Not really, you got to feed your best player, non stop. See Detroit, they throw it to Calvin if he is covered by everyone.Posted it in the game thread. Seems it should be posted here as well.
Dez has 119 targets on the year. That's 11th in the NFL. He's averaging over 9 per game. The targets thing is completely overblown.
Dallas's results say otherwise.Dez isn't as good as Calvin and Dal has far better surrounding options than Det. There is no need at all for Dez to see Calvin like targets.
Exactly. I am a Calvin lover, but since he is in the league no other WR can be good or deserves a healthy level of Targets.Dallas's results say otherwise.Dez isn't as good as Calvin and Dal has far better surrounding options than Det. There is no need at all for Dez to see Calvin like targets.
You mean the Dal team with the same record as perennial winners, Det?Dallas's results say otherwise.Dez isn't as good as Calvin and Dal has far better surrounding options than Det. There is no need at all for Dez to see Calvin like targets.
So maybe they wouldn't have the same record if Dez got more targets, thats the point.You mean the Dal team with the same record as perennial winners, Det?Dallas's results say otherwise.Dez isn't as good as Calvin and Dal has far better surrounding options than Det. There is no need at all for Dez to see Calvin like targets.
More than 2 catches for 12 yards are ridiculous expectations? Dang, wish i knew.The issue is Dez owners and they're ridiculous expectations.
There are tons of receivers right now that are getting force fed the ball and putting up monster numbers. Dez goes stretches where there is literally nothing thrown his way.The issue is Dez owners and they're ridiculous expectations.
I'm a Dez owner too, btw.
Because Murray can't put up 7 TD's on his own to beat the Bears?Dal had Murray ripping off runs at 8 yds a pop and Romo only threw 20 times last night.
I'd love to know how forcing the ball to Dez was going to win them the game.
Who are these far better surrounding options Dallas has than Detroit? Williams is a rookie and learning, Austin is not near as good as he used to be, then you have Bryant, Witten, and Murray. Detroit has Bush, Bell, Johnson, and Burleson. Durham is still learning, and Pettigrew has been disappointing.Dez isn't as good as Calvin and Dal has far better surrounding options than Det. There is no need at all for Dez to see Calvin like targets.
They don't do that because they have Witten doing those things.My problem lies more with the play designs. A lot of targets Dez gets are either hitch routes or fades only. The cowboys rarely move him to the slot or run him in bunch formations in an attempt to get him the ball in space or moving across the field. The is my biggest disappointment. His targets don't accurately reflect what he is capable of because of this. Detroit does a good job of this with Calvin and DN was a phenomenal job with Thomas. If they did this, I could see greater production on even fewer targets.
You're underestimating the importance of not being predictable. We know they have Witten doing that. So does every one else. See the problem here?They don't do that because they have Witten doing those things.My problem lies more with the play designs. A lot of targets Dez gets are either hitch routes or fades only. The cowboys rarely move him to the slot or run him in bunch formations in an attempt to get him the ball in space or moving across the field. The is my biggest disappointment. His targets don't accurately reflect what he is capable of because of this. Detroit does a good job of this with Calvin and DN was a phenomenal job with Thomas. If they did this, I could see greater production on even fewer targets.
This...My problem lies more with the play designs. A lot of targets Dez gets are either hitch routes or fades only. The cowboys rarely move him to the slot or run him in bunch formations in an attempt to get him the ball in space or moving across the field. The is my biggest disappointment. His targets don't accurately reflect what he is capable of because of this. Detroit does a good job of this with Calvin and DN was a phenomenal job with Thomas. If they did this, I could see greater production on even fewer targets.
Agreed. Some of you may have seen a game where Dez was not getting thrown to and the announcers mentioned it (they didn't get the lack of targets either) and said they never move him around. Next play they mention he is in the slot and it was something like a 40 yard reception down the middle. Then, nothing.My problem lies more with the play designs. A lot of targets Dez gets are either hitch routes or fades only. The cowboys rarely move him to the slot or run him in bunch formations in an attempt to get him the ball in space or moving across the field. The is my biggest disappointment. His targets don't accurately reflect what he is capable of because of this. Detroit does a good job of this with Calvin and DN was a phenomenal job with Thomas. If they did this, I could see greater production on even fewer targets.
Have you ever considered that Dal has a reason for that? Those slot routes/movement routes in the Dal offense are general option routes in which the receiver is required to read the D on the run and adjust to the proper route, depth and timing. Maybe, just maybe Witten is better at these things, more reliable and trusted more than Dez.You're underestimating the importance of not being predictable. We know they have Witten doing that. So does every one else. See the problem here?They don't do that because they have Witten doing those things.My problem lies more with the play designs. A lot of targets Dez gets are either hitch routes or fades only. The cowboys rarely move him to the slot or run him in bunch formations in an attempt to get him the ball in space or moving across the field. The is my biggest disappointment. His targets don't accurately reflect what he is capable of because of this. Detroit does a good job of this with Calvin and DN was a phenomenal job with Thomas. If they did this, I could see greater production on even fewer targets.
If this is the case, their WR coach needs to be fired yesterdayHave you ever considered that Dal has a reason for that? Those slot routes/movement routes in the Dal offense are general option routes in which the receiver is required to read the D on the run and adjust to the proper route, depth and timing. Maybe, just maybe Witten is better at these things, more reliable and trusted more than Dez.You're underestimating the importance of not being predictable. We know they have Witten doing that. So does every one else. See the problem here?They don't do that because they have Witten doing those things.My problem lies more with the play designs. A lot of targets Dez gets are either hitch routes or fades only. The cowboys rarely move him to the slot or run him in bunch formations in an attempt to get him the ball in space or moving across the field. The is my biggest disappointment. His targets don't accurately reflect what he is capable of because of this. Detroit does a good job of this with Calvin and DN was a phenomenal job with Thomas. If they did this, I could see greater production on even fewer targets.
It is atrociously bad. It reminds me of Carolina when they were 1-3. You could see in the first four games they were trying to hold Newton back, keep it simple and be conservative. It didn't work, they took the reigns off and boom, Newton plays really well and an 8 game winning streak.This...My problem lies more with the play designs. A lot of targets Dez gets are either hitch routes or fades only. The cowboys rarely move him to the slot or run him in bunch formations in an attempt to get him the ball in space or moving across the field. The is my biggest disappointment. His targets don't accurately reflect what he is capable of because of this. Detroit does a good job of this with Calvin and DN was a phenomenal job with Thomas. If they did this, I could see greater production on even fewer targets.
They line him out wide every play... Never move him around, motion, bunch, nothing! They make it easy and predictable for defenses.
Hopefully they go back to the drawing board this week and realize a 2/12 line with a dynamic playmaker isn't a winning formula.
This now reserved offense they are attempting is terrible... They need to let Romo go out and sling it - They have to take the good with the bad in that situation, their only chance of doing any damage.
He should be fired because of a HOF TE playing on his team?If this is the case, their WR coach needs to be fired yesterdayHave you ever considered that Dal has a reason for that? Those slot routes/movement routes in the Dal offense are general option routes in which the receiver is required to read the D on the run and adjust to the proper route, depth and timing. Maybe, just maybe Witten is better at these things, more reliable and trusted more than Dez.You're underestimating the importance of not being predictable. We know they have Witten doing that. So does every one else. See the problem here?They don't do that because they have Witten doing those things.My problem lies more with the play designs. A lot of targets Dez gets are either hitch routes or fades only. The cowboys rarely move him to the slot or run him in bunch formations in an attempt to get him the ball in space or moving across the field. The is my biggest disappointment. His targets don't accurately reflect what he is capable of because of this. Detroit does a good job of this with Calvin and DN was a phenomenal job with Thomas. If they did this, I could see greater production on even fewer targets.
And that would explain why Witten had 1 reception last night or is that because someone else is more reliable and trusted than Witten and Dez?Have you ever considered that Dal has a reason for that? Those slot routes/movement routes in the Dal offense are general option routes in which the receiver is required to read the D on the run and adjust to the proper route, depth and timing. Maybe, just maybe Witten is better at these things, more reliable and trusted more than Dez.You're underestimating the importance of not being predictable. We know they have Witten doing that. So does every one else. See the problem here?They don't do that because they have Witten doing those things.My problem lies more with the play designs. A lot of targets Dez gets are either hitch routes or fades only. The cowboys rarely move him to the slot or run him in bunch formations in an attempt to get him the ball in space or moving across the field. The is my biggest disappointment. His targets don't accurately reflect what he is capable of because of this. Detroit does a good job of this with Calvin and DN was a phenomenal job with Thomas. If they did this, I could see greater production on even fewer targets.
What does Derek Dooley the wide receiver coach, have to do with Wes Phillips the tight end coach?He should be fired because of a HOF TE playing on his team?If this is the case, their WR coach needs to be fired yesterdayHave you ever considered that Dal has a reason for that? Those slot routes/movement routes in the Dal offense are general option routes in which the receiver is required to read the D on the run and adjust to the proper route, depth and timing. Maybe, just maybe Witten is better at these things, more reliable and trusted more than Dez.
Can't throw the ball to himself. Can't call plays.Some of you guys think that Romo and Garrett don't want to win. Why would they NOT throw it to Dez if he's open??
Anyone have a logical, rational response??
Can you at least give Dez SOME of the blame???
In today's NFL tons of pass plays have the qb throwing to a spot whether the WR is open or not. It is practically robotic. That is why you can still see Manning throw the ball into triple coverage sometimes. You think he sees three guys and says wth I will throw it in there. On tons of deep routes the qb is throwing the ball when the CB and WR are step for step.Some of you guys think that Romo and Garrett don't want to win. Why would they NOT throw it to Dez if he's open??
Anyone have a logical, rational response??
Can you at least give Dez SOME of the blame???
It really is getting old. Every time he has a low target total we get this water works show. There is more to it than just targets, which I contest aren't really the problem. He's in the top tier of all players both in mass number and percentage.I think Romo is absolutely part of the problem.I just think you aren't blaming the player enough.
It's not like Garrett wakes up every morning and goes "I wonder who our best playmaker is. Man, we have GOT to find a way to get Cole Beasley and Dwayne Harris the ball. Those guys make plays!"
I honestly don't know why Bryant has underperformed. I came here to get some reasons why. The obligatory "He's on my fantasy team so I am blaming the coach" response is getting old.
Not sure if you watch the games, but this isn't a case of Romo looking Dez's way and he's not getting separation. Romo gets the snap and, many times, never even looks to Bryant's side of the field. As a Dez owner, I'm watching where he's lined up and it's frustrating as hell to see pass play after pass play where Romo never even looks to his side of the field. Now watch Stafford or Dalton otr Campbell. First look is their stud receiver 75% of the time. Then they progress from there.I just think you aren't blaming the player enough.
It's not like Garrett wakes up every morning and goes "I wonder who our best playmaker is. Man, we have GOT to find a way to get Cole Beasley and Dwayne Harris the ball. Those guys make plays!"
I honestly don't know why Bryant has underperformed. I came here to get some reasons why. The obligatory "He's on my fantasy team so I am blaming the coach" response is getting old.
Dez is supremely talented, which is why you have to look at what else could cause him to not go over 85 yards in 6 weeks.Teams who have dynamic playmakers usually give them a chance to make plays. I am not sure if it is Romo or the playcalling....but it seems like Romo hesitates on driving the ball down the field. He appears to be playing not to lose at this point. Stafford will throw to Calvin even when he is triple-covered.....heck even McCown will give Jeffery several chances a game to make contested catches. Maybe Dez is not as dynamic as I thought........maybe Romo is trying to not make the big mistake......maybe the playcalling lacks creativity........
Where's the link to your source? Is this including last night's game?Percentage of team targets.
V. Jackson, 31.3 Wow!
Garcon, 30 wow!
Green, 29.6
Calvin, 28.2 (removing his missed game)
Andre, 28.2
Marshall, 27.2
Shorts, 26.5
A. Brown, 26.3
Gordon, 25.9 (removing 1st 2 games)
Dez, 25.6
I am not, but is that really what Romo is doing?Not sure if you watch the games, but this isn't a case of Romo looking Dez's way and he's not getting separation. Romo gets the snap and, many times, never even looks to Bryant's side of the field. As a Dez owner, I'm watching where he's lined up and it's frustrating as hell to see pass play after pass play where Romo never even looks to his side of the field. Now watch Stafford or Dalton otr Campbell. First look is their stud receiver 75% of the time. Then they progress from there.I just think you aren't blaming the player enough.
It's not like Garrett wakes up every morning and goes "I wonder who our best playmaker is. Man, we have GOT to find a way to get Cole Beasley and Dwayne Harris the ball. Those guys make plays!"
I honestly don't know why Bryant has underperformed. I came here to get some reasons why. The obligatory "He's on my fantasy team so I am blaming the coach" response is getting old.
Terrible data. He did targets vs. completions.Where's the link to your source? Is this including last night's game?Percentage of team targets.
V. Jackson, 31.3 Wow!
Garcon, 30 wow!
Green, 29.6
Calvin, 28.2 (removing his missed game)
Andre, 28.2
Marshall, 27.2
Shorts, 26.5
A. Brown, 26.3
Gordon, 25.9 (removing 1st 2 games)
Dez, 25.6
I don't know, Det has a league leading 38 drops this year. Maybe we could start there...Who are these far better surrounding options Dallas has than Detroit? Williams is a rookie and learning, Austin is not near as good as he used to be, then you have Bryant, Witten, and Murray. Detroit has Bush, Bell, Johnson, and Burleson. Durham is still learning, and Pettigrew has been disappointing.Dez isn't as good as Calvin and Dal has far better surrounding options than Det. There is no need at all for Dez to see Calvin like targets.
nevermind, looked at wrong column.Terrible data. He did targets vs. completions.Where's the link to your source? Is this including last night's game?Percentage of team targets.
V. Jackson, 31.3 Wow!
Garcon, 30 wow!
Green, 29.6
Calvin, 28.2 (removing his missed game)
Andre, 28.2
Marshall, 27.2
Shorts, 26.5
A. Brown, 26.3
Gordon, 25.9 (removing 1st 2 games)
Dez, 25.6
No, I took the passes attempted by each team and the targets for each WR. I removed games not played from the totals.Terrible data. He did targets vs. completions.Where's the link to your source? Is this including last night's game?Percentage of team targets.
V. Jackson, 31.3 Wow!
Garcon, 30 wow!
Green, 29.6
Calvin, 28.2 (removing his missed game)
Andre, 28.2
Marshall, 27.2
Shorts, 26.5
A. Brown, 26.3
Gordon, 25.9 (removing 1st 2 games)
Dez, 25.6
Link? And does it include last night's 4 target game?No, I took the passes attempted by each team and the targets for each WR. I removed games not played from the totals.Terrible data. He did targets vs. completions.Where's the link to your source? Is this including last night's game?Percentage of team targets.
V. Jackson, 31.3 Wow!
Garcon, 30 wow!
Green, 29.6
Calvin, 28.2 (removing his missed game)
Andre, 28.2
Marshall, 27.2
Shorts, 26.5
A. Brown, 26.3
Gordon, 25.9 (removing 1st 2 games)
Dez, 25.6