Insein
Footballguy
2 picks in the end zone and a slow start again is the average part.39 points and over 500 yards of offense vs the saints was "average to bad"?The offense has looked average to bad in 7 games now. Who can we fire?
2 picks in the end zone and a slow start again is the average part.39 points and over 500 yards of offense vs the saints was "average to bad"?The offense has looked average to bad in 7 games now. Who can we fire?
You should try watching a game sometime. Last night was on his receivers. He played well.By all means, keep rolling with Bradford and his 0.0000006 yards per pass attempt.And the WR's will just get open and catch the ball too!!! Sanchez can fix Everything!Chip has to swallow his pride and admit that the Bradford experiment was ill-fated. Get Sanchez ready to play. He can think on his feet, he's capable of escaping trouble in the pocket, and he's willing to throw the ball up the seams. All things Bradford has shown no signs of.
I wouldn't say he played well. He played ok and the receivers didn't help him out.You should try watching a game sometime. Last night was on his receivers. He played well.By all means, keep rolling with Bradford and his 0.0000006 yards per pass attempt.And the WR's will just get open and catch the ball too!!! Sanchez can fix Everything!Chip has to swallow his pride and admit that the Bradford experiment was ill-fated. Get Sanchez ready to play. He can think on his feet, he's capable of escaping trouble in the pocket, and he's willing to throw the ball up the seams. All things Bradford has shown no signs of.
Chip has to swallow his pride and admit that the Bradford experiment was ill-fated. Get Sanchez ready to play. He can think on his feet, he's capable of escaping trouble in the pocket, and he's willing to throw the ball up the seams. All things Bradford has shown no signs of.
Honestly thought Bradford looked pretty decent last night. Accuracy still not quite where we'd like, but he looked far more comfortable in the pocket (at least, before that last drive), and made generally good decisions. That was one of the leagues better defenses and the offense looked pretty good at times, despite at least 5 drops and 3-5 more passes an elite WR might catch.I keep coming back to Mike Tanier's old comment about Greg Schiano and Josh Freeman: "Their awfulness is not a zero-sum game."Chip has to swallow his pride and admit that the Bradford experiment was ill-fated. Get Sanchez ready to play. He can think on his feet, he's capable of escaping trouble in the pocket, and he's willing to throw the ball up the seams. All things Bradford has shown no signs of.Honestly thought Bradford looked pretty decent last night. Accuracy still not quite where we'd like, but he looked far more comfortable in the pocket (at least, before that last drive), and made generally good decisions. That was one of the leagues better defenses and the offense looked pretty good at times, despite at least 5 drops and 3-5 more passes an elite WR might catch.
That loss was NOT on Bradford, and there's certainly no shame in losing a relatively close game on the road to an undefeated opponent
no offense, but are you watching the games? On the short routes, Bradford repeatedly hit his guy in the hands. With exception to the first drive slant route that was *a little behind Matthews-but still 100% catchable, he was spot on, on all of his short to intermediate routes. Re: the deep passes, who do you propose he throws to? No one gets open and on the rare times that Bradford bites the bullet and throws it up for his WR to make a play, Austin drops it, Cooper stops his route or drops it, Huff drops it and Matthews drops it. Why would he throw it deep? Riley Cooper is his best option deep. Say that out loud. I wouldn't throw it deep either.I keep coming back to Mike Tanier's old comment about Greg Schiano and Josh Freeman: "Their awfulness is not a zero-sum game."Chip has to swallow his pride and admit that the Bradford experiment was ill-fated. Get Sanchez ready to play. He can think on his feet, he's capable of escaping trouble in the pocket, and he's willing to throw the ball up the seams. All things Bradford has shown no signs of.Honestly thought Bradford looked pretty decent last night. Accuracy still not quite where we'd like, but he looked far more comfortable in the pocket (at least, before that last drive), and made generally good decisions. That was one of the leagues better defenses and the offense looked pretty good at times, despite at least 5 drops and 3-5 more passes an elite WR might catch.
That loss was NOT on Bradford, and there's certainly no shame in losing a relatively close game on the road to an undefeated opponent
Yes, that was one of the worst games I have ever seen a wide receiving corps play. But that doesn't excuse Bradford. He won't throw deep, and he's not accurate enough on the short stuff to make up for it. If he's improved since Week 1 (and I think he has, FWIW), it's only because the bar he set initially was so low.
agree 100%The whole "he wont throw deep" narrative is complete and total garbage. There's no threat of anything deep on this team, period. It's like saying "This team never runs outside runs/ sweeps" when their RB is Mike Tolbert. This isn't Madden where just cause a guy runs a 93 he's a "deep threat". Our game is short to intermediate routes and running the ball. If you have skill guys dropping a quarter of the throws you, and any other team that runs a similar offense, will be in trouble.
Only in Philly will you see guys drop 8-9-10 passes and the QB actually gets blamed. The blame for what you're seeing now falls on whoever decided not to match or exceed Maclin's offer. He was a culture guy, a good guy, and a nice young WR that we needed. You can't let him walk.
Right now we have bottom 3-5 WR's and TE's in the league.
Letting Maclin go, and drafting Agholor in the first, has severely impacted the offense. Agreed.The whole "he wont throw deep" narrative is complete and total garbage. There's no threat of anything deep on this team, period. It's like saying "This team never runs outside runs/ sweeps" when their RB is Mike Tolbert. This isn't Madden where just cause a guy runs a 93 he's a "deep threat". Our game is short to intermediate routes and running the ball. If you have skill guys dropping a quarter of the throws you, and any other team that runs a similar offense, will be in trouble.
Only in Philly will you see guys drop 8-9-10 passes and the QB actually gets blamed. The blame for what you're seeing now falls on whoever decided not to match or exceed Maclin's offer. He was a culture guy, a good guy, and a nice young WR that we needed. You can't let him walk.
Right now we have bottom 3-5 WR's and TE's in the league.
Yep. I dint Bradford is Aaron Rodgers but no way was last night on him. I can't ever remember a WR week in and week out dropping balls like Mathews has. He's a #3 at best. Huff is miscast. I could go on. This core is horrible and it's all on Chip the GM. He won 20 games with mostly Ried's guys. I'm not going to list them but the WRs this team passed up to draft Mathews and huff will make you throw up in your mouth.agree 100%The whole "he wont throw deep" narrative is complete and total garbage. There's no threat of anything deep on this team, period. It's like saying "This team never runs outside runs/ sweeps" when their RB is Mike Tolbert. This isn't Madden where just cause a guy runs a 93 he's a "deep threat". Our game is short to intermediate routes and running the ball. If you have skill guys dropping a quarter of the throws you, and any other team that runs a similar offense, will be in trouble.
Only in Philly will you see guys drop 8-9-10 passes and the QB actually gets blamed. The blame for what you're seeing now falls on whoever decided not to match or exceed Maclin's offer. He was a culture guy, a good guy, and a nice young WR that we needed. You can't let him walk.
Right now we have bottom 3-5 WR's and TE's in the league.
Every snap of every game, but that's not the issue here.no offense, but are you watching the games? On the short routes, Bradford repeatedly hit his guy in the hands. With exception to the first drive slant route that was *a little behind Matthews-but still 100% catchable, he was spot on, on all of his short to intermediate routes. Re: the deep passes, who do you propose he throws to? No one gets open and on the rare times that Bradford bites the bullet and throws it up for his WR to make a play, Austin drops it, Cooper stops his route or drops it, Huff drops it and Matthews drops it. Why would he throw it deep? Riley Cooper is his best option deep. Say that out loud. I wouldn't throw it deep either.
Sadly, I don't think this is true. But again, who do you expect him to go deep to? Forget the fact that his WR's are not getting open-who do you trust to make a play at the ball? There are plenty of guys that don't get wide open in this league, but they at least know how to high point the ball, or use their body to box out a defender. No one on this team can do either of those things. Cooper is probably his best deep threat and the dude jumps up on every pass reception in order to catch the ball in his stomach. Every pass play, he jumps up unnecessarily and then falls over. It looks like junior high, back yard football and its ridiculous. You want to knock some of Bradford's decision making in the redzone, fine. But I just don't get how people are dogging him for not going deep when he has the athletic equivalent of me running around out there.Every snap of every game, but that's not the issue here.no offense, but are you watching the games? On the short routes, Bradford repeatedly hit his guy in the hands. With exception to the first drive slant route that was *a little behind Matthews-but still 100% catchable, he was spot on, on all of his short to intermediate routes. Re: the deep passes, who do you propose he throws to? No one gets open and on the rare times that Bradford bites the bullet and throws it up for his WR to make a play, Austin drops it, Cooper stops his route or drops it, Huff drops it and Matthews drops it. Why would he throw it deep? Riley Cooper is his best option deep. Say that out loud. I wouldn't throw it deep either.
Look, all I'm trying to say is it's not completely on our WR corps. Bradford didn't throw deep in St. Louis, either (read the Barnwell piece on him at Grantland) and he damn sure had better deep-ball threats than Riley Cooper there. And if you can't do that - and the defense knows you can't do it - you have to have otherworldly short and intermediate accuracy to be successful in the NFL. And Sam doesn't.
Alex Smith's group of WRs last year were every bit as bad as the Birds have this year ... and he averaged 1.7 AY/A more than Bradford has managed so far under Chip. Is it really too much to expect Alex Smith-type stats out of a guy Chip traded away our starter and a second-round pick to get?
nice schtickYou guys should calm down. The winner of the division is going to be 8 - 8 this year, mark it down. There is still a lot of football left to be played. It might be a good idea to activate Sanchez though....if I recall, he was pretty good last year, at least from a fantasy perspective. He was putting up 20 -25 points every week. Sam the man has had 3 weeks so far where he has failed to put up even 10 points!!!! Get rid of him.
Giants have a super tough schedule, so the division is yours for the taking!!!!
Yeah that's all well and good. Maybe they win division. Then what? Get annihilated by a decent team fist round. Right or wrong, eagles fans want more. They want progress and so far it looks like the idea to give Chip "the keys to the kingdom" has been a disastrous move by Lurie.nice schtickYou guys should calm down. The winner of the division is going to be 8 - 8 this year, mark it down. There is still a lot of football left to be played. It might be a good idea to activate Sanchez though....if I recall, he was pretty good last year, at least from a fantasy perspective. He was putting up 20 -25 points every week. Sam the man has had 3 weeks so far where he has failed to put up even 10 points!!!! Get rid of him.
Giants have a super tough schedule, so the division is yours for the taking!!!!
Just because he's had 1 offseason in charge doesn't mean he can pull off a bunch of Madden trades and have Brady and Peterson suiting up. Just because he coached Mariotta in college isn't going to make a terrible team like the Titans give him a franchise QB.Yeah that's all well and good. Maybe they win division. Then what? Get annihilated by a decent team fist round. Right or wrong, eagles fans want more. They want progress and so far it looks like the idea to give Chip "the keys to the kingdom" has been a disastrous move by Lurie.nice schtickYou guys should calm down. The winner of the division is going to be 8 - 8 this year, mark it down. There is still a lot of football left to be played. It might be a good idea to activate Sanchez though....if I recall, he was pretty good last year, at least from a fantasy perspective. He was putting up 20 -25 points every week. Sam the man has had 3 weeks so far where he has failed to put up even 10 points!!!! Get rid of him.
Giants have a super tough schedule, so the division is yours for the taking!!!!
, Chip the GM =
, thus far anyway. Certainly seems like this year's Eagles are inferior to the product of the past two years.It was a dumb signing and a waste of money.Like I said, its a long season and you guys are in o.k. shape. Honestly, you have a back up that is probably better than your starter. How many teams can say that?
Yes, it was stupid to offer Kelly the GM job as that almost never works out well, but you guys have a good team. There is a lot of talent to work with there.
It was dumb to backup an injury prone starter with a competent backup?It was a dumb signing and a waste of money.Like I said, its a long season and you guys are in o.k. shape. Honestly, you have a back up that is probably better than your starter. How many teams can say that?
Yes, it was stupid to offer Kelly the GM job as that almost never works out well, but you guys have a good team. There is a lot of talent to work with there.
So far yes. What needs to be understood is that itChip the Coach =, Chip the GM =
, thus far anyway. Certainly seems like this year's Eagles are inferior to the product of the past two years.
Let's not get into this Sanchez is better then Bradford talk. I know you mentioned you didn't watch many Eagles games last year but Sanchez was NOT good. He's not going in, we can just put that to rest now.Like I said, its a long season and you guys are in o.k. shape. Honestly, you have a back up that is probably better than your starter. How many teams can say that?
Yes, it was stupid to offer Kelly the GM job as that almost never works out well, but you guys have a good team. There is a lot of talent to work with there.
Exactly this. I think our roster is better this year overall then last year. ESPECIALLY on defense. Maxwell has not played well, but as a WHOLE, our DB's are better this year then last year and I'm not sure anyone will argue that. Carrol and Jenkins were here last year but are finally playing fantastic this year. He also brought in Thurmond who is doing well. And Chip was blasted on the Hicks pick, but look how that has turned out.So far yes. What needs to be understood is that itChip the Coach =, Chip the GM =
, thus far anyway. Certainly seems like this year's Eagles are inferior to the product of the past two years.
- Takes time. This is his first season as a GM
- He has quite a few positives as well. The guys he got rid of aren't really doing a thing. He covered his #### when he signed Murray by singing Matthews. The DB's look way better than the previous 2 seasons. Remember when drafting Hicks instead of a guard was the wrong move?
Never should have signed Murray. The offered Mathews before Murray.It was dumb to backup an injury prone starter with a competent backup?It was a dumb signing and a waste of money.Like I said, its a long season and you guys are in o.k. shape. Honestly, you have a back up that is probably better than your starter. How many teams can say that?
Yes, it was stupid to offer Kelly the GM job as that almost never works out well, but you guys have a good team. There is a lot of talent to work with there.
You might be right. 20/20 hindsight sure is a nice thing though, isn't it? At the time it was a good signing, and I STILL to this day am very happy we have both. Mathews as the only back, getting 25 carries a game scares the crap out of me and Sproles is a good change of pace 3rd back. Not happy with Murray's production, but still think it was the right move, especially at the time it was done.Never should have signed Murray. The offered Mathews before Murray.It was dumb to backup an injury prone starter with a competent backup?It was a dumb signing and a waste of money.Like I said, its a long season and you guys are in o.k. shape. Honestly, you have a back up that is probably better than your starter. How many teams can say that?
Yes, it was stupid to offer Kelly the GM job as that almost never works out well, but you guys have a good team. There is a lot of talent to work with there.
I thought that was going to be the game plan at the start of the season. Not bradford throwing out of shotgun 95 % of the timeMaybe just give them both the ball more. 10-15 carries for Mathews, 15-20 carries for Murray. Less than 30 passes for Bradford. That should be the game plan.
I think that's what they want to do, but have been unable to execute. My biggest grip with Kelly's playcalling is constantly "taking what the defense gives them." At some point, they need to start dictating to the defenses and not vice versa. I miss the creative guy the Eagles hired a couple years ago, not this predictable, conservative coach they have now.I don't know/care which back is better but I'll say this; for Mathews to gash Carolina for a 63 yard TD run 3:00 minutes into the third quarter and then get only one more carry the rest of the game is criminal.
ETA: I really thought they run the ball 30+ times a game this year. I've got no idea what this offense is even supposed to be.
Just heard on NFL Network that R Matthews was dealing with a hamstring issue after that.I think that's what they want to do, but have been unable to execute. My biggest grip with Kelly's playcalling is constantly "taking what the defense gives them." At some point, they need to start dictating to the defenses and not vice versa. I miss the creative guy the Eagles hired a couple years ago, not this predictable, conservative coach they have now.I don't know/care which back is better but I'll say this; for Mathews to gash Carolina for a 63 yard TD run 3:00 minutes into the third quarter and then get only one more carry the rest of the game is criminal.
ETA: I really thought they run the ball 30+ times a game this year. I've got no idea what this offense is even supposed to be.
I thought the line played better when he left. Maybe it's just me. Also hasn't Peters left just about every game this season so far?Awesome to hear that Peters will be back.
Agreed, played well until Jared Allen made the LT his ***** on the last drive and had 2 sacks. Bailed out by that PI call. And, yes, Peters has been out almost every game. Struggling to stay on the field.I thought the line played better when he left. Maybe it's just me. Also hasn't Peters left just about every game this season so far?Awesome to hear that Peters will be back.
...and that is when it looks smart to sign multiple RBs instead of keeping Instagram McCoy who has been hurt all year by the way.https://twitter.com/JonDorenbos/status/658499629248573440?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
Snapper Jon Derenbos tweeting missed FG was his fault, rushed the snap/timing was off. Mental miscues. Kickoff out of bounds, bad snaps by Kelce, ST not in sync, the beat goes on. Not just drops.
Also, some concern re: Mathews groin. Sounding like the bye is well-timed for him. Apparently injured it in the 3rd Q on a 22 yard run, re-aggravated it on the TD run. Stated felt it pull when outrunning Keuchly and 'wasn't sure he could make it into the end zone.' Was in constant dialogue w/Duce after that, trying to gauge what he could do. Got one carry after that, couldn't really push off of it. Didn't go back to him for health reasons.
I think Hardy is running that team already. Every person I've heard speak seems scared to say he did anything wrong. He was pushing coaches and players and all the coaches and execs are saying is that he's a leader and has passion.for as frustrating how the Eagles are, and i'm sure will continue to be, i'm just happy we are not the Cowboys with Greg Hardy picking fights on the sideline: http://www.bloggingtheboys.com/2015/10/26/9615900/cowboys-greg-hardy-in-the-spotlight-after-emotional-sideline
dropping passes suck, but letting a cancer on your team and letting him have his way will set you back a few years
Personally, I love it. Cowboys will implode with that kind of "leadership" regardless of what Romo and Dez can bring.I think Hardy is running that team already. Every person I've heard speak seems scared to say he did anything wrong. He was pushing coaches and players and all the coaches and execs are saying is that he's a leader and has passion.for as frustrating how the Eagles are, and i'm sure will continue to be, i'm just happy we are not the Cowboys with Greg Hardy picking fights on the sideline: http://www.bloggingtheboys.com/2015/10/26/9615900/cowboys-greg-hardy-in-the-spotlight-after-emotional-sideline
dropping passes suck, but letting a cancer on your team and letting him have his way will set you back a few years
I agree. He's a cancer. Dallas loves rolling the dice on criminals/low character-types. Sometimes it pays off, and sometimes we see why 31 other teams passed.Personally, I love it. Cowboys will implode with that kind of "leadership" regardless of what Romo and Dez can bring.I think Hardy is running that team already. Every person I've heard speak seems scared to say he did anything wrong. He was pushing coaches and players and all the coaches and execs are saying is that he's a leader and has passion.for as frustrating how the Eagles are, and i'm sure will continue to be, i'm just happy we are not the Cowboys with Greg Hardy picking fights on the sideline: http://www.bloggingtheboys.com/2015/10/26/9615900/cowboys-greg-hardy-in-the-spotlight-after-emotional-sideline
dropping passes suck, but letting a cancer on your team and letting him have his way will set you back a few years
Now with Mathews hurt, would hate to only have Sproles as our only RB.Never should have signed Murray. The offered Mathews before Murray.It was dumb to backup an injury prone starter with a competent backup?It was a dumb signing and a waste of money.Like I said, its a long season and you guys are in o.k. shape. Honestly, you have a back up that is probably better than your starter. How many teams can say that?
Yes, it was stupid to offer Kelly the GM job as that almost never works out well, but you guys have a good team. There is a lot of talent to work with there.
outstanding post.Bigboy10182000 said:The whole "he wont throw deep" narrative is complete and total garbage. There's no threat of anything deep on this team, period. It's like saying "This team never runs outside runs/ sweeps" when their RB is Mike Tolbert. This isn't Madden where just cause a guy runs a 93 he's a "deep threat". Our game is short to intermediate routes and running the ball. If you have skill guys dropping a quarter of the throws you, and any other team that runs a similar offense, will be in trouble.
Only in Philly will you see guys drop 8-9-10 passes and the QB actually gets blamed. The blame for what you're seeing now falls on whoever decided not to match or exceed Maclin's offer. He was a culture guy, a good guy, and a nice young WR that we needed. You can't let him walk.
Right now we have bottom 3-5 WR's and TE's in the league.
another great post.Deamon said:Exactly this. I think our roster is better this year overall then last year. ESPECIALLY on defense. Maxwell has not played well, but as a WHOLE, our DB's are better this year then last year and I'm not sure anyone will argue that. Carrol and Jenkins were here last year but are finally playing fantastic this year. He also brought in Thurmond who is doing well. And Chip was blasted on the Hicks pick, but look how that has turned out.Bigboy10182000 said:So far yes. What needs to be understood is that itCoeur de Lion said:Chip the Coach =, Chip the GM =
, thus far anyway. Certainly seems like this year's Eagles are inferior to the product of the past two years.
- Takes time. This is his first season as a GM
- He has quite a few positives as well. The guys he got rid of aren't really doing a thing. He covered his #### when he signed Murray by singing Matthews. The DB's look way better than the previous 2 seasons. Remember when drafting Hicks instead of a guard was the wrong move?
It seems everyone here expects a home run on every single signing, every single draft pick, every single trade. People say our offense has been "average to bad in EVERY game". Our offense was not average against the Saints, yet the response is about the 2 picks. Not everything is going to go great on every aspect of the game and to have those expectations is just insane. Overall his moves as a GM have been positive as a WHOLE. Remember, this defense improvement is on Chip the GM too, but fans seem to only focus on Chip the GM's offensive moves.