So this is Hunter's idea? Or Vince? Too much talent twiddling thumbs back there to keep up this silly Best In The World schtick from the boss's son.hagmania said:Shane does not make any backstage creative decisions. He is talent only.
Granted, he could bow out gracefully.
All of it is Vince. If it's on TV and Vince is watching it, it's Vince.So this is Hunter's idea? Or Vince? Too much talent twiddling thumbs back there to keep up this silly Best In The World schtick from the boss's son.
Seen it done a few times for the weekly stuff but not an avg. A few months ago we had 10 mins of wrestling on a 3hour RAW. The opening promo took 30 mins itselfHas anyone done any real-time research on WWE within the past few years about actual in-ring wrestling time per show?
Like the study that came out a few years ago with the NFL that said like only 7 1/2 minutes of actual plays being run per broadcast. I would be very interested in seeing something like that. Wrestling Vs promos Vs commercials.
Seen it done a few times for the weekly stuff but not an avg. A few months ago we had 10 mins of wrestling on a 3hour RAW. The opening promo took 30 mins itself
Shane doesn't make any decisions. Vince does when it comes to the main roster.Jayrok said:Does Shane really believe him being in the ring for 20+ minutes of every episode is in the best interest of the company? Or what the viewers want to see? Geez get over yourself.
I totally get pushing Roman Reigns because he gets female fans’ panties moist, but Baron Corbin?
There something here you want to share with us or did we just mistype here?I totally get pushing Roman Reigns because he gets female fans’ panties moist, but Baron Corbin?
Vince and I must have different tastes in dudes.
I take Meltzer with a grain of salt these days. He's a real hit or miss (Mostly miss) today. However this rumor is something I'd believe with Vince but I'm not buying the whole thing
100% times another 100%have to be a lot more optimistic about Heyman at least improving things creatively than Bischoff.
No remember the post I put of Sheppard's tweet of Fox meeting with WWE execs because they were not fans of recent ratings and all? Direct correlations with this. FOX has an opt out clause with WWE too. I don't know if that clause also allows them to get out of the contract completely before it starts. Both Heyman and Bischoff will go directly to Vince still. You might see bigger changes when they go to FOX though.Monumental shift for the WWE....
WWE names Paul Heyman and Eric Bischoff Executive Directors of Raw and SmackDown LIVE
https://www.wwe.com/shows/raw/article/paul-heyman-eric-bischoff-executive-directors-raw-smackdown-live?sf214941408=1&fbclid=IwAR0VN3aV0m7vDVw0vJXa_o_V621RzQaZy188MdtLAM6c5GQ854AEu8R6Eto
Do you think Vince is maybe a little worried about AEW?
Bischoff is a hell of a guy and has some fantastic ideas. The problem in WCW was he let the boys run the shows. He basically Let Hogan and those egos run the show do to the big paydays guaranteed they were getting. A few people have told me from what they've heard EB told a few people when he was with WWE had those contracts not been guaranteed he probably would have let them go. Also Turner had more say in what WCW was to do creatively then EB had and Turner wasn't a wrestling fan.It's a very interesting change, but why not Paul and Paul?
Bischoff...![]()
Paul was really good as the creative guy for SDL when he was there. He quit because Steph as the GM had way too much input on the show and Heyman said he was not given the freedom he was promised.All Vince knows and values is the people from his heyday in the 90s, Paul and Eric doesn't surprise me, his 2 biggest competitors as the industry was exploding. Now all he needs to do is hire Russo for creative and it'll come full circle.
Everything I’ve heard is that Ted Turner wanted wrestling on his network because the high ratings for Georgia Championship Wrestling (the first wrestling Turner had on TV) were the cornerstone of TBS in its early day. As far as creative input, however, Turner had none and no particular desire to have any.DJackson10 said:Also Turner had more say in what WCW was to do creatively then EB had and Turner wasn't a wrestling fan.
Russo quit cause of Steph too. She's awful.DJackson10 said:Paul was really good as the creative guy for SDL when he was there. He quit because Steph as the GM had way too much input on the show and Heyman said he was not given the freedom he was promised.
Correct in some parts however the story has changed and from who I talked with Turner had far more input on what to do creative wise then anything especially the final few yrs. It's why the final yrs was so bad. Turner got too involved and Bischoff basically told them had very little desire anymore to run the shows because Turner wasn't backing them with the $$$ anymore yet wanted more input on creative.Everything I’ve heard is that Ted Turner wanted wrestling on his network because the high ratings for Georgia Championship Wrestling (the first wrestling Turner had on TV) were the cornerstone of TBS in its early day. As far as creative input, however, Turner had none and no particular desire to have any.
Yep Steph for as good looking as she is, well she's quite the ##### and a hypocrite. Some of the ladies backstage are also upset about her taking full credit for the women's revolution when it was Hunters idea to begin with to get the ladies more time and revamp the division. It's something that VKM allowed Hunter to do, so he can get his feet wet. Most of the girls hate how Steph goes around with the whole We love our women yet we just took blood money from the Saudis and can't have them. Some people felt it was a low blow to the division The PPV for them as a crumb because they couldn't compete at the PPV.Russo quit cause of Steph too. She's awful.
Text I sent to a friend this morning about the Heyman and Bischoff hirings:
I disagree with you on this. I think he had plenty of creative ideas back in the day. Now whether he can bring that to today's fans.....that is yet to be determined.I can't imagine to many guys that would have been worse hires than Bischoff over creative/brand. Legitimately he offers zero creatively. Not to mention he's not well liked by many outside of the guys he handed blank checks to 20 years ago.. Any positive from the Heyman hire is offset (and then some) by Bischoff. Really only shows how out of touch Vince really is to think Bischoff offers much of anything. Just amazing to think Dixie Carter isn't the last person this guy conned.
Oh to be a fly on the wall to see AJ Styles reaction of the Bischoff news![]()
This is BS. Ted Turner was a HUGE fan of wrestling since TBS was channel 17 in Atlanta. Between Andy Griffin reruns and wrestling is where Ted made his money.DJackson10 said:Also Turner had more say in what WCW was to do creatively then EB had and Turner wasn't a wrestling fan.
Is thisAll Vince knows and values is the people from his heyday in the 90s, Paul and Eric doesn't surprise me, his 2 biggest competitors as the industry was exploding. Now all he needs to do is hire Russo for creative and it'll come full circle.
It's not sarcasm. @ShamrockPride isn't advocating for Vince to do such, merely stating if he did we'd be back where we started in 96.Is this? There's enough Russo fanbois so I'm not sure.
This.The issue with Bischoff is he is out of touch with the modern-day industry.
The NWO, cruiserweights and general party atmosphere were all great ideas from EB. I am cautiously optimistic, but it is apparent he either A) doesn't know much about the business today or B) is for some reason acting like he doesn't.
Is this? There's enough Russo fanbois so I'm not sure.
What Hags said. Although I can't lie, I am indeed a Russo fanboi. Not sure if that'sIt's not sarcasm. @ShamrockPride isn't advocating for Vince to do such, merely stating if he did we'd be back where we started in 96.
I would say that - if I were laying betting odds - that Bischoff would be the first to be fired and Heyman would be the first to quit. EB because he's sucking at the job and it's not changing anything or Heyman because he couldn't take Vince's thumb on his work.This.
He has zero connections with today's wrestler. Go watch his TNA run. He connected with none of the existing wrestlers. Unfortunately for him those same wrestlers he completely ignored (AJ/Joe) are prominent guys on WWE programming today. He was still pushing #### like Hogan/The Nasty Boys/RVD (who, no offense, was well past his prime and solely there for a paycheck). Outside of him talking/conning network execs or playing the part of the nauseating "authority" figure, not going to end well for him IMO. He just doesn't add anything at all today. He lacks the social skills to work with most people and in particular today's wrestler.. This isn't WCW where he's handing out the blank checks so he can be boys with the boys....
Hiring Eric Bischoff in 2019 is just proving only more how much VInce is completely out of touch.
I don't trust Meltzer on WWE stuff anymore like I use too. He's no longer their little Kiss ### who gives everything out. SI, ESPN and Justin Barrassoo are now. SI was given the Exclusive with JB for Yesterday's news.Trevor Dame @TrevorDame
"Recently Dave said he thought that one difference he saw in Vince now is that he no longer has confidence in his own ideas, that he was listening to everyone. If these two have real power, this certainly feels like the move of a guy who is admitting to himself that he's lost."
disagree here. I met him at a convention 2 yrs ago. I was one of the last people and just happened to almost accidentally bump into him. I apologized without recognizing him at first and when I did not embarrassed to say I marked out a bit. He was really friendly. I was asking him about today's industry, seeing if he could give some info on being in TNA and what changes he'd make. I was surprised at how much he kept in touch with what fans wanted today and that he watched NJPW and ROH and other shows to get ideas.hagmania said:The issue with Bischoff is he is out of touch with the modern-day industry.
The NWO, cruiserweights and general party atmosphere were all great ideas from EB. I am cautiously optimistic, but it is apparent he either A) doesn't know much about the business today or B) is for some reason acting like he doesn't.
My point is Turner or whoever was pumping the most $$$ into WCW at the time didn't care for it anymore and pumping less in but wanted to still have most of the final sayTom Servo said:This is BS. Ted Turner was a HUGE fan of wrestling since TBS was channel 17 in Atlanta. Between Andy Griffin reruns and wrestling is where Ted made his money.
It was the suits at Turner that wanted rid of wrestling, and after the deal with AOL, Ted has less power to stop the anti-wrestling faction.
I'd pay 100$ just to sit in the back of a theatre if it was to hear Heyman talk about the business. That guy is a real gem and we are fortunate he is healthy enough to be doing a lot of this still. I might be biased since ECW is literally my "Home team" (being started in Philly), but I think had Paul with his creative skills and had a real backer handling $$$ for ECW it'd be around today and doing very well. One Night Stand 2005 showed people were still interested and it still has a cult like following today. The wrestlers from talking to Sandman, Dudley's and others all loved and respected Heyman despite the fact he never paid them on time like Tommy Dreamer said on the WWE Network Special with Corey Graves they did awhile back. Hell whenever he has a chance Corey still raves about ECW. When he was doing NXT commentary it was routinely thing.Tom Servo said:Let's also not forget that wrestling is - at it's core - a carnival act. Wrestling has long had con men, double dealers and liars of various stripes. I wouldn't be surprised if EB just BS'ed his way into a job. Heyman? Heck, you can just look at him and tell he's perfect fit for the business. I respect Heyman a lot, but he's still a carny at heart.