What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Official CJ Spiller (1 Viewer)

Still too unreliable to be counted on yet. Boom or bust on the fantasy points each game.
He's the perfect flex play if you have that luxury.
BS....I will start Harvin in my flex in most leagues instead. GL with this chump .... once you are 0-5 I am sure he will go off when he is sitting on your bench
Won with him 2 years in a row at flex. Your hate is unnecessary.
He certainly wasn't drafted as a flex last year.

 
Still too unreliable to be counted on yet. Boom or bust on the fantasy points each game.
He's the perfect flex play if you have that luxury.
BS....I will start Harvin in my flex in most leagues instead. GL with this chump .... once you are 0-5 I am sure he will go off when he is sitting on your bench
Won with him 2 years in a row at flex. Your hate is unnecessary.
He certainly wasn't drafted as a flex last year.
Or this year in most cases. He still has a late third ADP. Unless one goes RBRBRB, then he's a second RB, not flex.

 
Are people really wringing their hands this badly when there hasn't been a game yet?! Come on man! He will get his 15-18 weekly touches, plus a kickoff return or two.

 
Rotoworld:

C.J. Spiller - RB - Bills

WGR 550 Buffalo's Joe Buscaglia believes Doug Marrone's comments about getting C.J. Spiller "touches" as opposed to "carries" could be an indication that the offense won't be running through Spiller as much as originally anticipated.

Spiller is the Bills' starter, but Buscaglia wouldn't be surprised if Fred Jackson leads the team in carries again this year. Jackson is going to handle all red-zone and inside work, leaving the majority of Spiller's touches to come on outside runs and in the receiving game. It's why Rotoworld has been pounding the table for Jackson over the last month. Spiller is a high-volume change-of-pace back, but his lack of scoring upside makes him a boom-or-bust RB2.

Source: WGR 550 Buffalo

Sep 6 - 6:16 PM
 
Here we go with CJ Spiller drama. New year, same ship. Why do I keep drafting him?
Three years ago, because he was a value where he was going/how he was valued.Last year, not sure. He was ranked way too high by most.

This year, because he's a value where he was going/how he is valued.

 
Spiller looked good today and was used in the redzone and on some third downs (changes from last year). Although the Bills showed that they plan on using the RBBC approach with Jackson and Dixon in the mix. At this point, I think he's still a worthy flex play, and maybe a RB2 if you're thin at the position.

 
Still too unreliable to be counted on yet. Boom or bust on the fantasy points each game.
He's the perfect flex play if you have that luxury.
BS....I will start Harvin in my flex in most leagues instead. GL with this chump .... once you are 0-5 I am sure he will go off when he is sitting on your bench
Won with him 2 years in a row at flex. Your hate is unnecessary.
And makes you look, less than smart.
 
With PPR just seems like a really good rb2. You know he is getting minimum 5 catches a game. He will hold his own in that spot.
He has only had 5 catches 6 times in his whole career. This is silly.
Sorry wrote catches meant points. In the end games he is healthy in he is going to average 12 to 15 ppg.
No worries, I agree with you. Just pointing out the stats, which baffle me because he really should get more targets.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
As a Bills fan I would be OK with that. I think we need to do whatever we can to get back into the first (I know Spiller alone won't get it done). But we need to take another shot at drafting a franchise QB and I think we'll need a first to do that.

I think Freddie, Brown and Dixon will be just fine without Spiller.

 
ghostguy123 said:
Honestly, the first thing I thought about when I heard this was that is was total BS in hopes of upping his trade value.
Spiller's agent passed away (a year ago?) and he had not hired a new agent since that occurred. I think part of this was held up by the lack of agent and recently Spiller made his hire. If the Bills went in the tank early I could see them making a trade, but with the Watkins trade at the draft and the 1-0 start I'm not sure it makes much sense.
 
If only he got 20-25 touches a game...
If only he wasn't the second best RB on the team
:rolleyes:
:shrug:
FJax has his merits for sure, but Spiller has been much more productive than him on a per touch basis for the past two years. Even with a high ankle sprain last year.
2013

Spiller: 202 carries, 933 yards, 4.6 y/a, 2 TDs

Jackson: 206 carries, 890 yards, 4.3 y/a, 9 TDs

I think the +7 edge in TDs is a bit more impressive than the 43 extra yards. Their workload running the ball was almost identical, although Fred had to take on more of the short-yardage duties, which are going to hurt your averages anyway.

Spiller's 2012 was amazing and he's an incredible talent, but Jackson is just a really good all around back and generally underrated by a lot of people.

 
If only he got 20-25 touches a game...
If only he wasn't the second best RB on the team
:rolleyes:
:shrug:
FJax has his merits for sure, but Spiller has been much more productive than him on a per touch basis for the past two years. Even with a high ankle sprain last year.
2013

Spiller: 202 carries, 933 yards, 4.6 y/a, 2 TDs

Jackson: 206 carries, 890 yards, 4.3 y/a, 9 TDs

I think the +7 edge in TDs is a bit more impressive than the 43 extra yards. Their workload running the ball was almost identical, although Fred had to take on more of the short-yardage duties, which are going to hurt your averages anyway.

Spiller's 2012 was amazing and he's an incredible talent, but Jackson is just a really good all around back and generally underrated by a lot of people.
The TD comparison is a bit unfair given that Jackson monopolized the redzone work last year. Last week's game showed that the coaching staff may be more willing to keep Spiller in the game at the goal line.

 
ghostguy123 said:
Honestly, the first thing I thought about when I heard this was that is was total BS in hopes of upping his trade value.
Spiller's agent passed away (a year ago?) and he had not hired a new agent since that occurred. I think part of this was held up by the lack of agent and recently Spiller made his hire. If the Bills went in the tank early I could see them making a trade, but with the Watkins trade at the draft and the 1-0 start I'm not sure it makes much sense.
I don't see a trade happening either unless they were given an absolute king's ransom for Spiller. The front office recognizes that everyone's job is on the line after this year, so it's definitely win-now mode.

 
If only he got 20-25 touches a game...
If only he wasn't the second best RB on the team
:rolleyes:
:shrug:
FJax has his merits for sure, but Spiller has been much more productive than him on a per touch basis for the past two years. Even with a high ankle sprain last year.
2013

Spiller: 202 carries, 933 yards, 4.6 y/a, 2 TDs

Jackson: 206 carries, 890 yards, 4.3 y/a, 9 TDs

I think the +7 edge in TDs is a bit more impressive than the 43 extra yards. Their workload running the ball was almost identical, although Fred had to take on more of the short-yardage duties, which are going to hurt your averages anyway.

Spiller's 2012 was amazing and he's an incredible talent, but Jackson is just a really good all around back and generally underrated by a lot of people.
2013

Spiller: 1 carry inside the 5 yard line - 0 TDs

Jackson: 18 carries inside the 5 yard line - 7 TDs

Perhaps it was situation rather than talent all along that led to those 7 TDs? Did I just uncover the mystery here? I love how you use the TDs from the short yardage work to pump Jackson, but want to use that as an excuse for the difference in ypc. So you are the type of person who wants to have his cake and eat it, too.

Also, you seem to think comparing a guy playing on a high ankle sprain to a healthy guy is an equal comparison. But if you actually look at Spiller's splits, you'll see as he got healthy, the gap between the two became apparent.

Games 1-8:

Spiller - 4.0 ypc

Jackson - 4.2 ypc

Games 9-16:

Spiller - 5.1 ypc

Jackson - 4.4 ypc

Again, I don't dislike Jackson. But calling him the better RB is a bit silly.

 
FF Ninja said:
Again, I don't dislike Jackson. But calling him the better RB is a bit silly.
my initial comment was mostly tongue in cheek.

both players are very good. I think I could make the case that Jackson is a better overall player, but he's near the end of his career and Spiller is a top-10 pick in his prime so it probably really shouldn't even be close. Yet it is. That's why Spiller doesn't see the 20+ touches every game most of us would like to see him get...because Jackson is really good and really the only veteran leader on offense these days. I'm happy to have both backs on the Bills. Spiller has more explosiveness and big play ability, but Jackson just doesn't make mistakes and breaks off plenty of big runs himself.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rotoworld:

C.J. Spiller rushed 15 times for 60 yards in Sunday's Week 4 loss to Houston.



He added three catches for 24 yards. The Bills used Spiller between the tackles, and not on outside runs or in the screen game. He's been less effective than Fred Jackson this season, but continues to get the majority of early-down work. Outside of a 47-yard run against Miami in Week 2, Spiller is averaging 3.1 yards per carry. He could see his role reduced going forward, and will continue to lose red-zone work to Jackson. Spiller will be a boom-or-bust RB2 for his upcoming matchup with the Lions.

Sep 28 - 5:40 PM
 
Rotoworld:

C.J. Spiller rushed 15 times for 60 yards in Sunday's Week 4 loss to Houston.



He added three catches for 24 yards. The Bills used Spiller between the tackles, and not on outside runs or in the screen game. He's been less effective than Fred Jackson this season, but continues to get the majority of early-down work. Outside of a 47-yard run against Miami in Week 2, Spiller is averaging 3.1 yards per carry. He could see his role reduced going forward, and will continue to lose red-zone work to Jackson. Spiller will be a boom-or-bust RB2 for his upcoming matchup with the Lions.

Sep 28 - 5:40 PM

Jackson is the COP back. Of course he will look good on his 2 carries per quarter. If anything should change, Spiller should be getting screen passes!

 
Still not producing much. We shouldn't be surprised with the Jackson there I guess, but it makes it hard to play Spiller. He's a very weak RB 2, and a middle of the road flex/RB3.

ETA: He's currently tied for the 30th RB in PPG average.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
For what it's worth, he's tied as the #13 RB in my league (pretty standard, no PPR, but does award return yardage points). He's been very consistent in his touches per game, between 13 and 18 from scrimmage and another 7 kick off returns (where he's currently 5th in the league in kick return yards).

He's not the worst flex spot option, especially considering he hasn't had his first rushing TD yet. That said, he's nearly unstartable in 3 of his next 5 games - Jets, Lions and a bye. He'll face the Jets again week 12, but after that he's got some very good matchups.

 
This Spiller/Jackson thing sucks. I've got both, and they sit on my bench unless I've got BYE week issues. I don't think either will be worth anything unless one of the two gets injured.

 
This Spiller/Jackson thing sucks. I've got both, and they sit on my bench unless I've got BYE week issues. I don't think either will be worth anything unless one of the two gets injured.
I agree.

What is weird to me is the way they are used. They use Spiller like he's a big back and give Jackson the stuff you'd expect to see from a COP back.

It's really odd.

 
Jackson is the COP back. Of course he will look good on his 2 carries per quarter. If anything should change, Spiller should be getting screen passes!
Jackson doesn't get a ton of carries, but based on playing time he seems to be the lead back. Certainly gets a lot more playing time than anyone I'd call a "COP back".

Spiller's snap count: 28, 25, 25, 32 = 27.5/game

Jackson's snap count: 29, 31, 45, 40 = 36/game

 
bicycle_seat_sniffer said:
I didnt think a new regime could be worse than Chan Gailey, yet here we are
Gailey was pretty great for the offense. What didn't you like? Spiller averaging 6 yards per carry in 2012 or Freddy averaging 5.5/carry in 2011?

 
I'm finally dealing him, after drafting him in my devy Draft I just can't do it anymore. He may turn out to be great but I'm out.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top