicated

12 team PPR cap and contracts

Start 1/1/1/1 and 4 flex

53mil cap.

Jordan Cameron - ~0.5 mil 4 yrs

Rookie 1.2 - 4.2 mil and up to 5 yrs

For

Randle - 0.7 mil and 4

Dwayne Allen - 0.5 and 3

1.10 - ~1 mil

2015 1st

 
12 team TE premium contract league. Only 1 starter from each position required & can start up to 5 RBs, WRs or TEs

Gave: Reed (2) & Pierce (3)

Got: Eifert (3) & Ertz (2)

 
Mingooch said:
10 team PPR league

Team A M Crabtree WR and CJ Spiller RB

Team B L Bell RB and Patterson WR
Click to expand...
I like every player in this trade and believe Crabtree and Spiller are both at least a little undervalued but I'd still take the Bell/Patterson side rather easily due to the significant age difference.

 
I turned down this trade but I'm thinking twice.....

I was offered

Russell Wilson

Shane Vereen

Kendall Wright

For

GIO Benard

And my 2.03

I have my dynasty in my sig. It's a 12 team league.

Having cam newton I'm not sure it's the best deal but I could have the blinders on ......

Any thoughts?

 
The Fantasy Chef said:
I turned down this trade but I'm thinking twice.....

I was offered

Russell Wilson

Shane Vereen

Kendall Wright

For

GIO Benard

And my 2.03

I have my dynasty in my sig. It's a 12 team league.

Having cam newton I'm not sure it's the best deal but I could have the blinders on ......

Any thoughts?
Click to expand...
No, not close. Unless it's a superflex or 2QB league, then yes.

And don't ask for advice in this thread, just a friendly reminder.

 
Denver724 said:
One More Rep said:
Mingooch said:
10 team PPR league

Team A M Crabtree WR and CJ Spiller RB

Team B L Bell RB and Patterson WR
Click to expand...
Crabtree and Spiller
Click to expand...
I just don't get the love for Spiller (or Crabtree for that matter). I will take Bell/Patterson all day long.
Click to expand...
I would take the Bell side but I can see why someone would take the other side. Spiller had put up rb1 numbers over a year and a half period before he got injured last year and never was the same. Crabtree just got done having a break out year before he got injured, but when he came back he looked rusty but he was looking better and better every week.

 
ghostguy123 said:
Jrodicus said:
ghostguy123 said:
Has rodgers been outscoring staffors by a ton the past few years?
Click to expand...
5, 6, and 4 ppg the past 3 years. 5 ppg is the difference between Jefrey and Hartline.
Click to expand...
Why bring up Hartline? A guy who is basically worthless to most people but overachieved some lately?

Would it look better if Dalton was the other piece instead of Stafford? Probably not, but he sure did score well.
Click to expand...
Just answering your question, bud.

If you don't like the answers, ask better questions.

 
Jrodicus said:
ghostguy123 said:
Jrodicus said:
ghostguy123 said:
Has rodgers been outscoring staffors by a ton the past few years?
Click to expand...
5, 6, and 4 ppg the past 3 years. 5 ppg is the difference between Jefrey and Hartline.
Click to expand...
Why bring up Hartline? A guy who is basically worthless to most people but overachieved some lately?

Would it look better if Dalton was the other piece instead of Stafford? Probably not, but he sure did score well.
Click to expand...
Just answering your question, bud.

If you don't like the answers, ask better questions.
Click to expand...
The question was just fine. I don't particularly agree that 4 PPG is a "ton", and using Brian Hartline to bridge the gap for the addition of Jeffrey is borderline MR.

Give me the ability to list 50 obscure second rate players. ONE of them with score around 200 or a little more like Hartline. But which one?

Will say it again. Rodgers is a lot more VALUABLE than Stafford, but the point per game difference doesnt make up for the addition of a 24 year old stud WR.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Ministry of Pain
New Dynasty League and we've had our first trade where people are asking questions
2
Replies
79
Views
1K
JohnnyU
JohnnyU
QuizGuy66
*** Just In Time! The annual worst thread in the Shark Pool - the 2025 QuizGuy66 Season Prediction Thread *** (feel free to drop your own)
Replies
8
Views
974
IHEARTFF
I
D
  • Poll Poll
Multi-season trade
Replies
8
Views
506
Hankmoody
Hankmoody

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top