That is the most I would pay for Gordon right now14 team PPR
J Matthews, M Wheaton
for
Josh Gordon
I like the Gerhart side but it is closejeaton6 said:This went down last night in a 12 team PPR startup
Team A: Ebron, Thompkins
Team B: Gerhart, Maclin
I might pay a little more but most Gordon owners I'm seeing are looking at 90 cents on the dollar. Had a guy shopping him and his minimum ask was Lynch, and a 2015 1 & 2. I told him Lynch' ADP higher than Gordon and Lynch was best I could do and he didn't even bother responding.That is the most I would pay for Gordon right now14 team PPR
J Matthews, M Wheaton
for
Josh Gordon
Eifert was the key to the deal for me. I still believe he can be an elite TE (even if it's not this year). Olsen looks like he's in for the best year of his career (have him #6) but looking ahead I'm hoping Eifert is a stud down the road. I may end up regretting the trade but I was in the position to take a chance.I labored over 2 days I think on this offer. It wasn't as cut and dry for me as it may appear. I do think rosters come into play a lot in this one. I knew he was deep at WR, I was deep at RB (per se), it just took us a while to find the right pieces. Personally, i still believe in Eifert long term....that was my holdup, not Sankey. says the Seattle/UW homerGave:
Evans, Mike TBB WR
Olsen, Greg CAR TE
Got:
Sankey, Bishop TEN RB
Eifert, Tyler CIN TE
I was extremely deep at WR (Evans was my 7th WR) and weak at RB. Now have Green, Eifert and Ebron at TE, hoping one turns into a stud.
Tell me about it. For some reason, while the Gordon owners want to trade him, they also expect the other party to take all the risk of a suspension but pay only a slightly discounted value of what he was worth before the rumors of the latest troubles emerged. So a trade for them ends up close to a no lose proposition.I might pay a little more but most Gordon owners I'm seeing are looking at 90 cents on the dollar.Had a guy shopping him and his minimum ask was Lynch, and a 2015 1 & 2. I told him Lynch' ADP higher than Gordon and Lynch was best I could do and he didn't even bother responding.That is the most I would pay for Gordon right now14 team PPR
J Matthews, M Wheaton
for
Josh Gordon
I was one to trade Gordon away here, and I feel all things considered, it's pretty fair for both teams. I was really short on WRs as well.Tell me about it. For some reason, while the Gordon owners want to trade him, they also expect the other party to take all the risk of a suspension but pay only a slightly discounted value of what he was worth before the rumors of the latest troubles emerged. So a trade for them ends up close to a no lose proposition.I might pay a little more but most Gordon owners I'm seeing are looking at 90 cents on the dollar.Had a guy shopping him and his minimum ask was Lynch, and a 2015 1 & 2. I told him Lynch' ADP higher than Gordon and Lynch was best I could do and he didn't even bother responding.That is the most I would pay for Gordon right now14 team PPR
J Matthews, M Wheaton
for
Josh Gordon
I will agree with that. My comment was directed to a tangent discussion about Gordon owners in general, rather than the above trade.I was one to trade Gordon away here, and I feel all things considered, it's pretty fair for both teams. I was really short on WRs as well.Tell me about it. For some reason, while the Gordon owners want to trade him, they also expect the other party to take all the risk of a suspension but pay only a slightly discounted value of what he was worth before the rumors of the latest troubles emerged. So a trade for them ends up close to a no lose proposition.I might pay a little more but most Gordon owners I'm seeing are looking at 90 cents on the dollar.Had a guy shopping him and his minimum ask was Lynch, and a 2015 1 & 2. I told him Lynch' ADP higher than Gordon and Lynch was best I could do and he didn't even bother responding.That is the most I would pay for Gordon right now14 team PPR
J Matthews, M Wheaton
for
Josh Gordon
Correct. He's one of the toughest values to pinpoint and owners struggle to give away the upside. Buyers want upside but don't want to give up more stable players. Makes it hard for two sides to meet. Similar trade problem with Christine Michael...I will agree with that. My comment was directed to a tangent discussion about Gordon owners in general, rather than the above trade.I was one to trade Gordon away here, and I feel all things considered, it's pretty fair for both teams. I was really short on WRs as well.Tell me about it. For some reason, while the Gordon owners want to trade him, they also expect the other party to take all the risk of a suspension but pay only a slightly discounted value of what he was worth before the rumors of the latest troubles emerged. So a trade for them ends up close to a no lose proposition.I might pay a little more but most Gordon owners I'm seeing are looking at 90 cents on the dollar.Had a guy shopping him and his minimum ask was Lynch, and a 2015 1 & 2. I told him Lynch' ADP higher than Gordon and Lynch was best I could do and he didn't even bother responding.That is the most I would pay for Gordon right now14 team PPR
J Matthews, M Wheaton
for
Josh Gordon
I'd take Foles but the trade is fair.12 team PPR, 1.25 TE PPR
Foles
for
Gerhart, 1.12, A-Robinson (NYG) TE, 2015 3rd round pick
That's the thing about different leagues. If the scoring is favorable and you can start 3 RBs, stud WRs lose some of their value for the short term. Still a VERY nice core to work with.Those are two seperate teams -- / = same team, and , seperates them. Oddly enough, I won that league going away last year with crappy WRs outside of Brandon Marshall, due to Charles, McCoy, and Matthews at RB.I'd say the first one is completely out of the ordinary. Could he not get DT as well?I don't get it. There are teams in all my leagues with similar WR corps. It's very possible, and I've seen many better, too.I mean, if you were allowed to assemble Julio, Jeffery, Cobb, Hopkins, Floyd and Watkins on one squad, you're probably going to win that league in your sleep anyway. What are the other owners doing?
EDIT - oh, and Evans too![]()
In one of my leagues alone there are WR corps of Calvin / Dez / Cobb, AJG / Julio / Crabtree, and Gordon / Jeffrey / Allen / Roddy / Decker. The group above is strong, certainly, but nothing at all out of the ordinary.
Not quite getting this one, assuming you were half honest about expected playing time for a guy like Michael. Mainly the addition of the 2nd I suppose...Quite a few trades in the last week in a new 32 team salary cap ($100) IDP league, divided into conferences (consider as 2 separate 16 team leagues with cross-over Super Bowl)
Shane Vereen ($7.00), Koa Misi ($3.50), 2015 4th
for
Christine Michael ($3.20), Jon Bostic, ($2.90) 2015 2nd
"Assuming I was half honest"? No idea what you mean here. Not my trade and I don't own Michael in any league.Not quite getting this one, assuming you were half honest about expected playing time for a guy like Michael. Mainly the addition of the 2nd I suppose...Don't really like Vereen as a reliable fantasy producer though.Quite a few trades in the last week in a new 32 team salary cap ($100) IDP league, divided into conferences (consider as 2 separate 16 team leagues with cross-over Super Bowl)
Shane Vereen ($7.00), Koa Misi ($3.50), 2015 4th
for
Christine Michael ($3.20), Jon Bostic, ($2.90) 2015 2nd
I meant it in the sense that you adopt the perspective of whoever made the trade, not necessarily you in particular FUBAR."Assuming I was half honest"? No idea what you mean here. Not my trade and I don't own Michael in any league.Not quite getting this one, assuming you were half honest about expected playing time for a guy like Michael. Mainly the addition of the 2nd I suppose...Don't really like Vereen as a reliable fantasy producer though.Quite a few trades in the last week in a new 32 team salary cap ($100) IDP league, divided into conferences (consider as 2 separate 16 team leagues with cross-over Super Bowl)
Shane Vereen ($7.00), Koa Misi ($3.50), 2015 4th
for
Christine Michael ($3.20), Jon Bostic, ($2.90) 2015 2nd
Ahh gotcha. Agreed that I'd take Michael over vereen at those prices.I meant it in the sense that you adopt the perspective of whoever made the trade, not necessarily you in particular FUBAR.Add in Vereen's additional cost."Assuming I was half honest"? No idea what you mean here. Not my trade and I don't own Michael in any league.Not quite getting this one, assuming you were half honest about expected playing time for a guy like Michael. Mainly the addition of the 2nd I suppose...Don't really like Vereen as a reliable fantasy producer though.Quite a few trades in the last week in a new 32 team salary cap ($100) IDP league, divided into conferences (consider as 2 separate 16 team leagues with cross-over Super Bowl)
Shane Vereen ($7.00), Koa Misi ($3.50), 2015 4th
for
Christine Michael ($3.20), Jon Bostic, ($2.90) 2015 2nd
Worked out great for you. Nice.Sent 1.4 for 1.6 and 2.12 while on the clock
He took Sankey
then sent 1.6 for Keenan Allen, He took Hyde needed a back bad.
I am not sure why but it just feels like an overpay for Foles.12 team PPR, 1.25 TE PPR
Foles
for
Gerhart, 1.12, A-Robinson (NYG) TE, 2015 3rd round pick
RobberySent 1.4 for 1.6 and 2.12 while on the clock
He took Sankey
then sent 1.6 for Keenan Allen, He took Hyde needed a back bad.
Both steals but the Allen deal is brutalSent 1.4 for 1.6 and 2.12 while on the clock
He took Sankey
then sent 1.6 for Keenan Allen, He took Hyde needed a back bad.
Because it is an overpay but this league is stupid about QBs and want the world for them and I needed one really badI am not sure why but it just feels like an overpay for Foles.12 team PPR, 1.25 TE PPR
Foles
for
Gerhart, 1.12, A-Robinson (NYG) TE, 2015 3rd round pick
That first deal seems way too cheap for a trade back. But since 1.06 turned into Allen, it doesn't really matter.Both steals but the Allen deal is brutalSent 1.4 for 1.6 and 2.12 while on the clock
He took Sankey
then sent 1.6 for Keenan Allen, He took Hyde needed a back bad.
I don't see it as an overpay at all. If Foles puts up a season in or near the top 5 this year then he becomes untouchable.Because it is an overpay but this league is stupid about QBs and want the world for them and I needed one really badI am not sure why but it just feels like an overpay for Foles.12 team PPR, 1.25 TE PPR
Foles
for
Gerhart, 1.12, A-Robinson (NYG) TE, 2015 3rd round pick
Disagree but I'm used to playing in idp so the #24 pick has good value this year.That first deal seems way too cheap for a trade back. But since 1.06 turned into Allen, it doesn't really matter.Both steals but the Allen deal is brutalSent 1.4 for 1.6 and 2.12 while on the clock
He took Sankey
then sent 1.6 for Keenan Allen, He took Hyde needed a back bad.
why?Gave M. Colston and got D.Bowe.
Good question. Think I offered it because I wanted to buy a couple extra years and for some reason I think he's going to put up solid WR 3/ Flex points in Andy Reeds offense. More of a gut feeling than anything.why?Gave M. Colston and got D.Bowe.
If Gerhart goes for 1800 total yards and 10 plus touchdowns, if the 1.12 turns into receiver then that has an Allen type year. I will also disagree with him being untouchable in a start 1 qb league no quarterback is untouchable.I don't see it as an overpay at all. If Foles puts up a season in or near the top 5 this year then he becomes untouchable.Because it is an overpay but this league is stupid about QBs and want the world for them and I needed one really badI am not sure why but it just feels like an overpay for Foles.12 team PPR, 1.25 TE PPR
Foles
for
Gerhart, 1.12, A-Robinson (NYG) TE, 2015 3rd round pick
If you really want to move McCoy I would think a straight up deal for one of the big 5 WRs is the best you will do IF those teams are RB needy.I actually offered McCoy to other teams (I'm deep at RB and shallow at WR in that league) and not only was rejected but not even a counter... This from 6 to 7 teams. Odd that there would be so little interest. One offer was McCoy for Julio and a late 1st. When we say untouchable, it's more accurate to say "priced out" or "overvalued'.
am I reading this wrong, or did you turn down Julio and a 1st for McCoy?I actually offered McCoy to other teams (I'm deep at RB and shallow at WR in that league) and not only was rejected but not even a counter... This from 6 to 7 teams. Odd that there would be so little interest. One offer was McCoy for Julio and a late 1st. When we say untouchable, it's more accurate to say "priced out" or "overvalued'.
I think he offered McCoy for that.Soulfly3 said:am I reading this wrong, or did you turn down Julio and a 1st for McCoy?slackjawedyokel said:I actually offered McCoy to other teams (I'm deep at RB and shallow at WR in that league) and not only was rejected but not even a counter... This from 6 to 7 teams. Odd that there would be so little interest. One offer was McCoy for Julio and a late 1st. When we say untouchable, it's more accurate to say "priced out" or "overvalued'.
Furreal?
Yes, I offered McCoy to other owners for some of the top WR's. Just no interest. It was most bizarre to not even get counters... as if McCoy is damaged goods or something.I think he offered McCoy for that.Soulfly3 said:am I reading this wrong, or did you turn down Julio and a 1st for McCoy?slackjawedyokel said:I actually offered McCoy to other teams (I'm deep at RB and shallow at WR in that league) and not only was rejected but not even a counter... This from 6 to 7 teams. Odd that there would be so little interest. One offer was McCoy for Julio and a late 1st. When we say untouchable, it's more accurate to say "priced out" or "overvalued'.
Furreal?
Also I wouldn't even say over valued. In a 1 qb league I would trade A guy like Luck for Antonio Brown in a heart beat.
to be fair, I wouldnt give you ANY top WR for for mccoy (let along julio + a first). especially in PPR.Yes, I offered McCoy to other owners for some of the top WR's. Just no interest. It was most bizarre to not even get counters... as if McCoy is damaged goods or something.I think he offered McCoy for that.Soulfly3 said:am I reading this wrong, or did you turn down Julio and a 1st for McCoy?slackjawedyokel said:I actually offered McCoy to other teams (I'm deep at RB and shallow at WR in that league) and not only was rejected but not even a counter... This from 6 to 7 teams. Odd that there would be so little interest. One offer was McCoy for Julio and a late 1st. When we say untouchable, it's more accurate to say "priced out" or "overvalued'.
Furreal?
Also I wouldn't even say over valued. In a 1 qb league I would trade A guy like Luck for Antonio Brown in a heart beat.
Well I mean yeah you could get similar production for longer period but RB is significantly more shallow than WR so that production at RB is more valuable than the WR production in the near term. McCoy's near term VBD destroys every receiver not named Calvin. His startup ADP is higher than 3 of the big 5 so startup owners value him higher than some of those top guys. I think the extra 2015 1st is what is probably turning them off or they just don't have the RB need.to be fair, I wouldnt give you ANY top WR for for mccoy (let along julio + a first). especially in PPR.Yes, I offered McCoy to other owners for some of the top WR's. Just no interest. It was most bizarre to not even get counters... as if McCoy is damaged goods or something.I think he offered McCoy for that.Also I wouldn't even say over valued. In a 1 qb league I would trade A guy like Luck for Antonio Brown in a heart beat.Soulfly3 said:am I reading this wrong, or did you turn down Julio and a 1st for McCoy?slackjawedyokel said:I actually offered McCoy to other teams (I'm deep at RB and shallow at WR in that league) and not only was rejected but not even a counter... This from 6 to 7 teams. Odd that there would be so little interest. One offer was McCoy for Julio and a late 1st. When we say untouchable, it's more accurate to say "priced out" or "overvalued'.
Furreal?
I mean... the guy isnt old, but how much top production years you expecting from him? WRs just have a much longer shelf life.. and I can get same/similar production for a longer period of time, then why would I make that trade?
probably why you arent getting bites
Agreedmsudaisy26 said:RobberyGottabesweet said:Sent 1.4 for 1.6 and 2.12 while on the clock
He took Sankey
then sent 1.6 for Keenan Allen, He took Hyde needed a back bad.
Oof, McCoy by a lot.10 team, standard scoring (non PPR):
A.Foster + 1.4 for L.McCoy.
Well no matter how you look at it a top 5 WR is worth more than McCoy to most owners. So to ask for a top 5 + a 1st is pretty much a non-starter.Well I mean yeah you could get similar production for longer period but RB is significantly more shallow than WR so that production at RB is more valuable than the WR production in the near term. McCoy's near term VBD destroys every receiver not named Calvin. His startup ADP is higher than 3 of the big 5 so startup owners value him higher than some of those top guys. I think the extra 2015 1st is what is probably turning them off or they just don't have the RB need.to be fair, I wouldnt give you ANY top WR for for mccoy (let along julio + a first). especially in PPR.I mean... the guy isnt old, but how much top production years you expecting from him? WRs just have a much longer shelf life.. and I can get same/similar production for a longer period of time, then why would I make that trade?
probably why you arent getting bites
Yeah that one is pretty tough to swallow in a nonPPR leagueOof, McCoy by a lot.10 team, standard scoring (non PPR):
A.Foster + 1.4 for L.McCoy.
Fair enough. There's some psychology in there from the receiving end I guess. I might just have McCoy higher in my valuation, despite having a slightly shorter window of life. Last year, McCoy scored about 40 points more than Gordon (#1 WR in that scoring, as most).Well no matter how you look at it a top 5 WR is worth more than McCoy to most owners. So to ask for a top 5 + a 1st is pretty much a non-starter.Well I mean yeah you could get similar production for longer period but RB is significantly more shallow than WR so that production at RB is more valuable than the WR production in the near term. McCoy's near term VBD destroys every receiver not named Calvin. His startup ADP is higher than 3 of the big 5 so startup owners value him higher than some of those top guys. I think the extra 2015 1st is what is probably turning them off or they just don't have the RB need.to be fair, I wouldnt give you ANY top WR for for mccoy (let along julio + a first). especially in PPR.I mean... the guy isnt old, but how much top production years you expecting from him? WRs just have a much longer shelf life.. and I can get same/similar production for a longer period of time, then why would I make that trade?
probably why you arent getting bites
My advice would be to offer the deal straight up if you want a counter. If somebody offered the deal to me for my top5Wr with a 1st I would assume I just couldn't afford McCoy at the cost of a top5WR +. If I thought the other owner would be willing to do McCoy+ for my top 5 WR I might think about it but that initial offer would make me think that isn't the case
I wonder who they are wanting at the 1.4?Yeah that one is pretty tough to swallow in a nonPPR leagueOof, McCoy by a lot.10 team, standard scoring (non PPR):
A.Foster + 1.4 for L.McCoy.
What would be viewed as better value in a trade back... I'm sitting with 1.5 & 1.6 and looking to stockpile picks but I don't have any clue how to gauge fair value for trading back in non ppr no idpAdam Harstad said:That first deal seems way too cheap for a trade back. But since 1.06 turned into Allen, it doesn't really matter.FUBAR said:Both steals but the Allen deal is brutalGottabesweet said:Sent 1.4 for 1.6 and 2.12 while on the clock
He took Sankey
then sent 1.6 for Keenan Allen, He took Hyde needed a back bad.
After the first 2 picks it's tough to get much value out of a trade back this year. For a couple of spots in the first you're probably only going to get a 2nd. However, 2nd's are worth a lot this year so it's not that bad.What would be viewed as better value in a trade back... I'm sitting with 1.5 & 1.6 and looking to stockpile picks but I don't have any clue how to gauge fair value for trading back in non ppr no idpAdam Harstad said:That first deal seems way too cheap for a trade back. But since 1.06 turned into Allen, it doesn't really matter.FUBAR said:Both steals but the Allen deal is brutalGottabesweet said:Sent 1.4 for 1.6 and 2.12 while on the clock
He took Sankey
then sent 1.6 for Keenan Allen, He took Hyde needed a back bad.
I don't play non PPR, but probably Hyde.I wonder who they are wanting at the 1.4?Yeah that one is pretty tough to swallow in a nonPPR leagueOof, McCoy by a lot.10 team, standard scoring (non PPR):
A.Foster + 1.4 for L.McCoy.