earlierEverything in this game makes for a Jets win. Counting on the craziness of the NFL to kick in here.What did I miss with Huff hurt too now? So we are relying on the rookie and Cooper with Revis on Matthews? Ouch.
Like Mikey Miss says, "just the ebb and flow of the game". Can't always explain it........So as I was saying ...
Just be happy that you were wrong so far. But don't jinx this, it's not even close to over yet.So as I was saying ...
Dallas is winning too which doesn't really help us even with the win. But need to get this one under our belt and move forward. If Brees is out next week as expected, I really hope he's out week 5 too.I get that. I really was feeling down on chip for being so predictable and was kind of questioning his ability. Seems like they are doing a better job of varying the tempo today.
I watched the game where the receivers costed him a 250 yard 3 TD game. Where the run game was working so we stuck with that (finally). Where he threw a few perfect balls that many other qb's would miss. I never said he had a great game, I said he looked better and was good enough for us to beat a good Jets team today.Not sure what game some of you watched, Bradford wasn't good again.
afaik huff was a healthy scratch.What did I miss with Huff hurt too now? So we are relying on the rookie and Cooper with Revis on Matthews? Ouch.
They said after the game that Huff hurt himself somehow during the Saturday walkthrough.afaik huff was a healthy scratch.What did I miss with Huff hurt too now? So we are relying on the rookie and Cooper with Revis on Matthews? Ouch.
which is another concerning sign of poor decision making by the staff considering miles austin and riley cooper are still getting targets.
Just a different opinion. I don't think he looked any different than the first two weeks.I watched the game where the receivers costed him a 250 yard 3 TD game. Where the run game was working so we stuck with that (finally). Where he threw a few perfect balls that many other qb's would miss. I never said he had a great game, I said he looked better and was good enough for us to beat a good Jets team today.How did Foles do vs a far worse Pitt D?Not sure what game some of you watched, Bradford wasn't good again.
I've never been making the comparisons, but lots of posters have been posting Foles' numbers as a crack at chip and bradford. Wasn't directed at you.Just a different opinion. I don't think he looked any different than the first two weeks.I watched the game where the receivers costed him a 250 yard 3 TD game. Where the run game was working so we stuck with that (finally). Where he threw a few perfect balls that many other qb's would miss. I never said he had a great game, I said he looked better and was good enough for us to beat a good Jets team today.How did Foles do vs a far worse Pitt D?Not sure what game some of you watched, Bradford wasn't good again.
Oh woo hoo, Foles must've sucked against Pittsburgh so that's makes Bradford's day better? Stop, I couldn't give a rats ### what Foles does for the rest of his career, it means nothing. We have Bradford, can we stop with the weekly Foles comparisons? Makes no sense.
If you weren't making the comparison why even bring it up?I've never been making the comparisons, but lots of posters have been posting Foles' numbers as a crack at chip and bradford. Wasn't directed at you.Just a different opinion. I don't think he looked any different than the first two weeks.I watched the game where the receivers costed him a 250 yard 3 TD game. Where the run game was working so we stuck with that (finally). Where he threw a few perfect balls that many other qb's would miss. I never said he had a great game, I said he looked better and was good enough for us to beat a good Jets team today.How did Foles do vs a far worse Pitt D?Not sure what game some of you watched, Bradford wasn't good again.
Oh woo hoo, Foles must've sucked against Pittsburgh so that's makes Bradford's day better? Stop, I couldn't give a rats ### what Foles does for the rest of his career, it means nothing. We have Bradford, can we stop with the weekly Foles comparisons? Makes no sense.
"I've never been" (past tense). I was making the comparison this time as I am sick of reading Foles' > Bradfords weekly stats in this thread. So yes I made the comparison this week for those people who rush in here to post Foles' stats after good weeks.If you weren't making the comparison why even bring it up?I've never been making the comparisons, but lots of posters have been posting Foles' numbers as a crack at chip and bradford. Wasn't directed at you.Just a different opinion. I don't think he looked any different than the first two weeks.I watched the game where the receivers costed him a 250 yard 3 TD game. Where the run game was working so we stuck with that (finally). Where he threw a few perfect balls that many other qb's would miss. I never said he had a great game, I said he looked better and was good enough for us to beat a good Jets team today.How did Foles do vs a far worse Pitt D?Not sure what game some of you watched, Bradford wasn't good again.
Oh woo hoo, Foles must've sucked against Pittsburgh so that's makes Bradford's day better? Stop, I couldn't give a rats ### what Foles does for the rest of his career, it means nothing. We have Bradford, can we stop with the weekly Foles comparisons? Makes no sense.
The way it reads is you are trying to support bradford by throwing out how poor foles did today even though bradford looked bad himself"I've never been" (past tense). I was making the comparison this time as I am sick of reading Foles' > Bradfords weekly stats in this thread. So yes I made the comparison this week for those people who rush in here to post Foles' stats after good weeks.If you weren't making the comparison why even bring it up?I've never been making the comparisons, but lots of posters have been posting Foles' numbers as a crack at chip and bradford. Wasn't directed at you.Just a different opinion. I don't think he looked any different than the first two weeks.I watched the game where the receivers costed him a 250 yard 3 TD game. Where the run game was working so we stuck with that (finally). Where he threw a few perfect balls that many other qb's would miss. I never said he had a great game, I said he looked better and was good enough for us to beat a good Jets team today.How did Foles do vs a far worse Pitt D?Not sure what game some of you watched, Bradford wasn't good again.
Oh woo hoo, Foles must've sucked against Pittsburgh so that's makes Bradford's day better? Stop, I couldn't give a rats ### what Foles does for the rest of his career, it means nothing. We have Bradford, can we stop with the weekly Foles comparisons? Makes no sense.
You read that correctly. For those rushing in here to post Foles' stats as a way of bashing the Chip trade, Foles was atrocious today. Not too sure what you're getting at here or maybe you're new to this thread.The way it reads is you are trying to support bradford by throwing out how poor foles did today even though bradford looked bad himself"I've never been" (past tense). I was making the comparison this time as I am sick of reading Foles' > Bradfords weekly stats in this thread. So yes I made the comparison this week for those people who rush in here to post Foles' stats after good weeks.If you weren't making the comparison why even bring it up?I've never been making the comparisons, but lots of posters have been posting Foles' numbers as a crack at chip and bradford. Wasn't directed at you.Just a different opinion. I don't think he looked any different than the first two weeks.I watched the game where the receivers costed him a 250 yard 3 TD game. Where the run game was working so we stuck with that (finally). Where he threw a few perfect balls that many other qb's would miss. I never said he had a great game, I said he looked better and was good enough for us to beat a good Jets team today.How did Foles do vs a far worse Pitt D?Not sure what game some of you watched, Bradford wasn't good again.
Oh woo hoo, Foles must've sucked against Pittsburgh so that's makes Bradford's day better? Stop, I couldn't give a rats ### what Foles does for the rest of his career, it means nothing. We have Bradford, can we stop with the weekly Foles comparisons? Makes no sense.![]()
regardless, I don't think Bradford looked bad today. See above if you'd like to re-hash out that discussion on how Bradford played today.The way it reads is you are trying to support bradford by throwing out how poor foles did today even though bradford looked bad himself"I've never been" (past tense). I was making the comparison this time as I am sick of reading Foles' > Bradfords weekly stats in this thread. So yes I made the comparison this week for those people who rush in here to post Foles' stats after good weeks.If you weren't making the comparison why even bring it up?I've never been making the comparisons, but lots of posters have been posting Foles' numbers as a crack at chip and bradford. Wasn't directed at you.Just a different opinion. I don't think he looked any different than the first two weeks.I watched the game where the receivers costed him a 250 yard 3 TD game. Where the run game was working so we stuck with that (finally). Where he threw a few perfect balls that many other qb's would miss. I never said he had a great game, I said he looked better and was good enough for us to beat a good Jets team today.How did Foles do vs a far worse Pitt D?Not sure what game some of you watched, Bradford wasn't good again.
Oh woo hoo, Foles must've sucked against Pittsburgh so that's makes Bradford's day better? Stop, I couldn't give a rats ### what Foles does for the rest of his career, it means nothing. We have Bradford, can we stop with the weekly Foles comparisons? Makes no sense.![]()
Yea, Hicks looked good. Guy was around the ball, looking like the real deal, Need to get Kendricks back to put them both on the field.My takeaway is, Hicks and Rowe can play. Why was Maragos playing so much? Why did it take an injury for Rowe to break in there?
Hicks is more obvious. But glad we found out he can play. Depth again at inside LB.
i was keeping am eye on him today and noticed this too. hope it is him being a little banged up and he gets betterThey looked improved, but only because of coming off a historically inept showing. The run game was improved with a normal tempo and running with the QB under center. The blocking wasn't a whole hell of a lot better on first glance. I paid attention to Tobin when he came in, I thought he was okay at guard. Peters left late and Tobin went to tackle. Peters is getting beat quite a bit. He's still above average, particularly in the pass game, but he is in decline in the run game.
Ever since hearing how close Bradford was to retiring I've really worried about if it even matters to him. The guy never seems fired up and got the last monster rookie contract so is beyond set for life. Hope I'm wrong.Having trouble seeing what Bradford brings. I'm just hoping there's some rust, and that over the course of the season Kelly the QB whisperer gets him going.
Is Agholor bad, or are we just expecting too much from a rookie WR?
He endured rehab for a reason. Never had to rehab, but from what I have heard, it's torture.Ever since hearing how close Bradford was to retiring I've really worried about if it even matters to him. The guy never seems fired up and got the last monster rookie contract so is beyond set for life. Hope I'm wrong.Having trouble seeing what Bradford brings. I'm just hoping there's some rust, and that over the course of the season Kelly the QB whisperer gets him going.
Is Agholor bad, or are we just expecting too much from a rookie WR?
He's not the god he was made out to be. He's just a good WR that will go as far as his QB/targets takes him. In Jac he's M. Lee. Here he's interesting.Having trouble seeing what Bradford brings. I'm just hoping there's some rust, and that over the course of the season Kelly the QB whisperer gets him going.
Is Agholor bad, or are we just expecting too much from a rookie WR?
Ignorance is bliss.You read that correctly. For those rushing in here to post Foles' stats as a way of bashing the Chip trade, Foles was atrocious today. Not too sure what you're getting at here or maybe you're new to this thread.The way it reads is you are trying to support bradford by throwing out how poor foles did today even though bradford looked bad himself"I've never been" (past tense). I was making the comparison this time as I am sick of reading Foles' > Bradfords weekly stats in this thread. So yes I made the comparison this week for those people who rush in here to post Foles' stats after good weeks.If you weren't making the comparison why even bring it up?I've never been making the comparisons, but lots of posters have been posting Foles' numbers as a crack at chip and bradford. Wasn't directed at you.Just a different opinion. I don't think he looked any different than the first two weeks.I watched the game where the receivers costed him a 250 yard 3 TD game. Where the run game was working so we stuck with that (finally). Where he threw a few perfect balls that many other qb's would miss. I never said he had a great game, I said he looked better and was good enough for us to beat a good Jets team today.How did Foles do vs a far worse Pitt D?Not sure what game some of you watched, Bradford wasn't good again.
Oh woo hoo, Foles must've sucked against Pittsburgh so that's makes Bradford's day better? Stop, I couldn't give a rats ### what Foles does for the rest of his career, it means nothing. We have Bradford, can we stop with the weekly Foles comparisons? Makes no sense.![]()
Ignorance is bliss.You read that correctly. For those rushing in here to post Foles' stats as a way of bashing the Chip trade, Foles was atrocious today. Not too sure what you're getting at here or maybe you're new to this thread.The way it reads is you are trying to support bradford by throwing out how poor foles did today even though bradford looked bad himself"I've never been" (past tense). I was making the comparison this time as I am sick of reading Foles' > Bradfords weekly stats in this thread. So yes I made the comparison this week for those people who rush in here to post Foles' stats after good weeks.If you weren't making the comparison why even bring it up?I've never been making the comparisons, but lots of posters have been posting Foles' numbers as a crack at chip and bradford. Wasn't directed at you.Just a different opinion. I don't think he looked any different than the first two weeks.I watched the game where the receivers costed him a 250 yard 3 TD game. Where the run game was working so we stuck with that (finally). Where he threw a few perfect balls that many other qb's would miss. I never said he had a great game, I said he looked better and was good enough for us to beat a good Jets team today.How did Foles do vs a far worse Pitt D?Not sure what game some of you watched, Bradford wasn't good again.
Oh woo hoo, Foles must've sucked against Pittsburgh so that's makes Bradford's day better? Stop, I couldn't give a rats ### what Foles does for the rest of his career, it means nothing. We have Bradford, can we stop with the weekly Foles comparisons? Makes no sense.![]()
How dare you compare Foles to a so-so game manager. Foles is consistency trying to make plays 20+ yards down the field vs looking for the nearest RB to dump the ball off too, kind of like many other great QBs. You don't have a clue from watching highlights. He was shredding the Steelers. Jeff Fisher just has a thing for small, inefficient RBs and this of course http://www.rams-news.com/lance-kendricks-big-drop-key-in-rams-loss-wagoner/
I'm a Steelers fan living in Philly and I try to keep things as objective as possible but I'm not sure today is the day where you should be defending Foles. He was awful today. He was put in a really good position to lead a game winning drive against a demoralized team (without maybe their best defensive player) and he failed.What a tart
It doesn't matter if you're a fan or not. How could he be "awful" completing almost 70% of his passes with 3-4 drops? The one to Kendricks is a walk in TDI'm a Steelers fan living in Philly and I try to keep things as objective as possible but I'm not sure today is the day where you should be defending Foles. He was awful today. He was put in a really good position to lead a game winning drive against a demoralized team (without maybe their best defensive player) and he failed.What a tart
I'm not going to derail this thread because it's really not about Foles. Also, I really like what you bring to the table. However, I watched the game today and Foles did not have a good game. Sure his completion % was good but did he even attempt one deep pass?It doesn't matter if you're a fan or not. How could he be "awful" completing almost 70% of his passes with 3-4 drops? The one to Kendricks is a walk in TDI'm a Steelers fan living in Philly and I try to keep things as objective as possible but I'm not sure today is the day where you should be defending Foles. He was awful today. He was put in a really good position to lead a game winning drive against a demoralized team (without maybe their best defensive player) and he failed.What a tart
As for the bold.
4th and 5 at STL 39(1:19) (Shotgun) N.Foles pass short left to K.Britt to SL 46 for 7 yards (A.Blake). The Replay Official reviewed the pass completion ruling, and the play was REVERSED. (Shotgun) N.Foles pass incomplete short left to K.Britt.
I don't defend anything, but I did catch the presser. Foles said all game the S went to the outside on that look. Allen baited him for the win. You can tell that's what he was thinking the way he floated the pass. It happens.I'm not going to derail this thread because it's really not about Foles. Also, I really like what you bring to the table. However, I watched the game today and Foles did not have a good game. Sure his completion % was good but did he even attempt one deep pass?It doesn't matter if you're a fan or not. How could he be "awful" completing almost 70% of his passes with 3-4 drops? The one to Kendricks is a walk in TDI'm a Steelers fan living in Philly and I try to keep things as objective as possible but I'm not sure today is the day where you should be defending Foles. He was awful today. He was put in a really good position to lead a game winning drive against a demoralized team (without maybe their best defensive player) and he failed.What a tart
As for the bold.
4th and 5 at STL 39(1:19) (Shotgun) N.Foles pass short left to K.Britt to SL 46 for 7 yards (A.Blake). The Replay Official reviewed the pass completion ruling, and the play was REVERSED. (Shotgun) N.Foles pass incomplete short left to K.Britt.
ETA -- How are you going to defend the interception that Foles threw in the 4th quarter than led to the Steelers FG?
You must be so upset that your golden boy couldnt lead the rams past an awful steelers D and that a Bradford led Eagles team beat the jets. Your "favourite team" just pull out a big win and the only posts you make are defending our ex-QB and bashing our current one. Sad case of someone who'd rather be right then have their team win. Foles looked bad, get over it.I don't defend anything, but I did catch the presser. Foles said all game the S went to the outside on that look. Allen baited him for the win. You can tell that's what he was thinking the way he floated the pass. It happens.I'm not going to derail this thread because it's really not about Foles. Also, I really like what you bring to the table. However, I watched the game today and Foles did not have a good game. Sure his completion % was good but did he even attempt one deep pass?It doesn't matter if you're a fan or not. How could he be "awful" completing almost 70% of his passes with 3-4 drops? The one to Kendricks is a walk in TDI'm a Steelers fan living in Philly and I try to keep things as objective as possible but I'm not sure today is the day where you should be defending Foles. He was awful today. He was put in a really good position to lead a game winning drive against a demoralized team (without maybe their best defensive player) and he failed.What a tart
As for the bold.
4th and 5 at STL 39(1:19) (Shotgun) N.Foles pass short left to K.Britt to SL 46 for 7 yards (A.Blake). The Replay Official reviewed the pass completion ruling, and the play was REVERSED. (Shotgun) N.Foles pass incomplete short left to K.Britt.
ETA -- How are you going to defend the interception that Foles threw in the 4th quarter than led to the Steelers FG?
I seen a few deep passes to Kendricks and one to Britt that resulted in a PI. Have to check the stats when they come out, but he has a whole body of work that suggest he's not consistently dinking and dunking. Bradford is/does and actually looks "atrocious." Thread back on track![]()
Great breakdown. I worry a bit too about Peters... he always seems to be hobbling off the field hurt, but usually comes back in. Don't think he can make it through every snap of the season this year.They looked improved, but only because of coming off a historically inept showing. The run game was improved with a normal tempo and running with the QB under center. The blocking wasn't a whole hell of a lot better on first glance. I paid attention to Tobin when he came in, I thought he was okay at guard. Peters left late and Tobin went to tackle. Peters is getting beat quite a bit. He's still above average, particularly in the pass game, but he is in decline in the run game.
Kelly showed me something today. He was willing to slow his tempo because the situation (even early) dictated he do so. And he was willing to put the QB under center and run conventional plays when he needed a run game. I was very impressed with the defense, particularly the secondary despite missing three starters and a key reserve. Rowe must suck in practice, because he looked great when he got in. I'm assuming he played nickel only because Maragos got dinged, but he was solid, albeit versus Ryan Fitzpatrick. Hicks was a stud, Bair was great, and I thought Nolan Carroll was tremendous. Even Maxwell was very solid. Fitz threw for under 300 yards with over 50 attempts. That's pretty good D against any team, particularly since they didn't allow a running game either.
I concede that there were quite a few drops, the two wheel routes alone could have yielded 150 yards and two more TDs, but Bradford still didn't impress me. His decision making is extremely questionable. He only threw at Revis once that I noticed and it was a third and five with under five minutes left when they were running clock. That's when you decide to make that throw???
All in all, the offense did what it had to against a tough D on the road. The defense largely held and got a bunch of turnovers. They didn't beat the Patriots, but it's a start. On to the Skins...
I'm not one to follow ex players in hopes they fail but I did notice Herremans lost his starting spot this week on a struggling team.JuniorNB said:All you can ask about a guy who hasn't played in two years (Bradford) is that he's making progress. There's no doubt that he played much better than last week. His stat line should have been much better. Drops that would have been huge gains. His stats should have been 250+ yards and three TDs. Against one of the top defenses in the league. On the road
Also, seeing how badly McCoy and Foles are doing restore my faith in Chip's judgement.
Herremans and Mathis have been less than good. I do think Foles turns it around though. He went from QB friendly Andy Reid and Chip Kelly to offensive dinosaur Jeff Fisher.I'm not one to follow ex players in hopes they fail but I did notice Herremans lost his starting spot this week on a struggling team.JuniorNB said:All you can ask about a guy who hasn't played in two years (Bradford) is that he's making progress. There's no doubt that he played much better than last week. His stat line should have been much better. Drops that would have been huge gains. His stats should have been 250+ yards and three TDs. Against one of the top defenses in the league. On the road
Also, seeing how badly McCoy and Foles are doing restore my faith in Chip's judgement.