This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
This is not guilt by association. I strongly defended Obama's friendship with Jeremiah Wright, because I don't care who you're friends with. But if Obama had hired Wright to be in charge of his campaign, and if Obama started spouting some of Wright's more offensive ideas. I'd have had a BIG problem with that.
A lot gets lost in the constant stream of crap. They can't keep up.SaintsInDome2006 said:
Given I pay little attention to this goober, these are genuine questions (believe it or not). So what ideas have been derived from this group that Trump has adopted since receiving their endorsement / hiring this campaign guy that would trigger a desire by Hillary to go down this path of naming this group specifically?
I could give you some (not all) stuff off the top of my head, but I'm sure Hillary will be more thorough later this afternoon.
Absolutely she would do that, it's a Brock specialty with a dash of Blumenthal stories peppered in the media.
SCOTUS votes are supposed to be based on interpreting the law, not helping out any one group.
It's pretty simple actually. For the last week Trump has been making the argument that he's not a racist after all. Although supposedly he's addressing minority voters, his real target is white moderate Republicans and independents who were uncomfortable with the idea of supporting a racist. Hillary's speech is designed for these same people to tell them "oh no, he really is a racist."
As a political junkie I think she has more to lose than gain with the alt right angle.
Given the incarnation rates of black Americans and the widening unemployment gap between blacks and whites, maybe a "racist" would be an improvement over the establishment.
Why? The press will cover the speech. They then turn around and ask Trump if he's a racist. At that point, she's won the debate. This is the "Clinton is sick angle", but for Trump.
Yes, indeed, it will definitely be a winning argument to say that today's Democratic Party is the same one that started the Civil War, was responsible for genocide against Native Americans and founded the KKK. That should sway the few undecided voters that are left in Trump's favor.
That's Hillary, she does stuff Obama would not do. She has the subtlety of a 2x4. Ask not why, the answer is 'because it's there.'
This move requires dexterity and subtlety on the part of Hillary.
She is a bigot...she is intolerant to those who hold a different opinion than hers...
Noah Rothman
I read the text, but didn't see the delivery. Did she scream, and was it genuine? This is a good tone.
Hillary would prefer you call those incarcerated "super-predators"...
Cool, we're interested in policies? Hillary has a detailed outline for small business growth, that was put together by actually listening to small business people, which was going to be the focus of the speech.I read this....I think I'd rather have held my breath and waited for details on the topics she was supposedly going to address instead of talking about Trump being a racist.
Well, Hill is just your ordinary, everyday gal...Bleachbit is just something that every household has lying around...never know when you need to destroy your yoga emails...I don't know what is more impressive...the levels of her deceit or fanaticism of her followers...
Bigger than the FBI Director concluding that she's extremely careless?
He was in office as President Pro Tempore 6 years ago...what exactly is the expiration date on criticizing a guy for being an Exalted Cyclops in the Klan? Once you get to 20 years out of the Klan do you get a pass?
Talk about an oldie. Rush and Hannity have been making this "Byrd was once a KKK member so the Dems are racist!" argument for 20 years or more!
