He's a lesser version of Antonio AndrewsCobb will be a big threat to Stankey IMO. No speed, but otherwise a very good back.
He's a lesser version of Antonio AndrewsCobb will be a big threat to Stankey IMO. No speed, but otherwise a very good back.
There was no Charles Clay at Wisconsin, though there was a John ClayI think Charles Clay from Wisconsin had a similar 40 time...EBF - do you have a list of successful RB's who ran a 4.81 at the combine or 4.73 at their Pro Day?I thought you'd be off the Sankey train by now Brewtown.The good news is if you have Sankey - you can easily go out and get a later rookie pick to protect yourself...The Titans waited until round 5 to add a back...Cobb will be a big threat to Stankey IMO. No speed, but otherwise a very good back.
A back doesn't have to be perfect to have FF value. He just has to be the best back on his team. This feels a bit like the Zac Stacy pick in the 5th in 2013. That pick came a year after the Rams whiffed on Pead in the 2nd round. This Cobb pick comes a year after the Titans whiffed on Sankey in the 2nd. If Cobb can come in and play reasonably well then he can potentially have redraft value this year. No guarantee that he'll beat out Greene and Sankey, but I like his prospects a lot more than the typical 5th round NFL draft pick.
 
 Charles/John... If you run a 4.8 forty I will not remember your name!!!There was no Charles Clay at Wisconsin, though there was a John ClayI think Charles Clay from Wisconsin had a similar 40 time...EBF - do you have a list of successful RB's who ran a 4.81 at the combine or 4.73 at their Pro Day?I thought you'd be off the Sankey train by now Brewtown.The good news is if you have Sankey - you can easily go out and get a later rookie pick to protect yourself...The Titans waited until round 5 to add a back...Cobb will be a big threat to Stankey IMO. No speed, but otherwise a very good back.
A back doesn't have to be perfect to have FF value. He just has to be the best back on his team. This feels a bit like the Zac Stacy pick in the 5th in 2013. That pick came a year after the Rams whiffed on Pead in the 2nd round. This Cobb pick comes a year after the Titans whiffed on Sankey in the 2nd. If Cobb can come in and play reasonably well then he can potentially have redraft value this year. No guarantee that he'll beat out Greene and Sankey, but I like his prospects a lot more than the typical 5th round NFL draft pick.
 
 This is what I think as well.werdnoynek said:Sankey is a role player who isn't even good at his role. Cobb should easily take over the lead back role.
That's funny, because I think their actions say the opposite.Madden Curse said:
I'm really curious what Sankey is being sold for these days. Maybe he will turn it around, but it doesn't seem like the club has a lot of optimism. Only thing working in his favor is that the competition is still weak - and I guess there's a chance that they still bring in a free agent.
I agree.That's funny, because I think their actions say the opposite.Madden Curse said:
I'm really curious what Sankey is being sold for these days. Maybe he will turn it around, but it doesn't seem like the club has a lot of optimism. Only thing working in his favor is that the competition is still weak - and I guess there's a chance that they still bring in a free agent.
They drafted a FB when there were more likely every down backs still on the board (Allen, Davis, Ajayi).
In the 5th they took a tough runner who is literally one of the slowest RB's in the draft (only Kenny Hilliard taken by the Texans in the 7th).
The draft went as well as it could have for Sankey.
Stephan Taylor perhaps?EBF - do you have a list of successful RB's who ran a 4.81 at the combine or 4.73 at their Pro Day?I thought you'd be off the Sankey train by now Brewtown.The good news is if you have Sankey - you can easily go out and get a later rookie pick to protect yourself...The Titans waited until round 5 to add a back...Cobb will be a big threat to Stankey IMO. No speed, but otherwise a very good back.
A back doesn't have to be perfect to have FF value. He just has to be the best back on his team. This feels a bit like the Zac Stacy pick in the 5th in 2013. That pick came a year after the Rams whiffed on Pead in the 2nd round. This Cobb pick comes a year after the Titans whiffed on Sankey in the 2nd. If Cobb can come in and play reasonably well then he can potentially have redraft value this year. No guarantee that he'll beat out Greene and Sankey, but I like his prospects a lot more than the typical 5th round NFL draft pick.
Everything I read about Cobb seems like a lesser version of Andrews.werdnoynek said:Sankey is a role player who isn't even good at his role. Cobb should easily take over the lead back role.
Cobb ranked 11th in the country in rushing yards last season. A lot of the guys immediately ahead and behind of him on that list were prominent prospects in this draft (Gordon, Coleman, Ajayi, Duke) or figure to be in future drafts (Elliott, Perine). To say "nobody would be talking about him" if not for some pundit is a slight on his college career. Based on what he did at Minnesota, he would've been getting looks regardless.Cobb hype is a product of the power DJ has. Nobody would be talking about him if DJ hadn't continually stamped his approval on this guy.
If it was as simple as rushing stats then people would be talking about Cameron Artis-Payne. He ranked 13 in the country in rushing yds and had very similar numbers as Cobb. He was also drafted in round 5.Cobb ranked 11th in the country in rushing yards last season. A lot of the guys immediately ahead and behind of him on that list were prominent prospects in this draft (Gordon, Coleman, Ajayi, Duke) or figure to be in future drafts (Elliott, Perine). To say "nobody would be talking about him" if not for some pundit is a slight on his college career. Based on what he did at Minnesota, he would've been getting looks regardless.Cobb hype is a product of the power DJ has. Nobody would be talking about him if DJ hadn't continually stamped his approval on this guy.
They're different players, but apart from that I think people recognize that there's less opportunity in Carolina than there is in Tennessee barring injury. There is 0% chance that Artis-Payne beats out a healthy Stewart, whereas it seems a lot more believable that Cobb could beat out Stankey/Greene. I'm sure that's a big part of the reason why there's more "talk" about Cobb (though there isn't much really). ADP is always linked to immediate opportunity with RBs. People will reach for a guy with an open opportunity (i.e. Zac Stacy two years ago) and pass on guys who have blocked paths (i.e. McKinnon, Knile, Michael, Pierce).He ranked 13 in the country in rushing yds and had very similar numbers as Cobb. He was also drafted in round 5.Where is all his talk?
I don't disagree Stewart is tougher to beat out. I still believe Cobb would largely be ignored by the fantasy community if it weren't for DJ, though. This didn't start after the draft. It started well before it.They're different players, but apart from that I think people recognize that there's less opportunity in Carolina than there is in Tennessee barring injury. There is 0% chance that Artis-Payne beats out a healthy Stewart, whereas it seems a lot more believable that Cobb could beat out Stankey/Greene. I'm sure that's a big part of the reason why there's more "talk" about Cobb (though there isn't much really). ADP is always linked to immediate opportunity with RBs. People will reach for a guy with an open opportunity (i.e. Zac Stacy two years ago) and pass on guys who have blocked paths (i.e. McKinnon, Knile, Michael, Pierce).He ranked 13 in the country in rushing yds and had very similar numbers as Cobb. He was also drafted in round 5.
Where is all his talk?
Could you please stop referring to him as "Stankey"?Cobb could beat out Stankey/Greene.
I really doubt one guy is responsible for the hype.I still believe Cobb would largely be ignored by the fantasy community if it weren't for DJ, though. This didn't start after the draft. It started well before it.
If he plays better, the (obvious) puns will go away. If he doesn't, wordplay will be the least of his worries.Could you please stop referring to him as "Stankey"?Cobb could beat out Stankey/Greene.
I know you think you're funny and cute but it comes across as an immature comment from someone in middle school rather than a 31 year old adult.
Not from EBF they won't (if the past is any indication).If he plays better, the (obvious) puns will go away.Could you please stop referring to him as "Stankey"?Cobb could beat out Stankey/Greene.
I know you think you're funny and cute but it comes across as an immature comment from someone in middle school rather than a 31 year old adult.
Still ignoring Andrews in this threadIf it was as simple as rushing stats then people would be talking about Cameron Artis-Payne.He ranked 13 in the country in rushing yds and had very similar numbers as Cobb. He was also drafted in round 5.Cobb ranked 11th in the country in rushing yards last season. A lot of the guys immediately ahead and behind of him on that list were prominent prospects in this draft (Gordon, Coleman, Ajayi, Duke) or figure to be in future drafts (Elliott, Perine). To say "nobody would be talking about him" if not for some pundit is a slight on his college career. Based on what he did at Minnesota, he would've been getting looks regardless.Cobb hype is a product of the power DJ has. Nobody would be talking about him if DJ hadn't continually stamped his approval on this guy.
Where is all his talk?
If he plays better and that continues, than the joke will be on EBF, and nobody will care any more. Meaning if it plays out like that (and not saying that is the case, that Sankey couldn't disappoint, or that EBF wouldn't cease), he wouldn't be taken seriously, at least about that, so it would be kind of self-correcting, either way.Not from EBF they won't' (if the past is any indication).If he plays better, the (obvious) puns will go away.Could you please stop referring to him as "Stankey"?Cobb could beat out Stankey/Greene.
I know you think you're funny and cute but it comes across as an immature comment from someone in middle school rather than a 31 year old adult.
EBF has never liked Sankey and acts like he should be working stand-up for repeatedly calling him Stankey (yuk yuk). No matter how much better Sankey plays, he will still call him that. If EBF was serious about having an intelligent discussion regarding Sankey, he should stop using this stupid nickname.
Did EBF have a one night stand with your sister and not call her the next morning or something? 85% of your posts are calling him out on his "misses" or bashing his arrogance. Who cares, it's a message board and he's a message board poster. Agree or disagree but then move on.Not from EBF they won't (if the past is any indication).EBF has never liked Sankey and acts like he should be working stand-up for repeatedly calling him Stankey (yuk yuk). If EBF is really serious about having an intelligent discussion regarding Sankey, he will stop using this nickname.If he plays better, the (obvious) puns will go away.Could you please stop referring to him as "Stankey"?I know you think you're funny and cute but it comes across as an immature comment from someone in middle school rather than a 31 year old adult.Cobb could beat out Stankey/Greene.
"It was terrible," LT Taylor Lewan said of the run game. "I would never put that on the backs. ... They have to be put in the right place. If they are having to make guys miss in the backfield, you are not going to have a great running game. We have to have a bond and have a cohesive unit. When we do that, that's when it's their turn. ... We have to do a better job, all five of us. We definitely don't want to be the weak link."
http://www.tennessean.com/story/sports/nfl/titans/2015/05/10/titans-taylor-lewan-nfl-tennessee/27095263/
not too bad.
- According to his NFL.com draft profile, Cobb gained 54 percent of his yardage the past two seasons after initial contact. He totaled 1,828 yards over that span, which means he gained almost 1,000 yards (987, to be precise) after the first hit.
- According to cfbstats.com, Cobb was given the ball 31 times on third down last season and he picked up 19 first downs, a success rate of 61.3 percent. That was one of the top rates in the nation among backs with at least 30 third-down carries, ranking Cobb higher than higher-drafted players including Michigan State's Jeremy Langford (50 percent), Wisconsin's Melvin Gordon (47.1) and Alabama's T.J. Yeldon (46.7).
- On third downs with 1-3 yards to go, Cobb picked up 12 first downs on 17 attempts, a 70.6 percent success rate that was also among the nation's best.
What percent of his yards did Shonn Greene have after initial contact?
- According to his NFL.com draft profile, Cobb gained 54 percent of his yardage the past two seasons after initial contact. He totaled 1,828 yards over that span, which means he gained almost 1,000 yards (987, to be precise) after the first hit.
- According to cfbstats.com, Cobb was given the ball 31 times on third down last season and he picked up 19 first downs, a success rate of 61.3 percent. That was one of the top rates in the nation among backs with at least 30 third-down carries, ranking Cobb higher than higher-drafted players including Michigan State's Jeremy Langford (50 percent), Wisconsin's Melvin Gordon (47.1) and Alabama's T.J. Yeldon (46.7).
not too bad.
- On third downs with 1-3 yards to go, Cobb picked up 12 first downs on 17 attempts, a 70.6 percent success rate that was also among the nation's best.
he didn't have enough carries for the statwhores to even look into it.What percent of his yards did Shonn Greene have after initial contact?
- According to his NFL.com draft profile, Cobb gained 54 percent of his yardage the past two seasons after initial contact. He totaled 1,828 yards over that span, which means he gained almost 1,000 yards (987, to be precise) after the first hit.
- According to cfbstats.com, Cobb was given the ball 31 times on third down last season and he picked up 19 first downs, a success rate of 61.3 percent. That was one of the top rates in the nation among backs with at least 30 third-down carries, ranking Cobb higher than higher-drafted players including Michigan State's Jeremy Langford (50 percent), Wisconsin's Melvin Gordon (47.1) and Alabama's T.J. Yeldon (46.7).
not too bad.
- On third downs with 1-3 yards to go, Cobb picked up 12 first downs on 17 attempts, a 70.6 percent success rate that was also among the nation's best.
I mean in college. Never heard any numbers but his draft profile read like Greene:he didn't have enough carries for the statwhores to even look into it.
Strengths
Greene is an absolute load to tackle. He has a short, stocky build and is tough to contain once he gets a head of steam. He is a powerful runner that runs through arm tackles, and refuses to go down on first contact. Greene thrives as a workhorse and can handle the load of 20 plus carries a game. He also shows surprising quickness and footwork for a 230lber. He gets to full speed quickly and has the ability to make the first defender miss and get up the field.
A 70.6% success rate on 3rd & short is actually slightly below average. RBs who were better this year include Gurley, Duke Johnson, Ajayi, Artis-Payne, Karlos Williams, and Mike Davis. RBs who were better last year include Sankey, Hill, Hyde, Mason, Freeman, Carey, Gaffney, and Storm Johnson. See column N of this spreadsheet.not too bad.
- According to his NFL.com draft profile, Cobb gained 54 percent of his yardage the past two seasons after initial contact. He totaled 1,828 yards over that span, which means he gained almost 1,000 yards (987, to be precise) after the first hit.
- According to cfbstats.com, Cobb was given the ball 31 times on third down last season and he picked up 19 first downs, a success rate of 61.3 percent. That was one of the top rates in the nation among backs with at least 30 third-down carries, ranking Cobb higher than higher-drafted players including Michigan State's Jeremy Langford (50 percent), Wisconsin's Melvin Gordon (47.1) and Alabama's T.J. Yeldon (46.7).
- On third downs with 1-3 yards to go, Cobb picked up 12 first downs on 17 attempts, a 70.6 percent success rate that was also among the nation's best.
add Andrews into your chart pleaseA 70.6% success rate on 3rd & short is actually slightly below average. RBs who were better this year include Gurley, Duke Johnson, Ajayi, Artis-Payne, Karlos Williams, and Mike Davis. RBs who were better last year include Sankey, Hill, Hyde, Mason, Freeman, Carey, Gaffney, and Storm Johnson. See column N of this spreadsheet.not too bad.
- According to his NFL.com draft profile, Cobb gained 54 percent of his yardage the past two seasons after initial contact. He totaled 1,828 yards over that span, which means he gained almost 1,000 yards (987, to be precise) after the first hit.
- According to cfbstats.com, Cobb was given the ball 31 times on third down last season and he picked up 19 first downs, a success rate of 61.3 percent. That was one of the top rates in the nation among backs with at least 30 third-down carries, ranking Cobb higher than higher-drafted players including Michigan State's Jeremy Langford (50 percent), Wisconsin's Melvin Gordon (47.1) and Alabama's T.J. Yeldon (46.7).
- On third downs with 1-3 yards to go, Cobb picked up 12 first downs on 17 attempts, a 70.6 percent success rate that was also among the nation's best.
Greene had some speed with the Jets. After he took a hit or rammed through defenders, he could get ahold of himself and just burst away.I mean in college. Never heard any numbers but his draft profile read like Greene:he didn't have enough carries for the statwhores to even look into it.
Strengths
Greene is an absolute load to tackle. He has a short, stocky build and is tough to contain once he gets a head of steam. He is a powerful runner that runs through arm tackles, and refuses to go down on first contact. Greene thrives as a workhorse and can handle the load of 20 plus carries a game. He also shows surprising quickness and footwork for a 230lber. He gets to full speed quickly and has the ability to make the first defender miss and get up the field.
Sankey may not be 'the guy' but I'm pretty sure Cobb isn't.I don't think Cobb is any good for dynasty. Teams always try to have some fancy RB on their roster and never seem satisfied with a hard hat type. I could "buy" Cobb for this year, maybe next year, but he's not the thoroughbred that all teams seem to try to find. Sankey represents the current blue chip that should be capable and if he fails, they'll draft or sign another. I feel like Cobb will always have quality competition that holds a genuine threat to him ever having some long storied productive career that dynasty people want.
My love for Alstott, every tough RB, and every FB that has ever carried the rock has never been enough for them to be a featured back for too long.
The NFL likes pretty runners
Drafting Cobb in dynasty then trading him away once he's had some success seems like the wise move here.
Were you similarly confident that Arian Foster wasn't the guy? Or Alfred Morris? I get it, he is a late round pick. The odds are low he becomes "the guy." Logically, we should all be saying that for pretty much any RB drafted in round 4 or later.Sankey may not be 'the guy' but I'm pretty sure Cobb isn't.I don't think Cobb is any good for dynasty. Teams always try to have some fancy RB on their roster and never seem satisfied with a hard hat type. I could "buy" Cobb for this year, maybe next year, but he's not the thoroughbred that all teams seem to try to find. Sankey represents the current blue chip that should be capable and if he fails, they'll draft or sign another. I feel like Cobb will always have quality competition that holds a genuine threat to him ever having some long storied productive career that dynasty people want.
My love for Alstott, every tough RB, and every FB that has ever carried the rock has never been enough for them to be a featured back for too long.
The NFL likes pretty runners
Drafting Cobb in dynasty then trading him away once he's had some success seems like the wise move here.
It's more about lack of speed, moves, and breakaway ability for me.Were you similarly confident that Arian Foster wasn't the guy? Or Alfred Morris? I get it, he is a late round pick. The odds are low he becomes "the guy." Logically, we should all be saying that for pretty much any RB drafted in round 4 or later.Sankey may not be 'the guy' but I'm pretty sure Cobb isn't.I don't think Cobb is any good for dynasty. Teams always try to have some fancy RB on their roster and never seem satisfied with a hard hat type. I could "buy" Cobb for this year, maybe next year, but he's not the thoroughbred that all teams seem to try to find. Sankey represents the current blue chip that should be capable and if he fails, they'll draft or sign another. I feel like Cobb will always have quality competition that holds a genuine threat to him ever having some long storied productive career that dynasty people want.
My love for Alstott, every tough RB, and every FB that has ever carried the rock has never been enough for them to be a featured back for too long.
The NFL likes pretty runners
Drafting Cobb in dynasty then trading him away once he's had some success seems like the wise move here.
Antonio Andrews is in there. See the 2013 season tab, row 37. He was slightly better than Cobb on 3rd and short. Andrews is also one of the least athletic RBs to participate in the NFL combine in the past 17 years. His 40 time, vertical, broad jump, and short shuttle are all among the 15 worst by a RB since 1999.add Andrews into your chart pleaseA 70.6% success rate on 3rd & short is actually slightly below average. RBs who were better this year include Gurley, Duke Johnson, Ajayi, Artis-Payne, Karlos Williams, and Mike Davis. RBs who were better last year include Sankey, Hill, Hyde, Mason, Freeman, Carey, Gaffney, and Storm Johnson. See column N of this spreadsheet.not too bad.
- According to his NFL.com draft profile, Cobb gained 54 percent of his yardage the past two seasons after initial contact. He totaled 1,828 yards over that span, which means he gained almost 1,000 yards (987, to be precise) after the first hit.
- According to cfbstats.com, Cobb was given the ball 31 times on third down last season and he picked up 19 first downs, a success rate of 61.3 percent. That was one of the top rates in the nation among backs with at least 30 third-down carries, ranking Cobb higher than higher-drafted players including Michigan State's Jeremy Langford (50 percent), Wisconsin's Melvin Gordon (47.1) and Alabama's T.J. Yeldon (46.7).
- On third downs with 1-3 yards to go, Cobb picked up 12 first downs on 17 attempts, a 70.6 percent success rate that was also among the nation's best.
Least athletic? DO you mean his vertical is a couple inches less, his 40 time .1-.2 slow etc?Antonio Andrews is in there. See the 2013 season tab, row 37. He was slightly better than Cobb on 3rd and short. Andrews is also one of the least athletic RBs to participate in the NFL combine in the past 17 years. His 40 time, vertical, broad jump, and short shuttle are all among the 15 worst by a RB since 1999.add Andrews into your chart pleaseA 70.6% success rate on 3rd & short is actually slightly below average. RBs who were better this year include Gurley, Duke Johnson, Ajayi, Artis-Payne, Karlos Williams, and Mike Davis. RBs who were better last year include Sankey, Hill, Hyde, Mason, Freeman, Carey, Gaffney, and Storm Johnson. See column N of this spreadsheet.not too bad.
- According to his NFL.com draft profile, Cobb gained 54 percent of his yardage the past two seasons after initial contact. He totaled 1,828 yards over that span, which means he gained almost 1,000 yards (987, to be precise) after the first hit.
- According to cfbstats.com, Cobb was given the ball 31 times on third down last season and he picked up 19 first downs, a success rate of 61.3 percent. That was one of the top rates in the nation among backs with at least 30 third-down carries, ranking Cobb higher than higher-drafted players including Michigan State's Jeremy Langford (50 percent), Wisconsin's Melvin Gordon (47.1) and Alabama's T.J. Yeldon (46.7).
- On third downs with 1-3 yards to go, Cobb picked up 12 first downs on 17 attempts, a 70.6 percent success rate that was also among the nation's best.
Cobb can play in the NFL but expecting anything more than Shonn Greene is unrealistic.Least athletic? DO you mean his vertical is a couple inches less, his 40 time .1-.2 slow etc?
What about his production? Looking at your chart those numbers seem quite favorable
What does that prove? It's easy to cherry pick examples of guys with putrid combine numbers who had great careers (Frank Gore, Arian Foster) and guys who rocked the testing and were mediocre or worse in the NFL (Joseph Addai, Donald Brown). Would you say that Foster has a lower ceiling than Addai because he tested worse? Clearly it doesn't work that way. I don't think comparing Greene and Cobb reveals much besides a bias to believe that Cobb can't be more than mediocre. For that matter, the 4.81 time comes with a big asterisk since he clearly pulled up lame before the finish line:Cobb can play in the NFL but expecting anything more than Shonn Greene is unrealistic.
Greene on the left, Cobb on the right:
- Height: 5' 11" vs 5'11"
- Weight: 227 vs 229
- 40 Yard Dash: 4.62 vs 4.81
- Bench Press: 19 (23 at Pro Day) vs 17
- Vertical Jump: 37" vs 38.5"
- Broad Jump: 121" vs 121"
- 20 Yard Shuttle: 4.40 vs 4.55 (Pro Day)
- 3 Cone: 7.10 vs 7.01 (Pro Day)
I'd leave Gore out of it since he not only was recovering from a torn ACL he also ran much faster than Cobb at his Pro Day (4.58 to 4.73.What does that prove? It's easy to cherry pick examples of guys with putrid combine numbers who had great careers (Frank Gore, Arian Foster). Would you say that Foster has a lower ceiling than Addai because he tested worse? Clearly it doesn't work that way.
Sankey may be more of an athlete and better in the gym, but he doesn't have the skills on the field that Cobb has.I'd leave Gore out of it since he not only was recovering from a torn ACL he also ran much faster than Cobb at his Pro Day (4.58 to 4.73.What does that prove? It's easy to cherry pick examples of guys with putrid combine numbers who had great careers (Frank Gore, Arian Foster). Would you say that Foster has a lower ceiling than Addai because he tested worse? Clearly it doesn't work that way.
Foster is a fair comparison but he's clearly an outlier. Now that Foster has done what he did every time a RB tests poorly people can say "But Foster...".
The most likely outcome will be Vick Ballard, but I suppose the hope is always there that he is another Foster.
I don't care if you think Sankey is joke and doesn't deserve to be the in the NFL - that doesn't mean Cobb is the guy who is going to replace him.
