Interesting that the 18/19 player rosters have the most teams left - looks like the stud strategy is working this year as the cuts get tighter.
Huh?
The concept of percentages is lost, I'm guessing."Don't stop him now. He's on a roll."
So do you think the winner is more likely to come out of the 28 person squads or one of the 18/19 player squads? I think the percentages are pretty even across the spectrum (from 3-7%) so if the vast majority of teams left are from the lower end of the spectrum, I say they are doing pretty well, considering there is a bit more luck involved with less players. I guess I don't see a 4% swing as that significant due to the small numbers overall, particularly in some of the higher player teams.
Dude, the difference isn't 3-4 % it's more like 50% comparing the most favorable survivor pools to the least favorable. The more successful pools survived at over 6% and the small rosters survived at only about 3%. You were over twice as likely to survive with a big roster than the small ones.That said, the big rosters are built to survive. I'm a 30 man roster and incredibly consistent as a top 50% score, but I never threw up a "huge" week. A small roster that lived though is probably more explosive (bigger high end players), and has a better shot once they get their IF their particular players go off and stay hot all 3 weeks. Personally, I'd rather make it to the end to have a chance than take a huge gamble of even making the 250. It's nice getting a pretty consistent free FBG subscription
, and have a legitimate 1 in 250 shot at some big holiday cash!Let's get it on!
