So has anyone tried the console versions yet?
I played a couple of rounds of Conquest on PS3 (gamertag BWAmbassador). The reviews of the graphics being a little ugly are right. But I thought it played smooth and that's more important to me. I've gotten use to running and gunning twitch lagfests in COD and BF4 was so much better. No crappy deaths due to lag, actual strategy mattering, and teamwork being encouraged. And frankly, since I know everyone is going to have the same graphics and frame rate as me without me having to go spend $500 to upgrade my PC, I actually don't mind the graphics. They never really interfered with my gameplay.I only played Shanghai and Langam Dam, but I thought both maps were good maps. Big, but not too big. Multiple routes to different points, good cover, etc. There were times that the maps felt a tad large for just 24 players as we just went round and round on flag captures, but I think better squad work would have changed that.
The balance between guns, equipment and vehicles seems decent so far. I will agree that the gunboats seem pretty OP right now. It will be interesting to see if the balance between vehicles and infantry remains as people start earning the higher vehicle upgrades. I thought the vehicles became hugely OPed in BF3 pretty quickly.
My initial impression is very good overall. I loved BFBC2. One of my favorite games. I hated BF3 and traded it in after 2 weeks. S
o far this reminds me much more of BFBC2 than BF3.
(I finished 2nd overall my first game and 1st on my team in my second. Assault class definitely seems like the way to go early)