Ramsay Hunt Experience
Footballguy
Wow, Saul Alinsky references. Feels very 2007. Maybe we should be bring back "Fergalicious" too.
Trump needs to win so those idiots have to back him.FoxNews with the breathless headline "ESTABLISHMENT MOVES TO MARCO"! So desperate.
"Yes, Cruz has been caught lying about his opponents on multiple occasions. But isn't it so much worse for his opponents to accuse him of lying?"bolzano said:Even the left leaning WaPo has come to Cruz's defense.
Seems Bump has issues with lying too.bolzano said:![]()
Even the left leaning WaPo has come to Cruz's defense.
Ted Cruz is not running a dirty campaign, despite what Donald Trump and Marco Rubio would argue. But that idea just cost Cruz’s spokesman, Rick Tyler, his job.
…
First, his opponents are more than willing to make a big deal out of these not-very-big issues because it serves their own political goals to do so. Trump plays them up because he wants people to think that maybe he won Iowa, which he didn’t. Carson plays them up because he wants people to think that he’s actually a good candidate, which he isn’t
…
Why? That brings us to the second point: The repetition of the accusation that he’s playing dirty by his opponents and their supporters and some in the media puts his campaign under much greater scrutiny than his opponents. Cruz is now seen as a dirty campaigner, so he has to meet a higher bar than Trump or Carson. Marco Rubio sent an email to voters in South Carolina telling them to look out for dirty tricks from Cruz — a way of getting them to consider anything from Cruz skeptically. This is how politics works; campaigns try to frame one another as low-energy or a “chaos candidate” or whatever, and sometimes it sticks (as in the first example there). But this is what Cruz has been saddled with.
…
Again, Tyler’s exit won’t solve Cruz’s perception problem. It’s now baked-in. All he can do is ensure that his relationship with his core base of support holds up — and that nothing else offering even a whiff of untowardness happens. With opponents willing to transform Kansas into Everest, though, that’s going to be nearly impossible.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/02/22/ted-cruz-isnt-running-a-dirty-campaign-but-that-perception-just-cost-a-staffer-his-job/
Have we determined what the battery life is in the Rubio? Seems that would be an important consideration for would-be voters.FoxNews with the breathless headline "ESTABLISHMENT MOVES TO MARCO"! So desperate.
Most likely because they are not insane enough to back Trump would be my guess.Caught some fox news over lunch these last few days, some granted with volume off or inaudible, so bear with me. Why are they so in the bag for anyone but Trump? Don't they stand to benefit more than anyone with Trump as the front runner? He must bring in the best ratings ever. If he gets the nomination how quickly will the pivot be towards Trump after all this?
Fox News (i.e. Murdoch) is for open borders and supports the corporatist/globalist wing of the party. Fox has just been able to hide it for a long time by throwing other red meat out on the table to distract people.Caught some fox news over lunch these last few days, some granted with volume off or inaudible, so bear with me. Why are they so in the bag for anyone but Trump? Don't they stand to benefit more than anyone with Trump as the front runner? He must bring in the best ratings ever. If he gets the nomination how quickly will the pivot be towards Trump after all this?
When I saw that I thought...skip out on Scalia's funeral but want to appoint the guy replacing him, next you are closing Gitmo...what next? Executive orders demanding all Americans house at least 1 Syrian refugee? The arrogance on that side is stifling right now. I guess losing the mid term elections despite a popular President didn't send the message. I'm not sure they care anyways, much more concerned in trying to be right.Obama throwing Trump red meat today with the plans to close Gitmo
Who needs a majority in Congress when the other team gives you what you want or just rolls over and lets you do what you want to do?When I saw that I thought...skip out on Scalia's funeral but want to appoint the guy replacing him, next you are closing Gitmo...what next? Executive orders demanding all Americans house at least 1 Syrian refugee? The arrogance on that side is stifling right now. I guess losing the mid term elections despite a popular President didn't send the message. I'm not sure they care anyways, much more concerned in trying to be right.
Who watches Fox more? Trump supporters or GOP establishment and tea party types?Caught some fox news over lunch these last few days, some granted with volume off or inaudible, so bear with me. Why are they so in the bag for anyone but Trump? Don't they stand to benefit more than anyone with Trump as the front runner? He must bring in the best ratings ever. If he gets the nomination how quickly will the pivot be towards Trump after all this?
Amazing that people are still surprised by the rise of Trump.Who needs a majority in Congress when the other team gives you what you want or just rolls over and lets you do what you want to do?
This is what bothers me most about Cruz and Rubio. They don't see that Trump is the one they should be going after and I'm not sure it could be more clear. Huge mistake and error in judgment for both of them. Makes me wonder about their abilities to analyze......well anything.bolzano said:In an earlier post, I conceded that Cruz's campaign has been responsible for its share of mudslinging. My point is that he hasn't been any worse in that regard than Rubio (or Trump). In fact, he's arguably been much better. Hence it's unfair for his campaign to be labeled as dishonest, whereas the others have not. But, unfortunately for Cruz, his obstructionism in Congress has led to high unfavorables, even outright hatred, and thus a lot of voters are unwilling to give him a fair shake. Moreover, it doesn't help that he's going toe-to-toe with the party's golden boy.
Trump is losing to Sanders in national polls he's beating Hillary.Man- if it wasn't for Trump being an actual possible nominee, I would be cheering Soviet Sanders on. The GOP could win with pretty much almost anyone against him and it would severely set back the Democratic party for years to come. With Trump though- I don't want to be in a nightmare of having either Sanders or Trump in the White House.
Not to mention most of the others guys who weren't "drafting" behind Trump are now out ofthe race.Well, in hindsight this is probably true. But at the time the vast majority of people thought the Trump bubble was going to burst. I certainly did.
Remember when they were all worried about HIM signing "the pledge"?Trump needs to win so those idiots have to back him.
Never have so many people been so wrong about so many things.Honestly, I think being a "pro" was probably a disadvantage in this case. This Trump phenomenon is just unprecedented in our history. The last few election cycles are littered with candidates like Michele Bachmann and Herman Cain that grabbed the spotlight for a month or two then faded into oblivion. It made a lot of sense for people to expect Trump to have a similar trajectory. That view was reflected everywhere -- pundits, the betting markets, anecdotal conversations I had with friends and family (both Republicans and Democrats). Only a genius like SIDA was able to see this coming back in September or October.
Trump is losing to Sanders in national polls he's beating Hillary.
Can the GOP close up shop once Trump officially wins their nom? TIA.
Didn't Eminence beat him to that schtick?Honestly, I think being a "pro" was probably a disadvantage in this case. This Trump phenomenon is just unprecedented in our history. The last few election cycles are littered with candidates like Michele Bachmann and Herman Cain that grabbed the spotlight for a month or two then faded into oblivion. It made a lot of sense for people to expect Trump to have a similar trajectory. That view was reflected everywhere -- pundits, the betting markets, anecdotal conversations I had with friends and family (both Republicans and Democrats). Only a genius like SIDA was able to see this coming back in September or October.
It has been a remarkable thing. Been one of the most interesting/fascinating political periods of my life time. I tend to believe it will be the craziest election cycle of our life time.Honestly, I think being a "pro" was probably a disadvantage in this case. This Trump phenomenon is just unprecedented in our history. The last few election cycles are littered with candidates like Michele Bachmann and Herman Cain that grabbed the spotlight for a month or two then faded into oblivion. It made a lot of sense for people to expect Trump to have a similar trajectory. That view was reflected everywhere -- pundits, the betting markets, anecdotal conversations I had with friends and family (both Republicans and Democrats). Only a genius like SIDA was able to see this coming back in September or October.
It is fair to say that he beat me to the schtick. In terms of putting forth serious political analysis and addressing the climate of the GOP base and what was going on there and why...no.Didn't Eminence beat him to that schtick?
Fair enough.It is fair to say that he beat me to the schtick. In terms of putting forth serious political analysis and addressing the climate of the GOP base and what was going on there and why...no.
General Election: Kasich vs. Clinton
129 Shares
Trump vs. Clinton | Cruz vs. Clinton | Rubio vs. Clinton | Bush vs. Clinton | More Head-to-Heads
Polling Data
Poll
Date
Sample
MoE
Kasich (R)
Clinton (D)
Spread
RCP Average
2/10 - 2/17
--
--
47.7
40.3
Kasich +7.4
FOX News
2/15 - 2/17
1031 RV
3.0
47
44
Kasich +3
Quinnipiac
2/10 - 2/15
1342 RV
2.7
47
39
Kasich +8
USA Today/Suffolk
2/11 - 2/15
1000 LV
3.0
49
38
Kasich +11
All General Election: Kasich vs. Clinton Polling Data
Definitely agree with you on this. I can't wait until election night to see so many people's heads explode with anger, disbelief, or whatever term is appropriate.It has been a remarkable thing. Been one of the most interesting/fascinating political periods of my life time. I tend to believe it will be the craziest election cycle of our life time.
People are desperate for the center to hold they just won't hold on to the center.Kasich having such a big lead on Clinton seems strange:
Hannity likes Trump a lot. In surprising news I never liked Rush so I don't follow him.How are the blowhard Hannity and Rush types taking that their party has been crushed by a poser like Trump?
Think I heard they should have a winner by midnight eastern.Since it's starting so late, anyone know when the results should start coming in?
SIDA even though at times I've been indignant, dismissive or downright rude I really do appreciate your openness to your reasoning for supporting the Donald.
2 honest questions...
1. Do you really want Trump to be the next president?
2. What would a Trump presidency accomplish that none of the others would do?
Hannity loves him. He can't stop talking about the guy. Rush is close personal friends with the president of Fox News, and out of deference to that friendship has been fairly quiet about offering support to Trump.How are the blowhard Hannity and Rush types taking that their party has been crushed by a poser like Trump?
These caucuses are stupid.There are reports of lots of shenanigans going on in Nevada.
Tell us some Louisiana election stories, Saints. These guys are amateurs, right?SaintsInDome2006 said:Shenanigans or getting outplayed on procedure and ground game?
Hm, well here's one - a local tv station looked up LA election law one time, brought along a candidate who had lost in a race, went to the warehouse, cracked open one of the machines, and two out of three votes for the candidate went to someone else. That happened. On tv.Tell us some Louisiana election stories, Saints. These guys are amateurs, right?