What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Official Hillary Clinton 2016 thread (8 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mr. Ham said:
Both of the facts I detailed are true.  How the #### pending drone strikes can be discussed on a private server and no charges!! 

And your fearless liar's claims that this was just discussions of published articles turns out to be -- this will shock you --- utter lies.
Click to expand...
Link

The vaguely worded messages didn’t mention the “CIA,” “drones” or details about the militant targets, officials said.

:

State Department officials told FBI investigators they communicated via the less-secure system on a few instances, according to congressional and law-enforcement officials. It happened when decisions about imminent strikes had to be relayed fast and the U.S. diplomats in Pakistan or Washington didn’t have ready access to a more-secure system, either because it was night or they were traveling.

Emails sent over the low side sometimes were informal discussions that occurred in addition to more-formal notifications through secure communications, the officials said.

One such exchange came just before Christmas in 2011, when the U.S. ambassador sent a short, cryptic note to his boss indicating a drone strike was planned. That sparked a back-and-forth among Mrs. Clinton’s senior advisers over the next few days, in which it was clear they were having the discussions in part because people were away from their offices for the holiday and didn’t have access to a classified computer, officials said.
Click to expand...


:yawn:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is it just me, or is "Delete your account" just unfunny in every way?  Seems right up there with "You're a doo-doo head", but not quite as witty.

A tweet from Trump saying "Drop out" wouldn't be funny either.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rich Conway said:
Is it just me, or is "Delete your account" just unfunny in every way?  Seems right up there with "You're a doo-doo head", but not quite as witty.

A tweet from Trump saying "Drop out" wouldn't be funny either.
Click to expand...
It seems to be epic to several (a turning point even).  Seems like two middle school children to me :shrug:   This is going to be embarrassingly entertaining, BUT at least we get the "act Presidential" shtick out of the way early.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah, the drone email issue registers a mild concern for me, but in isolation not a major issue.  It is the systematic pattern of abuse here, including absolutely "top secret" information being exchanged in an insecure manner--not withstanding the intent, secrecy, and lies that followed the private server's creation--that is what troubles me and I suspect is troubling the FBI right now.

I don't think this ends well.

 
dparker713 said:
Well, that would mean the problem originated with the Islamabad or Washington members of State.  Forwarding it on to Clinton's address would seem immaterial.
Click to expand...
I think Josh Earnest referring to this as a 'criminal investigation' is enough of a takeaway for me.

If you think it's about other culprits than Hillary, ok by me....

 
Let's make a count...

Hillary Clinton has been endorsed today by: Barack Obama, Michelle Obama, Joe Biden, Elizabeth Warren and Martin O'Malley.

Did I miss anybody?

 
Yankee23Fan said:
It's really offensive when someone says she is the most qualified person in history to run for president. I mean,it's borderline clinical insanity to say it and shows both a ridiculous narcissism for current politics and an ignorance of american history that I would expect from an,Internet message board but not a Constitutional law professor who happens to actually sit in the office the comment is about.
Click to expand...
Yankee, it's politics.

 
SaintsInDome2006 said:
I think Josh Earnest referring to this as a 'criminal investigation' is enough of a takeaway for me.

If you think it's about other culprits than Hillary, ok by me....
Click to expand...
I'm saying that if the information needed to be sent through secure channels, the issue has nothing to do with Clinton's server.  The information would have already been sent over an unsecure server.  

 
dparker713 said:
I'm saying that if the information needed to be sent through secure channels, the issue has nothing to do with Clinton's server.  The information would have already been sent over an unsecure server.  
Click to expand...
I love how the presumed Democratic nominee is under criminal investigation by the FBI and everybody is like 'no problem'.

 IC agent named on her server? Not a problem.

Specific drone strikes? No problem.

Top Secret & above? No problem.

Not authorized? No problem.

Not cooperating? No problem.

People were told to shut up? No problem.

SBU markings? Not a problem.

Destroyed all the metadata? No problem.

Said there was nothing on the server then server seized? No problem.

What exactly is the problem? 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
dparker713 said:
I'm saying that if the information needed to be sent through secure channels, the issue has nothing to do with Clinton's server.  The information would have already been sent over an unsecure server.  
Click to expand...
This is going to be a big takeaway, regardless of whether or not Hillary gets clipped by this investigation.  It's clear that State and other agencies do not have an adequate system of communication.

That does not in any way, however, justify Hillary's behavior in the slightest. And, let's all agree to dispense with the false pretense that the FBI is conducting a "security review."  This is a criminal investigation.  Hillary may not be guilty of committing any crimes in the end, but the FBI is most certainly condipucting a criminal investigation into possible criminal behavior she may or may not have been engaged in.

 
SaintsInDome2006 said:
I love how the presumed Drmocratic nominee is under criminal investigation by the FBI and everybody is like 'no problem'.

 IC agent named on her server? Not a problem.

Specific drone strikes? No problem.

Top Secret & above? No problem.

Not authorized? No problem.

Not cooperating? No problem.

SBU markings? Not a problem.

Said there was nothing on the server then server seized? No problem.

What exactly is the problem? 
Click to expand...
:lmao:

 
SaintsInDome2006 said:
I love how the presumed Drmocratic nominee is under criminal investigation by the FBI and everybody is like 'no problem'.

 IC agent named on her server? Not a problem.

Specific drone strikes? No problem.

Top Secret & above? No problem.

Not authorized? No problem.

Not cooperating? No problem.

SBU markings? Not a problem.

Said there was nothing on the server then server seized? No problem.

What exactly is the problem? 
Click to expand...
It's obviously spin. 

Replace Clinton with Trump in the above, and let me know if you think the investigation and coverage would be handled any differently. 

 
mquinnjr said:
It's obviously spin. 

Replace Clinton with Trump in the above, and let me know if you think the investigation and coverage would be handled any differently. 
Click to expand...
I don't think there's anyone else in the world that would be treated like this for this 'problem', Dandy Don included.

 
SaintsInDome2006 said:
I love how the presumed Drmocratic nominee is under criminal investigation by the FBI and everybody is like 'no problem'.

 IC agent named on her server? Not a problem.

Specific drone strikes? No problem.

Top Secret & above? No problem.

Not authorized? No problem.

Not cooperating? No problem.

People were told to shut up? No problem.

SBU markings? Not a problem.

Said there was nothing on the server then server seized? No problem.

What exactly is the problem? 
Click to expand...
It's not a good look at all.  And the fact that Hillary has had to keep moving the goal posts, as opposed to being straight forward from the beginning--and then not cooperating with OIG investigation for reasons that make no sense- -makes all of this even more concerning.

 
timschochet said:
She went on and on. Her praise was very lavish. Seems heartfelt. 

When are you going to realize that a lot of the country really admires this woman and doesn't see her in the negative way that you do? Hillary Clinton is a good person, whip smart, more qualified than nearly any other candidate in history, and she will make an excellent President. She has been a tremendous public servant because sh cares about all of us. 
Click to expand...
"whip smart" is the exact term Obama used the other day.  It's like you hear it on tv and it immediately becomes part of your vernacular.

 
Willie Neslon said:
"whip smart" is the exact term Obama used the other day.  It's like you hear it on tv and it immediately becomes part of your vernacular.
Click to expand...
Yep, I got it from him. It's a good phrase, I like it. It's very accurate with regard to her. Did you watch her testimony before Congress? Never seen anyone quite that knowledgeable about so many subjects. 

 
timschochet said:
Yep, I got it from him. It's a good phrase, I like it. It's very accurate with regard to her. Did you watch her testimony before Congress? Never seen anyone quite that knowledgeable about so many subjects. 
Click to expand...
Subjects like: deleting emails, smearing sexual assault victims, covering up her spouse's rape charges. 

 
timschochet said:
Yep, I got it from him. It's a good phrase, I like it. It's very accurate with regard to her. Did you watch her testimony before Congress? Never seen anyone quite that knowledgeable about so many subjects. 
Click to expand...
How come she didn't know giving speeches to wall street between the recession and running this time around may be a bad idea?  How come she didn't realize using an unsecured personal server while Secretary of State may not be the best plan?  If she's the best we got we're all doomed.

 
Willie Neslon said:
How come she didn't know giving speeches to wall street between the recession and running this time around may be a bad idea?  How come she didn't realize using an unsecured personal server while Secretary of State may not be the best plan?  If she's the best we got we're all doomed.
Click to expand...
Doomed how?  What are your predictions?

 
timschochet said:
Yep, I got it from him. It's a good phrase, I like it. It's very accurate with regard to her. Did you watch her testimony before Congress? Never seen anyone quite that knowledgeable about so many subjects. 
Click to expand...
Did you also like and lift the phrase "promiscuous 13 year old with the body of a 20 year old" line from someone else when excusing Roman Polanski's sexual assault...or were those your own words?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Willie Neslon said:
How come she didn't know giving speeches to wall street between the recession and running this time around may be a bad idea?  How come she didn't realize using an unsecured personal server while Secretary of State may not be the best plan?  If she's the best we got we're all doomed.
Click to expand...
In the end, neither of these issues will prevent her from being elected President. 

 
cobalt_27 said:
Did you also like and lift the phrase "promiscuous 13 year old with the body of a 20 year old" line from someone else when excusing Roman Polanski's sexual assault...or were those your own words?
Click to expand...
If you have a problem with me over this issue, I will address it with you in the timschochet thread. I prefer not to do it here, as it's irrelevant to Hillary Clinton. 

 
Willie Neslon said:
and that's really ####### sad.
Click to expand...
Why? Why should giving a legal speech to Goldman Sachs, and using a private email server, disqualify Hillary Clinton from the Presidency. I can understand if you don't agree with her on issues, or if you believe that she is overall a corrupt awful person (without real evidence I might add), but why should THESE two specific issues make it really "####### sad" that she will be our President? 

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

mr. furley
Long Island serial killer suspect in custody
Replies
34
Views
2K
Dezbelief
Dezbelief
krista4
In this thread I rank my favorite Beatles songs: 204-1.
138 139 140
Replies
7K
Views
254K
rockaction
rockaction
HellToupee
***Official*** Joe Biden 2016 Presidential Thread
Replies
35
Views
2K
That one guy
T

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 5 (members: 0, guests: 5)
Back
Top