What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*Official 2015 Philadelphia Eagles* - Winning when it doesnt count (2 Viewers)

So now we assume that any rook WR will easily put up 67/870/8? That's asking a lot IMO. For every Jordan Matthews there are 3 Josh Huffs.
Mathews obviously outperformed his #42 selection, but Huff was a 3rd rounder.

Can't really compare a guy we can get at #20 in a rich WR draft, to a guy we drafted at #86.

 
So now we assume that any rook WR will easily put up 67/870/8? That's asking a lot IMO. For every Jordan Matthews there are 3 Josh Huffs.
Look at last year's first round WRs:

Watkins

Evans

ODB

Cooks

Benjamin

The hit rate of WR's in first round seems pretty good. I think they could come close to Mathews' production (but like Insein says, we will be running the ball more so numbers may be lower but still have as big of an impact)

 
So now we assume that any rook WR will easily put up 67/870/8? That's asking a lot IMO. For every Jordan Matthews there are 3 Josh Huffs.
Mathews obviously outperformed his #42 selection, but Huff was a 3rd rounder. Can't really compare a guy we can get at #20 in a rich WR draft, to a guy we drafted at #86.
Understood, wasnt meant be a direct comparison but you get my point about rookies. Even some 1st rounders wont produce what Jordan did. And as Insein pointed out its going to be more run oriented this season.

 
So now we assume that any rook WR will easily put up 67/870/8? That's asking a lot IMO. For every Jordan Matthews there are 3 Josh Huffs.
Mathews obviously outperformed his #42 selection, but Huff was a 3rd rounder. Can't really compare a guy we can get at #20 in a rich WR draft, to a guy we drafted at #86.
Understood, wasnt meant be a direct comparison but you get my point about rookies. Even some 1st rounders wont produce what Jordan did. And as Insein pointed out its going to be more run oriented this season.
That being said, let's say we do not move in the draft and go WR at #20.

Who are our targets? Seems like that is a little bit of a tough spot to be in. We will obviously miss out on White, Cooper, and Parker. Seems like if we do go WR at 20, it's going to be for DGB. How do we feel about this guy, and is he a "chip guy"?

Edit: Maybe reach a bit on Strong or Perriman? Or trade down for one of them?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So now we assume that any rook WR will easily put up 67/870/8? That's asking a lot IMO. For every Jordan Matthews there are 3 Josh Huffs.
Mathews obviously outperformed his #42 selection, but Huff was a 3rd rounder. Can't really compare a guy we can get at #20 in a rich WR draft, to a guy we drafted at #86.
Understood, wasnt meant be a direct comparison but you get my point about rookies. Even some 1st rounders wont produce what Jordan did. And as Insein pointed out its going to be more run oriented this season.
That being said, let's say we do not move in the draft and go WR at #20.Who are our targets? Seems like that is a little bit of a tough spot to be in. We will obviously miss out on White, Cooper, and Parker. Seems like if we do go WR at 20, it's going to be for DGB. How do we feel about this guy, and is he a "chip guy"?

Edit: Maybe reach a bit on Strong or Perriman? Or trade down for one of them?
Think you have to look for Safety 1st round then WR next pick.

 
So now we assume that any rook WR will easily put up 67/870/8? That's asking a lot IMO. For every Jordan Matthews there are 3 Josh Huffs.
Mathews obviously outperformed his #42 selection, but Huff was a 3rd rounder. Can't really compare a guy we can get at #20 in a rich WR draft, to a guy we drafted at #86.
Understood, wasnt meant be a direct comparison but you get my point about rookies. Even some 1st rounders wont produce what Jordan did. And as Insein pointed out its going to be more run oriented this season.
That being said, let's say we do not move in the draft and go WR at #20.Who are our targets? Seems like that is a little bit of a tough spot to be in. We will obviously miss out on White, Cooper, and Parker. Seems like if we do go WR at 20, it's going to be for DGB. How do we feel about this guy, and is he a "chip guy"?

Edit: Maybe reach a bit on Strong or Perriman? Or trade down for one of them?
Think you have to look for Safety 1st round then WR next pick.
I think that makes it even worse. If Collins goes before our pick as expected, then that would be a big reach going for another S at 20.

Would be very excited about Collins or Parker at 20. But if both are gone, I hope we trade back because we'll be reaching on WR/S at that point.

 
So now we assume that any rook WR will easily put up 67/870/8? That's asking a lot IMO. For every Jordan Matthews there are 3 Josh Huffs.
Mathews obviously outperformed his #42 selection, but Huff was a 3rd rounder. Can't really compare a guy we can get at #20 in a rich WR draft, to a guy we drafted at #86.
Understood, wasnt meant be a direct comparison but you get my point about rookies. Even some 1st rounders wont produce what Jordan did. And as Insein pointed out its going to be more run oriented this season.
That being said, let's say we do not move in the draft and go WR at #20.Who are our targets? Seems like that is a little bit of a tough spot to be in. We will obviously miss out on White, Cooper, and Parker. Seems like if we do go WR at 20, it's going to be for DGB. How do we feel about this guy, and is he a "chip guy"?

Edit: Maybe reach a bit on Strong or Perriman? Or trade down for one of them?
Think you have to look for Safety 1st round then WR next pick.
There may not be a S available at #20 who is worthy of the pick. Better to sign a capable veteran so we don't have to reach.
 
So now we assume that any rook WR will easily put up 67/870/8? That's asking a lot IMO. For every Jordan Matthews there are 3 Josh Huffs.
Look at last year's first round WRs:

Watkins

Evans

ODB

Cooks

Benjamin

The hit rate of WR's in first round seems pretty good. I think they could come close to Mathews' production (but like Insein says, we will be running the ball more so numbers may be lower but still have as big of an impact)
last year was a total outlier in this regard. I know that this is a good WR draft, and maybe things are changing a bit, but I wouldn't necessarily assume immediate impact

 
Calling it now, the Jets will pass on him and he will slide to 20
No chance. If he makes it even to 10 we are going to be calling up and going after him. Even Chip won't let him slide to 20. If he is still there at 20 I'm going to be mega paranoid that something is wrong with him or that he is going to suck and I wouldn't even want him there.
I stand by this early call
 
The only explanation I can figure out for why he would bring in so many injury prone players, is that having an 85 man roster is a whole lot different than having a 53 man roster with a salary cap. Either he truly is a genius and those injury histories aren't going to matter, or he is about to learn a hard lesson in the difference between the NFL and college.
Injury histories don't really matter. Injury futures matter. But there is surprisingly little correlation between the two.

It wouldn't surprise me if Chip Kelly understood this better than most.
 
Not getting all of the Dwayne Bowe love. What has he done the last 3 years?

He's averaged roughly 100 targets, 58 recepts, 740 yards and 3 TD.

Not seeing the huge attraction.

 
Not getting all of the Dwayne Bowe love. What has he done the last 3 years?

He's averaged roughly 100 targets, 58 recepts, 740 yards and 3 TD.

Not seeing the huge attraction.
Yea I want no part of him. I think it's draft for WR and Safety.

 
Insein said:
bushdocda said:
How much better is Maclin than Greg Jennings?
At this point? A lot!
Jennings sux but Maclin is being overrated. Kelly made him not the other way around. It was the right call not to pay him 11 mill. He's not a special wr like a Dez, AJ green, etc.

 
I think the Eagles agree - they wanted to resign Maclin at 9-10, just couldn't keep going - 11 mil is a lot for a WR. I still think we'll be fine at WR, I don't want to see WR in the first - I want to see a DB or OL. If there's a good talent that drops, maybe - but WR is not as much of a need as OL.

 
I think the Eagles agree - they wanted to resign Maclin at 9-10, just couldn't keep going - 11 mil is a lot for a WR. I still think we'll be fine at WR, I don't want to see WR in the first - I want to see a DB or OL. If there's a good talent that drops, maybe - but WR is not as much of a need as OL.
They should have tagged him. I don't think Maclin would have wanted to double down on himself. They could have gotten him for 9.

 
Could we pry Andre Holmes away from Oakland? Lowest tender, no pick cost.

I see Darian Stewart signed with Denver, 2 years $4M. I think he was the last decent veteran S available, and he was a bargain. I hope Chip has something up his sleeve, I'd really hate to go into the draft needing to fill 3 starting positions. Makes a BPA strategy virtually impossible.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The only explanation I can figure out for why he would bring in so many injury prone players, is that having an 85 man roster is a whole lot different than having a 53 man roster with a salary cap. Either he truly is a genius and those injury histories aren't going to matter, or he is about to learn a hard lesson in the difference between the NFL and college.
Injury histories don't really matter. Injury futures matter. But there is surprisingly little correlation between the two.

It wouldn't surprise me if Chip Kelly understood this better than most.
There is so much more in question to take that article like gospel. In Bradford's case, he's torn the same ACL twice. That's a problem. He's also had shoulder problems in college. Do these injuries effect his ability to throw or be mobile in the future? I understand if you liked his talent, but you have to have a discussion about how injuries took it's toll and how they will effect him in the future.

Lets dig up Denario Alexander. Bradford had a nice connection with him and tearing the same ligament a few is a non-issue in sports.

 
The only explanation I can figure out for why he would bring in so many injury prone players, is that having an 85 man roster is a whole lot different than having a 53 man roster with a salary cap. Either he truly is a genius and those injury histories aren't going to matter, or he is about to learn a hard lesson in the difference between the NFL and college.
Injury histories don't really matter. Injury futures matter. But there is surprisingly little correlation between the two.

It wouldn't surprise me if Chip Kelly understood this better than most.
There is so much more in question to take that article like gospel. In Bradford's case, he's torn the same ACL twice. That's a problem. He's also had shoulder problems in college. Do these injuries effect his ability to throw or be mobile in the future? I understand if you liked his talent, but you have to have a discussion about how injuries took it's toll and how they will effect him in the future.

Lets dig up Denario Alexander. Bradford had a nice connection with him and tearing the same ligament a few is a non-issue in sports.
An orthopedic doctor being interviewed on the radio said that there is a greater risk of tearing the same ACL following surgery to repair it. It's why Bradford and the Rams medical staff decided to slow the pace of his recovery this time compared to the last time he tore the ACL. I'm not concerned with him tearing the same ACL as opposed to Maclin who tore ACLs in both knees. Personally, I don't think he'll stay healthy but if Chip thinks he has a better skillset than Foles I'll trust his opinion and believe it's worth the risk. It's not like we were going to re-sign Foles, he couldn't wait to get out of town.

 
Josina Anderson just tweeted some coaches still aren't convinced Chip sticks with Sam Bradford (SB) and think he is bait to move-up to #2 pick in the draft to trade with Tennessee.

--------------------

Josina Anderson @JosinaAnderson · 1h 1 hour ago

Interesting to hear some coaches @kwhite8 pro day who said not convinced w/ Kelly/Bradford. They think SB still bait for Titans, not sys fit
 
I think Cecil Shorts is a perfect fit in that offense (cue the always injured jokes). Solid yards after catch, and would probably be willing to sign a one year prove it deal.

 
Here we go again...

ESPN's Josina Anderson passes along buzz from the Pro Day circuit that "some coaches" around the league are "not convinced" the Eagles will keep Sam Bradford.
There's belief in league circles that Bradford will be used as trade bait to get to the Titans at No. 2 overall, where Chip Kelly could select Marcus Mariota. Kelly's affinity for Mariota is well known. Kelly has shown he isn't scared to make bold, complicated football decisions. It's anyone's guess as to what he'll do. We also wouldn't rule out a trade up to No. 1 overall. Bradford's pocket-passer style would fit well in new Bucs OC Dirk Koetter's offense.
 
Say no to bowe. Dude sucks
I don't get the Bowe hate in here. Of course his numbers sucked last year, NONE of the WR's on his team caught a TD last year! He's a big bodied, big hands WR that can excel in the possession game and as a deep threat.

He is a good teammate, doesn't have much injury history, and likely wants to prove himself. He's averaged 975 yards per 16 game season over his career, most of which wasn't in one of the better offenses in the league. Would love to see what he could do on a "prove it deal" that would be fairly cheap/low risk. I think he could put up the 872 yards that Mathews put up last year.

 
Say no to bowe. Dude sucks
I don't get the Bowe hate in here. Of course his numbers sucked last year, NONE of the WR's on his team caught a TD last year! He's a big bodied, big hands WR that can excel in the possession game and as a deep threat. He is a good teammate, doesn't have much injury history, and likely wants to prove himself. He's averaged 975 yards per 16 game season over his career, most of which wasn't in one of the better offenses in the league. Would love to see what he could do on a "prove it deal" that would be fairly cheap/low risk. I think he could put up the 872 yards that Mathews put up last year.
His numbers have sucked for many years. He has no motivation. He got paid and basically quit. Yea no Bowe.

 
Say no to bowe. Dude sucks
I don't get the Bowe hate in here. Of course his numbers sucked last year, NONE of the WR's on his team caught a TD last year! He's a big bodied, big hands WR that can excel in the possession game and as a deep threat. He is a good teammate, doesn't have much injury history, and likely wants to prove himself. He's averaged 975 yards per 16 game season over his career, most of which wasn't in one of the better offenses in the league. Would love to see what he could do on a "prove it deal" that would be fairly cheap/low risk. I think he could put up the 872 yards that Mathews put up last year.
His numbers have sucked for many years. He has no motivation. He got paid and basically quit. Yea no Bowe.
You have to look at his team though. Looking at stats, he has LEAD ALL KC WR's in Receptions, Yards, AND Touchdowns in EACH of the last 8 seasons. Every single year he has been in the league, he has been the top WR on his team in all 3 of those statistics.

(actually missed yards in 2009 by 18 yards, but still lead in receptions and tds--- and did it in only 11 games)

You can say all you want about how he had no WR competition, but not sure there's many players who go their entire career leading their team every year in those stats. The last few years his stats may have "sucked", but he's still been the top WR in those years with a terrible qb.

 
Say no to bowe. Dude sucks
I don't get the Bowe hate in here. Of course his numbers sucked last year, NONE of the WR's on his team caught a TD last year! He's a big bodied, big hands WR that can excel in the possession game and as a deep threat. He is a good teammate, doesn't have much injury history, and likely wants to prove himself. He's averaged 975 yards per 16 game season over his career, most of which wasn't in one of the better offenses in the league. Would love to see what he could do on a "prove it deal" that would be fairly cheap/low risk. I think he could put up the 872 yards that Mathews put up last year.
His numbers have sucked for many years. He has no motivation. He got paid and basically quit. Yea no Bowe.
Very informative argument here.
 
Say no to bowe. Dude sucks
I don't get the Bowe hate in here. Of course his numbers sucked last year, NONE of the WR's on his team caught a TD last year! He's a big bodied, big hands WR that can excel in the possession game and as a deep threat. He is a good teammate, doesn't have much injury history, and likely wants to prove himself. He's averaged 975 yards per 16 game season over his career, most of which wasn't in one of the better offenses in the league. Would love to see what he could do on a "prove it deal" that would be fairly cheap/low risk. I think he could put up the 872 yards that Mathews put up last year.
His numbers have sucked for many years. He has no motivation. He got paid and basically quit. Yea no Bowe.
Very informative argument here.
I don't need to go in depth. Bowe sucks.

 
Say no to bowe. Dude sucks
I don't get the Bowe hate in here. Of course his numbers sucked last year, NONE of the WR's on his team caught a TD last year! He's a big bodied, big hands WR that can excel in the possession game and as a deep threat. He is a good teammate, doesn't have much injury history, and likely wants to prove himself. He's averaged 975 yards per 16 game season over his career, most of which wasn't in one of the better offenses in the league. Would love to see what he could do on a "prove it deal" that would be fairly cheap/low risk. I think he could put up the 872 yards that Mathews put up last year.
His numbers have sucked for many years. He has no motivation. He got paid and basically quit. Yea no Bowe.
Very informative argument here.
I don't need to go in depth. Bowe sucks.
Again, with awful QB's, he's still put up great numbers for 8 straight seasons. I'll take any WR who lead his team for 8 straight years in yards/tds/catches as my WR3. All day, any day. Hopefully he signs.

 
Theoretically you're a few players/ bounced fumbles from a playoff run. Was this team that bad that you had to do a massive overhaul?

You can let me off of the Chip Kelly Bandwagon here at the corner :tfp:
I've maintained all along, whatever Chip does just has to result in wins on the field or at least show you have a plan and show improvement. I haven't waivered even though some moves are head scratchers. But none of the moves have resulted in losses ON THE FIELD.

You can jump off the bandwagon now, but don't look to come back if the plan starts to actually work. :bye:
I can do whatever I want
No you can't. You may think so, but once you're off the bandwagon there's no coming back. Stick with the team through good and bad or else you're just a fairweather fraud. Criticize all you want, but no jumping off - especially before they've even played a game.

Like I've said, I'm skeptical but I'm sticking around to see how it plays out.
I don't think jumping off the Chip Kelly bandwagon means you're no longer an Eagles fan. Just means you're no longer going to blindly accept that any decision Kelly makes is a good one. I'm in that neighbourhood myself.

If this reallocation of $$ leads to better results on the field, that's all I care about and I'll happily admit I was wrong.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Cross-posted from the trade thread:

"If Sam is healthy," Jaworski said, "this will be a great move by the Eagles."

"I had him as one of the highest-rated quarterbacks I've ever done," Arians said.

Jaworski, Arians high on Eagles' Bradford by Zach Berman

http://www.philly.com/philly/sports/eagles/20150315_Jaworski__Arians_high_on_Eagles__Bradford.html
"Didn't like him enough to trade for him though." Arians added.
That's a pretty poor post.
 
I think Cecil Shorts is a perfect fit in that offense (cue the always injured jokes). Solid yards after catch, and would probably be willing to sign a one year prove it deal.
He's Maclin's size if Chip is looking for a bigger receiver. He also had his share of drops last year.

 
I think Cecil Shorts is a perfect fit in that offense (cue the always injured jokes). Solid yards after catch, and would probably be willing to sign a one year prove it deal.
He's Maclin's size if Chip is looking for a bigger receiver. He also had his share of drops last year.
Sounds like he's gonna go to Houston.

Still think we need one more WR via FA. Sure we will draft one too, but Pratt and Murphy likely won't make the team. How many WR's does Chip keep on final roster?

 
Here we go again...





ESPN's Josina Anderson passes along buzz from the Pro Day circuit that "some coaches" around the league are "not convinced" the Eagles will keep Sam Bradford.

There's belief in league circles that Bradford will be used as trade bait to get to the Titans at No. 2 overall, where Chip Kelly could select Marcus Mariota. Kelly's affinity for Mariota is well known. Kelly has shown he isn't scared to make bold, complicated football decisions. It's anyone's guess as to what he'll do. We also wouldn't rule out a trade up to No. 1 overall. Bradford's pocket-passer style would fit well in new Bucs OC Dirk Koetter's offense.
I'm convinced Chip is going to trade Bradford to the Skins for #5.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top