What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Official 2016 GOP thread: Is it really going to be Donald Trump?? (1 Viewer)

Jeb looks like the typical white guy lost in the middle of a Home Depot who just cannot believe the cost of a pvc connector.
wait...how much are they supposed to cost?
I loved this analogy but wasn't sure either. Perhaps it's a step down from being so out-of-touch that you don't know what a supermarket scanner is? If so, well played.
But how much do they cost? I just bought some this weekend and now I'm freaking out that I paid too much!

 
Ben Carson is firmly in the debates, consistently polling at 10%, which is pretty high. (Trump, the current leader, is at 19%).

I'm interested in hearing him. I don't know Ben Carson, never seen him speak or interviewed. I've read his comments and found them to be on the extreme end, somewhere even beyond Ted Cruz. But I'm not reading the context so perhaps that's unfair. Obviously if he was an innovative surgeon then he must be a pretty bright guy, though I admit the quotes, especially about gays, don't show any evidence of it. But there must be something there that attracts so many Republicans. Surely it can't all be about his skin color.

Hopefully we'll learn more Thursday night...

 
Ben Carson is firmly in the debates, consistently polling at 10%, which is pretty high. (Trump, the current leader, is at 19%).

I'm interested in hearing him. I don't know Ben Carson, never seen him speak or interviewed. I've read his comments and found them to be on the extreme end, somewhere even beyond Ted Cruz. But I'm not reading the context so perhaps that's unfair. Obviously if he was an innovative surgeon then he must be a pretty bright guy, though I admit the quotes, especially about gays, don't show any evidence of it. But there must be something there that attracts so many Republicans. Surely it can't all be about his skin color.

Hopefully we'll learn more Thursday night...
Ben Carson may be a really skilled doctor, etc., but he's another one of these social conservatives who's pretty much behind the times. I guess it's possible to be very skilled as a brain surgeon, but not be smart on equality.

I also don't get the draw to this guy; I've seen him on many interviews, and he comes off as very reserved. I don't get the draw to him.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Someone on CNN made an interesting point today: the 16 candidates are a direct result of the Citizens United decision. And a lot of them are going to stay in the race longer than they should because there's a couple of rich people backing them.

The only reason this didn't happen on the Democrat side this time around is because Hillary's such a heavy favorite. But what we are seeing here is what's going to happen in both parties in the future. Some might argue that it's more democratic this way. I have my doubts that it's a good thing.
No, it's not. I'll bet $500 with you right now that there won't be 16 serious Democratic candidates for Presidency ever.
Meh. There aren't 16 serious GOP candidates either. There are about 5 serious candidates, 1 clown who wants to boost his brand, and 10-ish people that want to land high-paying gigs on Fox News.
Huckabee must have his entire family constantly telling how great a President he'd be; he's running, I believe, for the 3rd time, and no political consultant with any credibility could make a case that he could win the election. This is a guy who was making a few million a year on FOX, and had already capitalized from his previous runs (with some early success) to make a name for himself within the party. I'm not sure how/why he'd consider running again unless he lets the 10 people telling him great he is delude his thinking.

Santorum is sort of in that boat as well; had some pretty surprising success in the last Republican nomination process, but is never going to win.

I guess a few of these people like publicity that they receive.

 
I think it's only the second time for Huckabee.

And I would guess that he was surprised at how well he did in 2008, and then watched the Tea Party (which expressed many of his views) rise in the years since, and honestly thinks he has a shot at the nomination. (Also the fact that Huckabee watched in 2012 while a far less charismatic version of himself named Rick Santorum actually won several states must have caught his attention.) I agree with you that he doesn't likely have a chance, but in today's splintered GOP, anything's possible.

 
I think it's only the second time for Huckabee.

And I would guess that he was surprised at how well he did in 2008, and then watched the Tea Party (which expressed many of his views) rise in the years since, and honestly thinks he has a shot at the nomination. (Also the fact that Huckabee watched in 2012 while a far less charismatic version of himself named Rick Santorum actually won several states must have caught his attention.) I agree with you that he doesn't likely have a chance, but in today's splintered GOP, anything's possible.
Fair points; I'm sure he see's a path through his social conservatism views. I think he's more appealing that Santorum, but they are both probably hurt by the number of candidates who are taking social positions pretty close to their's. The perceived leaders aren't known for (or seen as running on) social views (for the most part with some exceptions on specific issues) like Huckabee or Santorum though.

 
Marco Rubio ‎@marcorubio

Look at all this outrage over a dead lion, but where is all the outrage over the planned parenthood dead babies.
Oh yes, another "important" issue the right is so worried about. This planet can't even take care of the people we already have and they are worried about the funding of planned parenthood. Abortion should be promoted imo.
Not to mention calling any woman who has had an abortion a killer.

 
Ben Carson is firmly in the debates, consistently polling at 10%, which is pretty high. (Trump, the current leader, is at 19%).

I'm interested in hearing him. I don't know Ben Carson, never seen him speak or interviewed. I've read his comments and found them to be on the extreme end, somewhere even beyond Ted Cruz. But I'm not reading the context so perhaps that's unfair. Obviously if he was an innovative surgeon then he must be a pretty bright guy, though I admit the quotes, especially about gays, don't show any evidence of it. But there must be something there that attracts so many Republicans.
I wonder about you sometimes.

 
Did you see this recent exchange in Iowa?

Chris Christie tore into a gun rights activist who questioned his Second Amendment record in an Iowa town hall event Saturday night, displaying the fiery and confrontational style the New Jersey governor is known for.

"I'm still waiting for one fact from you, one fact about me being anti-gun," Christie scolded the man. "Give me one. One fact. Got one?"

NJ.com found some facts the Gov. should remember:

Because it's true now, it was true yesterday, and it will be true long after this presidential campaign becomes history's yard waste: Gov. Christie has signed more than a dozen pieces of legislation that by any loose definition can be termed "gun-control." They are not hard to find. This newspaper prints them at regular intervals.

The NJ.com article goes on to list several examples, plus points out Christie's own quote, to "strengthen New Jersey's already tough gun laws and upgrade penalties for those who ... violate gun trafficking laws" one day in 2013, when he signed (count 'em) 10 pieces of legislation.

He's a bully who shook hands with Obama. That's it. He's got nothing else.

 
Did you see this recent exchange in Iowa?

Chris Christie tore into a gun rights activist who questioned his Second Amendment record in an Iowa town hall event Saturday night, displaying the fiery and confrontational style the New Jersey governor is known for.

"I'm still waiting for one fact from you, one fact about me being anti-gun," Christie scolded the man. "Give me one. One fact. Got one?"

NJ.com found some facts the Gov. should remember:

Because it's true now, it was true yesterday, and it will be true long after this presidential campaign becomes history's yard waste: Gov. Christie has signed more than a dozen pieces of legislation that by any loose definition can be termed "gun-control." They are not hard to find. This newspaper prints them at regular intervals.

The NJ.com article goes on to list several examples, plus points out Christie's own quote, to "strengthen New Jersey's already tough gun laws and upgrade penalties for those who ... violate gun trafficking laws" one day in 2013, when he signed (count 'em) 10 pieces of legislation.

He's a bully who shook hands with Obama. That's it. He's got nothing else.
Yeah but now Christie says he will use his pardon power to nullify people who came to New Jersey and break our laws.

Basically he is shameless.

http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2015/08/christie_says_hell_likely_pardon_gun-toting_out-of.html

Anyway back to regular programming - we gotta get ready for the debate!!!! :excited: :tfp:

-QG

 
Carly Fiorina said tonight that Congress should shut down the government before funding Planned Parenthood.

Unbelievable. And she's supposed to be one of the reasonable ones.

 
What a motley crew on stage tonight. It's no wonder Trump leads in the polls. Still think it comes down to Bush vs. Christie. Christie's number will rise the more they debate. The only guy tonight who came off at all presidential. I don't agree with a lot of what he says but he was easily the most impressive tonight. I thought it was an off night for Bush, he appeared more nervous than anything.

All the talking points the same as four years ago. The party needs a forward thinker, not the ones who say the same things we've heard for the last several election cycles. I can't believe Carson was polling at 10%. Him, Graham, santorum, fiorina, Pataki, Cruz and Perry can all get out now. They're just wasting their time.

 
Watching bits.

Fiorina was very much against "the status quo" - said it like 15 times.

Seems like everyone has developed a weird country accent. Walker did. Pataki did. Pataki ssaid he'd get Democrats to vote to repeal Obamacare :lmao:

-QG

 
What a motley crew on stage tonight. It's no wonder Trump leads in the polls. Still think it comes down to Bush vs. Christie. Christie's number will rise the more they debate. The only guy tonight who came off at all presidential. I don't agree with a lot of what he says but he was easily the most impressive tonight. I thought it was an off night for Bush, he appeared more nervous than anything.

All the talking points the same as four years ago. The party needs a forward thinker, not the ones who say the same things we've heard for the last several election cycles. I can't believe Carson was polling at 10%. Him, Graham, santorum, fiorina, Pataki, Cruz and Perry can all get out now. They're just wasting their time.
I've got Christie and Palin in the same tier.

 
For the debate, I only want to see Trump to rip into Fiorina's time at HP.

Other than that, it'll all be about Obama, changing his policies, pp, and Iran.

 
Are they really going to waste time talking about Planned Parenthood? Just amazing.
It wouldn't be a Republican primary if they weren't talking about abortion, man. It certainly should be discussed.
I don't recall it being a central issue during the last 2 campaigns. Correctly, the focus was on the economy.

When I talk to Republicans, they seem to be interested in the following issues:

1. The economy

2. Obamacare

3. illegal immigration

4. Foreign affairs (Iran, ISIS, Russia)

5. Law and Order issues (police, black arrests, riots, etc.)

Abortion and gay marriage aren't on the list. If the candidates choose to concentrate on those issues, I suspect they're going to get a deaf ear from the GOP electorate. Just a guess.

 
Are they really going to waste time talking about Planned Parenthood? Just amazing.
It wouldn't be a Republican primary if they weren't talking about abortion, man. It certainly should be discussed.
I don't recall it being a central issue during the last 2 campaigns. Correctly, the focus was on the economy.

When I talk to Republicans, they seem to be interested in the following issues:

1. The economy

2. Obamacare

3. illegal immigration

4. Foreign affairs (Iran, ISIS, Russia)

5. Law and Order issues (police, black arrests, riots, etc.)

Abortion and gay marriage aren't on the list. If the candidates choose to concentrate on those issues, I suspect they're going to get a deaf ear from the GOP electorate. Just a guess.
I think abortion matters very much. It centers around power, perceived power, articles of the constitution and other things. I'm not being hostile when I say this, but I can break it down in a way if you'd like. I just don't want to write a ####-ton for no audience, really, at this point. But Roe was a weird and landmark decision in many ways...it's tremendously important for Republicans, who have made this an issue for so long that they should come to grips with it during a primary and election year that they're essentially buried under anyway.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I didn't say it doesn't matter. But in the year 2016, in the larger scheme of things, I'm be amazed if Republicans placed it front and center over issues that the American public is really concerned about. They're free to do it, but I think they're making a huge mistake.

And it sure sounds like they're going to make it. Despite all of their pledges of no more government shutdowns, they're going to shut down the government over spending for Planned Parenthood. I think that's ####### nuts.

 
I don't think abortion is a winning issue for the GOP in the general election but it expect to hear a lot about it during the primaries. But I wonder how smart it is for a candidate to dwell on abortion during Thursday's debates. All the GOP candidates are opposed to choice so it's almost impossible for any one of them to differentiate his or herself from the others by outflanking the field.

 
Some dumb questions tonight too. "What country will you visit first as president?" It's a year and a half away. Who the hell knows what will be going on in Jan '17. Then the questions stating something is a "controversial" issue and how do you feel about it? Uh, I'm opposed!

 
I'm not going to dig into the details because they're all the same but there are three new polls out today - Bloomberg, Fox and NBC/WSJ, and in all three Trump is killing the GOP field.

I don't get the predictions of Trump's eventual demise, ie the claims he can't win - I think he can and maybe will win the nomination. He's definitely going to win in IA & NH and after that the only question is if all those other candidates don't try to play musical chairs and instead drop out so a consensus can form against him. Trump has totally played this system.

I guess he could skrew up in some major way but he or his reps have already made comments about Mexicans, wounded vets, spousal rape... every time Trump trumps the media and the establishment by calling them out for playing games and being hypocritical.

 
Saints you just wrote that Trump will definitely win Iowa and New Hampshire. I don't believe he will come close to winning either.

 
I'm not going to dig into the details because they're all the same but there are three new polls out today - Bloomberg, Fox and NBC/WSJ, and in all three Trump is killing the GOP field.

I don't get the predictions of Trump's eventual demise, ie the claims he can't win - I think he can and maybe will win the nomination. He's definitely going to win in IA & NH and after that the only question is if all those other candidates don't try to play musical chairs and instead drop out so a consensus can form against him. Trump has totally played this system.

I guess he could skrew up in some major way but he or his reps have already made comments about Mexicans, wounded vets, spousal rape... every time Trump trumps the media and the establishment by calling them out for playing games and being hypocritical.
Because he is Nickelback:

Despite what you may have read elsewhere — or heard from the man himself — Donald Trump is not all that popular with Republican voters. Sure, he’s in first place in many polls. But Trump is near the back of the pack by another important measure.

In the chart below, I’ve taken an average of favorability ratings from seven polls of Republican voters that were conducted wholly or partly after Trump made his comments about John McCain on July 18. They include national polls from CNN, Public Policy Polling and YouGov, along with polls of Iowa and New Hampshire from each of Marist College and Monmouth University.1

On average in these polls, Trump’s favorability ratings among Republicans are barely better than break-even: 47 percent favorable and 43 percent unfavorable. Among the 17 Republican candidates, Trump’s net favorable rating, +4, ranks 13th, ahead of only Chris Christie, Jim Gilmore, Lindsey Graham and George Pataki.

And yet, in these same polls, Trump is the first choice of an average of 20 percent of Republican voters — the highest in the field, ahead of Scott Walker (14 percent) and Jeb Bush (12 percent).

What’s going on? On Twitter yesterday, I likened Trump to the band Nickelback: disliked by most people but with a few very passionate admirers. The best contrast to Trump is Marco Rubio: like a “lite rock” radio station, he’s broadly acceptable but few people’s favorite. Rubio’s favorable ratings are much higher (56 percent) than The Donald’s, and his unfavorable ratings are much lower (16 percent). But only 6 percent of Republicans list Rubio as their first choice.

The Nickelback analogy isn’t perfect. As the Republican strategist Patrick Ruffini points out, the bulk of Trump’s support in polls isn’t necessarily coming from passionate Republicans but rather from “low-information voters” who may not turn out in Iowa and New Hampshire. That doesn’t mean none of Trump’s support is real, however. There’s another factor that helps him: He’s highly differentiated from the rest of the Republican pack.

---

I don’t mean to suggest that favorability ratings are foolproof. Like the first-choice numbers, they can fluctuate. Before Trump officially declared for the presidency last month, his favorability ratings among Republicans were execrable. They improved after he announced his candidacy but have since slipped back to mediocre (well below the standard of candidates who have won their party’s nomination in the past).

But if you’re going to imply that a candidate is popular based on their receiving 20 percent of the vote, you ought to consider what the other 80 percent thinks about him. Most Republicans who don’t plan to vote for Trump are skeptical of him instead.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top