This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Politicians always seem to write laws which make it is nearly impossible to convict politicians. If the laws were written similar to what regular federal employees are subjected to, where even the appearance of wrong doing is enough to convict, we could actually clean up some of this mess.
There is an easy answer to this. I offered it several days ago and got ridiculed, but here it is again:
If something gets to the mainstream media, it means that one side or the other, gave it to the mainstream media...
It doesn't matter where they get from; they vet it before they report it. And that's the key.
![[scooter]](/data/avatars/m/22/22287.jpg?1659477690){kind=avatar}
I think the most important thing to do is to get information from varied sources. Read newspapers, magazines, and journals as opposed to getting your information only from cable news.
You're right, and I've spoken to several Hillary supporters who have told me that if Hillary is indicted over the emails there's going to be a violent revolution and they're going to get their guns and attack the Justice Department and rescue her...
Oh dude, totally. I can tell you're dialed in. Have you read this yet:
They reported finding a transmission signal. Are you saying they didn't actually find a transmission signal?
They didn't go "outside the prescribed time". Anyone who showed up after the prescribed time was turned away.
There is some truth to this, but you way overstate it. There are stories which pass the vetting process of the mainstream media, but they intentionally suppress. You put the mainstream media on too high of a pedestal (you do that with political leaders too), but they all have their biases and personal interest which get in the way of being an honest broker of information.
The MSM are profit-oriented businesses. Scrub the data accordingly. And please, for the love of grabbing em by the #####, enough with the whining about about MSM.
They picked up a radio signal from outside the building that they speculate could be a listening signal.
Right, but even if people arrived after 7 why should they not be allowed to exercise their democratic rights to the polling station is still open?
He had tons of support from mainstream Dems when he was dumping Bush administration info. Why is he suddenly a hack because Podesta is the target?
A firm they hired allegedly claimed to have picked up a radio signal from outside the chairman's office. I don't believe anyone has reported whether it was inside or outside the building, but would love to see that quote.
I do, because they already said there wasn't enough there to prosecute (assuming nothing new /significant comes off Weiner's laptop). There might well be a minor crime there, but it's just not substantial enough to warrant more than a slap on the wristDavid Dodds said:
Yup. And it's closer than we thought so please go and vote for Hillary. Actually, not really, but just in case.
No, an allegedly reputable company had the DNC's permission to check and then everything was properly reported to the FBI to investigate, at which point someone posted that the DNC may have been bugged and the FBI was informed.
It's their building and the firm swept all of the offices. If the radio signal was emanating from inside the building why didn't they find it?
Initially you asked if they were falling for it, which is an entirely different question. I'd imagine many people are still following it to see what's uncovered. Why wouldn't they?
