It wouldn't surprise me too much if Algeria ends up in second.I remember when South Korea used to run teams off the field. Germany is going dismantle which ever of these two come in second.
Yep. It's also silly how many other cameras you see in the shots. Besides, shouldn't they be using their hands for beer and not waving them and jumping around?Joe Bryant said:Maybe they do. I've just never seen them referred to like soccer folks do. Seems like the futbolguys are more interested in taking video of fans watching fans than other sports are. Just an observation.gianmarco said:Seriously? You don't think these exact same videos exist of fans watching football games or baseball games or other sports?Joe Bryant said:I think it's honestly kind of odd the fascination soccer folks seem to have taking video of themselves watching games.NewlyRetired said:You don't enjoy vids like those?I think they show why sports a great. Look at the KC crowd, that is awesome.Joe Bryant said:Now you guys are just taunting me, right?The Gator said:Chills every time...gianmarco said:That stuff gives me chills. Am I the only one that tears up with this kinda crap?Premier said:
Sure, it's nice to see a bunch of happy people. But no where near "chills" or "tearing up".
People are serious about tearing up for these?
J![]()
J
Cool. Um not not the best training for their match though
With 2 points on goal differential for the bunker foxes?It wouldn't surprise me too much if Algeria ends up in second.I remember when South Korea used to run teams off the field. Germany is going dismantle which ever of these two come in second.
They weren't too bad in the first half. You might be on to something though, Belgium is going to take the other two teams apart imo.With 2 points on goal differential for the bunker foxes?-QGIt wouldn't surprise me too much if Algeria ends up in second.I remember when South Korea used to run teams off the field. Germany is going dismantle which ever of these two come in second.
When the analyst said "why worry about 3-1" or something like that I disagreed. I'm not kidding when I say that I think a one-goal loss to Belgium probably was in the thinking of the coach as a good result. Still, I think it will be tough for Algeria to get the results they need. The tie benefited them clearly, however.They weren't too bad in the first half. You might be on to something though, Belgium is going to take the other two teams apart imo.With 2 points on goal differential for the bunker foxes?-QGIt wouldn't surprise me too much if Algeria ends up in second.I remember when South Korea used to run teams off the field. Germany is going dismantle which ever of these two come in second.
I just finished the match on dvr with my 9-5er Russian buddy who avoided spoilers for the day (and drank Moscow Mules).Awoken like an angry lion? C'mon there was a great bear/hibernation simile there, guy.
I thought Jo looked decent when he came on but didn't have enough time to make a real impact. The problem with Brazil last night was that they had no desire to go forward. They asked no questions from the defense. Scolari is doing it wrong IMO. I'd have Neymar wide left so he can cut in and create space/shooting opportunities. Willian wide right with Jo through the middle. Oscar can then attack from the centre and pull the strings. He's the key to this Brazil side and will be the best midfielder in the world in 2-3 years time.Just to finish my hipple (whatever happened to that guy?)...
How great would Brazil be with an actual decent #9? Fred and Jo both sucked today.
Who regrets the one more: Costa or Brasil?
--
Qty Product Code - Product Name Price
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Men's Nike USA 2014/2015 Away Stadiu 114.99
(X-Large)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sub-Total: 114.99
Tax: 0.00
Shipping & Handling: 9.99
Customization: I BELIEVE
14
![]()
![]()
Joe, you should go watch a game at a soccer bar that focuses on a foreign team. I think you would enjoy it. For many countries in the world, this is the only sport that really matters. We are the exception.Yep. It's also silly how many other cameras you see in the shots. Besides, shouldn't they be using their hands for beer and not waving them and jumping around?Joe Bryant said:Maybe they do. I've just never seen them referred to like soccer folks do. Seems like the futbolguys are more interested in taking video of fans watching fans than other sports are. Just an observation.gianmarco said:Seriously? You don't think these exact same videos exist of fans watching football games or baseball games or other sports?Joe Bryant said:I think it's honestly kind of odd the fascination soccer folks seem to have taking video of themselves watching games.NewlyRetired said:You don't enjoy vids like those?I think they show why sports a great. Look at the KC crowd, that is awesome.Joe Bryant said:Now you guys are just taunting me, right?The Gator said:Chills every time...gianmarco said:That stuff gives me chills. Am I the only one that tears up with this kinda crap?Premier said:
Sure, it's nice to see a bunch of happy people. But no where near "chills" or "tearing up".
People are serious about tearing up for these?
J![]()
J
I kind of think Chile gets them here. Casillas has been awful in his last two big games. If he plays like that again, Chile will score a couple times.Spain pretty much has to win today. A tie and they'll probably have to put 7+ goals on the Aussies to have a chance of advancing on 4 points.
If Chile has the fitness to press high and use their speed consistently on attacke, keeping Spain off the ball, yeah- I agree with 80s. I don't see a Casillas howler/mob-pay-off happening like with the Russia GK.I kind of think Chile gets them here. Casillas has been awful in his last two big games. If he plays like that again, Chile will score a couple times.Spain pretty much has to win today. A tie and they'll probably have to put 7+ goals on the Aussies to have a chance of advancing on 4 points.
I have no idea what will happen. Something's off with Spain though and it'll be interesting to see if they include Costa again or go back to full on tiki-takaIf Chile has the fitness to press high and use their speed consistently on attacke, keeping Spain off the ball, yeah- I agree with 80s. I don't see a Casillas howler/mob-pay-off happening like with the Russia GK.I kind of think Chile gets them here. Casillas has been awful in his last two big games. If he plays like that again, Chile will score a couple times.Spain pretty much has to win today. A tie and they'll probably have to put 7+ goals on the Aussies to have a chance of advancing on 4 points.
But its the goal scoring avatar - it will suffice for a day or so - while I get the hang of things againyour avatar has his shirt onDid I miss anything good?
Go away, you're not needed around here.Did I miss anything good?
GET A ROOM, YOU GUY.Go away, you're not needed around here.Did I miss anything good?
Um, the USA is undefeated with shirtless avatars, so...yeah, that's not going to fly, guyBut its the goal scoring avatar - it will suffice for a day or so - while I get the hang of things againyour avatar has his shirt onDid I miss anything good?
Well, I think it might be better to start with Bedoya - assuming he is healthy, save Zusi for a subLet's talk about the US lineup on Sunday... if we try to play the same way (which I'd be tempted to do given how strong we've been at the back)...
---------Howard
Fab Cameron Besler? Beasley
-----Zusi Beckerman Jones
-------Bradley Johannsson
----------Dempsey
What are the alternatives?
Gollum, GollumGo away, you're not needed around here.Did I miss anything good?
TimmyLet's talk about the US lineup on Sunday... if we try to play the same way (which I'd be tempted to do given how strong we've been at the back)...
---------Howard
Fab Cameron Besler? Beasley
-----Zusi Beckerman Jones
-------Bradley Johannsson
----------Dempsey
(Giving Zusi the start this time, planning to bring Bedoya in for Jones so they've all three played less than 180 minutes in the two games.)
What are the alternatives?
Dempsey's not a physical force, but with his skill he can hold the ball when he needs to. Wondolowski would be worse than Bacon in that role IMO, and I think you'd have to go to two advanced forwards with him in the game.Might be tempted to start Wondo up top, and keep Dempsey where he is - though I think Bacon played better than people thought - given what we had to work with.
I agree about keeping Bedoya in there- they'll need his pace on Ronaldo's side.Well, I think it might be better to start with Bedoya - assuming he is healthy, save Zusi for a subLet's talk about the US lineup on Sunday... if we try to play the same way (which I'd be tempted to do given how strong we've been at the back)...
---------Howard
Fab Cameron Besler? Beasley
-----Zusi Beckerman Jones
-------Bradley Johannsson
----------Dempsey
What are the alternatives?
Might be tempted to start Wondo up top, and keep Dempsey where he is - though I think Bacon played better than people thought - given what we had to work with.
Or have Netherlands lose out... but ya, I suggest winningSpain pretty much has to win today. A tie and they'll probably have to put 7+ goals on the Aussies to have a chance of advancing on 4 points.
Better?your avatar has his shirt onDid I miss anything good?
I thinkn the problem is that Dempsey floats with his runs, finding pockets of space rather than exploding for a diagonal run which Jozy sometimes did, and which the US needs. Wondo explodes if he's inside the 6 yard box, otherwise, I'd prefer to have bacon work on that role over the next couple days.Dempsey's not a physical force, but with his skill he can hold the ball when he needs to. Wondolowski would be worse than Bacon in that role IMO, and I think you'd have to go to two advanced forwards with him in the game.Might be tempted to start Wondo up top, and keep Dempsey where he is - though I think Bacon played better than people thought - given what we had to work with.
everything I have read says Besler is good to go so I think it is safe to pencil him in.Let's talk about the US lineup on Sunday... if we try to play the same way (which I'd be tempted to do given how strong we've been at the back)...
---------Howard
Fab Cameron Besler? Beasley
-----Zusi Beckerman Jones
-------Bradley Johannsson
----------Dempsey
(Giving Zusi the start this time, planning to bring Bedoya in for Jones so they've all three played less than 180 minutes in the two games.)
What are the alternatives?
Only if we get 80 minutes in.Sorry if I missed this discussion, but given the current group standings, how much emphasis will/should the US put on just playing for a tie compared to game 1? Clearly, a tie puts us in a great position, but doesn't guarantee anything either. Do you think we'll play strategically different from the opening kick with that in mind or do you think that is more something that gets considered once we're on like 80 minutes?
JK says they're 100% playing for the win, which I think makes sense. But if it's 1-1 in the 80th minute we'll definitely be happier to hold the ball/waste time/play for the counter and Portugal will be pressing like mad.Sorry if I missed this discussion, but given the current group standings, how much emphasis will/should the US put on just playing for a tie compared to game 1? Clearly, a tie puts us in a great position, but doesn't guarantee anything either. Do you think we'll play strategically different from the opening kick with that in mind or do you think that is more something that gets considered once we're on like 80 minutes?
I think/hope we will not play for a draw. It is unlikely Portugal will be as kind to us as Ghana was if we try and sit back the whole game.Sorry if I missed this discussion, but given the current group standings, how much emphasis will/should the US put on just playing for a tie compared to game 1? Clearly, a tie puts us in a great position, but doesn't guarantee anything either. Do you think we'll play strategically different from the opening kick with that in mind or do you think that is more something that gets considered once we're on like 80 minutes?
Re: Wondo playing 'these kind of players'....It's Ricardo Costa and Bruno Alves. He can deal with these guys imo. Pepe, if he was in and on his game would be a different story, but these two guys are passed it. Both are 32-3yo iirc and were never quick. Add in Neto(just a guess because Almeida isn't a natural LB) and these are guys Wondo can beat, and, imo, the kind of FOX IN THE BOX(scoobs> hi_) we need.I agree about keeping Bedoya in there- they'll need his pace on Ronaldo's side.Well, I think it might be better to start with Bedoya - assuming he is healthy, save Zusi for a subLet's talk about the US lineup on Sunday... if we try to play the same way (which I'd be tempted to do given how strong we've been at the back)...
---------Howard
Fab Cameron Besler? Beasley
-----Zusi Beckerman Jones
-------Bradley Johannsson
----------Dempsey
What are the alternatives?
Might be tempted to start Wondo up top, and keep Dempsey where he is - though I think Bacon played better than people thought - given what we had to work with.
I'd prefer to keep Bacon in there, but he and Deuce play very similar roles unless they've been able to sort out what kind of runs he's going to need to make if he's up high ala Jozy. Wondo... was always a mistake to bring. Just doesn't have any of the skills needed to beat these kind of players- off the run, off the dribble, anything. I'd love to be proved wrong about him- I would happily eat crow with him scoring goals, but I'd much rather have an EJ to throw on the field. Without that option, give me Bacon.
you can't be less effective than Dempsey was in the Ghana game defensively (some of which was likely due to his injury).Re: Mix - not sure I agree about him being more active defensively. Well, maybe more active, but not more effective.
I just don't see Wondo beating either of those guys, unless it's the foxy kind of beating in the 6.Re: Wondo playing 'these kind of players'....It's Ricardo Costa and Bruno Alves. He can deal with these guys imo. Pepe, if he was in and on his game would be a different story, but these two guys are passed it. Both are 32-3yo iirc and were never quick. Add in Neto(just a guess because Almeida isn't a natural LB) and these are guys Wondo can beat, and, imo, the kind of FOX IN THE BOX(scoobs> hi_) we need.I agree about keeping Bedoya in there- they'll need his pace on Ronaldo's side.Well, I think it might be better to start with Bedoya - assuming he is healthy, save Zusi for a subLet's talk about the US lineup on Sunday... if we try to play the same way (which I'd be tempted to do given how strong we've been at the back)...
---------Howard
Fab Cameron Besler? Beasley
-----Zusi Beckerman Jones
-------Bradley Johannsson
----------Dempsey
What are the alternatives?
Might be tempted to start Wondo up top, and keep Dempsey where he is - though I think Bacon played better than people thought - given what we had to work with.
I'd prefer to keep Bacon in there, but he and Deuce play very similar roles unless they've been able to sort out what kind of runs he's going to need to make if he's up high ala Jozy. Wondo... was always a mistake to bring. Just doesn't have any of the skills needed to beat these kind of players- off the run, off the dribble, anything. I'd love to be proved wrong about him- I would happily eat crow with him scoring goals, but I'd much rather have an EJ to throw on the field. Without that option, give me Bacon.