This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
This would make a lot sense to me if A) he wasn't so concerned about the response to the safety release and needed to update the results simply to add numbers while doing a paid video later in the day B) we didn't know the guy's background as someone hungry to hear their own voice and speak on every possible piece of news.
) as a headline on the website doesn't instill confidence. He also scheduled this press conference before he had any data on severe (I believe).There would have to be something else happening behind the scenes that we don't know about for him to withhold good results results. I have no doubt that if it were just that, they would be released immediately but there could be something we aren't taking into consideration.
If he got word the severe results were coming this week it would make sense to hold off to put it all together.
I agree it is within the realm and can't be completely dismissed, but I'm skeptical of it. It's on the list. We need a comprehensive list, then we need to analyze it to determine what makes the most sense. We should keep going, we only have a little over 2 days to go.
Right but that was all before they theoretically (for this exercise) got great results back. Once you get the results back you know how everybody will react when they come out so the stock price in the interim doesn’t really matter. He probably also is being advised to play it cool and not blow this.This would make a lot sense to me if A) he wasn't so concerned about the response to the safety release and needed to update the results simply to add numbers while doing a paid video later in the day B) we didn't know the guy's background as someone hungry to hear their own voice and speak on every possible piece of news.
Having Dr. Yo (
Chet has voiced an opinion on two. Peer reviewed papers take months and months to be published.
You're an early shareholder too, voice your opinion as to why no efficacy results and this conference call Thursday.
I don't disagree but they said this was going to happen at the end of April. This was the same week that NP sold his stock. That's always bothered me.
Was it ever determined if Patterson also sold his stock on April 30th? He was on the list with Nader and Scott Kelly but people were saying he didn't sell.
I don’t get the impression Chet is too worried. I’m not either. It’s going to be fine either way.
It's been about 3 months since that article, let's keep our eyes open here; I see nothing happening there.
I'm starting to see more skepticism towards the M2M, it's worrying. Now we're holding out hope for severe, if that is the case.
Skepticism isn’t rooted in any facts; just people getting worried on a message board because they are getting impatient.
Agree that the results are not of the shout-from-the-rooftops variety, or Nader would be up there with a megaphone. Everybody knows this.
I've done this, and I've put about $5k in my pocket, if it goes to zero, I'll still have $5k. That doesn't change the fact that I have $40k of very real money still floating out there. I personally don't want to give that back, nor do I think anyone else wants to let go of nice gains.
I'm hoping for the opposite. That the new advisory board had, among conditions of participation, some authority to weigh in on process, including for results releasee, press release drafting, analysis, etc. Perhaps these advisors are in it for a buck, but perhaps they're in it because the science is intriguing and the one thing that needs fixing is the CEO clown show.
Kevzilla's previous post speaks to us knowing the results weren't over the top fantastic, right? I agree with him and if the results were excellent, he'd be screaming them, yet we're all still holding. Plenty of times when you look back on an investment gone wrong, there were plenty of red flags and someone comes back and says how did I miss that? To me, this is a potential red flag, and in organizing our thoughts, I'm trying to make the case for holding or selling.
JFC, enough with the excuses already. If I taught myself Thermodynamics in a weekend after Friday night of binge drinking, you would think these yahoos could get off there butts and analyze a measley 84 data points. If they start a Cytodyn FF league, I want in because these clowns would be drafting a QB in the first and kicker in the second because they score the most points. Scratch that, their draft clock would expire every pick and the draft would take 6 months.
There are plenty of red flags but I’m not selling anyways so it doesn’t really matter to me. I appreciate the exercise and like to see people’s thoughts but it won’t influence me either way. JMO
In fairness, I believe we have 12 secondary and one primary, so they are analyzing 1,092 data points. With that, I agree with your sentiments.
Cytodyn employees= 10
Can we keep adding here? Not sure about you guys, but this list is a screaming sell so far.
We need Cytodyn to be FC Porto circa 2004Cytodyn is in the champions league looking for promotion to the premier league
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04343651
It was more of a joke than anything, but it looks like they have. They're in Phase III.
So if that completes in September, they probably are looking at interim soon too, right?
Could it be this?
I apologize. Trying to put all our thoughts into one clear organized and coherent post was too much to ask as we collectively have 7 figures on the line, my bad. Now if you'll excuse me, I have to put a collared shirt over my Beastie Boys tank top to host a virtual meeting.
