What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Official Great Works Draft (6 Viewers)

32.04--The Machine Gun-Invention

One of the most fearsome advances in warfare was the invention of the machine gun by Sir Hiram Maxim in 1881. A machine gun uses the explosive force of each bullet to reload itself, allowing for extremely high rates of fire and making the machine gun the second leading cause of casulaties in WWI. Addapted to use on aircraft, ships, tanks and made smaller into sub-machine guns. automatic weapons have changed military tactics and battles.

The first machine gun was invented in 1881 by Sir Hiram Maxim. The "Maxim gun" used the recoil power of the previously fired bullet to reload rather than being hand-powered, enabling a much higher rate of fire than was possible using earlier designs such as the Nordenfelt and Gatling weapons. Maxim's other great innovation was the use of water cooling (via a water jacket around the barrel) to reduce overheating. Maxim's gun was widely adopted and derivative designs were used on all sides during the First World War, most famously - during stalemate at The Battle of the Somme. The design required fewer crew, was lighter, and more usable than earlier Nordenfelt guns and Gatling guns.

Heavy guns based on the Maxim such as the Vickers machine gun were joined by many other machine weapons, which mostly had their start in the early 20th century such as the Hotchkiss machine gun. Submachine guns (e.g., the German MP18) as well as lighter machine guns (the Chauchat, for example) saw their first major use in World War I, along with heavy use of large-caliber machine guns. The biggest single cause of casualties in World War I was actually artillery, but combined with wire entanglements, machine guns earned a fearsome reputation. The automatic mechanisms of machine guns were applied to handguns, giving rise to automatic pistols (and eventually machine pistols) such as the Borchardt (1890s) and later submachine guns (such as the Beretta 1918). Machine guns were mounted in aircraft for the first time in World War I. Firing through a moving propeller was solved in a variety of ways, including the interrupter gear, metal reinforcement of the propeller, or simply avoiding the problem with wing-mounted guns or having a pusher propeller.

 
Sorry for the delay. I hemmed and hawed about whether or not it was eligible, since it's technically a collection of works. Let me know what y'all think.
Just so everyone understands, he's asking if he can take six books that were organized about 350 years after Aritstotle wrote them:
The Categories (Latin: Categoriae) introduces Aristotle's 10-fold classification of that which exists. These categories consist of substance, quantity, quality, relation, place, time, situation, condition, action, and passion.
On Interpretation (Latin:De Interpretatione, Greek Perihermenias) introduces Aristotle's conception of proposition and judgment, and the various relations between affirmative, negative, universal and particular propositions. It contains Aristotle's principal contribution to philosophy of language. It also discusses the Problem of future contingents.
The Prior Analytics (Latin: Analytica Priora) introduces his syllogistic method (see term logic), argues for its correctness, and discusses inductive inference.
The Posterior Analytics (Latin: Analytica Posteriora) deals with demonstration, definition, and scientific knowledge.
The Topics (Latin: Topica) treats issues in constructing valid arguments, and inference that is probable, rather than certain. It is in this treatise that Aristotle mentions the Predicables, later discussed by Porphyry and the scholastic logicians.
Sophistical Refutations (Latin: De Sophisticis Elenchis) gives a treatment of logical fallacies, and provides a key link to Aristotle's work on rhetoric.Influence

The Organon was used in the school founded by Aristotle at the Lyceum, and some parts of the works seem to be a scheme of a lecture on logic. So much so that after Aristotle's death, his publishers (Andronicus of Rhodes in 50 BC, for example) collected these works.

Following the collapse of the Roman Empire in the fifth century, much of Aristotle's work was lost in the Latin West. The Categories and On Interpretation are the only significant logical works that were available in the early Middle Ages. These had been translated into Latin by Boethius. The other logical works were not available until translated to Latin in the 12th century, although preserved in the Greek-speaking lands of the Roman Empire.

The books of Aristotle were available in the Arab Empire and were studied by Islamic and Jewish scholars, including Rabbi Moses Maimonides (1135–1204) and Muslim Judge Ibn Rushd (1126 - 1198); both lived in Cordoba, Spain. Cordoba had 70 libraries, one of them with over 40,000 volumes; the two largest libraries in non-Arab Europe each had only 2,000 volumes.

All the major scholastic philosophers wrote commentaries on the Organon. Aquinas, Ockham and Scotus wrote commentaries on On Interpretation. Ockham and Scotus wrote commentaries on the Categories and Sophistical Refutations. Grosseteste wrote an influential commentary on the Posterior Analytics.
I'm very interested in this ruling. I have multi-volume non-fiction books on my list (which, unlike the above, were intended from the beginning to be one work split into different volumes). I'm not clear if we there are exceptions whereby we can take multiple volumes in a series (i.e., many history works consist of several books).
Figured I'd regret it if I didn't throw it out there. It's generally studied as a single work, but I totally understand the criticism. We needed some drama today, right? :shrug:

 
No gavel bangers around?
The dictator is out for a few hours, Doug B is AWOL, Krista4 is trying to hold together the sham known as the Desperate Following ®.I don't care so much about this one - I just want clarity on what the policy will be going forward.

I did, however, find this comment interesting:

It's generally studied as a single work
Is that true historically? Got the impression it was just the opposite.As for contemporary study, I thought this reflected the current attitude/trend toward Aristotle:

Since the logical innovations of the 19th century, particularly the formulation of modern predicate logic, Aristotelian logic is mainly studied out of historical interest. There is, however, a mostly pedagogical interest in term logic deriving from its close structure to the actual forms of reasoning encountered in natural language.
I'm not a SME on philosophy, and not trying to be argumentative - just asking questions as I would like to know more about it.
 
BLS' Halfway +1 Roster:

01.15 Non-fiction Book - Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica - Isaac Newton

02.06 Scientific Discovery – Genetics - Gregor Mendel

03.15 Scientific Discovery - Antibiotics - Paul Erlich

04.06 Building/Structure - Taj Mahal

05.15 Invention - The Gasoline-Powered Automobile - Karl Benz

06.06 Poem - The Aeneid - Virgil

07.15 Novel - Madame Bovary - Gustave Flaubert

08.06 Building/Structure - Notre-Dame de Reims (Reims Cathedral)

09.15 T.V. Show - The Simpsons - Matt Groening

10.06 Acting Performance - Guido Orefice in Life Is Beautiful - Roberto Benigni

11.15 Play - Death of a Salesman - Arthur Miller

12.06 Painting - Oath of the Horatii - Jacques Louis David

13.15 Sculpture - St. Peter's Baldachin/Baldacchino - Gian Lorenzo Bernini

14.06 Composition - The Marriage of Figaro - Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart

15.15 Political Document - Code of Hammurabi

16.06 Novel - The Sun Also Rises - Ernest Hemingway

17.15 Short Story - The Nine Billion Names of God - Arthur C. Clarke

18.06 Song - A Change is Gonna Come - Sam Cooke

19.15 Composition - 40th Symphony - Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart

20.06 Play - Antigone - Sophocles

21.15 Album – IV - Led Zeppelin

22.06 Painting - Allegoria della Primavera - Sandro Botticelli

23.15 Movie – Psycho - Alfred Hitchcock

24.06 Non-fiction Book - I Ching

25.15 Painting - The Virgin - Gustav Klimt

26.06 Novel - A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man - James Joyce

27.15 Philosophical/Political Idea - Dialectic - Socrates

28.06 Scientific Disocovery - Central Dogma of Molecular Biology - Francis Crick

29.15 Album - Otis Blue - Otis Redding

30.06 Invention - Gregorian Calendar

31.15 Acting Performance - Daniel Plainview in There Will Be Blood - Daniel Day Lewis

32.06 - Two Treatises of Government - John Locke - Non-Fiction

Some pretty good value in the 32nd.

The Two Treatises is divided into the First Treatise and the Second Treatise. The original title of the Second Treatise appears to have been simply "Book II," corresponding to the title of the First Treatise, "Book I." Before publication, however, Locke gave it greater prominence by (hastily) inserting a separate title page: "An Essay Concerning the True Original, Extent and End of Civil Government."[9] The First Treatise is focused on the refutation of Sir Robert Filmer, in particular his Patriarcha which argued that civil society was founded on a divinely-sanctioned patriarchalism. Locke proceeds through Filmer's arguments, contesting his proofs from Scripture and ridiculing them as senseless, until concluding that no government can be justified by an appeal to the divine right of kings.

The Second Treatise outlines a theory of civil society. Locke begins by describing the state of nature, a picture much more stable than Thomas Hobbes' state of "war of every man against every man," and argues that all men are created equal in the state of nature by God. From this, he goes on to explain the hypothetical rise of property and civilization, in the process explaining that the only legitimate governments are those which have the consent of the people. Thus, any government that rules without the consent of the people can, in theory, be overthrown.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sorry for the delay. I hemmed and hawed about whether or not it was eligible, since it's technically a collection of works. Let me know what y'all think.
For what it's worth, before you drafted The Bhagavad Gita,I had planned on trying to grab The Mahabharata as a single pick.
 
32.06 - Two Treatises of Government - John Locke - Non-Fiction

Some pretty good value in the 32nd.

The Two Treatises is divided into the First Treatise and the Second Treatise. The original title of the Second Treatise appears to have been simply "Book II," corresponding to the title of the First Treatise, "Book I." Before publication, however, Locke gave it greater prominence by (hastily) inserting a separate title page: "An Essay Concerning the True Original, Extent and End of Civil Government."[9] The First Treatise is focused on the refutation of Sir Robert Filmer, in particular his Patriarcha which argued that civil society was founded on a divinely-sanctioned patriarchalism. Locke proceeds through Filmer's arguments, contesting his proofs from Scripture and ridiculing them as senseless, until concluding that no government can be justified by an appeal to the divine right of kings.

The Second Treatise outlines a theory of civil society. Locke begins by describing the state of nature, a picture much more stable than Thomas Hobbes' state of "war of every man against every man," and argues that all men are created equal in the state of nature by God. From this, he goes on to explain the hypothetical rise of property and civilization, in the process explaining that the only legitimate governments are those which have the consent of the people. Thus, any government that rules without the consent of the people can, in theory, be overthrown.
The Second Treatise is huge; this is where Locke, who shares a foundation with Hobbes, takes a radical departure. I have no idea where Leviathan will rank, but unless the judge is a royalist, this one has to go above it.
 
No gavel bangers around?
The dictator is out for a few hours, Doug B is AWOL, Krista4 is trying to hold together the sham known as the Desperate Following ®.I don't care so much about this one - I just want clarity on what the policy will be going forward.
I don't feel like dragging it out. I think I'm just going to take something else.
:confused: Trust me, I don't have any appetite for debating this either. You should keep it for now; I just want to know what the multi-volume rule is for non-fiction going forward.

 
MisfitBlondes' Pick

32.07 Untitled (Skull) (1981) - Jean-Michel Basquiat (Painting)

this

Jean-Michel Basquiat's productive career spanned just one short decade, yet he is considered one of the best-known artists of his generation and one of only a small number of Hispanic-African-American artists to have achieved international recognition. Graduating from subway walls to canvas and from the streets of New York to the galleries of SoHo, the artist and his work will forever remain a mystery to those who seek explanation.
Despite a brief career of less than a decade, Basquiat is a crucial figure in the story of modern art. He was perhaps the last major painter of the twentieth century to pursue a key aspect of the visual language invented by some of the century's first great artists, including Henri Matisse, Pablo Picasso, the German Expressionists, and others. These modern painters had turned to nontraditional sources—African art, as well as the art of children, the insane, and the untrained—for new ideas that would make their own work more direct, powerful, and expressive.

Working eighty years later, and inspired by his own heritage, Basquiat not only contributed to this modern tradition but also transcended it. That is, he understood not only the African-influenced work of his predecessors from the beginning of the century, but also the state of contemporary art as his own generation had found it: austere, cerebral, exclusive, and detached from everyday life. Like many artists of the so-called postmodernist years, he was to a certain extent a revivalist in his effort to make art more immediately relevant to a larger public. But Basquiat was unique among his fellow artists of the 1980s for avoiding nostalgia, imitation, and irony in his attempt to provide a once revolutionary but now outmoded modernist pictorial language with a brilliant final voice.
 
Another day of list shredding; almost there...

32.07 - MisfitBlondes

:shrug:

32.08 - Uncle Humuna

32.09 - Team CIA (autoskip)

32.10 - El Floppo (autoskip if here in first 15)

32.11 - Thatguy (autoskip)

32.12 - Big Rocks

32.13 - Tides of War (autoskip)

32.14 - BobbyLayne

32.15 - Abrantes
 
No gavel bangers around?
The dictator is out for a few hours, Doug B is AWOL, Krista4 is trying to hold together the sham known as the Desperate Following ®.I don't care so much about this one - I just want clarity on what the policy will be going forward.
I don't feel like dragging it out. I think I'm just going to take something else.
:shrug: Trust me, I don't have any appetite for debating this either. You should keep it for now; I just want to know what the multi-volume rule is for non-fiction going forward.
Eh, I went ahead and changed it. I actually wanted to take Nicomachean Ethics initially, but talked myself out of it. It's probably a better pick anyway. When does Genedoc get back?

 
32.08 Smelting (Invention)

Smelting is a form of extractive metallurgy; its main use is to produce a metal from its ore. This includes iron extraction (for the production of steel) from iron ore, and copper extraction and other base metals from their ores. Smelting uses heat and a chemical reducing agent, commonly a fuel that is a source of carbon such as coke, or in earlier times charcoal, to change the oxidation state of the metal ore. The carbon or carbon monoxide derived from it removes oxygen from the ore to leave the metal. The carbon is thus oxidized, producing carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide. As most ores are impure, it is often necessary to use flux, such as limestone, to remove the accompanying rock gangue as slag.

Plants for the electrolytic reduction of aluminium, while not using carbon, are also generally referred to as smelters.
In the Old World, humans learned to smelt metals still in the prehistory, more than 8000 years ago. The discovery of the "useful" metals — copper and bronze at first, then iron a few millenia later — had an enormous impact on human society. The impact was so pervasive that scholars traditionally divide ancient history into Stone Age, Bronze Age, and Iron Age.

In the Americas, the Incas and other civilizations of the Andes had mastered the smelting of copper and bronze when the first Europeans arrived in the 16th century
 
32.06 - Two Treatises of Government - John Locke - Non-Fiction

Some pretty good value in the 32nd.

The Two Treatises is divided into the First Treatise and the Second Treatise. The original title of the Second Treatise appears to have been simply "Book II," corresponding to the title of the First Treatise, "Book I." Before publication, however, Locke gave it greater prominence by (hastily) inserting a separate title page: "An Essay Concerning the True Original, Extent and End of Civil Government."[9] The First Treatise is focused on the refutation of Sir Robert Filmer, in particular his Patriarcha which argued that civil society was founded on a divinely-sanctioned patriarchalism. Locke proceeds through Filmer's arguments, contesting his proofs from Scripture and ridiculing them as senseless, until concluding that no government can be justified by an appeal to the divine right of kings.

The Second Treatise outlines a theory of civil society. Locke begins by describing the state of nature, a picture much more stable than Thomas Hobbes' state of "war of every man against every man," and argues that all men are created equal in the state of nature by God. From this, he goes on to explain the hypothetical rise of property and civilization, in the process explaining that the only legitimate governments are those which have the consent of the people. Thus, any government that rules without the consent of the people can, in theory, be overthrown.
The Second Treatise is huge; this is where Locke, who shares a foundation with Hobbes, takes a radical departure. I have no idea where Leviathan will rank, but unless the judge is a royalist, this one has to go above it.
you bite your tongue, hussy.
 
Team Norwood/Anborn selects....

32.05 - Take the "A" Train (Ellington, 1941) - Composition

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_GudYS33N5g...feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHRbEhLj540...feature=related

This pick needs no explanation.
####you

norwood

xoxo

GAH
that pick was all me... had been targetting it since round whenever I joined up with him. #### norwood anyway for good measure.
:goodposting:
 
32.08 Smelting (Invention)

Smelting is a form of extractive metallurgy; its main use is to produce a metal from its ore. This includes iron extraction (for the production of steel) from iron ore, and copper extraction and other base metals from their ores. Smelting uses heat and a chemical reducing agent, commonly a fuel that is a source of carbon such as coke, or in earlier times charcoal, to change the oxidation state of the metal ore. The carbon or carbon monoxide derived from it removes oxygen from the ore to leave the metal. The carbon is thus oxidized, producing carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide. As most ores are impure, it is often necessary to use flux, such as limestone, to remove the accompanying rock gangue as slag.

Plants for the electrolytic reduction of aluminium, while not using carbon, are also generally referred to as smelters.
In the Old World, humans learned to smelt metals still in the prehistory, more than 8000 years ago. The discovery of the "useful" metals — copper and bronze at first, then iron a few millenia later — had an enormous impact on human society. The impact was so pervasive that scholars traditionally divide ancient history into Stone Age, Bronze Age, and Iron Age.

In the Americas, the Incas and other civilizations of the Andes had mastered the smelting of copper and bronze when the first Europeans arrived in the 16th century
smelt it dealt it. nice one
 
It's generally studied as a single work
Is that true historically? Got the impression it was just the opposite.As for contemporary study, I thought this reflected the current attitude/trend toward Aristotle:
Since the logical innovations of the 19th century, particularly the formulation of modern predicate logic, Aristotelian logic is mainly studied out of historical interest. There is, however, a mostly pedagogical interest in term logic deriving from its close structure to the actual forms of reasoning encountered in natural language.
I'm not a SME on philosophy, and not trying to be argumentative - just asking questions as I would like to know more about it.
This is one of those "influence = great" things. While he didn't get everything figured out, Aristotle put us a huge step forward in coming to a scientific view of the world. You really can't overstate his influence on Western thought. I suppose the problem for this draft is that none of his individual treatise contain the essence of his influence on science and logic.
 
It's generally studied as a single work
Is that true historically? Got the impression it was just the opposite.As for contemporary study, I thought this reflected the current attitude/trend toward Aristotle:

Since the logical innovations of the 19th century, particularly the formulation of modern predicate logic, Aristotelian logic is mainly studied out of historical interest. There is, however, a mostly pedagogical interest in term logic deriving from its close structure to the actual forms of reasoning encountered in natural language.
I'm not a SME on philosophy, and not trying to be argumentative - just asking questions as I would like to know more about it.
This is one of those "influence = great" things. While he didn't get everything figured out, Aristotle put us a huge step forward in coming to a scientific view of the world. You really can't overstate his influence on Western thought. I suppose the problem for this draft is that none of his individual treatise contain the essence of his influence on science and logic.
True dat. I screwed up in the Worlds Greatest Draft and put him in with Philosophers, and ended up with a mediocre score even though he was the 2nd one off the board (should have stuck him in the Intellectuals category).

There are actually quite a few intellectual and philosophy giants out there who are still unrepresented.

 
32.12 De humani corporis fabrica (On the fabric of the human body), non-fiction

Many medical advances were made due to Andreas Vesalius' work on human corpses, correcting commonly held beliefs held for many centuries. His work and lectures were summarized in this textbook that is one of the most influential works in the field of medicine.

Wiki link:

The book is based on his Paduan lectures, during which he deviated from common practice by dissecting a corpse to illustrate what he was discussing. It presents a careful examination of the organs and the complete structure of the human body. This would not have been possible without the many advances that had been made during the Renaissance, including both the artistic developments and the technical development of printing. Because of this, he was able to produce illustrations superior to any that had been produced up to then.

Fabrica rectified some of Galen's worst errors, including the notion that the great blood vessels originated from the liver. Even with his improvements, however, Vesalius clung to some of Galen's errors, such as the idea that there was a different type of blood flowing through veins than arteries. It was not until William Harvey's work on the circulation of the blood that this misconception of Galen would be rectified in Europe.

Vesalius had the work published at the age of 28, taking great pains to ensure its quality. The illustrations are of great artistic merit and are generally attributed by modern scholars to the "studio of Titian" rather than Johannes Stephanus of Calcar, who provided drawings for Vesalius' earlier tracts, but in a much inferior style. The woodcuts were greatly superior to the illustrations in anatomical atlases of the day, which were often made by anatomy professors themselves. The woodcuts were transported to Basel, Switzerland, as Vesalius wished that the work be published by one of the foremost printers of the time, Joannis Oporini.
 
Don't know where Big Rocks went; thought he was posting. Looks like El Floppo's 15 minutes & skip me thingy is up and he can pick.

Got a meeting, back in an hour.

 
It's generally studied as a single work
Is that true historically? Got the impression it was just the opposite.As for contemporary study, I thought this reflected the current attitude/trend toward Aristotle:

Since the logical innovations of the 19th century, particularly the formulation of modern predicate logic, Aristotelian logic is mainly studied out of historical interest. There is, however, a mostly pedagogical interest in term logic deriving from its close structure to the actual forms of reasoning encountered in natural language.
I'm not a SME on philosophy, and not trying to be argumentative - just asking questions as I would like to know more about it.
This is one of those "influence = great" things. While he didn't get everything figured out, Aristotle put us a huge step forward in coming to a scientific view of the world. You really can't overstate his influence on Western thought. I suppose the problem for this draft is that none of his individual treatise contain the essence of his influence on science and logic.
True dat. I screwed up in the Worlds Greatest Draft and put him in with Philosophers, and ended up with a mediocre score even though he was the 2nd one off the board (should have stuck him in the Intellectuals category).

There are actually quite a few intellectual and philosophy giants out there who are still unrepresented.
I don't see how you could screw up putting him in the Philosophers category.
 
SKIPPED

23.05 - Doug B (requested skip)

24.16 - Doug B (autoskip)

25.05 - Doug B (autoskip)

26.16 - Doug B (autoskip)

27.05 - Doug B - (autoskip)

28.11 - Thatguy (autoskip)

28.16 - Doug B (autoskip)

29.05 - Doug B (autoskip)

29.10 - thatguy (autoskip)

30.11 - thatguy (autoskip until further notice)

30.16 - Doug B (autoskip)

31.05 - Doug B (autoskip)

31.10 - Thatguy (autoskip)

31.19 - Tirnan (autoskip if not around)

32.02 - Tirnan (autoskip if not around)

32.09 - Team CIA (autoskip)

32.10 - El Floppo (autoskip if here in first 15)

32.11 - Thatguy (autoskip)

32.13 - Tides of War (autoskip)

32.14 - BobbyLayne - OTC until :20

32.15 - Abrantes - On Deck

32.16 - Doug B (autoskip)

32.17 - Timscochet (autoskip)

32.18 - Postradamus - In The Hole

32.19 - Rodg

32.20 - Krista

33.01 - Fennis (autoskip)

33.02 - Rodg

33.03 - Postradamus

33.04 - Timscochet (autoskip)

33.05 - Doug B (autoskip)

33.06 - Abrantes

33.07 - BobbyLayne

33.08 - Tides of War (autoskip)

33.09 - Big Rocks

33.10 - Thatguy (autoskip)

33.11 - El Floppo (autoskip if not here in first 15 min)

33.12 - Team CIA (autoskip)

33.13 - Uncle Humuna

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sesame Street Brief write-up

Really needs no introduction, as 77 million Americans watched show as a child, an even more phenomenal number when you subtract the millions already beyond childhood before the Street hit the streets in 1969 (hey, I was four then which must make me a plank owner). Also the show has won 109 Emmys (as of 2006). ... so says the great Wiki.

Crap! I usually find myself too busy to do a proper write-up, and now that I sit to do one I ask myself - how the bleep can I do a write-up on Sesame Street. Obviously far greater than the sum of its parts, it's when trying to describe Sesame Street do I realize just how many parts there are. Memorable Muppets in the dozens, enduring themes (one of these is not like the others), and just a warm fuzzy memory of what is probably the first cool thing I ever knew.

Darn near flawless.

Favorite Muppet: Cookie Monster (obvious pick)

Muppet I related to most: The Count

Favorite song: I'm a Little Airplane - can't find link to original -

I would suggest just copying and pasting the Newsweek article from last week...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
SKIPPED

23.05 - Doug B (requested skip)

24.16 - Doug B (autoskip)

25.05 - Doug B (autoskip)

26.16 - Doug B (autoskip)

27.05 - Doug B - (autoskip)

28.11 - Thatguy (autoskip)

28.16 - Doug B (autoskip)

29.05 - Doug B (autoskip)

29.10 - thatguy (autoskip)

30.11 - thatguy (autoskip until further notice)

30.16 - Doug B (autoskip)

31.05 - Doug B (autoskip)

31.10 - Thatguy (autoskip)

31.17 - DC Thunder (timed out)-MASTERING THE ART OF FRENCH COOKING-NON-FICTION

31.19 - Tirnan (autoskip if not around)

32.02 - Tirnan (autoskip if not around)

32.09 - Team CIA (autoskip)

32.10 - El Floppo (autoskip if here in first 15)

32.11 - Thatguy (autoskip)

32.13 - Tides of War (autoskip)

32.14 - BobbyLayne - OTC until :20

32.15 - Abrantes - On Deck

32.16 - Doug B (autoskip)

32.17 - Timscochet (autoskip)

32.18 - Postradamus - In The Hole

32.19 - Rodg

32.20 - Krista

33.01 - Fennis (autoskip)

33.02 - Rodg

33.03 - Postradamus

33.04 - Timscochet (autoskip)

33.05 - Doug B (autoskip)

33.06 - Abrantes

33.07 - BobbyLayne

33.08 - Tides of War (autoskip)

33.09 - Big Rocks

33.10 - Thatguy (autoskip)

33.11 - El Floppo (autoskip if not here in first 15 min)

33.12 - Team CIA (autoskip)

33.13 - Uncle Humuna
FIXED
 
How Sesame Street Changed the World

This story has been brought to you by the letter S and the numbers 15 and 40. (Or, as the Count might say in his adorable Transylvanian accent, "fivteen and forrrty—HA, HA, HA!") The S, as anyone who has ever watched television can deduce by now, stands for Sesame Street. The 40 is almost as easy: this year marks the 40th anniversary of sunny days, friendly neighbors and the fuzzy creatures who live on that street where the air is sweet. If you haven't watched recently with your children or grandchildren, you'll be relieved to know that impending middle age hasn't wrinkled Sesame Street all that much. Big Bird still waddles, Cookie Monster still goes on his sugar binges and Ernie still wakes up Bert at all hours with questions (none of them, mercifully, about the nature of their relationship). In a world where cultural touchstones are dropping faster than the Mets in September—sorry, Guiding Light fans—the endurance of Sesame Street is nothing short of a miracle.

Which brings us to that second number of the day: 15. That, shockingly, is where Nielsen says Sesame Street ranks among the top children's shows on the air. Some months, it does even worse. Ask a preschooler who her favorite TV character is, and chances are she'll say Dora, Curious George or, heaven help us, SpongeBob. We know it doesn't seem nice to point out that the granddaddy of children's television is regularly beaten up by a girl who talks to her backpack, but these are desperate times. The Children's Television Workshop (now called Sesame Workshop) produces only 26 episodes a year now, down from a high of 130. The workshop itself recently announced it was laying off 20 percent of its staff as the recession continues to take a toll on nonprofit arts organizations. But Sesame Street is no ordinary nonprofit. It is, arguably, the most important children's program in the history of television. No show has affected the way we think about education, parenting, childhood development and cultural diversity, both in the United States and abroad, more than Big Bird and friends. You might even say that Sesame Street changed the world, one letter at a time. Don't believe us? Then let's imagine where we'd be if Sesame Street never existed.

For one thing, television itself might be a "vast wasteland." That was the phrase FCC chairman Newton Minow used to describe the TV landscape in 1961, and children's TV was hardly exempt. As recounted in Street Gang, a new book by TV journalist Michael Davis, the show came about after Lloyd Morrisett, an experimental psychologist, walked into his living room and found his 3-year-old daughter mesmerized by the TV test pattern. He told that story at a dinner party several weeks later and wondered aloud if children might be able to learn something from the boob tube. It seems like a crazy question in our Baby Einstein world, but back then, to paraphrase Donald Rumsfeld, we didn't know what we didn't know. When Sesame Street arrived, scientists were just discovering that our brains were not fully formed at birth and could be affected by early experiences. Head Start began in 1965, in part, out of that revelation. "Educators were virtually ignoring the intellect of preschool children," says Joan Ganz Cooney, who threw that dinner party and has been the show's visionary since the beginning. Children would eat up the ABCs before kindergarten, Cooney believed, especially if a wacky puppet ate up alphabet-shaped cookies along with them. The Department of Education was skeptical. Captain Kangaroo and Mister Rogers, though age-appropriate, had not become must-see TV; Bozo and Romper Room (which ended each show with the hostess pretending she could see children at home through a magic mirror that was obviously fake) presented dumbed-down fun. But the government agreed to contribute half of the original $8 million budget to launch Sesame Street. "It was a speculative leap," Morrisett says.

The results were pretty immediate. The first season in 1969 set out to teach children to count from one to 10, but it became clear that kids as young as 2 could make it to 20. (The show now hits 100, counting by tens.) That rookie year also yielded three Emmys, a Peabody Award, a front-page rave from The New York Times and one especially noteworthy piece of fan mail: "The many children and families now benefiting from 'Sesame Street' are participants in one of the most promising experiments in the history of that medium. The Children's Television Workshop certainly deserves the high praise it has been getting from young and old alike in every corner of the nation. This administration is enthusiastically committed to opening up opportunities for every youngster, particularly during his first five years of life, and is pleased to be among the sponsors of your distinguished program. Sincerely, Richard Nixon."

The most impressive feedback, however, came from the kids themselves—or at least from their test scores. No show to this day has probed its effects on kids as thoroughly as Sesame Street, which plans to spend more than $770,000 in 2009 on its department of education and research. When people think of Sesame Street as the essence of educational television, what they don't realize is how much the show has educated the educators. "Before Sesame Street, kindergartens taught very little," says Cooney, "and suddenly masses of children were coming in knowing letters and numbers." Independent research found that children who regularly watch Sesame Street gained more than nonviewers on tests of letter and number recognition, vocabulary and early math skills. One study, in 2001, revealed that the show's positive effects on reading and achievement lasted through high school. "It totally changed parental thinking about television," says Daniel Anderson, a psychologist at the University of Massachusetts.

But the show was never just about improving test scores. Perhaps the most radical part of the Sesame DNA has always been its social activism. From the start, Sesame targeted lower-income, urban kids—the ones who lived on streets with garbage cans sitting in front of their rowhouse apartments. The show arrived on the heels of riots in Washington, Baltimore, Cleveland and Chicago, and the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. Chester Pierce, a Harvard professor who founded the Black Psychiatrists of America, was one of the show's original advisers, and he was acutely aware of the racism his 3-year-old daughter would face in that hostile time. "It was intentional from the beginning to show different races living together," says David Kleeman, executive director of the American Center for Children and Media. "They were very conscious of the modeling that kids and parents would take away from that."

In 1969, that was still a radical notion in some corners of the country. Here was a TV show putting African-Americans on a level playing field with white characters, showing them not as servants or entertainers, but as equals. (Though it should be noted that when the show premiered, some African-Americans took offense to Oscar the Grouch, who accepts his poverty rather than fighting against it, as a demeaning stand-in for inner-city blacks.) An integrated program aimed at impressionable children was too much for the good people of Mississippi. The state's commission for educational television banned the show in May 1970. Cooney called it "a tragedy for both the white and black children of Mississippi," and news reports saw her outrage and raised it. The state finally reversed itself, 22 days later. When you think about what the world might have looked like without Sesame, you can't dismiss the impact of putting Gordon and Susan into America's living rooms. Is it too much of a stretch to claim that the man in the White House might not be there without Sesame Street? "I like to think," Cooney says, "that we had something to do with Obama's election."

The show's impact has been as profound overseas. Sesame Street is now exported to 16 countries and regions—places such as the Palestinian territories, Kosovo and Bangladesh, where the message of tolerance can be in short supply. In South Africa, where as recently as 2008 the president insisted that HIV does not cause AIDS, the show features a ginger-colored, HIV-positive Muppet. The South African Sesame is also now produced in 12 of the country's official languages.

The show's we-are-the-world agenda doesn't always produce friendly neighbors. In 1998, a Middle East version was launched, co-produced by Israelis and Palestinians. The Israeli and Palestinian Muppets lived on different streets, but they would sometimes visit each other to play. Israeli Muppets could appear in Palestinian territory, but not without being invited. But the intifada made the notion of coexistence and cooperation politically untenable and it was canceled. The show returned in 2006, but now there are separate versions produced for Israel and the Palestinian territories. The Palestinian one no longer features Jews at all.

The tough topics aren't only political. Following the attacks of 9/11, the 33rd-season premiere found Elmo struggling to deal with his fear after he sees a grease fire break out at a lunch counter. He's reassured after he visits with real-life firefighters in Harlem. With that storyline, Sesame Street did more to acknowledge its audience's unsettled feelings than many adult shows did, even some set in Manhattan, including Friends and Sex and the City. In 1982, Will Lee, the man who played Mr. Hooper, died suddenly of a heart attack. The show decided to tackle the issue of death with an episode on Big Bird's distress and confusion over losing his friend. Children with illnesses and conditions such as Down syndrome are also regularly included. "For many children, the first place they may see a ballet may be on Sesame Street," said Rosemarie Truglio, vice president of education and research for Sesame Workshop, in a book about the show. "Moreover, it may be the only place where they see a ballet performed by a girl in a wheelchair."

Not everyone thinks that Sesame Street is doing right by kids. Latino groups have criticized it for not having a Hispanic character in its early years. The show only introduced a major female Muppet in 1992. (Prairie Dawn was too annoying to count as a role model.) It has also been criticized by Ralph Nader and the Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood for selling out its characters in too many licensing deals. Some of its interactive software products have been panned by Children's Technology Review.

There is no question that Sesame has provoked some critics to chastise it for getting a little too attached to the letters P and C. After the show launched an obesity-awareness campaign called Healthy Habits for Life, one particular Muppet needed to get with the program. So in 2005, Cookie Monster began to sing about cookies being "sometimes" food. Parents, some of whom wrongly believed that Cookie was going to become a health-food nut, started a preschool food fight. It turns out that Cookie still eats cookies in his typically frenzied fashion. "But the lesson was, this show is important," says executive producer Carol-Lynn Parente. "Don't mess with it."

That's impossible, of course. As Nicole Kidman might say about Botox, no 40-year-old looks young without a few touch-ups. (Cosmetic case in point: in the first season, Oscar was a particularly unattractive shade of orange.) Sesame Workshop is focusing a lot of energy on the digital universe. It recently launched a new Web site featuring a huge library of free video clips, both recent ones and classics. It also offers a series of podcasts that parentscan download to their phones to show their kids later, like when they're stuck in a long line at the grocery store. So in that sense, Sesame Street is no longer changing the world as much as trying to keep up with the world's changes. "We need to continuously reinvent or experiment," says CEO Gary Knell, "or else we are going to be dead."

Could that really happen—could Big Bird follow Mr. Hooper into the big playground in the sky? Maybe it's wrong to even worry about that. The granddaddy of them all doesn't have to survive for the breed to prosper; if that were true, people would still be driving Edsels. Children's programs are in more places than ever. But only a tiny handful, such as Blue's Clues or the new PBS show Super Why!, make any real attempt to conduct research like Sesame Workshop, not to mention influence the way the world thinks. If we agree that Sesame Street has changed our society, and many others, for the better, if we agree that we still need messages of open-mindedness and if we agree that it is still rare to find an educational television show that parents and children can enjoy watching together, then we have to hope that our furry gang will live on to greet the next generation of children. Can you tell me how to get to Sesame Street? Of course. The more important question now is: can you tell me if Sesame Street will continue to get to us?
 
Figured I'd regret it if I didn't throw it out there. It's generally studied as a single work, but I totally understand the criticism.
This is how I read it, and how it was presented to me by an Aristotelian scholar. Yes, he noted how it was organized, but it's been considered a single work for a long time now. Why not allow it?I'm all for multivolume works to be eligible. Why be so stingy about it?

After all, if we allow thatguy to draft In Search of Lost Time (technically one novel published as 6 separate books - or a multivolume novel), and others to take The Lord of the Rings (someone took that already, right?), then why can't we allow Nicomachean Ethics?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Figured I'd regret it if I didn't throw it out there. It's generally studied as a single work, but I totally understand the criticism.
This is how I read it, and how it was presented to me by an Aristotelian scholar. Yes, he noted how it was organized, but it's been considered a single work for a long time now. Why not allow it?I'm all for multivolume works to be eligible. Why be so stingy about it?

After all, if we allow thatguy to draft In Search of Lost Time (technically one novel published as 6 separate books - or a multivolume novel), and others to take The Lord of the Rings (someone took that already, right?), then why can't we allow Nicomachean Ethics?
or The Star Wars Saga (Episodes IV-VI)?
 
Figured I'd regret it if I didn't throw it out there. It's generally studied as a single work, but I totally understand the criticism.
This is how I read it, and how it was presented to me by an Aristotelian scholar. Yes, he noted how it was organized, but it's been considered a single work for a long time now. Why not allow it?I'm all for multivolume works to be eligible. Why be so stingy about it?

After all, if we allow thatguy to draft In Search of Lost Time (technically one novel published as 6 separate books - or a multivolume novel), and others to take The Lord of the Rings (someone took that already, right?), then why can't we allow Nicomachean Ethics?
I changed my pick from The Organon to Nicomachean Ethics. The Organon was the one stirring up controversy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Figured I'd regret it if I didn't throw it out there. It's generally studied as a single work, but I totally understand the criticism.
This is how I read it, and how it was presented to me by an Aristotelian scholar. Yes, he noted how it was organized, but it's been considered a single work for a long time now. Why not allow it?I'm all for multivolume works to be eligible. Why be so stingy about it?

After all, if we allow thatguy to draft In Search of Lost Time (technically one novel published as 6 separate books - or a multivolume novel), and others to take The Lord of the Rings (someone took that already, right?), then why can't we allow Nicomachean Ethics?
or The Star Wars Saga (Episodes IV-VI)?
Technically the story is about Darth Vader, and thus you'd have to take episodes I-VI.Would you like to repick now or bury your head in shame?

:goodposting:

 
Figured I'd regret it if I didn't throw it out there. It's generally studied as a single work, but I totally understand the criticism.
This is how I read it, and how it was presented to me by an Aristotelian scholar. Yes, he noted how it was organized, but it's been considered a single work for a long time now. Why not allow it?I'm all for multivolume works to be eligible. Why be so stingy about it?

After all, if we allow thatguy to draft In Search of Lost Time (technically one novel published as 6 separate books - or a multivolume novel), and others to take The Lord of the Rings (someone took that already, right?), then why can't we allow Nicomachean Ethics?
I changed my pick from The Organon to Nicomachean Ethics. The Organon is the one stirring up controversy.
I think I just put my foot in my mouth. What the hell was I remembering? Wasn't Nichomachean Ethics a multivolume work?

Philosophy 201 was a decade ago. I'm so confused.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Figured I'd regret it if I didn't throw it out there. It's generally studied as a single work, but I totally understand the criticism.
This is how I read it, and how it was presented to me by an Aristotelian scholar. Yes, he noted how it was organized, but it's been considered a single work for a long time now. Why not allow it?I'm all for multivolume works to be eligible. Why be so stingy about it?

After all, if we allow thatguy to draft In Search of Lost Time (technically one novel published as 6 separate books - or a multivolume novel), and others to take The Lord of the Rings (someone took that already, right?), then why can't we allow Nicomachean Ethics?
I changed my pick from The Organon to Nicomachean Ethics. The Organon is the one stirring up controversy.
I think I just put my foot in my mouth. What the hell was I remembering? Wasn't Nichomachean Ethics a multivolume work?

Philosophy 201 was a decade ago. I'm so confused.
Actually, it does consist of 10 books, but it's certainly a single "work".
 
Figured I'd regret it if I didn't throw it out there. It's generally studied as a single work, but I totally understand the criticism.
This is how I read it, and how it was presented to me by an Aristotelian scholar. Yes, he noted how it was organized, but it's been considered a single work for a long time now. Why not allow it?I'm all for multivolume works to be eligible. Why be so stingy about it?

After all, if we allow thatguy to draft In Search of Lost Time (technically one novel published as 6 separate books - or a multivolume novel), and others to take The Lord of the Rings (someone took that already, right?), then why can't we allow Nicomachean Ethics?
or The Star Wars Saga (Episodes IV-VI)?
Technically the story is about Darth Vader, and thus you'd have to take episodes I-VI.Would you like to repick now or bury your head in shame?

:thumbup:
:towelwave:
 
BL just timed out, Abrantes you're up.....

SKIPPED

23.05 - Doug B (requested skip)

24.16 - Doug B (autoskip)

25.05 - Doug B (autoskip)

26.16 - Doug B (autoskip)

27.05 - Doug B - (autoskip)

28.11 - Thatguy (autoskip)

28.16 - Doug B (autoskip)

29.05 - Doug B (autoskip)

29.10 - thatguy (autoskip)

30.11 - thatguy (autoskip until further notice)

30.16 - Doug B (autoskip)

31.05 - Doug B (autoskip)

31.10 - Thatguy (autoskip)

31.19 - Tirnan (autoskip if not around)

32.02 - Tirnan (autoskip if not around)

32.09 - Team CIA (autoskip)

32.10 - El Floppo (autoskip if here in first 15)

32.11 - Thatguy (autoskip)

32.13 - Tides of War (autoskip)

32.14 - BobbyLayne - (timed out)

32.15 - Abrantes - OTC until :20

32.16 - Doug B (autoskip)

32.17 - Timscochet (autoskip)

32.18 - Postradamus - On Deck

32.19 - Rodg - In The Hole

32.20 - Krista

33.01 - Fennis (autoskip)

33.02 - Rodg

33.03 - Postradamus

33.04 - Timscochet (autoskip)

33.05 - Doug B (autoskip)

33.06 - Abrantes

33.07 - BobbyLayne

33.08 - Tides of War (autoskip)

33.09 - Big Rocks

33.10 - Thatguy (autoskip)

33.11 - El Floppo (autoskip if not here in first 15 min)

33.12 - Team CIA (autoskip)

33.13 - Uncle Humuna

 
timschochet

:lmao:

krista4

:lmao:

Doug B

:kicksrock:

I'm going to pass taking a pick until I get a ruling on multi-volume non-fiction books.

Abrantes is up.

FWIW

The Lord of the Rings - timschochet immediately ruled (before any objections) that it was one work, the publisher is the one who made the decision to split it into three volumes.

Remembrance of Things Past/In Search of Lost Time - that's called being asleep at the switch. I have a first edition of The Guermantes Way - no mention of the now more familiar title. I say let it go; it is one continuous story, with something like 2,000 characters.

 
BL just timed out, Abrantes you're up.....SKIPPED23.05 - Doug B (requested skip)24.16 - Doug B (autoskip)25.05 - Doug B (autoskip)26.16 - Doug B (autoskip)27.05 - Doug B - (autoskip)28.11 - Thatguy (autoskip)28.16 - Doug B (autoskip)29.05 - Doug B (autoskip)29.10 - thatguy (autoskip)30.11 - thatguy (autoskip until further notice)30.16 - Doug B (autoskip)31.05 - Doug B (autoskip)31.10 - Thatguy (autoskip)31.19 - Tirnan (autoskip if not around)32.02 - Tirnan (autoskip if not around)32.09 - Team CIA (autoskip)32.10 - El Floppo (autoskip if here in first 15)32.11 - Thatguy (autoskip)32.13 - Tides of War (autoskip)32.14 - BobbyLayne - (timed out)32.15 - Abrantes - OTC until :2032.16 - Doug B (autoskip)32.17 - Timscochet (autoskip)32.18 - Postradamus - On Deck32.19 - Rodg - In The Hole32.20 - Krista33.01 - Fennis (autoskip)33.02 - Rodg33.03 - Postradamus33.04 - Timscochet (autoskip)33.05 - Doug B (autoskip)33.06 - Abrantes33.07 - BobbyLayne33.08 - Tides of War (autoskip)33.09 - Big Rocks33.10 - Thatguy (autoskip)33.11 - El Floppo (autoskip if not here in first 15 min)33.12 - Team CIA (autoskip)33.13 - Uncle Humuna
Nice job staying on top of this cluster love rodg. :hophead:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top