SameSongNDance
Footballguy
Yes, you'd be getting good value.If someone offered you even money to take Hillary against the field right now would you take it?
Yes, you'd be getting good value.If someone offered you even money to take Hillary against the field right now would you take it?
There has been some concern that if Trump is GOP nominee, it could cost them the House.Government isn't just the white house. The republicans control congress. Maybe its not an idea we're not used to because the last three presidents all had congress when taking office, but Hillary wouldn't have an agenda. She would have no first 100 days. She would enter office very weak and facing empowered opposition. We haven't seen that since 1988 but that's what it looks like.
That's one way of wording it.There has been some concern that if Trump is GOP nominee, it could cost them the House.
Completely disagree. Trump is an incompetent buffoon. You know it. I know it. I don't have to vote for anyone that doesn't represent my vision of a President. But, I can absolutely vote against someone who is, in every way, antithetical to it.That's neither a compelling case nor an alternative. It needs to be a case FOR someone. Not "anyone", but a single, specific, named candidate.
And of course it isn't.
No, you can't. But it's not worth arguing any more. Cheers.But, I can absolutely vote against someone who is, in every way, antithetical to it.
Yes. Why yes I can. In fact, it's working out that's exactly what I'll be doing.No, you can't. But it's not worth arguing any more. Cheers.
She's 2 to 1 at most sites so yeah.If someone offered you even money to take Hillary against the field right now would you take it?
Doubtful.There has been some concern that if Trump is GOP nominee, it could cost them the House.
Of course. She's like -250 right now. You would have to be really bad at math not to do that.If someone offered you even money to take Hillary against the field right now would you take it?
All that I have and more.If someone offered you even money to take Hillary against the field right now would you take it?
I don't even know all those words you used but I'm pretty sure I agree with you.Completely disagree. Trump is an incompetent buffoon. You know it. I know it. I don't have to vote for anyone that doesn't represent my vision of a President. But, I can absolutely vote against someone who is, in every way, antithetical to it.
I don't even know all those words you used but I'm pretty sure I agree with you.
Oh boy that Ted Cruz is such a jokester. He just won my vote. I had no idea he was so hip.Ted Cruz puts a rickroll in a video for April Fools.
Looking forward to him taking the Ice Bucket challenge. 9 years from now.Oh boy that Ted Cruz is such a jokester. He just won my vote. I had no idea he was so hip.
Thanks for the heads up. I don't see it on the guide tho.If anyone is interested Fox business is showing the Libertarian debate tonight and tomorrow.Repeat 1st showing later tonight.Could be interesting.
I agree with this sentiment. He had too much of a good thing going before he began his campaign, so it would be easy for him to say, "eff it, this ain't worth it."To me Trump is that guy that is used to winning but will pout and quit if he thinks he is just wasting his time. A guy like Trump is usually obsessed with being efficient. If he solidifies 15%-20% behind Hillary in the polling, I think he decides the general election is simply a waste of 5 months of his life and drops out on his own, accusing the GOP is dirty tactics on his way out the door to save face. Then he moves on to other projects.
The GOP would immediately announce a brokered convention in order to prevent Cruz from being the nominee. Then it would probably be one of Romney, Kasich, or Ryan. Kasich probably winds up on the ticket somewhere because they'd want SOMEONE on the ticket that actually ran for president in 2016.
then it already is...I've been wanting to put money on Romney for a couple weeks. Right now, I think Rubio might be more likely. The problem with Romney and Ryan is they don't have any of organization in place needed to run. Part of the primary run is winning delegates, but another part is building an organization of workers/volunteers. Rubio could get that up and running much quicker than Mitt or Romney. Rubio already has delegates. While Rubio never broke through in the primaries, he still likely kept a strong likeability number. He wasn't a lot of people's choice for #1, but if people ranked candidates instead of just chose 1, he would likely have been finishing consistently near the top where Cruz and Trump would likely have been marked last as much as first.This is the moment where sharp bettors go and look at ways to get money on people that are not the three in the race right now. Because it ain't gonna be any of them.
Sorry to disappoint, but Ted has already blown that opportunity to feign humanity. Link.Looking forward to him taking the Ice Bucket challenge. 9 years from now.
I've been wanting to put money on Romney for a couple weeks. Right now, I think Rubio might be more likely. The problem with Romney and Ryan is they don't have any of organization in place needed to run. Part of the primary run is winning delegates, but another part is building an organization of workers/volunteers. Rubio could get that up and running much quicker than Mitt or Romney. Rubio already has delegates. While Rubio never broke through in the primaries, he still likely kept a strong likeability number. He wasn't a lot of people's choice for #1, but if people ranked candidates instead of just chose 1, he would likely have been finishing consistently near the top where Cruz and Trump would likely have been marked last as much as first.
Wouldn't say that it's a guarantee until he loses NY or Cali. He needs to hit that 50% mark in NY.North Dakota Republicans selected 25 national delegates and, of those, 18 were on a list of preferred delegates that Cruz circulated -- a clear win for the Texas senator.
When Trump loses in Wisconsin on Tuesday, a contested Convention becomes almost guaranteed.. .![]()
Thus the "Almost"Wouldn't say that it's a guarantee until he loses NY or Cali. He needs to hit that 50% mark in NY.
Wow - tight white shirt puts Heidi close to the "women I'm oddly attracted to" category.Ramsay Hunt Experience said:Sorry to disappoint, but Ted has already blown that opportunity to feign humanity. Link.
FIne with me. If Hillary could then select Tom Brady as her running mate, I could concentrate all of my hate on one tiny little corner of the world.I can see where Trump gets shafted by the GOP and a "brokered" convention so Trump quits the RNC, and starts campaigning for Hillary.
The chances of me voting for him would increase exponentially if he ended a speech with "bro, you could get a smack for this, I ain't no joke" and then mic-drops and walks offstage.Unlike Trump, he ain't no joke.What about Rakim?
Tim would become "must read".I can see where Trump gets shafted by the GOP and a "brokered" convention so Trump quits the RNC, and starts campaigning for Hillary.
I'm picturing this, with Hillary flailing her arms wildly while screaming, "I DISAVOW HIS SUPPORT! I DISAVOW!" And Trump's pro-Hillary rallies just become more and more ludicrous, with pyrotechnics and scantily-clad Hillary Dancers doing leg-kicks while Sarah Palin runs around stage in a pantsuit and making airplane noises just because.I can see where Trump gets shafted by the GOP and a "brokered" convention so Trump quits the RNC, and starts campaigning for Hillary.
its like the GOP doesn't want to win the election. Putting up Cruz as the nominee is suicide. He has zero chance.MSNBC acting like this is a done deal- Trump will not get to 1237, and Ted Cruz will, on the second ballot, be the nominee.
Hard to believe...
Not cheering for Cruz.. just cheering that Trump lost...How could any human possibly cheer for Cruz?
But it's still a really bad delivery.Over/Under for how many times Cruz meticulously rehearsed each line of this speech: 5