What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official 2014 World Cup Thread*** (1 Viewer)

For some comparaive perspective:

The Broncos were thoroughly humilated in a similar manner in the Super Bowl yet the city of Denver didnt lash out with any kind of vitriol against the team and coaches.
Bill Buckner might be a better example.
I like the first "dream team" that lost in the Olympics - at least in terms of the US that's pretty close as it was a sport we invented (I know Brazil just feels like it invented it) and that we would always be best.

Perhaps the Miracle on Ice game from '80 (from the Russian perspective) but we didn't blast them.

And neither was a perceived match-up of equals.

It's hard for analogies to hockey, pro basketball, or baseball because those are series. The humiliation takes at least a week.

Maybe the proper analogy really is war - I mean Custer had to be considered a favorite at Little Big Horn, right?

-QG
Awkward to compare basketball when the US is the only country that considers the Olympics > WCs.

 
Really want to see Germany v Netherlands and Brazil v Argentina. Two of the biggest rivalries in the world.
Germany v Holland is a great, hateful rivalry, but seems more of a UEFA rivalry for me. We can see that in France 2016. Germany v Argentina has great FIFA history, would be a rubber match of sorts having split the 86 and '90 finals.
Holland finally winning the big one over the country that denied their greatest team in 1974 would be an awesome story. Holland has won the European Championship before. There are no demons to be exorcised there.
I'm feeling the same.

Plus- #### Germany. amirite?
I am going for Argie myself.

I was not old enough to watch Pele

Soccer was not popular enough to see Maradona at his peak in 1986

Messi might be my best chance to say I got to watch "the best player ever". That would be pretty cool.
I got to see him... you didn't?
:old:

 
Really want to see Germany v Netherlands and Brazil v Argentina. Two of the biggest rivalries in the world.
Germany v Holland is a great, hateful rivalry, but seems more of a UEFA rivalry for me. We can see that in France 2016. Germany v Argentina has great FIFA history, would be a rubber match of sorts having split the 86 and '90 finals.
Holland finally winning the big one over the country that denied their greatest team in 1974 would be an awesome story. Holland has won the European Championship before. There are no demons to be exorcised there.
I'm feeling the same.

Plus- #### Germany. amirite?
I am going for Argie myself.

I was not old enough to watch Pele

Soccer was not popular enough to see Maradona at his peak in 1986

Messi might be my best chance to say I got to watch "the best player ever". That would be pretty cool.
There's enough historical and current connections among these three teams that there will be good angles either way, but I do like the fact that Maradona played against Germany in two finals and Messi may get the chance to win a title against Germany. Holland-German history as well as Robben against his Bayern teams would add some flavor as well. For today's game, I'm sure the network will be showing Bergkamp's goal against Argentina in '98 a few times - one of the most famous in WC history I think.

 
Anyone but Holland for me. Robben, DeJong, the 2010 Final and no one I really like.
Agree. I really don't want another final like 10.
To be fair- Holland played that goonish way pretty much throughout 10... I have not seen them play that way this time. except for ####### De Jong. but thankfully there's no more van Bommel
True, but I'll still hate them for ruining my Euro 2012 bracket. :lol:

 
Always love how ZM shows the formations as they actually played. Not sure how that lineup is considered defensive. The stupidity of Marcelo and Hulk being left alone on the left both attacking is incredible.
Fernandinho and Luis Gustavo shouldn't have been playing together. One or the other is fine and provides necessary defensive cover, but there was no link between defense and attack, as was noted in the article.

 
Really want to see Germany v Netherlands and Brazil v Argentina. Two of the biggest rivalries in the world.
Germany v Holland is a great, hateful rivalry, but seems more of a UEFA rivalry for me. We can see that in France 2016. Germany v Argentina has great FIFA history, would be a rubber match of sorts having split the 86 and '90 finals.
Holland finally winning the big one over the country that denied their greatest team in 1974 would be an awesome story. Holland has won the European Championship before. There are no demons to be exorcised there.
I'm feeling the same.

Plus- #### Germany. amirite?
I am going for Argie myself.

I was not old enough to watch Pele

Soccer was not popular enough to see Maradona at his peak in 1986

Messi might be my best chance to say I got to watch "the best player ever". That would be pretty cool.
I got to see him... you didn't?
I did not. I think only the final was aired in 1986 if memory serves on NBC (maybe one other game). If it was on a Spanish station at the time, I don't think I got it in my area.

 
Anyone but Holland for me. Robben, DeJong, the 2010 Final and no one I really like.
Agree. I really don't want another final like 10.
To be fair- Holland played that goonish way pretty much throughout 10... I have not seen them play that way this time. except for ####### De Jong. but thankfully there's no more van Bommel
The game against Portugal when they had a combined 4 or 5 red cards and something like 20 yellows? That was fun, would make for a very entertaining final.

 
Anyone but Holland for me. Robben, DeJong, the 2010 Final and no one I really like.
Agree. I really don't want another final like 10.
To be fair- Holland played that goonish way pretty much throughout 10... I have not seen them play that way this time. except for ####### De Jong. but thankfully there's no more van Bommel
The game against Portugal when they had a combined 4 or 5 red cards and something like 20 yellows? That was fun, would make for a very entertaining final.
Wasn't that 2006?

 
Really want to see Germany v Netherlands and Brazil v Argentina. Two of the biggest rivalries in the world.
Germany v Holland is a great, hateful rivalry, but seems more of a UEFA rivalry for me. We can see that in France 2016. Germany v Argentina has great FIFA history, would be a rubber match of sorts having split the 86 and '90 finals.
Holland finally winning the big one over the country that denied their greatest team in 1974 would be an awesome story. Holland has won the European Championship before. There are no demons to be exorcised there.
I'm feeling the same.

Plus- #### Germany. amirite?
I am going for Argie myself.

I was not old enough to watch Pele

Soccer was not popular enough to see Maradona at his peak in 1986

Messi might be my best chance to say I got to watch "the best player ever". That would be pretty cool.
I got to see him... you didn't?
I did not. I think only the final was aired in 1986 if memory serves on NBC (maybe one other game). If it was on a Spanish station at the time, I don't think I got it in my area.
strange.

we didn't have any kind of fancy cable back then... I must've either gone to see the games at pubs (that allowed teenagers in) or watched them on Univisionish stations. I distinctly remember watching him eviscerate England live- the initial move he pulled to turn and beat two players before rampaging through the rest of the English defense had me falling out of my seat. I don't seem to recall much else about that game :whistle:

 
Anyone but Holland for me. Robben, DeJong, the 2010 Final and no one I really like.
Agree. I really don't want another final like 10.
To be fair- Holland played that goonish way pretty much throughout 10... I have not seen them play that way this time. except for ####### De Jong. but thankfully there's no more van Bommel
The game against Portugal when they had a combined 4 or 5 red cards and something like 20 yellows? That was fun, would make for a very entertaining final.
Wasn't that 2006?
yes - correct. The "Battle of Nuremberg"

 
Anyone but Holland for me. Robben, DeJong, the 2010 Final and no one I really like.
Agree. I really don't want another final like 10.
To be fair- Holland played that goonish way pretty much throughout 10... I have not seen them play that way this time. except for ####### De Jong. but thankfully there's no more van Bommel
The game against Portugal when they had a combined 4 or 5 red cards and something like 20 yellows? That was fun, would make for a very entertaining final.
Wasn't that 2006?
yes - correct. The "Battle of Nuremberg"
That was entertaining, not what I'd want the final to come down to.

 
Anyone but Holland for me. Robben, DeJong, the 2010 Final and no one I really like.
Agree. I really don't want another final like 10.
To be fair- Holland played that goonish way pretty much throughout 10... I have not seen them play that way this time. except for ####### De Jong. but thankfully there's no more van Bommel
The game against Portugal when they had a combined 4 or 5 red cards and something like 20 yellows? That was fun, would make for a very entertaining final.
Wasn't that 2006?
Yup, The Battle of Nuremberg

 
I feel like we haven't appropriately mocked Sebowski for his "Brazil played them even for 10 whole minutes!" comments yet.
Better than even, even!
Watching the replay after I sobered up, I was surprised to find that even without as much of the ball, I thought Germany still had more moments that were closer to real chances before the goal. Most notably, the shot that hit Kroos in the back.

 
El Floppo said:
Native said:
Ramsay Hunt Experience said:
Native said:
For some comparaive perspective:

The Broncos were thoroughly humilated in a similar manner in the Super Bowl yet the city of Denver didnt lash out with any kind of vitriol against the team and coaches. Of course everyone was massively disappointed but there was none of the hysterical crying or existential questioning of the team by the city. The only time I can remember a US team be so derided was when the US Mens Basketball team lost in the Olympics and were labeled selfish primma donnas. The media had a field day with them because it made a good story but it didnt come with any of the theatrics, drama or on-the-brink societal breakdowns were seeing in Brazil. There was no emotion in that defeat by the fans, just resentment.

In Brazil its completely different. Just goes to show you how deep soccer/football runs in people's blood there. That country is a pressure cooker right now due to social and political unrest and those players were, unfairly, carrying the yolk of a nation on their shoulders. They simply wilted under the pressure. Ive seen lots of teams melt down on big stages, but never with the fallout like were seeing in this instance. Social media only compounds things. The venom coming out of people's mouths (and keyboards) is really upsetting.
I suppose that's true in the media, but I've read some accounts that basically say that many Brazil fans were kind of philosophical about the whole thing. Its a footballing nation, which at least means that they weren't delusional. A lot of Brazil fans understood very well that this was not a particularly strong team by Brazil's standards. As one fan explaining why the defeat was easier to take than the one in 1950 said, "The difference is [the 1950] team was good. This team sucks."
I guess thats what makes the reaction that much darker. The fans knew this team doesnt compare to prior generations yet the country still unanimously views the loss as a national catastrophe. Of course the WAY they lost was the real kick in the gut. Brazil desparately needed a morale boost and what they got was humilation.
I dunno... this is essentially the team that dominated the last Confed Cup in dramatic fashion. yeah- maybe an indication that Spain was done, but to that point, nobody else had been able to do to them what Brazil did. They were almost German in that win with a level of determination that they just lacked this entire WC.
I remember someone saying at the time that dominating the confed cup may have been the worst thing that could have happened to Brazil.

 
Man Kroos's passing chart is insane. 66 of 71. All but one miss in the attacking third. And the majority of the passes at least intermediate length (almost no backward and horizontal passes either). And he scored two goals. Pretty, pretty good.

 
[icon] said:
It's easy to get hyperbolic at this point.... however does ARG or NED have a chance against Germany?

Before I get attacked...Of course they "have a chance", but generally speaking either would have to come in as pretty damn significant dogs to GER right now, no?
Given the expected lines I'd bet either Argentina or Netherlands. Brazil was just awful - Germany isn't *that* good. And there may be some letdown after winning that blowout.


NewlyRetired said:
If Chile's shot late in extra time that hit the cross bar, instead goes in, and Brazil is eliminated in the round of 16, is that "better, same or worse" for the players legacy compared to what happened yesterday?
Way, way better.


NewlyRetired said:
Messi might be my best chance to say I got to watch "the best player ever". That would be pretty cool.
Read this? Fascinating read on why he is, far and away, the best player currently out there. He (IMO) holds up really, really well if you want to talk about "best of all time", as well.


 
Last edited by a moderator:
Man Kroos's passing chart is insane. 66 of 71. All but one miss in the attacking third. And the majority of the passes at least intermediate length (almost no backward and horizontal passes either). And he scored two goals. Pretty, pretty good.
Makes one wonder whether Bayern and Real have already agreed to a fee for Kroos. Its hard to imagine him going for much less than Oezil money at this point.

 
WTF?! Had never heard about this before -- must've been fun to watch. :rolleyes:

In the 1982 World Cup, Italy's Claudio Gentile fouled Argentina's Diego Maradona 23 times ... in Italy's 2-1 victory.
This game is infamous in soccer lore.

The best part was that Gentile got a yellow in the first minute and then just hacked away for the rest of the game. Maradona got a yellow for complaining to the ref about constant infringement.

Twas a different game back then.
That match and Italy's match against Brazil in that same tournament basically instilled a life-long hate of Italian football in me when I was a boy. I was crushed when that '82 Brazil team went out. Still mad that Zico got his jersey torn in the box and nothing was called. Of course, if that team could have played defense for 15 minutes in a row, they would have probably won by three goals that day.

Yesterday's match was shocking because you never see seven goals scored in the knockout stages of the World Cup, let alone against the host nation, and certainly never against Brazil. However, in terms of talent, it isn't shocking to see that Germany handled Brazil and knocked them out. Which Brazilian players truly rate among the top 3 or 5 in the world at their position? Neymar? Perhaps. Thiago Silva? Probably. But it is pretty damning of the state of Brazil's talent that Fred, Hulk, and Jo are the three best options up top. Defensively it wasn't much better. Dani Alves gets benched for an aging Maicon. Hell, I nearly passed out when I was looking at the roster at the beginning of the tournament and saw that both Maxwell and Henrique made the squad.

And in the midfield, where was the creativity? Oscar? How many times this tournament did Brazil get into the attacking third and do nothing but either pull it back out because they couldn't pick out a pass or blast a shot into a defender already waiting? And this team also lacked a hard man in the midfield to keep things in order such as Gilberto Silva or Dunga.

All in all, you have to wonder if this squad would have made it out of the group stage if this tournament was played somewhere besides Brazil. They were fortunate to get the PK in their first match, and Mexico played them pretty even in the second. Cameroon gave them some trouble early on before being overrun.

It was sad to see Brazil's mystique shattered so brutally yesterday. Jogo bonito died a while ago, but that yellow jersey still had an aura about it. But after seeing Germany thrash them so easily, treating them like a youth team, I feel as if Brazil has dropped down a notch from the lofty status they had to one where they are on equal footing with countries like Germany, Italy, and Argentina. Before that, even though they didn't win every match, there was something special about the Brazilian national time. Right now, the only thing special about them is their margin of defeat.

I hope Argentina gets through today, because I would prefer the record of no European team winning the WC in the Americas remain intact (hey, my dad is Chilean - definite South American bias here) and I want Messi to win so that Argentinean fans give him the credit he has deserved from them prior to this. To do this, they need to play like they did against Belgium: sit back and invite the Dutch on to them and counterattack with the available space once they force a turnover. Losing Di Maria hurts considerably, but they still have the ability to get the result. Basically, they have to play a bit like the '90 team, though with less cynicism. If they try to attack and possess the ball, their offense stagnates and their back line gets exposed to counterattacks that it can't handle. And if Argentina loses and Messi gets grief from his home fans about it, I think FIFA should initiate a rule where a soccer god who is unduly criticized by his nation's fans due to their unrealistic expectations and Maradona worship is immediately eligible to play for the United States.

 
Its easy to bury Brazil, but its not really fair to compare a team that lost its best player to teams that didn't. How good is the 2002 team if Ronaldo goes down? They still had a lot of talent, but enough to replace 8 goals?

On reputation, Dani Alves is one of the best RBs in the game. Same with David Luiz at CB. And Brazil had respected players in Dante and Henrique backing him up.

If Holland wins today, Ron Vlaar is going to start the World Cup final. Johnny Heitinga started for Holland in the final in 2010 at the same position if memory serves. Dirk Kuyt could very well be starting LB despite the fact that he's 110 years old and not a LB (and I love Dirk Kuyt).

We all thought that Felipao had the formula right for Brazil. Keep it congested in the middle and play through Neymar. Frankly, I had thought that he had admirably leashed Marcelo through the tournament (or that Marcelo had gracefully aged out of the kind of shockers you saw yesterday).

 
Its easy to bury Brazil, but its not really fair to compare a team that lost its best player to teams that didn't. How good is the 2002 team if Ronaldo goes down? They still had a lot of talent, but enough to replace 8 goals?

On reputation, Dani Alves is one of the best RBs in the game. Same with David Luiz at CB. And Brazil had respected players in Dante and Henrique backing him up.

If Holland wins today, Ron Vlaar is going to start the World Cup final. Johnny Heitinga started for Holland in the final in 2010 at the same position if memory serves. Dirk Kuyt could very well be starting LB despite the fact that he's 110 years old and not a LB (and I love Dirk Kuyt).

We all thought that Felipao had the formula right for Brazil. Keep it congested in the middle and play through Neymar. Frankly, I had thought that he had admirably leashed Marcelo through the tournament (or that Marcelo had gracefully aged out of the kind of shockers you saw yesterday).
somewhere, right now, Dirk Kuyts hair is dripping with sweat.

 
Its easy to bury Brazil, but its not really fair to compare a team that lost its best player to teams that didn't. How good is the 2002 team if Ronaldo goes down? They still had a lot of talent, but enough to replace 8 goals?

On reputation, Dani Alves is one of the best RBs in the game. Same with David Luiz at CB. And Brazil had respected players in Dante and Henrique backing him up.

If Holland wins today, Ron Vlaar is going to start the World Cup final. Johnny Heitinga started for Holland in the final in 2010 at the same position if memory serves. Dirk Kuyt could very well be starting LB despite the fact that he's 110 years old and not a LB (and I love Dirk Kuyt).

We all thought that Felipao had the formula right for Brazil. Keep it congested in the middle and play through Neymar. Frankly, I had thought that he had admirably leashed Marcelo through the tournament (or that Marcelo had gracefully aged out of the kind of shockers you saw yesterday).
We lost Jozi and we only lost to Germany by 1 goal. :shrug:

 
El Floppo said:
strange.

we didn't have any kind of fancy cable back then... I must've either gone to see the games at pubs (that allowed teenagers in) or watched them on Univisionish stations. I distinctly remember watching him eviscerate England live- the initial move he pulled to turn and beat two players before rampaging through the rest of the English defense had me falling out of my seat. I don't seem to recall much else about that game :whistle:
His performance against Belgium in the next match was equally outstanding. I watched the 30 for 30 about Maradona recently and they had a ton of great footage from the '86 World Cup. Seeing that again reminded me just how otherworldly he was in Mexico. He was so amazing guys couldn't even foul him though they tried. I never saw Pele but my father and grandfather did, as well as Garrincha and many other wonderful players, and they both said that Dieguito's performance in '86 was the best they ever saw by one player at any World Cup.

 
Its easy to bury Brazil, but its not really fair to compare a team that lost its best player to teams that didn't. How good is the 2002 team if Ronaldo goes down? They still had a lot of talent, but enough to replace 8 goals?

On reputation, Dani Alves is one of the best RBs in the game. Same with David Luiz at CB. And Brazil had respected players in Dante and Henrique backing him up.

If Holland wins today, Ron Vlaar is going to start the World Cup final. Johnny Heitinga started for Holland in the final in 2010 at the same position if memory serves. Dirk Kuyt could very well be starting LB despite the fact that he's 110 years old and not a LB (and I love Dirk Kuyt).

We all thought that Felipao had the formula right for Brazil. Keep it congested in the middle and play through Neymar. Frankly, I had thought that he had admirably leashed Marcelo through the tournament (or that Marcelo had gracefully aged out of the kind of shockers you saw yesterday).
The 2002 team had Rivaldo, Kaka, and Ronaldinho, three players who had won or would go on to win World Player of the Year at least once. Could that squad have replaced Ronaldo? Probably not, but at least that team had outstanding options. This team did not. Given those circumstances, the tactics were correct. It's just amazing to think that a Brazil squad would be forced by a lack of attacking talent to play that way.

 
This is a team that had more than enough talent to win the WC, especially in front of home crowds. Maybe the Silva suspension started the landslide: Scolari thinks he needs more defense to cover for his absence, Brazil's lack of skill in the midfield plays right into Germany's hands in terms of their pressing game, Marcelo feels like he has to over-compensate and join the attack more, and all of these things go wrong, not to mention Germany has a pretty good day and several of Brazil's more or less check out mid-game.

I think there's probably an ideal balance for Brazil that's more positive than what we saw yesterday and a team that's all precious short passes and trying to walk the ball into the net, but yesterday wasn't it. It's going to be very interesting to see what happens between now and 2016.

 
Its easy to bury Brazil, but its not really fair to compare a team that lost its best player to teams that didn't. How good is the 2002 team if Ronaldo goes down? They still had a lot of talent, but enough to replace 8 goals?

On reputation, Dani Alves is one of the best RBs in the game. Same with David Luiz at CB. And Brazil had respected players in Dante and Henrique backing him up.

If Holland wins today, Ron Vlaar is going to start the World Cup final. Johnny Heitinga started for Holland in the final in 2010 at the same position if memory serves. Dirk Kuyt could very well be starting LB despite the fact that he's 110 years old and not a LB (and I love Dirk Kuyt).

We all thought that Felipao had the formula right for Brazil. Keep it congested in the middle and play through Neymar. Frankly, I had thought that he had admirably leashed Marcelo through the tournament (or that Marcelo had gracefully aged out of the kind of shockers you saw yesterday).
We lost Jozi and we only lost to Germany by 1 goal. :shrug:
The USMNT played very hard and admirably, given the talent disparity. Yesterday's game should be required viewing for the "How can you be satisfied with the US losing to Belgium and Germany" crowd.

 
Its easy to bury Brazil, but its not really fair to compare a team that lost its best player to teams that didn't. How good is the 2002 team if Ronaldo goes down? They still had a lot of talent, but enough to replace 8 goals?

On reputation, Dani Alves is one of the best RBs in the game. Same with David Luiz at CB. And Brazil had respected players in Dante and Henrique backing him up.

If Holland wins today, Ron Vlaar is going to start the World Cup final. Johnny Heitinga started for Holland in the final in 2010 at the same position if memory serves. Dirk Kuyt could very well be starting LB despite the fact that he's 110 years old and not a LB (and I love Dirk Kuyt).

We all thought that Felipao had the formula right for Brazil. Keep it congested in the middle and play through Neymar. Frankly, I had thought that he had admirably leashed Marcelo through the tournament (or that Marcelo had gracefully aged out of the kind of shockers you saw yesterday).
I liked Barney Ronay's take in the Guardian today which, despite its hyperbolic headline, was actually a pretty nuanced look at how Brazil is facing some difficult football related problems without being hysterical about what yesterday meant.

Beyond this the structural problems in Brazil and Brazilian football will continue to exist whatever the score against Germany. It is worth remembering, for what it’s worth, that Brazil is still a country in a state of energetic flux. Things do not just look after themselves here. If something is neglected it will tend to fester and Brazilian football has been neglected. The domestic league is weak. The academy structures, which must eventually take the place of just allowing poverty to make footballers for you, are – according to those who know – totally inadequate compared to the best European countries.
 
Its easy to bury Brazil, but its not really fair to compare a team that lost its best player to teams that didn't. How good is the 2002 team if Ronaldo goes down? They still had a lot of talent, but enough to replace 8 goals?

On reputation, Dani Alves is one of the best RBs in the game. Same with David Luiz at CB. And Brazil had respected players in Dante and Henrique backing him up.

If Holland wins today, Ron Vlaar is going to start the World Cup final. Johnny Heitinga started for Holland in the final in 2010 at the same position if memory serves. Dirk Kuyt could very well be starting LB despite the fact that he's 110 years old and not a LB (and I love Dirk Kuyt).

We all thought that Felipao had the formula right for Brazil. Keep it congested in the middle and play through Neymar. Frankly, I had thought that he had admirably leashed Marcelo through the tournament (or that Marcelo had gracefully aged out of the kind of shockers you saw yesterday).
We lost Jozi and we only lost to Germany by 1 goal. :shrug:
The USMNT played very hard and admirably, given the talent disparity. Yesterday's game should be required viewing for the "How can you be satisfied with the US losing to Belgium and Germany" crowd.
Sure, but then it also plays into the bunkering style that we were supposed to be breaking out of. As some said, they were happy to see Brazil lose for playing negative football but if anything the result probably justifies the Greece's of the world b/c at worst, they aren't embarrassed off the world stage.

 
Its easy to bury Brazil, but its not really fair to compare a team that lost its best player to teams that didn't. How good is the 2002 team if Ronaldo goes down? They still had a lot of talent, but enough to replace 8 goals?

On reputation, Dani Alves is one of the best RBs in the game. Same with David Luiz at CB. And Brazil had respected players in Dante and Henrique backing him up.

If Holland wins today, Ron Vlaar is going to start the World Cup final. Johnny Heitinga started for Holland in the final in 2010 at the same position if memory serves. Dirk Kuyt could very well be starting LB despite the fact that he's 110 years old and not a LB (and I love Dirk Kuyt).

We all thought that Felipao had the formula right for Brazil. Keep it congested in the middle and play through Neymar. Frankly, I had thought that he had admirably leashed Marcelo through the tournament (or that Marcelo had gracefully aged out of the kind of shockers you saw yesterday).
We lost Jozi and we only lost to Germany by 1 goal. :shrug:
The USMNT played very hard and admirably, given the talent disparity. Yesterday's game should be required viewing for the "How can you be satisfied with the US losing to Belgium and Germany" crowd.
I'd also be worthwhile consideration for the Wynaldas and Donovans out there who complained that the US played too defensively.

 
Its easy to bury Brazil, but its not really fair to compare a team that lost its best player to teams that didn't. How good is the 2002 team if Ronaldo goes down? They still had a lot of talent, but enough to replace 8 goals?

On reputation, Dani Alves is one of the best RBs in the game. Same with David Luiz at CB. And Brazil had respected players in Dante and Henrique backing him up.

If Holland wins today, Ron Vlaar is going to start the World Cup final. Johnny Heitinga started for Holland in the final in 2010 at the same position if memory serves. Dirk Kuyt could very well be starting LB despite the fact that he's 110 years old and not a LB (and I love Dirk Kuyt).

We all thought that Felipao had the formula right for Brazil. Keep it congested in the middle and play through Neymar. Frankly, I had thought that he had admirably leashed Marcelo through the tournament (or that Marcelo had gracefully aged out of the kind of shockers you saw yesterday).
We lost Jozi and we only lost to Germany by 1 goal. :shrug:
The USMNT played very hard and admirably, given the talent disparity. Yesterday's game should be required viewing for the "How can you be satisfied with the US losing to Belgium and Germany" crowd.
it's beating a horse, but for me the frustrating thing about the US v Germany game was that I know the US capable of far more than they showed. Slightly less so against Belgium... but only slightly.

 
Its easy to bury Brazil, but its not really fair to compare a team that lost its best player to teams that didn't. How good is the 2002 team if Ronaldo goes down? They still had a lot of talent, but enough to replace 8 goals?

On reputation, Dani Alves is one of the best RBs in the game. Same with David Luiz at CB. And Brazil had respected players in Dante and Henrique backing him up.

If Holland wins today, Ron Vlaar is going to start the World Cup final. Johnny Heitinga started for Holland in the final in 2010 at the same position if memory serves. Dirk Kuyt could very well be starting LB despite the fact that he's 110 years old and not a LB (and I love Dirk Kuyt).

We all thought that Felipao had the formula right for Brazil. Keep it congested in the middle and play through Neymar. Frankly, I had thought that he had admirably leashed Marcelo through the tournament (or that Marcelo had gracefully aged out of the kind of shockers you saw yesterday).
We lost Jozi and we only lost to Germany by 1 goal. :shrug:
The USMNT played very hard and admirably, given the talent disparity. Yesterday's game should be required viewing for the "How can you be satisfied with the US losing to Belgium and Germany" crowd.
Sure, but then it also plays into the bunkering style that we were supposed to be breaking out of. As some said, they were happy to see Brazil lose for playing negative football but if anything the result probably justifies the Greece's of the world b/c at worst, they aren't embarrassed off the world stage.
Brazilians are one of several groups of fans who claim they would rather lose than win by playing ugly. I guess you can say Brazil was playing "negative football" in this tournament because Scolari favored a defensive-oriented midfield, but it sure wasn't bunkering or playing a counter-attacking game, at least as I understand those terms. When Brazil lost possession in midfield, it seemed Germany almost always had equal or better numbers attacking, the the Brazilian back line was not really a line at all, more a random scattering of unconnected, disorganized individuals.

 
I have a bad feeling that the Netherlands are just clicking too well right now.

Cletius, reverse jinx please. I'd do it, but I don't believe in the stuff.

TIA

 
Its easy to bury Brazil, but its not really fair to compare a team that lost its best player to teams that didn't. How good is the 2002 team if Ronaldo goes down? They still had a lot of talent, but enough to replace 8 goals?

On reputation, Dani Alves is one of the best RBs in the game. Same with David Luiz at CB. And Brazil had respected players in Dante and Henrique backing him up.

If Holland wins today, Ron Vlaar is going to start the World Cup final. Johnny Heitinga started for Holland in the final in 2010 at the same position if memory serves. Dirk Kuyt could very well be starting LB despite the fact that he's 110 years old and not a LB (and I love Dirk Kuyt).

We all thought that Felipao had the formula right for Brazil. Keep it congested in the middle and play through Neymar. Frankly, I had thought that he had admirably leashed Marcelo through the tournament (or that Marcelo had gracefully aged out of the kind of shockers you saw yesterday).
We lost Jozi and we only lost to Germany by 1 goal. :shrug:
The USMNT played very hard and admirably, given the talent disparity. Yesterday's game should be required viewing for the "How can you be satisfied with the US losing to Belgium and Germany" crowd.
it's beating a horse, but for me the frustrating thing about the US v Germany game was that I know the US capable of far more than they showed. Slightly less so against Belgium... but only slightly.
I have no beef with the performance against Germany. Sheer pragmatism demanded an approach that eliminated the worst case scenario, which was a curb-stomping like we saw yesterday.

I don't think the performance against Belgium was pragmatic. At least not in the second half. Belgium had more chances in 10 minutes than Germany had all game against the US. So I found the Belgium performance much more disappointing. Particularly because I felt that Belgium had vulnerabilities to be exploited and the US's last desperate push showed those vulnerabilities.

 
Straight-up trash talk

@BitterOldPunk How do you say, "Brazil got their ### kicked" in Portuguese?

@TheTweetOfGod The destruction of the Amazon is complete. #WorldCup

@DrunkTedTurner Germany gets 10 goals, everyone in the stadium gets a free taco. And riot gear shield. #worldcup

@DavidEpstein in dog goals, it's 49-0

@rustyrockets They'll have 5 mins added on for the time Cesar has spent picking the ball out of the net.

@psmith If only there was a German word for schadenfreude

Pop culture references

@jearle "Brazil, the Lannisters send their regards." - Germany.

@mickmcavoy The last time I saw a Brazil this bleak it was getting directed by Terry Gilliam

@Ihnatko ‏This seems like the right time to use the classic"Yank down the opposing teams' pants and then run back to the bus and split" play.

@DarthRachel it's ok Brazil, you still have a chance if you catch the Snitch!

@jhoffman NOW IST THE TIME ON SPROCKETS WHEN WE SKOR A GOOOOOAL.

Web and tech culture

@papadimitriou #GER #BRA You Won't Believe What Happened Next.

@JustinRood I just took the poll, Which German Goal Against Brazil Are You? I'm #6!

@lfrum Is Brazil's controller plugged in? Check the batteries? #BrazilvsGermany #WorldCup

@ditzkoff At 7 goals, the World Cup scoreboard just goes to the Donkey Kong kill screen
Did anyone post these? These are pretty good. :lol:

 
I have a bad feeling that the Netherlands are just clicking too well right now.

Cletius, reverse jinx please. I'd do it, but I don't believe in the stuff.

TIA
I've got my 2006 Holland jersey in the car for a meeting at the bar if I can get away, but honestly don't have a care either way. Just hoping for a good one.

But I'll go ahead and predict a Dirk Kuyt hattrick for you ...

 
Its easy to bury Brazil, but its not really fair to compare a team that lost its best player to teams that didn't. How good is the 2002 team if Ronaldo goes down? They still had a lot of talent, but enough to replace 8 goals?

On reputation, Dani Alves is one of the best RBs in the game. Same with David Luiz at CB. And Brazil had respected players in Dante and Henrique backing him up.

If Holland wins today, Ron Vlaar is going to start the World Cup final. Johnny Heitinga started for Holland in the final in 2010 at the same position if memory serves. Dirk Kuyt could very well be starting LB despite the fact that he's 110 years old and not a LB (and I love Dirk Kuyt).

We all thought that Felipao had the formula right for Brazil. Keep it congested in the middle and play through Neymar. Frankly, I had thought that he had admirably leashed Marcelo through the tournament (or that Marcelo had gracefully aged out of the kind of shockers you saw yesterday).
We lost Jozi and we only lost to Germany by 1 goal. :shrug:
The USMNT played very hard and admirably, given the talent disparity. Yesterday's game should be required viewing for the "How can you be satisfied with the US losing to Belgium and Germany" crowd.
it's beating a horse, but for me the frustrating thing about the US v Germany game was that I know the US capable of far more than they showed.
Does the US have one player that even makes Germany's 23?

 
Predicting a brace for Fred Kuyt today and another on Sunday to win the cup for Brazil Holland and become a Selecao Dutch legend. Fred Kuyt sold to Spurs this summer for £8m and leads them to win the English double in 2015-16 at the age of 32 35, then offloaded to Real for £27m. Fred Kuyt returns to Fluminese Fenerbaçhe at 36 39 and leads it to one more Brasileiro Serie A Turkey Süper Lig title before going into semi-retirement with the Red Bulls.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
btw - wearing an XXL Holland jersey gives one the feeling of a human road block of sorts. I feel like I could direct airport traffic in a heavy fog.

 
I have a bad feeling that the Netherlands are just clicking too well right now.

Cletius, reverse jinx please. I'd do it, but I don't believe in the stuff.

TIA
I've got my 2006 Holland jersey in the car for a meeting at the bar if I can get away, but honestly don't have a care either way. Just hoping for a good one.

But I'll go ahead and predict a Dirk Kuyt hattrick for you ...
Thanks! and :lmao: we both picked Kuyt.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top